iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Arianna Huffington
 

Sunday Roundup

Posted: 06/17/2012 12:00 am

This week, America's sports pages took on a much darker tone as the Jerry Sandusky sex abuse trial got underway and Lance Armstrong was hit with yet another round of doping allegations. Meanwhile, Jamie Dimon's Senate visit left both Democratic and Republican senators looking foolish. On the Democratic side, an ill-prepared Jeff Merkley told Dimon he wouldn't have a job if the government hadn't bailed out his bank with TARP funds -- a claim Dimon swatted away as "factually wrong." On the GOP side, Senators Jim DeMint and Bob Corker used the opportunity to rail against ineffective regulation they've dedicated themselves to making ineffective. Jon Stewart summed up the political jujitsu perfectly: "It must be fun to be a Republican senator... you get the fun of breaking shit and the joy of complaining that the shit you just broke doesn't work." It all made you long for Elizabeth Warren as Dimon's cross-examiner.


Add your voice to the conversation on Twitter: twitter.com/ariannahuff

 
 
 
FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopcoca
01:50 AM on 06/18/2012
@ariannahuff points out something some child advocates have pointed out and that's that a child sex scandal #sandusky being placed in the sports pages.

It's a case that exposes Systemic Child Sexual Abuse something that shouldn't be tucked away into the dark crevices of a newspaper. It should be out front to be used a a teaching tool, to let predators and their facilitators know that your time is coming.

Hiding it in the sports pages does an injustice to every victim of child sex assault.
08:47 PM on 06/17/2012
What Was Missing Was A Serious Discussion About The American People's Number 1 Priority, Job Creation!

A DEFICIT NEUTRAL JOB CREATION PLAN. Caution: Political courage required!

It can be done by putting money into hands of retiring baby boomers. Consumers account for 70% of our economic activity or GDP. You just simply change how Social Security checks are paid. Let boomers have partial distributions of their Social Security principal in the amount of $20,000.00 or $40,000.00 dollars, and issue them a monthly check on the remainder of their principal. Look, let’s say it takes $313,000.00 dollars in principal at 6.9% interest to send me a monthly Social Security check of $1800.00 dollars. So, I say to Social Security, I would like to have some of my money up front, say $40,000.00 dollars. Now pay me a monthly check on the remainder, which is in this instance $273,000.00 dollars, which amounts to a monthly check of $1569.00 dollars. That makes this plan (the Davis Plan) deficit neutral. It’s their money! Presenting the option of taking a partial distribution of your retirement principal is common practice in the private sector. Yet, the largest payer of pensions, the Social Security Trust Fund, does not do this at a time when it will benefit our economy the most.
07:15 PM on 06/17/2012
Here's a good article on how unfettered capitalism (corporate greed) goes against the needs of society and really the long term stability of the company and could ultimately destroy that corporation and damage the society as a whole.

http://anamecon.blogspot.com/
Milton Friedman: "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits," is Wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Docdearth2
06:41 PM on 06/17/2012
The "banksters" and Wall Street wise guys (doing God's work) were genuinely afraid of Liz Warren. You can be sure she will never be given a position of real power that can threaten these "greedy bastards." She has already been shut down as far as being a Wall Street policeman or regulator. Until money is taken out of politics, we will continue to have the best government money can buy. Our government will continue with the present status quo. It really doesn't matter who controls the house and senate or who sits in the White House. Big money and special interests own our government pure and simple. The majority of the people of this country do not have their well being and interests being served by their representatives. We need a "common sense" alternative to this two-party system and to get money out of the political process. Failure to change the current system will just result in rolling along in useless and ineffective dead lock with both sides cancelling each other out. At the same time, much needed legislation and regulation will continue to be subverted and undermined.
Mildmannered
"Be excellent to each other"
05:11 PM on 06/17/2012
"It all made you long for Elizabeth Warren as Dimon's cross-examiner."

I would have paid good money to watch that!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Ritter
05:10 PM on 06/17/2012
Ms. Warren would kick ass and take no prisoners...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cqwnurs
04:02 PM on 06/17/2012
just because they are in congress does not mean they are smart or ethical. It means they were bought and paid for by powerful lobbyists for the corporations...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bobzmcishl
03:50 PM on 06/17/2012
Would love to see Elizabeth Warren on the banking committee. The display of idiocy we saw last week from Jim Demint, and Bob Corker was sad to behold. Reinforces the view that Schumer expressed months ago that the banking industry owns the Congress. Corker and DeMint certainly acted like Jaime Dimon was their boss. Reminded me of the time my bosses boss asked us managers to interview the guy who was going to become our new boss. We asked him all of these softball questions because of course we knew he would have our job security in his hands when he came onboard.
03:14 PM on 06/17/2012
I agree that the right questions weren't asked. The power players were just play-acting out a 'slap down' of Dimon for public consumption to make it 'seem' like they were doing something without really doing anything at all.

Rather than complaining about the 1%, who are always going to do what 1% folks do, average working folks would be best to just get their shekels out of the market completely and keep it somewhere safe and secure. Your life's savings are your life's savings. Why give it to people like Dimon and expect his friends in government to protect it?

Without our money Dimon et al would then be left playing with the money of their friends in the 1%. You wanna lose $2-$4 billion? OK then. At least it won't be my money.
06:40 PM on 06/17/2012
You're 100% correct, without the middle class, which is shrinking, the 1% will have to go after themselves to make any money, thereby shrinking the 1% to .8%....6%.... eventually, it all ends up in a few peoples hands and they declare democracy a failure and we end up with a dictatorship or a king.
08:32 PM on 06/17/2012
What life savings? The old guys I grew up around in the 50's and 60's were periodically asked when they would retire. Their reply was always a variation on, "When I'm six feet under." Now that I am their age, I actually understand what they meant.
02:47 PM on 06/17/2012
I don't care if Dimon once was a Democrat and favored by Obama or not. He is in concert with Republicans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ThermoChemist
"Forewarned Is Forearmed"
12:10 PM on 06/17/2012
"Jon Stewart summed up the political jujitsu perfectly: "It must be fun to be a Republican senator... you get the fun of breaking shit and the joy of complaining that the shit you just broke doesn't work."
==========

Sorta reminds me of THIS quote...

"The Democrats are the party that says government will make you smarter, taller, richer, and remove the crabgr@ss on your lawn. The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then get elected and PROVE it."
-- P.J. O'ROURKE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Ritter
04:33 PM on 06/17/2012
Excellent quote... I have to copy that...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda Hassler
Freelance Writer; Documentary Producer
11:53 AM on 06/17/2012
Ah, Elizabeth Warren. Just the thought of having her as the senator questioning Jamie Dimon and all the other bloated Wall Street bankers thrills me. I would get up at 3:00am just to hear that exchange. So glad you put her in your article, Arianna.
11:32 AM on 06/17/2012
Yes, it would have been ideal IF we had an Elizabeth Warren posing questions to Dimon to be sure. It will be a real loss for the people if she is not elected. Only wish we had a 100 senators with the integrity of this woman to look out for the interests of all Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lou on Vancouver Island
Allin, Lou: Mystery Author
04:33 PM on 06/17/2012
Wouldn't it be paradise if all of our legislators cared about the people for a change? It's nearly the same in Canada where a Tory 39% government just pushed past an Omnibus Bill tearing down environmental controls, pushing back pensions, and setting the nation back about fifty years.
12:44 PM on 06/18/2012
didn't know that, everything is upside down Lou
11:03 AM on 06/17/2012
In fact, Dimon and JP Morgan did not have the toxic assets on the balance sheet that tanked the rest of the market. Remember, Lehman, Bear Sterns, Wamu, Countrywide, AIG, Fannie and Freddie were the insolvent ones and JPM was forced to take the bail out because, correctly, we could not to expose the weakest institutions so the short selling vultures could take them out, making the situation even worse. This is why the Fed kept much of the data on who was insolvent and who was not.
The Consumer Protect Agency is another over reach of government, in my opinion. I think it is necessary but like most all of Obama’s efforts; it was and is being implemented poorly without regard to value. So far approximately 50,000 people have filed complaints that had merit. The recovery was around $170 per complaint. Let’s be generous and say $50 Million Dollars. The cost of the agency? $60 Billion.
Come to your own conclusions, rationalizations and justifications on what that means of course. But just like Health Care (I cannot call it Affordable); we could have just passed a pre-existing clause once single payer was out of the question and be done with it.
But Noo, as John Belushi would say. So the Insurance companies have increased premiums (rate of growth tripling under Obama) institutionalizing their profits, plus $1.8 Trillion in debt and counting for a system, already providing health care (not insurance) to everyone. No value in those details.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scvblwxq
09:40 PM on 06/17/2012
You would have to also include the companies that would have hurt the consumer had there been no law and how much that would hurt the consumers.

We could get rid of traffic laws and save money but what would it cost the taxpayer in deaths and accidents?
08:43 PM on 06/18/2012
Not the point and certainly not an equivalency. You spend $60 billion to protect $50 million, something is horribly wasteful. This in not life and death. It’s $170 dollars on average. See Ms Warren wants to create a huge activist organization just for its own sake. Like so many regulations, it defends no one and will attempt to extort money from whom they regulate as a revenue stream, only. And extort is the word, because originally she wanted the banks to pay the $60 Billion to get it up and running.

Not hope. Not Change. Not hey you Mr. Man, we built those roads so you can make money. Just pure business as usual Washington. Lawyer Style.
11:02 AM on 06/17/2012
Quoting (R) Sen. McConnell, October 2010, “The single most important thing we (Republicans) want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

Putting this atrocious Republican policy into perspective and context- President Obama (Democrat) had just inherited from the previous Republican administration the greatest American economic crisis since the Great Depression, with the American economy teetering on potential economic collapse. The unemployment rate was 8.3 % when the President took office and peaked to 10.2% shortly thereafter due to economic lag. America was hemorrhaging around 700,000 jobs a MONTH. The stock market had plummeted from around 13,500 in mid 2008 to around 6,500 when President Obama took office in early 2009. The US GDP was at (negative) -2.6%. Foundational US corporations, banks, financial institutions, etc. were teetering on the edge of a downward, unrecoverable economic spiral. Tens of millions of Americans were losing homes, jobs, $ Trillions of former personal financial assets, 401K’s, life savings…

In the midst of this extremely critical time, needing Republicans to come together in unity with Democrats on behalf of “the people” and nation, they decided to make their #1 priority to obstruct the President and make sure he was a one term President.

That policy by Republicans at that critical time with the nation and its people teetering on total economic collapse was IMO in the realm of treason.

Therefore, why would any sane voter consider putting these same Republicans back into power in 2012?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyHO
Speaking Truth to Power
12:05 PM on 06/17/2012
I'm sure you understand by now that using facts and reason is beyond the comprehension of a conservative. I'm serious!

It would be O.K. with me if conservative leaders drove the bus over the cliff with only conservatives on board but that isn't the case at all.

Thanks for the post - fanned and faved
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ThermoChemist
"Forewarned Is Forearmed"
12:07 PM on 06/17/2012
"Therefore, why would any sane voter consider putting these same Republicans back into power in 2012?"
=========

"For a working man or woman to vote Republican this year is the same as a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders."
-- Walter Mondale