iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Sunday Roundup

What's Your Reaction?

This week, a day after Democrats voted down an attempt to remove scandal-plagued Ways and Means Committee chairman Charlie Rangel from his post, the House Ethics Committee voted unanimously to expand its investigation of him. Nancy Pelosi, who promised to "drain the swamp" and create "the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history," is, instead, sticking by Rangel. Talk about tone deaf. The Democrats have to make it clear to America's beleaguered middle class that they don't believe there are two sets of rules: one for the power players of Wall Street and Washington, and one for everybody else. Congress' approval rating is at 21 percent, a 10-point drop over the last month. If the Democrats want to see it hit single digits, by all means, keep Charlie Rangel as chairman.

***UPDATE*** During the Roundtable on ABC's This Week, Arianna called for Rangel to step down on Monday. Watch the Roundtable  

 
 

Follow Arianna Huffington on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ariannahuff

 
 
  • Comments
  • 150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
funkalicious
06:05 PM on 10/17/2009
Rangel, Go!

Get the hell out
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobertFromMN
Fiercely secular Luxemburgist
02:50 AM on 10/12/2009
But Arianna, what if they DO believe there are two sets of rules: one for the power players of Wall Street and Washington, and one for everybody else... as they clearly do?
photo
elbzee
Fear is the mind-killer
11:06 AM on 10/12/2009
Clearly, there ain't no "what if?", nor has there been for a loooong time!
01:15 AM on 10/12/2009
Instead of conjecture let us wait for the Ethics Committee findings & have the Government take all appropriate legal action.
------------

It doesn't work that way. They run around making deals with each other to stay out of trouble.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meldah
11:59 PM on 10/11/2009
Remember: The American legal system is predicated on the moral stand that people are innocent until the jury has deliberated and found that person guilty.

I am a fan of critical thought, so let’s put it into practice for a moment. Speaker Pelosi didn’t indicate she would stand by Representative Rangel in the event he was found guilty. The fact that they have expanded the investigation indicates that she is keeping her promise of ‘draining the swamp’. If she had softened the efforts of the investigation she would be blameworthy of ‘ tone deafness’. She is acting in the appropriate legal and moral manner. Any other action would be a concession to the efforts of many to split the Democratic Party, & that would be a shame. A wise man once said ‘friends are the people who walk in the door when everybody else is walking out.’

It would be nice if the American people read Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible once a decade. We need reminding of the dangers of listening to voices that are trying to tear us apart. Unity for unity sake is wrong, but let’s not burn people at the stake of public opinion. We may find that Representative Rangel acted without criminal intent, making an honest mistake or he may be guilty of trying to defraud the Government and the people of the United States. Instead of conjecture let us wait for the Ethics Committee findings & have the Government take all appropriate legal action.
08:24 PM on 10/11/2009
As Mr. Rangel indicated that he under estimated his assets and income, then he needs to immediately step down. No-one should be above the law and friendship should not trump ethics and morality,
06:46 AM on 10/26/2009
I say you robbed Fort Knox. You need to go to prison right now. We'll deal with the court case later.

We are a society of laws. Mr. Rangel is currently under the protection of those laws. We don't know all the facts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
07:29 PM on 10/11/2009
I agree with Arianna's compromise. The venerable Charlie Rangel can relinquish his committee chairmanship, but he is still needed as a representative in New York, and in congress.
11:05 PM on 10/11/2009
Why? He's the only 'talented' person in New York?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
12:14 AM on 10/12/2009
Charlie is a special personality in New York. I don't want to see congress lacking his New York attitude, his common sense or his gravely voice. I don't even care if he keeps his chairmanship. He can get out of debt to the IRS. Give him more time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JISantiago
07:23 PM on 10/11/2009
It's time for Democrats to ditch the corrupt Rangel. Period.

This is no time to play politics, Pelosi. The time has come to act,...and act wisely. Rangel is no angel. Too long in Congress has not made this guy wise but wealthy. That's not why he was sent to Congress in the first place.

There are no mitigating factors in favor of Rangel.

Pelosi is given a golden opportunity to live up to her words. Clean up the House. Get rid of the rotten Rangel. It's good for you. Good for the Democrats. Good for America.
06:28 PM on 10/11/2009
OK folks. I have reading through these comments. The solution is obvious.

Democrat/Liberal - one side of the coin. Republican/Conservative - the other side of the coin.

Nothing is going to work until the real people who work, live and die in this country take the country back.

That's not going to happen until we get together and do it. I know it sounds unbelievable, but none of us are getting what we want, and those in Washinton and Wall Street are taking whatever they want from us, and leaving us with nothing. I'm not smart or educated enough to understand how this could ever happen. But this is the country that can do anything. If we don't change, nothing else will change.
06:43 PM on 10/11/2009
Don't have to be "smart or educated enough to understand....".

That's what "advanced representative democracy" is ultimately bringing to people everywhere around the World.
Let's anyone tell what "representative democracy" means today, in time of Internet when everyone can "represent" him/her-self in a blink of an eye by pressing browser's button?
07:19 PM on 10/11/2009
But at the same time - don't you notice how someone on the left can give an "interesting" opinion online, and then you begin to see it being echoed by people all over the interenet - some agreeing, some disagreeing? I understand what you're saying, but let me ask you this: Do you feel like you are part of a huge country where many people look at things the same way? Not every detail, but the big things. I hope we still believe the U.S. stands for freedom (I know, I know), for courage, for helping the world (which we do)?

Do I only think this way because I'm a baby-boomer? I hope not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackiero
You want me to do what?
08:44 PM on 10/11/2009
Absolutely agree.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wingnutgator
05:30 PM on 10/11/2009
I saw the roundtable and it is clear that Stephanoupolis, Will, et al are Washington insiders who are fixated on the inside the beltway game. They have no clue what the people of this country are thinking and feeling. Arianna is right, all of us. left, right, middle, whatever are fed up with a big bank wall street bailout that is doing nothing to help average people get jobs, stop foreclosures, etc. The O admin and the Dems are not much different than Bush and co. We have more troops in Afghanistan and Iraq today than we did on innauguration day. I for one am disgusted and fed up with both parties who are controllled by the same people. I am an attorney and a multi-millionaire, but I grew up in the working class and started working when I was 12. My smypathies and concerns are with the average people in this country who are being royally screwed. I really don't blame people for breaking the law and doing whatever is necessary to survive.
05:46 PM on 10/11/2009
The difference is if Rangel were a Republican, he would have been gone by now. It's the hypocrisy of the Dems and the fact that they always get a pass. You are right though, the Dems and Obama are no different than Bush and the Republicans. They need to ALL be kicked out, and let's start with term limits, but I won't hold my breath. Regardless, Pelosi promised things would be different and it's even worse. I expect the Republicans to come close, if not win back the House in 2010.
photo
kamachanda
Mr. President, Tear this Wall Street down!
06:55 PM on 10/11/2009
Nonsense, has Cheney been indited? There is a real problem with elected people in our government thinking that they are above the law, is you want to pretend that issue doesn't cross party lines, you are fooling yourself.
The government has gotten away from the people, it has become a fantasy government, an extension of the fantasy casino run by the fiscal sector of our economy.
05:17 PM on 10/11/2009
With all due respect, I doubt very, very much that those on Main Street disapprove of our Congress because of Charlie Rangel. I would be most surprised if polls showed that few on Main Street even know who Charlie Rangel is. Rangel is a beltway concern, not a Main Street concern.

No, the major reason that recent polls show a decline in approval for our Congress more than likely has to do with its miserable shenanigans on health care reform. We are seeing our Congress at its very WORST on health care reform.

And unless President Obama and the Democrats can come up with a strong, comprehensive health care reform measure that includes a robust public option, it is they who will suffer the most in the polls and in the 2010 elections and even beyond.

And don't think for one moment that the wool can be pulled over the people's eyes in this matter. The people will know if they're getting weak, watered down "reform" or the real deal.

The cost of health care in this nation is the final nail in the coffin of the middle class. Don't you figure they'll know at last when they're finished for good?

The question: Do President Obama and the Democrats in the Congress really want to be the ones to provide that last nail?
05:02 PM on 10/11/2009
Amen sister...you hit the nail sqarely on the head.
04:57 PM on 10/11/2009
Rangel is where Congress should put its attention? Please. Fix the foreclosure mess and Wall Street first.
05:20 PM on 10/11/2009
What happened to mult-tasking?
07:25 AM on 10/26/2009
It never worked.
06:44 PM on 10/11/2009
You're right - we shouldn't be spending a lot of time on the Rangel situation.

That is why he needs to resign. Keeping him as Ways and Means Committee Chairman is just nuts. We have to get him out of there.

Sooner or later, he'll need to be put on trial and punished for his misdeeds. But we have bigger fish to fry right now. So he waits.

But we still have to enforce the law for EVERYONE.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:41 PM on 10/11/2009
Rangel should step down. If I, like Rangel, had property in the Dominican Republic that I'd been renting for years but hadn't reported income on, the IRS wouldn't cut me any slack; they'd audit me with a fine tooth comb, yell "tax evasion," hit me with a hefty fine, put cuffs on me and bring me to court. I know a guy who owns a bar and when the IRS suspected he did not report substantial income, they actually came to his business, had him arrested, closed down his bar in the middle of the day and took him away. I know people who had to sweat through audits to prove that their deduction for their charitable contribution was "ethical." But a public servant like Rangel gets to keep his day job while a "Committee of his Peers" works out a deal for him behind closed doors. Once again there is no accountability for publilc servants. There is a different standard of "judicial review," a different standard of "penalty" and certainly no risk of losing a high-ranking position on prestigious Congressional Committee that writes the very tax laws that put Americans who don't work on Capitol Hill behind bars for doing the kinds of things that Rangel has done. Either Rangel has to step down or it's time to level the playing field and change the tax code, so that no more Americans have to be cuffed and/or interrogated for making "mistakes" on their tax returns.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plumnelly
04:35 PM on 10/11/2009
He didn't pay his taxes of over a million dollars and questionable behavior regarding his special treatment for how much he pays in rent. He should step aside while being investigated.
05:05 PM on 10/11/2009
Rangel had better step down before they find other shady dealings. I don't believe his current problems is his first foray into ethics or illegal activities. Had it been on of us, we would be under the jail.
04:35 PM on 10/11/2009
Arianna is spot on with her comments.
I had a very scary over the fence conversation with my neighbor yesterday. An average guy. A small business owner. A genuinely nice neighbor (will let the dog out, help with a project or loan a tool, etc.).
His comments started with statement like "With all the corruption and hand outs to wall street is that if there are no consequences for the rich, then what's the point of the law?" And moved on to "Until one of these guys is strung up on a rope, they are just going to continue to rob us blind."
Now, I tried to point out that we don't lynch people - we have the rule of law. But he points out that the rich and powerful don't have to obey the law. Or, worse, they write the law to suit themselves. What do you say to that? It is true.
Men like my neighbor should be the voice of reason but they are angry that there are two sets of rules. One for the rich and the powerful, the other for average americans.
The right incites violence on talk radio all day long. Do I think he will act on his anger? No. But if someone else does, I think he and others will stand by silently.
The Dems need to do what they said they would do - clean house, make reforms and help us take back our country. That's why we elected them.