Nuns, Students Blocked from Voting in Indiana -- Where's Congress?

Posted May 6, 2008 | 08:05 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

As voters went to the polls today to choose between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in the Indiana and North Carolina primaries, there was an overlooked peril facing all voters this year: a failing election system and GOP-led vote suppression. All these obstacles undermine fair and accurate voting, leading to potential meltdowns and the disenfranchisement of voters, especially African-Americans, the elderly and students.

Indeed, the Election Protection coalition reported by mid-afternoon some disturbing accounts from the Indiana and North Carolina primaries from early callers to their 1-866-Our-Vote hotline. All told, by day's end, the coalition hotline fielded nearly 800 complaints about election barriers. As Election Protection reported earlier on Tuesday:

This morning, in South Bend, Indiana, a freshman student at St. Mary's College, excited to vote for the first time, left the polling place in tears because she only possessed a private college ID and was unable to vote. The poll workers, nuns at a local convent, were trying to help the young student through her problem. While they were helping her, they realized that some of their fellow nuns, who had just arrived at the polling place, also could not vote because of the photo ID law. Not only was this group of nuns disenfranchised, but so would be four floors of retired nuns in their convent. "The situation this morning in South Bend is a glaring example of why Indiana's onerous photo ID law erects an unnecessary barrier to the ballot box and disenfranchises legitimate voters," said John Borkowski, Esquire, a partner at law firm Hogan & Hartson and Lawyers' Committee board member who witnessed this incident firsthand.
Why didn't the TV pundits take more notice of these incidents while describing the Indiana primary results as too close to call in Indiana as the evening wore on? Indeed, when you add in Obama-leaning minorities and students turned away from the polls because they lacked the proper photo ID, along with Rush Limbaugh's Republican dittoheads turning up to vote for Hillary as part of "Operation Chaos," the narrowness of the difference between the two candidates would doubtless have been even slimmer had there been a truly fair vote.

So when every vote counts, it's important that our election officials fairly and honestly count every voter -- a lesson progressives need to learn before the expected close election in November. That's in part because they can't count on a Democratic-led Congress, as Alternet reports this week, to take any action that can protect voting rights and our election system before the November election.

As Jonah Goldman, director of the National Campaign for Fair Elections of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Right's Voting Rights Project, concluded, "As this historic primary season has progressed, record numbers of voters have turned out to exercise their fundamental right to vote. It is unfortunate, however, that many of these eligible voters were disenfranchised and unable to cast a ballot. In state after state, including both North Carolina and Indiana, we've seen eligible voters lose their right to vote because of poorly trained poll workers, problems with voting machines and inaccurate voter registration rolls." It's equally unfortunate that Congress and most state governments won't be doing anything to stop these abuses and problems that undermine our democracy.

And remember, these sorts of complaints were based only on reports from those relatively few people who knew about the hotline, not all voters who were having problems during the massive voting turnout today. The coalition reminded voters that voters in both states could call 1-866-OUR-VOTE toll-free until 8 p.m. EST with any concerns. Other problems arose that should arouse concern in a country that supposedly values every person's right to vote:

Other incidents from Indiana include:

Multiple reports of voting machine problems, including from a school teacher who had to leave without casting a ballot because he had to get to school before classes started. Additionally, he said the mostly African-American voters were untrusting that the poll workers would ensure their votes would count.

At another polling place, voters were not offered paper ballots when machines went down, and countless voters left without casting a ballot.

A voter, previously convicted of a misdemeanor, was prevented from voting by a poll worker. Election Protection provided him with the code provision which dictates that only those convicted of a felony and those incarcerated cannot vote.

Specific incidents reported in North Carolina include:

Poll workers at a local precinct announced at 6:20 a.m. that there were no ballots and voters were sent home. Election Protection followed up and discovered that the polling place had the ballots in a box which had not been opened.

Election Protection has also received multiple reports of registered Independents who were not allowed to vote in either primary, or were given Republican ballots despite believing they were registered as Democrats at polling sites.

Trained volunteers will continue to staff the Hotline to provide voters with free assistance and volunteers will remain at election officials' offices in targeted areas across North Carolina and Indiana. Field volunteers are on the ground to assist voters in person or place telephone calls to the appropriate election official.

The toll-free number, administered by the Lawyers' Committee is available to any voters who need information, assistance or need guidance in understanding their rights. It is open to the entire voting public, but targets historically disenfranchised communities, including Hispanic, African American and low-income communities.

The result of all these problems and Congressional inaction? Progressives hoping for a victory in November because of an upsurge of newly-registered Democratic voters, particularly young people and minorities, should join with voting advocacy groups to protect these voters' rights to cast a ballot and have it counted. That's because, as Alternet reports in a new article, the Democratic-led Congress won't be doing anything to fix any major election problem this year, whether it's flawed voting machines, unconstitutional voting purges or GOP-promoted dirty tricks. (Of course, some critics charge, a few of Hillary Clinton's allies may also use deceptive practices, too.)

For today's primary, in the absence of meaningful state or federal prevention of voting foul-ups, voters experiencing problems in Indiana and North Carolina are urged to call either Election Protection's hotline, 1-866-Our-Vote or the hotline of the Watch-My-Vote Coalition, which includes Voter Action and the NAACP-National Voter Fund (NVF), 1-866-My-Vote-1. (The first emphasizes live help, while the latter monitors ongoing complaints and offers follow-up assistance calls.)

Unfortunately, these hotlines just record the symptoms, while the federal government -- and relatively few states -- have failed to cure the underlying disease of our disappearing democratic rights. After interviewing Congressional staffers and voting-rights advocates, I concluded:

As a result of Congressional inaction, look for more long lines, failed machines, questionable voter purges, election-day dirty tricks, GOP challenges to minority voters and ill-trained poll-workers who, following last week's court decision, are even more likely to mistakenly demand photo ID where it's not required, among other voting obstacles. In fact, as Jonah Goldman of the National Campaign for Fair Elections points out, "In every primary contest we found voters who were disenfranchised with identification requirements. This ruling is going to further confuse voters and poll workers." And it could likely limit the ability of elderly, poor and minority voters to cast their votes in Tuesday's Indiana primary -- and in other states where such laws could pass.

All this will be worsened by the recent Supreme Court decision upholding the vote-suppressing Indiana photo ID law that could limit the right to vote of the 20% of African-Americans in Indiana who don't have government-issued photo ID. Even more disturbing, as Michael Slater of Project Vote, points out, "The Supreme Court's decision gives a green light to legislators in the twenty-five states where strict photo ID laws are under consideration. If these states act, they will disenfranchise the new voters that this year's exciting election has stimulated to participate for the first time."

In addition, while the mainstream media has contributed to the misleading impression that all the primary elections have gone smoothly, voting advocacy groups have found a far darker picture, even before the trouble-plagued Pennsylvania primary.

(You can hear on-the-ground reports from that primary by clicking on this link to the radio show, "D'Antoni and Levine," I co-host at BlogTalk Radio that featured interviews with three voting rights leaders talking about Pennsylvania's problems.)

The Election Protection coalition found:

Under-Trained and Not Enough Poll Workers: In each primary covered by Election Protection, the dedicated cadre of poll workers misapplied many election rules - from what ballot to give which voter, to what to do when election equipment broke down - causing voters to unnecessarily cast pro-visional ballots or, worse, to leave the polling place without voting.


Election Machinery Breakdowns: Last-minute changes in voting equipment and new procedures at the polls caused confusion among voters, poll workers and election administrators often leading to dis-enfranchisement. But it was not only human error and confusion; ballot scanners jammed, electronic voting machines broke down and new electronic poll books malfunctioned.

Registration Roll Problems: From state to state, eligible voters who submitted timely registration applications failed to appear on the registration rolls. Other voters showed up on the rolls registered with a political party other than the one with which they intended to register.

Confusion Over Voter Identification Requirements: Voters across the country were improperly asked for identification. Some poll workers, apparently confused about the requirements in their state, were implementing illegal and restrictive voter identification requirements, turning away eligible voters who did not have identification.


How do we prevent these screw-ups from denying progressives ( and of course those Republicans who may care about honest elections) the right to a fair election this November? How, in short, do we avoid a repeat of Ohio in 2004 in key battleground states?

The Election Protection Coalition has some short-term reform suggestions, but they're just not likely to happen unless the rest of the progressive community organizes to make these issues a priority before November's vote:

Over the coming months, election officials across the country have the authority to prevent many of these problems from happening. Election Protection looks forward to working together with those responsible for administering elections to:


*Improve poll worker training;

*Ensure proper protocols for dealing with election machinery breakdowns;

*Implement procedures to guarantee that all eligible registrants make it on the registra-
tion rolls; and

*Widely publicize correct requirements and restrictions about voter identification and
other procedures.

Will any of this happen in such a large-scale way to prevent election disasters and the quiet disenfranchisement of hundreds of thousands of voters come November?

Don't count on it -- unless far more concerned citizens get involved in the often arcane issues of election reform.

As Robert Fitrakis, an Ohio voting rights attorney and editor of the Free Press alternative paper, told me for the Altnernet article, "The system is still broken and instead of voting being a universally guaranteed federal right, it lingers under the shadow of Jim Crow and states' rights."

You can hear more about this year's election controversies, voting rights and the latest political trends on "The D'Antoni and Levine Show," with my co-host Tom D'Antoni, a Huffington Post blogger, every Thursday at 5:30 p.m., EST, at BlogTalk Radio

Read more reactions from Huffington Post bloggers to the Indiana and North Carolina primary results

 

Comments
130
Pending Comments
0
Post a Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I hit post to early on that last post. You also have the right to peaceably assemble. Yet cities and local municipalities can require you to get a permit and or to pay a fee. There are all kind of rights granted by the constitution but that does NOT mean that those rights come without responsibility. The state has a right to determine its voting laws. As long as those laws and rules apply to ALL groups or persons then there is no disenfranchisement. Indiana, as well as other states, distribute photo I.D.s free of charge. Your ignorance of the law does not constitute disenfranchisement. Your inability to follow the law does not constitute disenfranchisement. Your refusal to follow the law does not constitute disenfranchisement. If you want to vote then you need to follow the law. I'm not buying the statement that "20% of black voters are disenfranchised" because of this law. Go to the DMV. Get an I.D. If you don't have a car then have someone drive you. If you don't have someone to drive you then take the bus. If you can't take the bus then call a taxi. If a taxi won't pick you up then walk. I don't understand how people can find their way to the polling place yet they can't find their way to the DMV.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 05/07/2008

It is typical right-wing play to blame the voter for fraud but to not look at voting machines which have no paper or any other form of accountability. It isn"t the machines it is the voters that are defrauding the process. The machine manufactures can do no wrong especially when they contribute to the Republican Party. Maybe if they donated to the Left more than the Right they might be held to a higher standard of accountability.

The taking away of constitutional rights by laws doesn"t make it right.

Our freedoms are being chipped away at one small piece at a time, it is done that way so no one will catch on to what is happening. Because this is a right-wing talking point it is fine and dandy with right-wing voters.

However while the Supremes are busy shifting blame of vote fraud off on to the people the machines that the people vote with have no viable accountability. Now we can argue all day about how maybe illegals are voting and that there are people out there voting more than once, but as long as the machines everyone vote on have no real checks to certify how the voter voted was recorded correctly then it doesn"t really matter if everyone votes twice. Because as long as the machines are vulnerable to tampering be it via hacker or via programming then no ones vote counts for anything.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 AM on 05/08/2008

No ones rights were taken away. No ones freedom was taken away. Quit acting like a drama queen and just accept the fact that with rights there comes responsibilities. And liberals don't want to be responsible for anything. They just want to whine and cry and make accusations.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 05/08/2008

You like the rest of the limp wristed, backboneless right will gladly give up your rights given to you by the constitution, just because you are scared shitless of the Mexicans. You guys are falling all over yourselves to keep something that doesn't happen from happening mean while the real threat to democracy voting machines is buried under your hatred of all that is different.

People like you are why the Constitution can be called nothing but a goddamned piece of paper and be regarded as such.

You follow like sheep being lead to the slaughter. If the right says it is right then by god it is and no mater how wrong it is you will blindly follow regardless of what it means.

You are blind you and people like you have no idea what you are doing to your selves. The phrase cutting off your nose to spite you face comes to mind.

One day people like you will wake up and wonder just how things got this way, the truth is you allowed it to happen and would not take a stand when it could have been prevented.

Should folks have to show that they are American citizens to register to vote, HELL YES. Should folks have to show ID to vote after that what the hell for?

If the voting machines don't matter then what difference does it make who votes and how many times?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 05/08/2008

What difference does it make to show an ID when it comes to voting more than once. All it means is that person just has to flash their ID more than once. Someone on down the page here said something about a friend of theirs voting in two different states how will showing an ID stop that all that person has to do is show their ID a second time.

The truth is, well in my state, when you show up to vote you have to give your name and address the person working the polling place checks that on a paper list. They find your name and say you are registered to vote in this district, once upon a time they would then hand you your card and direct you to the voting both. Now we have voting machines that don't even give a paper ticket or record any other form of check that how I voted was recorded in the machine. These machines are the most important thing and should be the most secure and checkable thing that has to do with voting. A famous communist once said it doesn"t mater who votes it matters who counts the vote, or something like that. What we have now is a mockery of our democracy and all you people can do is blindly tear off in a direction that the very politicians that received money from these manufactures point you in.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 05/09/2008

REPUBLICAN FASCISM doesn't want ANYBODY to vote.
The Land of fascists and the home of THE GREED. Get used to it.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 05/08/2008

The problem I see on this blog is that too many liberals want rights yet they don't want the responsibilities of rights. You have the right to free speech. However, you can not use that right to cry "fire" in the middle of the theater. You also don't have the right to lie under oath. You have the right to freedom of the press. However, if you print something libelous, you can be legally held accountable.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 05/07/2008

Responsibility is making sure the bought and paid for politicians don't destroy what so many have given life and limb for.

Rolling over and going along with it is not being responsible.

Responsibility is just another catchphrase the right uses when they are trying to screw the people out of something.

Yet when it comes time to take responsibility they can't find enough people to lay the blame off on.

As Americans it is our right to vote. While no one is taking away that right they are putting requirements to be allowed to do so. We have to register to vote that is all that should be needed. Showing an ID is no more effective than not doing so when it comes to stopping persons from voting more than once. If it doesn"t go into a nation wide or even state wide recording system what good does it do? Those people who do so just have to show their ID more than once if it is not recorded on some kind of data base.

Voting machines are what should be the issue here not the voters. Everyone knows there is no way to check that how voters voted is how the machine recorded the vote. Yet no one is raising a stink about that. Why? Because the manufactures say so, it works but there is no way to double check it. Would anyone believe that if it were for anything else?

You want to talk at me about responsibility.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 05/09/2008

While I agree that the problems with people not being able to vote is a problem. But I do not think that showing a photo ID is one of them. You can't write a check without photo ID, you can't board a plane without one. But you can vote without one? That doesn't make sense to me, and never has. One of my employees voted twice this year, he is registered here in Pennsylvania where he goes to Carnegie Melon and has a PA drivers license. He is from West Virginia, Charles Town I beleive and will be voting there after he goes home this weekend since classes have ended. He registered 3 years ago in West Virginia when he lived with his family. He could vote in both in November if he didn't mind the drive. That is wrong.

I understand many people cannot afford ID, as long as the states are required to give non-driving state IDs for free there should be no disenfranchisement of voters.

Maybe it is difficult for the average person like me who has always had a drivers license since I was 16 to understand why some people who are in this country legally can't or won't get a state ID. And they wouldn't cost the state too much if they were free since the overwhelming majority of the population has drivers licenses even in cities.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 05/07/2008

It may well be time for mail-in ballots. Oregon took awhile to perfect their system, but it seems to work. If you validate citizenship when one registers to vote, the voter id problem would not be an issue. Your ballot is sent to you in a timely manner and you mail it in. If you don't get it mailed in time, they have supervised drop off boxes. I've voted absentee for years and it's so much easier than driving to a polling locations, waiting in line and dealing with the machines.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 05/07/2008

How flippin hard is it to let people vote? Are there that many crook/dishonest people out there that they will not allow people their right to vote?
Damn george has turned this country into another Russia or China by rigging elections..........

WAKE UP AMERICA - Our rights are being taken away and we are sitting on our @$$es and letting it happen...........................
Contact your congress person and let them know that this has got to stop..........NOW

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 05/07/2008

How hard is it to go to the DMV and get a FREE government I.D.?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 05/07/2008

I voted in Indiana and the ID system made no sense. At the door, a poll worker asked to see my ID. She checked my drivers license and confirmed that I was the person pictured on the license. I then got in line with other and when I got to the ballot table I was asked my name and signed the voter roll just like before. In other words, there was no attempt to match my ID with the name I voted under. In essence, all the poll worker did was to see if I had and ID at all. There was no correlation between the person on the ID and the person voting. It was a meaningless exercise. Instead of being called voter ID it should be called do you own an ID. In talking with others who voted in other precincts, they confirmed they had the same process.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 05/07/2008

Well by the sounds of it it stopped some voters and I'm guess ing others that weren't legal to vote.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 05/07/2008

To what purpose? Illegal aliens voting is not a problem - they can't register to vote in the first place. This system stopped no one except people who did not have IDs from fraudulent voting. I could have said I was anyone and voted in their name. I could have come in 10 times and voted as 10 different people.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 05/07/2008

Laws are different in every state, in Minnesota all you need is a utility bill and someone to say yes that is you. I could vote 300 times if I wanted to.

Something needs to be done.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 05/07/2008

You don't know what you're talking about. Illegal aliens DO vote. They use fake or stolen social securities numbers to get driver's licenses. Then they use those driver's licenses to register to vote. Then they vote ILLEGALLY. What do you mean it's not a problem? Also, where I vote, you could give ten different names. But if you can't tell them the address to which those names are registered then you can't vote.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 05/07/2008

Look. Unless you were on Mars last week you knew what the SCOTUS opinion was on Indiana law. These nuns were just trying to get a little liberal press for political purposes. The Indiana Secretary of State opined that they should get a government issued ID if they want to vote in November. Sounds like good advice.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 05/07/2008

You're kidding, right? Nuns read the National Law Journal now? I am an attorney at a firm, and I'll bet colleagues of mine haven't yet read that opinion. Get real.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 05/07/2008


"Expected close election" in the general? This is Bushit!!

The only way it could be close is with massive voter fraud

& gross manipulation by our corporatist MSM for the GOP.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 05/07/2008

You are not starting the whining already are you?

The map as it currently sits looks a lot like it did in 2004 so I would expect it to be close.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 05/07/2008

I agree, people need to stop whining. I almost alway vote democratic, there are exceptions. But sometimes I am embarrassed to say I am a democrat. There are too many cry-babys and ignorant people (like some Obama supporter saying that Clinton supporters are a bunch of undeducated morons) that is an ignorant statement. I guess it is better than saying I am a republican. I may just start saying I am independent.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 05/07/2008

These types of laws are extremely unfair. Sometimes people need to vote for five or six of their neighbors, especially when they're dead. Will somebody please explain to me how dead people are supposed to get to the polls even if they could get valid state ID's.

By disenfranchising dead voters, the states are taking away the rights of Democrats to be elected. Where's congress?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 05/07/2008

Only in Chicago and if you last name is Daley!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 05/07/2008

Dems have to support the rights of the dead to vote in order to offset your party's efforts to prevent the live voters from casting a ballot....

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 05/07/2008

The idiotic, knee-jerk comments seen here by republicans is a bit jarring, until you understand that most of them are happy idiots who rationalize-away anything a person with an actual conscience would take exception to:

Jeanna Bryner
Senior Writer
LiveScience.com

"Individuals with conservative ideologies are happier than liberal-leaners, and new research pinpoints the reason: Conservatives rationalize social and economic inequalities.

"Regardless of marital status, income or church attendance, right-wing individuals reported greater life satisfaction and well-being than left-wingers, the new study found. Conservatives also scored highest on measures of rationalization, which gauge a person's tendency to justify, or explain away, inequalities."

So, with a fair use nod to Jeff Foxworthy, I think following list could be useful in determining your party affiliation, if you're not sure:

You might be a Republican if:

You lack the ability to feel EMPATHY for others

You will justify anything your party is responsible for, including WAR CRIMES

You don't care what happens to other people, as long as YOU GET YOURS

You support capital punishment because you DON'T CARE IF INNOCENT PEOPLE ARE EXECUTED

You think patriotism is defined by who wears a flag lapel pin

Your golden rule is "BUY LOW, SELL HIGH."

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 05/07/2008

You must not know too many Republicans. Your list is just emotional reaction. No one party is all good or all bad. Both parties are made up of human beings. Hardly perfect. We are each allowed to hold our own views and we are allowed to disagree.

I find it especially interesting that you are a Democrat and your cry over capital punishment is that "we" DON'T CARE IF INNOCENT PEOPLE ARE EXECUTED. So, can you explain the parties backing of abortion, no matter at what point? Every single one of those babies is unquestionably INNOCENT!
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Nothing in this world is all black and all white. Many shades of gray exist in our country, which is to our credit. What if it turns out that you are not happy with your candidate after they have been elected? Whose fault will that be? Broad generalizations do nothing but discredit you. Unless, of course, you have met every single person who votes Republican.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 05/07/2008

Pro-life and Pro-death penalty how can that be????