School is back in session. After a couple of weeks of holiday relaxation, the kids are returning to their school habits. As we start 2012, I wanted to take some time to look at ways to improve study habits in the coming year. A lot of what I'm including here comes from my new book Smart Thinking: Three essential keys to solve problems, innovate, and get things done (Perigee Books).
The real aim of education is make all of us smarter thinkers. At the core of smart thinking is the ability to understand the world. Ultimately, if you are going to solve new problems or to make effective decisions, you need to have causal knowledge about the world.
Causal knowledge is what you use to answer the question "Why?" In order to learn from history, for example, it is important to understand the events that took place, but also why those events happened. Current events are never exactly like historical ones, and so the more you know about these causal factors, the better job you can do of applying knowledge of the past to the present.
Unfortunately, the most common study habits are not that effective for learning to give good explanations. First of all, students tend to study for exams in the day or two before the test is given. That kind of studying does not provide enough chances to help connect their knowledge together to provide long-term understanding of the material. If you are going to study for a test for an hour, it is better to study for four days 15-minutes at a time, than to study for an hour all at once.
Second, students often study by re-reading the material that will be covered on the exam. Obviously, reading the material is important, but the exam will require more than just reading, it will require producing an answer. So, it is important to study by actually answering the kinds of questions that will be covered.
Creating your own explanations helps to guard against what Frank Keil and Leo Rozenblit called the Illusion of Explanatory Depth. Basically, we often believe that we understand the way things work better than we do. That means that students often overestimate how well they are going to do on an exam. They think they are ready when they're not.
When you explain things to yourself, you find the gaps in your knowledge. Practicing for an exam by answering questions quickly reveals the places where you need to learn more. As an added bonus, there is a real benefit in memory for information that you produce yourself over information that you just read.
Finally, tests in schools (and particularly the kinds of high-stakes tests that are used to evaluate student performance) give questions that have a correct answer. And in some domains, there really is a correct answer (or at least a best one). When you add 1 and 1, you better get 2. And the theory of natural selection really is the best explanation for the data on the development of species on Earth.
We have to remind our kids that not every problem in the world has just one answer. Almost every real-world problem has many possible successful answers, whether you're trying to eat a good breakfast, get in shape, or design a better vacuum cleaner. It is crucial that students learn that they are not supposed to find the answer to a problem, but rather to find one or more good answers.
Here's to a year of smart thinking.
Follow Art Markman, Ph.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/abmarkman
Plus, the value of homework is grossly overstated. Look at the Finnish model. They receive less than half the instructional time and half the homework that our students do and they are ranked near the top of every learning category while we languish in the twenties.
"One successful example of early intervention is home visitation by childcare experts, like those from the Nurse-Family Partnership. This organization sends nurses to visit poor, vulnerable women who are pregnant for the first time. The nurse warns against smoking and alcohol and drug abuse, and later encourages breast-feeding and good nutrition, while coaxing mothers to cuddle their children and read to them. This program continues until the child is 2.
At age 6, studies have found, these children are only one-third as likely to have behavioral or intellectual problems as others who weren’t enrolled. At age 15, the children are less than half as likely to have been arrested."
First we work with / play with our infants. Then our children. Doing badly at an earlier stage makes the later stages much more difficult.
To the extent they can, they start work when they get the assignment, not just before it is due. If you work (problems, readings, etc) is all current, a quick review is typically enough to do well on the tests.
The other thing that helps cement knowledge is to help other students with the material. In the process of helping others, they reinforce their knowledge. This is the old medical school practice "Learn one, do one, teach one" pertaining to skill acquisition.
The kids don't get to do their amusements (TV, video games, etc) unless their studies are at a reasonable state of completion (for the due date). And even then, the video / screen time is rationed. I prefer that they read.
I doubt it.
Remember that SAT scores of education majors average near the very bottom of all college majors monitored by the U.S. Department of Education. Teachers "beat out" agriculture students, home economics and public relations.
Teachers are probably more likely to be heart people than head people.
Support school libraries. Sign the petition and pass it on via Facebook and Twitter:
https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petitions/all/0/2/18
Sign in at Whitehouse.gov/petitions. Then go to education and find the library petition. Our children will thank you.