McCain and Me: Hero Worship Dies Hard (But When It Does...)

Posted May 6, 2008 | 01:45 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

The way the McCain camp has reacted to my revelation about his not voting for Bush in 2000, immediately moving into kill-the-messenger mode, is further confirmation of what has happened to McCain -- now willing to say or do anything, or sling mud at anyone, to satisfy his hunger for the White House.

And I'm curious, at exactly what point did Mark Salter decide I was "a flake, and a poser, and an attention seeking diva"? Was it before or after I hosted a book party at my home for the book he co-wrote with McCain, Faith of My Fathers?

Was it before or after our many conversations about McCain giving the keynote address at the 2000 GOP Shadow Convention I organized in Philadelphia to underline the failure of both political 2008-05-06-inquirer_photo_hp.jpg parties to address major issues, like campaign finance reform?

Was it before of after he told me during one of these conversations that George Bush had personally asked McCain to pull out of keynoting the Shadow Convention, but that McCain had decided to do it anyway?

Was it before or after he thanked me for accepting McCain's invitation to join the board of the Reform Institute McCain founded in 2001 (and from which he resigned in 2005, after it was revealed that he had solicited $200,000 in contributions from Cablevision for the Institute -- and wrote a letter to the FCC supporting Cablevision's interests)?

As you can see from the many, many newspaper columns I wrote singing his praises, John McCain was one of my political heroes.

Here's one column where I compared him to a modern day gladiator, inspired by his vow "to have blood all over the floor of the Senate until we accede to the demands of the people" for meaningful reform. In the column, I credit Salter as McCain's "fellow gladiator," and include a quote he gave me... before I flaked out on him and started posing and seeking attention.

But hero-worship dies hard, which is why it took so long for me to see that the man who had been willing to take on his own party and redefine what it meant to be a "loyal Republican," who stood up for his beliefs in campaign finance reform and his opposition to unconscionable tax cuts and even more unconscionable torture, was no more.

It's why I described his fall as Shakespearean (and, speaking of the Bard, hearing the invective spewing from the McCain camp in response to my post, "thou doth protest too much, methinks" leaps to mind).

This isn't Mitt Romney we're talking about, folks -- a man for whom pandering and flip flopping fit like a perfectly tailored suit. This is John McCain, a man whose personal history, in the words of Newsweek in 2000, "makes the other presidential candidates look like pygmies" -- and who, at one time, before he held a fire sale on his principles (Everything Must Go!), was ennobled by that history and had the chance to become that rarest of things -- a real leader.


Previously:
Arianna Huffington: What John McCain Told Me, and What it Says About How Far He's Fallen [Updated]


Flashback:
Slater Insults Student Protester; Protester Responds
Remember Jean Rohe, the student commencement speaker at the New School who, in 2006, discarded her originally prepared remarks and instead delivered a speech that questioned the university's decision to extend an invitation to McCain to deliver that year's commencement address -- with McCain sitting right behind her? She blogged about her decision on HuffPost, prompting an angry reaction from Mark Salter, posted in the comment section of her post. Here is Salter's comment, and here is Rohe's response.


Image courtesy of the Philadelphia Inquirer



Comments
400
Pending Comments
0
Post a Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

Arianna,

I am struck by the way you describe your disillusionment with John McCain. You know him personally and you speak of him as if he's not the same person he was in 2000.

There can be no question whatever that he is at very significant risk for post-traumatic stress syndrome. Is it possible that the flip flops (particularly on torture) and irrationality as well as his frequent gaffs are symptoms of a real and treatable ailment?

Don Krieger

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 05/10/2008

Wasn't it McCain that said "What's wrong with telling people what they want to hear if it means you get elected?" if not, who was it? Been driving me crazy.

I might have voted for McCain too. After watching his bs for the last 8 years though, I wouldn't vote him dogcatcher.

He's a hot-headed, pandering wimp.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 05/10/2008

He's still the hero of the majority of the electoral votes in America:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Obama/Maps/May10.html

Can you deal with it?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 05/10/2008

Do you finally understand that the GOP does not want the average voter to remember what they said or did yesterday. You must read their lips. "Today's message" is the only operable one. That way they can stay on top of things and deal from the bottom of the deck without us rubes seeing what their game really is .

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 05/09/2008

"The way the McCain camp has reacted to my revelation about his not voting for Bush in 2000..."

...indicates that they believe Arianna Huffington is off her rocker.

You had your "gotcha" moment, now the Republicans are making us look like idiots.

Thanks a lot Arianna.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:02 PM on 05/09/2008


Say "No" to the war. Say "NO" to McCain.

McCain is against abortion, but he is not against kill people around the word.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 05/09/2008

Hell's bells! I'm against abortion...so I decided I will never have one (I'm a 62 year old male). The problem I have with the right's stand on the issue is they are against abortion and want to prevent OTHER people from getting one. As far as killing people "around the world" is concerned, I've never met a Republican (and quite a dew Democrats) against that if it meant making a buck.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 05/10/2008

When my parents lived in Arizona not too long ago, my father used to ride with a very conservative fellow (not neocon, more paleocon like McCain) who had worked with and known McCain for years. His words? "The man is the biggest whore in politics." This was a few years ago. Now we're all learning that he was exactly right - he doesn't have an honorable leg to stand on anymore.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 AM on 05/09/2008

Well, as long as you are giving it to us third hand from your father, well, then, it must be true!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 05/10/2008

McCain, time to learn the "Hillary" lesson - when you resort to pandering and abandoning your principles, people don't like you so much anymore.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 05/08/2008

So it is you who is partly responsible for the destruction of the First Amendment? It is you who helped put pressure on weak politicians to create an incumbent protection act? It is you who helped create the 527s of fame?

Why not, since what "Campaign Finance Reform" did was to stop political debate, which only helps liberals? It all makes sense now.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 05/08/2008

Seems to me that releasing this tidbit to the public works in McCain's favor. Conservative Republicans can't stand him. After NC and Indiana, that's clear. But Independents who supported him last time want to hear that there is a rift between McCain and Bush, and something like this reinforces it.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 05/08/2008

Well, what McCain needs is the figurative 'nuclear-option,' a VP-slot to focus all the controversy ON.

What a great 'show' that would be. The Pres and VP butting-heads, passionate discourse, a quick 'time-out,' and a friendly, "Let's go get some Chinese food and have a Tsing Tao beer -- we'll argue passionately again later."

But in our society of zero forgiveness, they'd rather see blood and guts, or promises of it -- writing-off people like 'bad-debts' -- zero compassion -- then hate each other about 'offensive blood and guts' and 'violent words.' "It's about the children! Boo-hoo!" It's ridiculous.

That's why that 'nuke-option' works so well.

GIVE THE DOGS BONES.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 05/11/2008

I disagree.. I think it presents effectively how much McCain has changed. I admired John McCain in 2000 and would have possibly voted for him had he won the nomination.

Now he seems like a whipped Rottweiler. Once adept at pit fighting, now content to crawl tail-tucked to whomever will scratch his little chin. Sorry Michael Vick.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 05/08/2008

Most of us did not have Arianna's personal acquaintance with McCain. All we knew was the straight Talk Express...then the trashing by Bush, then the hugging Bush....

Trashing was an eye opener, it was not about policy or approach...it was that he had become
unstable with his POW stint, that his wife was a drug addict, that he fathered a black child..

The behind your back viciousness from Bush and Karl Rove, aided with the phone banks of Fawell and Robertson, and the Religious right...

And then he hugged them, campaigned for them, voted for every one of their crazy ideas, and besmirched every hope we had.

Some of us knew McCain was not a POTUS a long long time ago.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 05/08/2008

i understand how false images about someone are difficult to shed, but why would Arianna be surprised that McCain would lie at this point? Although McCain is as phony as they come, why did Arianna wait until this critical point to disclose this information which McCain obviously meant to be kept secret. Divulging something like this during an election insures prevarication. I believe that Arianna saw McCain through rose colored glasses; the question is why did it take so long to take them off, and once having done so, does that make it Ok to betray what was an obvious confidence? If it came out unpremeditated, in the heat of an argument, that's one thing, but if it was to bring him down as a consequence of his own imprudence, that's low level politics. All this said: McCain must be exposed for the open fraud that he is.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 AM on 05/08/2008

Arianna, thanks so much for getting this out. Typically, the republicans then go into attack mode and lie even more (the values party HA). It will now be fun watching Obama expose McCain's lies and show the world just what a hypocrite he really is.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 AM on 05/08/2008

WHat did Maureen Dowd say? Sometimes I miss John McCain, even when I'm with him? Me too. He has taken more money from lobbyist bundlers than any other candidate - by far. He has tried, probably without success to sell himself to the Christian Right - which really is sad, because there is no Christian Right anymore. HIs foreign policy plan is a disaster for America. HIs health care plan is inhumane. He has no economic plan. He once stood alone against torture - and argued passionately for the tenets of the Geneva Convention - and then reversed and voted with Bush. He once stood for honor and integrity, Now he can't ever remember what to stand for.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 AM on 05/08/2008

Kudos to Arianna for exposing McCain for his double talk. He has flipped flopped so many times it is hard to keep track of his lies. His not voting for Bush in 2000 will unnerve the neocons who are reluctantly backing him right now. He has proven that he will say or do anything to win the presidency along the way he sold his integrity to the highest neocon bidder.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 05/07/2008

You do know that the neoconservatives are a coven of witches, do you not? Neocons are followers of Leo Strauss, a witch kabbalist. S&B is witch coven. I hope that you are watching Nightline right now to hear 2 women, witches, who made voodoo dolls to ruin the lives of husbands to steal the wealth and lives. Look at the truth.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 05/07/2008

No No it's not Silly. He said She said... no no... IT'S WELL SAID McCain is a major hypocrite. He now votes against his own fellow Vets. Sad very Sad

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 05/07/2008

This entire story is absolutely SILLY. She said..he said.....and that is really all there is to it.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 05/07/2008

There is nothing silly about this. It is dead on. And it is not a matter of she said ... he said; you just have to have been observent since the 2004 election cycle to know this is true. I reached the same conclusion back when McCain journeyed to Bob Jones University to give a commencement speech and make nice with the religious right. I held out hope for him with the torture bill was under consideration, and then passed. But knowing he stood next to the President as he signed the law, then had a signing that gutted any mean to the bill and said nothing in protest.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 05/08/2008

The correct quote is "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

(Sorry. I'm a stickler for accuracy when Shakespeare is quoted!)

However, I do appreciate the sentiment.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 05/07/2008

We don't know what the correct quote is, since only the Bowdlerized versiob has come down to us.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 05/07/2008

Could it be, Arianna, that McCain has never really changed? Could it be that you fell for what you projected onto McCain, the way a lover falls for the object of her ardor and not the real man? Could it be that you duped yourself with a willful acceptance of how he presented himself, taking him at face vaue and accepting his calculated positions as if they were bedrock principles, with a complete suspension of critical evaluation, because he seems so much to be what you longed for at the time - a humane conservative? Is there a lesson to be learned from this that could be applied to any other, recent "hero" of yours?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 05/07/2008

I like this response. If I were rich or important, I'd give it a meaningful seal of approval.

It's ok, Arianna. We all have those moments in life where our heroes fall. Maybe one day, when he loses his bid, and he realizes the crap of his ways, you can help him get back on a genuinely good track.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 05/07/2008

They are all the same.Obama,Hillary,John.When will you people wake up to that.We need to start voting for real changeThrow out the old and elect the best newcomer to office.and that will start sending the message.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 05/07/2008

If you think that McCain, Obama, and Clinton are all the same, I have to conclude that a) you have no children - so you don't need to worry about education or their future b) you are so wealthy that McCain's health care atrocity will not impact you the way it will millions of other Americans and c) you have not looked at a single position that the candidates hold. and c) no one you know or have ever known has ever gone to actually fight in Iraq.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 AM on 05/08/2008

They all are part of the political machine. They all owe something to the large corporations.

However.....The United States of America would fare very differently under McCain than it would under a democrat.

If you liked the last seven or so years and think that they were as good as the nineties, then so be it. I think that the nineties was a period of relative peace and prosperity. The environment was in danger, but it wasn't being destroyed by exponentially greater reductions in regulation and exponential increases in development, including a fence on our southern border. The rich were rich, but they were not increasing their wealth at the expense of the middle class. Gas was reasonable. The future did not look so bleak. I, for one, would much rather have a corporate democrat than a military industrial republican. Under Hillary, we probably wouldn't have gone to war. Under Obama, we definitely wouldn't have.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 05/07/2008

John McCain is a war hero ,yes,BUT as with all special people we have to put what they were and what they ARE NOW together and make sense of why they act as they do.I always wondered why McCain has always skirted the ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION issues and always been the lead Republican sponsor of failed immigration legislation that would have granted a path to citizenship to most of the more than 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States.
,NOW I know .Read about John and his friend a radical Illegal immigration supporter ,that works for FOX ,my ,my ,my ,the things we can learn about people online .......http://www.americanpatrol.com/FEATURES/010608NIGHTLINEHERNANDEZ/FeatureNightline010608.html .I once had said I would vote for McCain IF Obama lost ,NOT NOW after reading this and doing some more research .I just won't vote period if Obama doesn't get the nomination....

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 05/07/2008

Such is the core problem with too many in the D party-if my canidate does not win the nomination-then I shall vote for a Republican? And such may very well be the reason why McCain may very well win, because of the chicken shit attitudes and pissing contests between the two crews. Seriously folks, wonder why those bitter folks in those fly over states think Liberals and Progressives are fools and idiots?

If McCain is elected, which will not surprise me, it will becasue of of such attitudes along with the D idiots in Florida and Michigan who wanted to impress upon the contry how importent they are.

There are def. some very sorry ass Democrats out there proclaiming they will vote for a R over another D.

Perhaps an Obama party sd. be created so the cult can go it on their own.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 PM on 05/07/2008