iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

As we get ready for John Boehner to take the gavel from Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday, I find myself thinking back to the last time a Republican speaker took control of the House from a Democrat -- and reflecting on how far down the wrong road we have traveled since then.

It was January 1995, and Newt Gingrich, now considered a right-wing bomb thrower, was taking the gavel from Tom Foley. After taking the oath of office, he delivered a speech that praised FDR as "the greatest president of the 20th century" and presented concern for the least among us as a shared national objective. "The balanced budget is the right thing to do," he said. "But it does not in my mind have the moral urgency of coming to grips with what is happening to the poorest Americans."

For the incoming Republican speaker, reducing poverty and lifting the poor into the middle class was a moral imperative beyond the left vs. right battlefield -- not just the purview of lefties, socialists, and community organizers:

I say to those Republicans who believe in total privatization, you cannot believe in the Good Samaritan and explain that as long as business is making money we can walk by a fellow American who is hurt and not do something.... If you cannot afford to leave the public housing project, you are not free. If you do not know how to find a job and do not know how to create a job, you are not free. If you cannot find a place that will educate you, you are not free. If you are afraid to walk to the store because you could get killed, you are not free.

So now, with poverty higher than it was 16 years ago, with greater income inequality, and with the middle class struggling to hold on, what will Speaker Boehner make his number one priority? According to the Washington Post, it's "cutting spending," followed by repealing the healthcare law, and "helping get our economy moving" (no specifics on how he plans to do that).

Yet we saw on 60 Minutes that he's very aware of how fragile the American Dream has become, telling Lesley Stahl, "I can't go to a school anymore. I used to go to a lot of schools. And you see all these little kids running around. Can't talk about it." And he choked up when he did try to talk about "making sure these kids have a shot at the American Dream, like I did. It's important."


Interestingly, in his first speech as speaker, Gingrich also talked about being moved by the woes of school kids.

"I have seldom been more shaken," he said, "than I was after the election when I had breakfast with two members of the Black Caucus. One of them said to me, 'Can you imagine what it is like to visit a first-grade class and realize that every fourth or fifth young boy in that class may be dead or in jail within 15 years? And they are your constituents and you are helpless to change it?' For some reason, I do not know why, maybe because I visit a lot of schools, that got through. I mean, that personalized it. That made it real, not just statistics, but real people."

But the trajectory of our political discourse over the last decade and a half has meant that taking on poverty has gone from a moral imperative and shared national objective to an afterthought -- or no thought at all.

The question is, is there anything that can be done to help Boehner make the connection between the policies he supports and the effect those policies have on the kids who bring him to tears?

Newt Gingrich failed to follow through on the moral imperative he identified in his first speech as speaker, trading in his moral vision and replacing it 15 months later with an announcement that the Republican agenda could be reduced to six words: "Earn more, keep more, do more."

Will Boehner's take be "Earn more, keep more, cut more"? Or is there a chance he will surprise us? Maybe it's because it's close enough to Christmas that I still believe in miracles, but wouldn't it be great if the John Boehner who takes the gavel on Wednesday is the one who weeps at the thought of kids denied a shot at the American Dream?

 
 
 

Follow Arianna Huffington on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ariannahuff

 
 
  • Comments
  • 365
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
09:04 PM on 03/01/2011
Boehner pretends to be struggling on behalf of us all, lying to us that spending cuts are the way to help the economy, but in truth, his only interest is rewarding his lobbyist friends.

But what really amazes me is how brazenly he can lie while he appeals to people emotions, talking about the "American Dream" even as he is denying it to so many others. In order to lie so shamelessly, he must have struggled far harder earlier to strangle his conscience.
11:11 PM on 01/09/2011
On Obama's out of control spending can we get a few FACTS straight. Fist the majority of the current deficit (and a higher proportion as we move into the future) is a direct result of pre-Obama policies including the Bush tax cuts, unfunded medicare prescription drug benefits, two wars (for which Obama must now take a part of the responsibility) etc. Second, much of the added expenditure since the Sept. 2008 meltdown has been in the form of extraordinary one-off expenditures to mitigate and turn around what has been the worst recession since the 1930s. This includes TARP, most of the so-called Stimulus Package, additional unemployment benefits, etc, that are clearly not part of long-term policy but that have been critical in mitigating disaster and helping people survive. If we set these aside, I believe one will find that contributions of other spending to the overall deficit has been really quite limited.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capitaldysfunction
White male never voted Republican
09:14 PM on 01/09/2011
In 2008 the American electorate threw the bums out. In 2010 they threw the bums out again-- the same bums they installed in 2008, prompting some observers to comment "no wonder we can't get anything done in this country." Upward mobility in this country is now behind five or six other countries. Nothing suggests our standard of living or our level of thought or discourse is going to improve. Facts are ignored. The willful disregard of reality has become a normal part of one of our major political parties, making political discussion or debate irrelevant. Our economy has become a plutonomy, further exacerbating negative expectations. If anyone can find hope in these realities, let it be known. I see none.
03:16 PM on 01/09/2011
Greetings Arianna and Citizens,

The Age Of Forgetfulness or The Habit of Writing to See Yourself In Print....

I am surprised to see that you feel that we have been heading down the right road before now. Have you forgotten that both the Republicans and Democrats have managed to steer us down a path of increased regulation, more spending, a plethora of entitlements and earmarks and of course an overwhelming debt-all at the expense of the American people.

More recently we have had a congress controlled by the Democrats and it seems they have spent more money than a well kept divorced woman with credit cards on Black Friday. So why would you think it could get any worse with a new group.....

Warm regards,

Michael Winters
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nomccain
01:10 PM on 01/09/2011
A party OF the rich, BY the rich and FOR the rich! Nothing has changed since 1929. If you are a middle income American, avoid this bunch like the plague because they will do NOTHING for you and take away what you've got if they can so they can give it to the rich. Just watch them over the next two years and see what they do and try to do and remember it well in 2012.
10:10 AM on 01/09/2011
The bush dogs and republicans have been in charge for 30 years..They have created this mess for us..and they are back in charge full force with a bush dog president ....You might think they have become the protecter of the corrupt.. Enter a new nut in the mix, the tea party, and everyone is out for themselves, no one is for the people..Should be an interesting year....
05:16 PM on 01/05/2011
Arianna, You kind of surprised me bringing back the comments of Newt. I think it speaks volumes to just how bad things have become. At least back then Republican felt like they needed to at least pay lip service to poverty reduction on moral and religous grounds. The current Republican Party especially the Tea Party element come across as a very selfish enclave of the population with no moral qualms or shame about calling for the equivalent of social and economic darwinism to be the law and practice of the nation. At least this time they won't try to put window dressing on it. We had Gingrich's comments, then 8 years of so called "compassionate conservatism". Well where are the results? More poverty, a dissapearing middle class, and larger income disparities. I will complement the Tea-Party. At least they have guts to say what they really think which is governments only role is protecting their property. Not bettering society or advancing the human race. As crass as it may be. (They aren't exactly the most self perceiving types.)
04:15 PM on 01/05/2011
amen to that, brother! boehner sums the new era in wash dc by reminding congress they are there to serve their constituents and not to poke or prod with laws, policies and taxes the people into submission to Congress or any governemnt entity. boehner admits one in ten are unemployed and for every unemployed person is at least one person dependent on the person no longer able to provid food, clothing or shelter. I pray boehner shows the 112th congress that their most pressing issue will not be jobs but how to prevent the overused, abused safety net(unemployment benefits, food stamps) will not unravel from the added weight of 68 million people recently dumped into it by our 17.7 % U6 unemployment rate. obama has promised stimulus jobs only to see a few jobs created at exorbitent tax dollar cost and he has spent more tax dollars spent on continuing wall street and GM bail outs and war in afghanistan. the 112th congress proves the tea party is not astroturf but a sincere effort by americans to restore our bill of rights and constitution by decreasing government intrusion that inevitably interferes with every individual's right to pursue life, liberty and happiness
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CapeJack
Veritas Vos Liberabit
09:19 PM on 01/05/2011
Very insightful.

F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randall Bart
03:54 PM on 01/05/2011
I expect Boehner and the tea partiers do it exactly like 16 years ago. Gingrich obstructed government until the country turned on him. The only difference I expect is that Boehner will cry when he resigns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CapeJack
Veritas Vos Liberabit
09:23 PM on 01/05/2011
Very, VERY optimistic and "progressive" of you.

Have another sip of that Kool Ade.

Didn't you learn anything about your friends, neighbors and co-workers (if you have any) from the midterrms?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
07:09 AM on 01/09/2011
One of the biggest hoaxes being foisted on the American people right now is the notion that this last election was somehow a random sample of what Americans believe. It was not.

For example, there were many Democrats disillusioned that the health care reform didn't go far enough but yet you're lumping their disatisfaction as some how 'being in your camp.'

Did you not learn anything from that fated time in 2008 when George Bush and Hank Paulsen walked up to the microphone to tell us they had crashed the world's economy and that if we didn't hand over 750 billion dollars, with no questioned asked, by the end of the weekend, the world as we know it would be lost?

That wasn't some fluke. It was the direct result of TOO MUCH Republican anti-regulation success. Continue that line of mal-economics and you will usher in the next Great Depression.
HardKnocksBlues
We CAN handle the truth
12:07 PM on 01/09/2011
Didn't you learn anything about your friends, neighbors and co-workers from the 2008 elections?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PRONESE
Somewhat Opinionated Curmudgeon
10:01 AM on 01/05/2011
Arianna, I am fairly certain that there will be very little in the content of House Majority Leader John Boehner's speech that will make you happy.
R/ PRONESE
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
08:56 AM on 01/05/2011
The speaker will do like any other true Republican politician will do if this whole debacle with the Tea party don't work out he'll blame the Tea party and move on, just like the Republicans blamed the Christian right during the Bush years........
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Steve McSwain
Author; speaker; spiritual teacher
08:47 AM on 01/05/2011
Well stated Arianna!! Politely, but with punch. Now, we'll see...
04:43 AM on 01/05/2011
I say to those Republicans who believe in total privatization, you cannot believe in the Good Samaritan and explain that as long as business is making money we can walk by a fellow American who is hurt and not do something.... If you cannot afford to leave the public housing project, you are not free. If you do not know how to find a job and do not know how to create a job, you are not free. If you cannot find a place that will educate you, you are not free. If you are afraid to walk to the store because you could get killed, you are not free.

My compliments, Bravo! Very powerful words!
08:57 AM on 01/05/2011
JimmyCC

Oh but Pottersville Republicans would privatize the schools AND the police AND the prisons. That way, all that non-productive riffraff can be dealt with in a more economical fashion-----i.e., put to work in large labor camps producing consumer goods real cheap. I mean really cheap. Only way we can compete with the Chinese!

Hell we are already there in my state. We incarcerate something like 20% of our population down here in Louisiana. Our state prison is larger than most towns and has its own zip code for cryin' out loud. It's becoming a tourist mecca, holding one of the largest and most lucrative rodeos and craft- fairs in the country and now sports a full-time museum. It's developed and markets its own breed of horse, the Angola Police Horse, and holds one of the largest herd of cattle in the state. Don't get me started...
12:50 AM on 01/05/2011
I would like to see how cutting spending and the repeal of medicare will help the poor in America -- or anywhere for that matter.
But.... who will stop him??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CapeJack
Veritas Vos Liberabit
09:35 PM on 01/05/2011
"Repeal Medicare"? "REPEAL MEDICARE"? Where did THAT come from?
10:36 PM on 01/08/2011
Agreed on the, "where did that come from". But I'm concerned about the privatization of Medicare, rhetoric that has occurred in the recent past. That is a scary idea. For all of its flaws Medicare has allowed countless Americans who are elderly or have a disability be able to get necessary medical care. If some private entity comes along and begins to make a profit off of Medicare I could easily see the good that the program produces becoming a thing of the past.
11:15 PM on 01/04/2011
Middle America Government Reform

Middle America government reform is a new paradigm in American politics.

Middle America:
Middle America is the foundation, vessel, protector, and defender of America. Middle America is the fundamental source of all American liberty, freedom, and equality. Middle America made America, defends America, and preserves all liberties, freedoms, and equality.

There are no democrats or republicans, liberals or conservatives, red or blue. There is only middle America and two significant extreme fringes, the radical desperate poor and the radical wealthy elite.

Middle America’s two radical fringe are a curse and a blessing. Cauldrons of wealthy elite and desperate poor spur imagination, creativity, initiative, and progress. These same cauldrons produce tyranny, exploitation, liability, and burden.

Middle America must govern both desperate poor and wealthy elite radical extremes for simple survival and progress. The extreme desperate poor will always require social programs, social security, medicare, unemployment compensation, and etc. The extreme wealthy elite will always require taxation, regulation, and oversight.

Tending two radical extremes is the fate of middle America. The payoff is liberty, freedom, and equality for more Americans. The dangers of the radical extreme influences include eight elephants: war, immigration, ecology, recession, foreclosure, joblessness, tax, and debt.

Citizen is coach to team democracy. Coach is responsible for success. It’s your call, coach.
http://middleamericareformparty.wordpress.com/about/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Virgil Starkwell
dissent w/o resistance is consent.
07:34 AM on 01/05/2011
"The radical wealthy elite" have enormous resources, "the radical desperate poor" have very, very few resources. So which, the rich or the poor, poses as a larger obstacle to the advancement of Middle America?
08:59 AM on 01/05/2011
Radical wealthy elite. If Middle America regains the economic and political power it once had, they are left without a chair again and will have to either be satisfied with hundreds of millions instead of billions, or move to Dubai.