More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ari Melber

Ari Melber

Posted: March 17, 2010 10:23 AM

The Democrats' Real 'Energy' Gap

What's Your Reaction:

This final hour of the health care battle looks promising for Barack Obama -- political analysts say he is winning back the base, and even the skeptical Paul Krugman is "impressed."

But this conventional wisdom is wrong. Obama never actually "lost" his core supporters in the first place. He does have a problem with the base. But it is about energy, not loyalty.

The current danger for the White House is not losing its coalition, which has shown it can stomach a lot, but rather mistaking its allegiance for enthusiasm.

According to a metric just introduced by Gallup last week, only 27 percent of Democrats are "enthusiastic" about voting in the midterms. Republicans are far more pumped: Forty-three percent say they are eager to turn out.

Put aside all the coverage of Obama's political woes. The fact is that this president is unusually popular within his party and strongly backed by self-identified liberals and the cohorts who propelled him to victory in 2008.

About 82 percent of Democrats currently approve of Obama's job performance. By historical standards, that's gangbusters. At this point in a first term, no Democratic president has held such high standing within his party since Lyndon B. Johnson. (LBJ clocked in just 3 percentage points higher.)

By ideology, Obama still does very well on the left: Seventy-nine percent of liberals approve of his job performance. And that number jumps to 89 percent among liberal Democrats. By contrast, moderates are at 58 percent, while conservatives hover at a sour 26 percent.

Meanwhile, the young, educated and multiracial coalition that Obama built is still in his corner.

About 61 percent of voters younger than 30 currently approve of Obama, while every other age bracket stands below 50 percent. That is a departure from the past two administrations, in which the approval gap by age ran only 3 to 6 percentage points. And a whopping 91 percent of black Americans approve of Obama's job performance.

A White House official told me these numbers show that while the base is "frustrated," given the current political process, Obama's supporters still think he is on the "right track."

"The core of the president's support, young people and African-Americans in particular, are still seeking change in Washington," the official said, but they "understand that changing that system is not going to happen overnight."

Tune out the background noise, and it is undeniable that the grass-roots, left-leaning base is one of the only bright spots for this rough patch of Obama's presidency.

But that might not be bright enough.

Political operatives don't tend to be existentialists. They do know, however, that if a supporter doesn't vote, then his or her opinion does not make a sound -- or a difference. Just look at the midterms. Current tracking polls still show that more voters prefer Democratic candidates to Republicans for Congress. Everyone expects Republican gains, however, partly because of the yawning enthusiasm gap.

While new administrations always struggle with the first midterm election, enthusiasm is where Obama's unusual coalition is particularly vulnerable.

Right now, only 20 percent of those voters younger than 30 are "very enthusiastic" about voting. That is half the rate of older voters.

"Younger Americans are decidedly more Democratic than the national average," notes the latest Gallup report on the midterms, "thus their apparent lack of motivation to vote -- if it continues until Election Day -- could deprive Democrats of the full benefit [if their base turned out]."

Translation: It's hard for Democrats to take solace in their youth support if millennials stay home.

The same age gap appears in a tracking poll from Daily Kos. That poll also found only 28 percent of black voters plan to turn out, compared with 49 percent of white voters.

Does this White House know the difference between approval and enthusiasm?

The official I spoke with could see that people see it -- referring to "what others describe as an enthusiasm gap" -- but argued that legislative progress will mobilize the base.

"As members of Congress are able to make a specific case about what they've done in the last two years," said the official, predicting success on health care and financial reform, "[then we'll] start to see what others describe as an enthusiasm gap start to diminish."

The GOP obviously agrees with the White House. Republicans believe an obstructionist, do-nothing Congress will deny Obama momentum and keep their base energized. For his part, the president must pivot from bipartisan meetings to legislative action. Otherwise, his loyal supporters from 2008 may turn into a silent majority.

Ari Melber writes a monthly column for Politico, where this piece first appeared.

 
 
 

Follow Ari Melber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AriMelber

 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:51 PM on 03/17/2010
I wonder if he could raise the enthusiasm level by describing the Mid-term elections as the opportunity to drive another nail into the coffin of the current incarnation of Conservatism? If he described it as a battle to keep Tea Party candidates out of office? If Democrats ran ads using the Tea Party signs against their opponents?

Basically, turn Republican ugliness back on itself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timm0
It's impossible to have too many malasadas.
03:02 PM on 03/17/2010
Obama would have credibility only if he accomplishes something meaningful for the country before dialing that up. But so far, the accomplishments are modest or hollow.

Inviting everyone to hammer a nail into the neo coffin doesn't help fend off the repo man, prevent another 1,000 jobs from going overseas, save another x,000 people from dying prematurely from no access to healthcare, or rein in abuses in the finance industry.

Very hollow rallying call without serious progress....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:27 PM on 03/17/2010
Perhaps, and it's possible we're once again left with a choice between the lesser of two evils. But it's crystal clear to me who wins that vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timm0
It's impossible to have too many malasadas.
01:47 PM on 03/17/2010
Been through this stuff a million times. No surprises.

The thing that people miss (and clearly, the white house insiders miss it, too), is that love for a President doesn't translate into good Congressional candidate options, well-executed local district campaigns, adequate campaign financing, or defensible incumbent records.

Regarding records, the current "leadership" situation in congress is abysmal. "Dem leaders" (I'm convinced that this term is now an oxymoron) refuse to bring important legislation to the floor for votes.

The problem with that is that it fails to give voters a record on which to assess incumbents of either party. "Dem leaders" feel that avoiding controversy makes it easier to campaign because incumbents don't have to defend their votes. The flipside of that cow@rdly practice is that they 1.) have no ACCOMPLISHMENTS to crow about and 2.) Dem candidates looking to unseat Repugs have little to attack.

R candidates will cheerfully make stuff up about Dem candidates (easy to do when the candidate or party has nothing to brag about accomplishing) and their core, energized base will slarp it down, paint some signs, and charge the polls. Unless Dems can match that assured turnout, [more] local races are going to be lost.

People are fed up with Congressional intransigence more than anything. And that pat.hetic strategy only exacerbates the condition, turning people off. We need accomplishments - and fast, otherwise the losses due to apathetic voters will be significant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robbcoffee
11:10 AM on 03/17/2010
Since the enthusiasm metric is new, it will be interesting to see how it correlates with elections over time. Right now it's probably not all that useful since enthusiasm is a self-identified subjective measure that doesn't really tell us about likelihood to vote. One can be motivated without feeling positive. I expect enthusiasm to have more effect on donations and campaign volunteerism than on votes.
11:56 AM on 03/17/2010
Turnout is related to enthusiasm.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robbcoffee
12:20 PM on 03/17/2010
In a general sense, yes. But being that this self-identified metric is new, there's no way of telling how accurately it measures actual enthusiasm or what elements of enthusiasm it accurately captures. A pattern will have to emerge and that will take repeated use of the question in polls.