More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Auren Kaplan

GET UPDATES FROM Auren Kaplan
 

An Evolved Take on Psychology, Brands and Poverty

Posted: 01/16/2012 9:21 am

I'm not an educator. But I do want to teach you one thing in this article, and that is the function of your reticular activation system. It is a mouthful, I know, but you can boil it down to the much simpler R.A.S. for the purpose of an easier conversation. So what is the R.A.S.? Firstly, everyone has one. Now for the definition -- your R.A.S. is the system in your brain that determines what has value to you -- it determines on what you place your attention. On what matters to you, to say it another way. (I learned about R.A.S. in Tony Robbins' book Awaken The Giant Within.)

Many amongst us have Kim Kardashian high in our R.A.S. She has a value to us, she matters to us. Bless her heart, I don't particularly care. She's not on my R.A.S.

Others have their families and their communities high on their R.A.S. And I would argue that they should. Most people would agree that giving your community a degree of attention is normatively good, in addition to having positive effects that reflect well on yourself.

Lately, I've been asking myself these questions: What is it within us that makes us care for one another? Why do some care when others don't?

Here's the real question that perplexes me deeply: How do I expand the awareness of people so that poverty is within their R.A.S.?

All of which flows into what you might be able to deduce: Poverty is high on my R.A.S.

It matters to me. I care about the lives of people in India, and China, and Brazil, and Indonesia, so much that it doesn't -- really, I have to say -- make sense. Poverty has invaded my R.A.S., and it's there to stay.

Now think for a second about what tries to invade your R.A.S. all the time -- what tries to capture your attention: brands.

Brands want you to focus your R.A.S. on them. Like Kim Kardashian, they want to matter to you. But brands do more than just enter your stream of vision -- they define how you see the world.

When Nike is in your R.A.S., you know that what matters is sport, and competition, and training. So when a brand enters your R.A.S., what also enters your R.A.S. is what that brand stands for -- that brand's very identity. Walmart's value is just that -- its great value. So as it enters your R.A.S. you start to think -- what is the best value for me? When you associate with a brand, when you include it in your R.A.S., you also allow that brand's identity into your R.A.S. Over time, your identity and the identity of the brand merges as you focus your attention on the values of the brand.

Wow. Brands are pretty important. Like you wouldn't believe: businesses spend $450 billion per year marketing brands to you. They are spending $450 billion per year to enter your R.A.S. In other words, to matter to you. And inadvertently, to give your life meaning. So companies are spending billions of dollars every year so that you will define yourself in the way that matters to brands. Let's hope that these brands don't just appeal to basic instincts.

As human beings, we have an inherent desire to have an identity that matters. An identity that fits into other people's R.A.S., so we can connect. We deserve brands that appeal to our higher order thoughts, and feelings, and values.

So brands have a lot of responsibility here. It's worth thinking about: What if a brand existed that appealed to your highest hopes and dreams, to your highest sense of self? To take a page from Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, what if a brand existed that helped you achieve self-actualization?

Thankfully, there is a movement afoot in the advertising community to change how it enters, and so defines, your R.A.S. It's called prosocial advertising. As Mark Woerde persuasively argues in his book, How Advertising Will Heal the World and Your Business, people like you and me want brands to interact with us in a way that gives our life meaning. And so he identifies a $450 billion opportunity for brands to appeal to us in ways that give our lives meaning.

I'm a long way from talking about poverty. But maybe there's a connection here. Brands are a part of our life, and that's not going to change for the foreseeable future. Given that, what if a brand appealed to that higher calling? More specifically, what if a brand appealed to that yearning for meaning by working to end poverty? That's a brand I would love to have enter my R.A.S.

I write this not only to open your eyes to your R.A.S. and how brands play a role in shaping it and changing it. I write this because I have a dream. I want to create a brand whose core message is ending poverty. I've been inspired by companies like Product (RED), that generated $150 million dollars from brands to fight AIDS in Africa. Frankly, I think they have a pretty good business model.

So I want to introduce to you the newest brand, a brand whose chief aim is empowering people and nonprofits to end poverty.

That brand is Evolve.

Over the coming months and years, I will be developing the concept because I want poverty to be in everyone's R.A.S. I want poverty to invade the R.A.S. of everyone in the developed world just like it invaded mine. Because people, just like you and us, are suffering like you and I can't imagine. They borrow money in city slums, sometimes with rates as high as 10 percent interest per day. I want people to understand how they are exactly the same as the person in the slum. In that uniquely human way, they are no better and no worse than them -- they are the same. We are the same -- whether we make $50 an hour or $0.05 an hour (the hourly rate of many a poor farmer who earns under $1 per day). I want people to awaken like I did, to that understanding that we are all part of a global community. That what matters for him, and her, and me, matters for you. Because we are the same.

I know that many of us aren't there yet. But we need to evolve our mentality, we need to evolve our spirituality, and we need to evolve our capitalism to that place where we truly see each other as equals. And so I am creating a brand that stands for that evolution. That stands for a belief that we, as humans, all seven billion of us, interconnected, can end poverty in our time. So my writing serves to have poverty enter your R.A.S. And my brand will do the same. And my hope is that it will align with your core, higher desire to live a life of meaning.

I want to create a world without poverty. I want all of us to Evolve. Will you join me?

Facebook: http://facebook.com/evolvebrand
Twitter: http://twitter.com/joinevolve

 

Follow Auren Kaplan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/aurensays

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Bartholomew
My micro-bio isn't empty.
03:42 AM on 01/20/2012
Gee Mr Kaplan, I think you're barking up the wrong tree publishing an article that appeals to voluntary charitable giving. Based on most of the posts I've read in this forum, Progressives don't believe in voluntary charitable giving---they believe in heavy-handed government force. Instead of poverty invading the R.A.S. of everyone in the developed world, they find that jackbooted government thugs invading the bank accounts of everyone in the developed world is a much simpler and more effective solution.

For instance:

'New York Contractor Sentenced in Payroll Tax Evasion Scheme

'On November 15, 2011, in Manhattan, N.Y., Michael Mahoney was sentenced to 24 months home confinement, two years of supervised release and ordered to pay $306,765 in restitution. According to the information, from 2004 through 2006, Mahoney, owner and operator of a construction company known as EMC of New York, took checks that represented receipts of EMC and, rather than depositing them in the corporate bank accounts, cashed them at a check-cashing establishment in New York City. The cash that Mahoney received was used, in part, to pay employees all or a portion of their wages avoiding federal tax reporting and withholding requirements and defrauding the IRS of taxes owed under FICA.'
-- http://www.irs.gov/compliance/enforcement/article/0,,id=246531,00.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Bartholomew
My micro-bio isn't empty.
01:13 AM on 01/20/2012

The IRS doesn't like people pιssιng on its organisation. You see, that money was destined to buy votes to keep our dear elected dons in power. Mr decided that the government dons already had enough of his (and his employees') money. So when said dons found out about it, they ordered a hit. Who needs advertising when you can get better results just breaking a few legs?
12:10 PM on 01/18/2012
Is it absolutely necessary to begin a new brand or would it be more feasible to re-market an existing brand to have the need to solve global poverty enter our R.A.S.?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Auren Kaplan
Business is a force for ending poverty.
01:04 PM on 01/27/2012
I'm starting a new brand because I don't have control or influence over existing brands. :)
07:35 PM on 01/17/2012
I look forward to learning more about Evolve. I think that branding around issues like this can be so challenging. In this work, I always find myself trying to find the perfect balance between informing others yet not putting people on display. I think the work of Evolve will be wonderful because it seems like your interest is solely in helping others, and I think that we can learn a lot from a recognized brand with these values.
06:08 PM on 01/17/2012
As always a great and though provoking article. Evolve - Bold enough to to be part of the solution!!! Bravo @Auren!
08:23 PM on 01/16/2012
I am supposing that you have heard of Muhammad Yunus and the Grameen Banking system using microcredit to help support impoverished individuals that was developed in Bangladesh and spread throughout the world, including the United States. In his book, Banker to the Poor, he notes that many organizations who are designed to help the poor are cleverly developed by institutions to aid more their own causes and people than actually helping the poor. How will you make sure that Evolve will stay the course of helping to legitimately elevate its intended beneficiaries out of poverty without exploitation?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Auren Kaplan
Business is a force for ending poverty.
12:52 PM on 01/17/2012
Aaron, thanks for the great question. Evolve brokers the connection between the original brand and the nonprofit that works to end poverty. Every time a consumer buys an Evolve-branded product made by the original brand, up to 50% of the profit will go directly to the partner nonprofit. So everyone wins - the brand, because it gains new consumers and makes more profit, the nonprofit because it makes more money to work to end poverty, and Evolve because of increased brand strength and recognition, as well as the furthering of our message - it is possible to end poverty in our lifetime.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nlightenup
Retired psychologist, responds to open minds.
10:52 AM on 01/16/2012
Oh, yes, please, DO IT! Magnificent idea. I want to see this unfold. It's imminently do-able--just takes enough people who believe it's possible.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Auren Kaplan
Business is a force for ending poverty.
11:28 AM on 01/16/2012
Thank you so much for your comment! I am going to follow through with this, in a big way. :) Please follow Evolve at the Facebook and Twitter links above!

And I completely agree with you, it just takes enough people who believe it's possible. That means establishing partnerships with core nonprofits that fight poverty and brands who think that message is a good fit and will resonate with their customers.