The Faces of Detention and Deportation

Recent headlines have focused on the surge in the number of criminal deportees to the Caribbean. CARICOM leaders are making preparations for the meeting with President Obama scheduled this fall in Washington, D.C. Crime in the Caribbean is at the top of the agenda. One persistent question regarding individuals who are in detention and subject to deportation is, "What is the nature of their offenses?"

According to statistics recently released by the Department of Homeland Security, the number of criminal deportees to the Caribbean in the past ten years is in excess of 50, 000. The breakdown for the English-speaking Caribbean is as follows - Jamaica (14, 006 criminal deportees); Trinidad and Tobago (2, 589); Guyana (1, 742); Barbados (484); Antigua and Barbuda (303); St. Vincent and the Grenadines (202); St. Lucia (192); Dominica (177); and Grenada (176).

The governments of various Caribbean nations have adopted different strategies to deal with the deportee dilemma. In Guyana, the government has officially entered into a pilot program -- with the assistance of the United States government -- aimed at reintegrating deportees into society. In Jamaica (and other CARICOM nations), there is a renewed interest in Beyond Boundaries, a comparative study of criminal deportation and its impact by Dr. Annmarie Barnes, a noted criminologist. In Trinidad and Tobago, as reported in a local newspaper, National Security Minister Martin Joseph indicated that CARICOM leaders are exploring the possibility of reciprocal arrangements for the deportation of criminals.

But as CARICOM leaders prepare for the upcoming meeting to discuss crime, they are best advised to consider this analysis:

How many Caribbean nationals are currently in detention subject to deportation?

What is the anticipated rate of deportation for Caribbean nationals?

What is the nature of the offense committed? Urinating in public? Jumping a turnstile? Possession of a controlled substance? Possession with intent to sell? Armed robbery? Murder? Manslaughter?

How long ago did the offense occur?

Should an individual who has committed a more serious offense be treated the same way as an individual who has committed a less egregious offense?

There is no one-size-fits-all mold to the deportee dilemma. So leaders should take all these variables into consideration as they strive to craft a solution favorable to all affected parties.

NOTE: This is the first in a series of ongoing articles that will profile Caribbean nationals who are in detention subject to deportation or who have been deported.

Follow Arlene M. Roberts on Twitter: www.twitter.com/arlenemroberts

Comments

[nee]

If they were arrested and convicted they need to be deported it doesn't matter what the crime was.

[Arlene M. Roberts - Huffpost Blogger]

They were arrested, convicted and served out their sentences in U.S. prisons. When addressing the issue of deportation, the nature of the crime does matter. Take a look at the attached list compiled by the ACLU http://www.aclu.org/immigrants/review/39906res2

[ModernTimes1]

"Trinidad, Barbados and Antigua, are now moving to round up and deport thousands of nationals from countries like Guyana, Jamaica, St. Vincent and St. Lucia because of the strain they are putting on economies at a time when economic prospects are far less rosy than years ago when they tolerated undocumented workers. "
Any concern and or comment?

[Arlene M. Roberts - Huffpost Blogger]

Yes, here's my comment. The deportation by Trinidad, Barbados and Antigua to which you refer is of a different nature. See http://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/news/local/06/30/fifty-three-guyanese-deported-from-barbados/ The Caribbean nationals being deported by the U.S. government are legal permanent residents - although not citizens - who have already served criminal sentences in U.S. prisons. For two interesting cases, Elliot Grenade and Warren Joseph, revisit an opinion I wrote earlier this month about detention and deportation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arlene-m-roberts/when-detention-is-more-th_b_252758.html Then view this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g3u7rrQtXY Then you'll see what I'm concerned about.

[ModernTimes1]

The questions posted by the author display little to no interest in issues of integration of former deportees.
Rather the intent is to halt or slow down the flow of the convicts back to their homeland.

[Arlene M. Roberts - Huffpost Blogger]

I am simply advocating careful consideration of all factors when detaining then deporting individuals. Otherwise, here's what can happen, as the ACLU clearly illustrates http://www.aclu.org/immigrants/review/39906res20090617.html

[greyhound2]

The nature of the offense is that they have proven that they have no respect for our laws and will break them according to their own choosing.

[Arlene M. Roberts - Huffpost Blogger]

Maybe, maybe not. View the following video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g3u7rrQtXY then decide.