<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Albert Raboteau</title>
  <link href="http://huffingtonpost.com/author/index.php?author=albert-raboteau"/>
  <updated>2013-05-24T07:16:49-04:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Albert Raboteau</name>
  </author>
  <id xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/index.php?author=albert-raboteau</id>
  <rights>Copyright 2008, HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.</rights>
  <subtitle>HuffingtonPost Blogger Feed for Albert Raboteau</subtitle>
  <generator>Good old fashioned elbow grease.</generator>

<entry>
    <title>'Under the Healing Wings of Suffering': Christianity, Slavery and Redemption in America</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/under-the-healing-wings-o_b_828401.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.828401</id>
    <published>2011-02-25T21:13:45-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T18:35:25-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Slaves revealed that Americans had a deeply flawed understanding of what it meant to be chosen by God. To be chosen does not bring preeminence, elevation and glory in this world.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Albert Raboteau</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/"><![CDATA[In his classic meditation on the spirituals, <em>Deep River</em>, Howard Thurman, made a profound observation about the role of Christian slaves in the nation's history. "By some amazing but vastly creative spiritual insight the slave undertook the redemption of a religion that the master had profaned in his midst." <br />
<br />
To profane something sacred is to desecrate it, to treat it with irreverence or contempt. The slaveholder's profaned Christianity by racism, which degrades the sacrality of human persons, and by materialism, which values things over people and so effaces the image of God in which they are created. Contrary to the religion of those Americans who believed that Christianity and slavery were compatible, the slaves bore witness, sometimes with their blood, to the truth of the gospel: that the law of love contradicted slavery and the racism upon which it was built.  <br />
<br />
Today, we fail to understand how radical this gospel was. But black Christians of the late 18th century were among the earliest to make the case that slavery and Christianity were not only contradictory but that Christianity demanded the abolition of the slave trade and slavery.  American slaves were the paradigm, the test case, the key witnesses to the truth that Christian community extends to all peoples, all races, and that it extends fully, not partially, depending upon the color of a person's skin.  So segregated pews, segregated graveyards, ministers of the gospel participating in the slave trade, the refusal of southern churches to recognize the permanence of slave marriages, their toleration of laws that forbade slaves to learn to read the very Bible that stood at the heart of American Christianity -- all these deformations of Christianity slaves challenged.<br />
	<br />
They also challenged the nation to live up to the religious principles upon which it was founded: principles of equality grounded in the inalienable rights bestowed by the Creator.  Preceding the Revolution, slaves pointed out the failure of Americans to fully understand the principles they claimed constituted their identity as a nation. As early as 1774 slaves in Massachusetts sent a petition to the governor: "We have in common with all other men a naturel right to our freedoms without Being deprived of them by our fellow men as we are a freeborn Pepel and have never forfeited this Blessing by aney compact or agreement whatever.  But we were unjustly dragged by the cruel hand of power from our dearest frinds and sum of us stolen from the bosoms of our tender Parents ... and Brought hither to be made slaves for Life in a Christian land."  <br />
	<br />
Note the reference to "the cruel hand of power." Slaves appreciated, through direct experience, the corruption of principles, of common decency, of basic humanity, that comes from wielding unchecked power, over other human beings. They realized the brutalizing effect of power upon those who hold it and upon those who suffer from its use. They stood as witnesses to the deep antipathy between Christianity and oppression. "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven; blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth; blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called children of God; blessed are those who hunger and thirst after righteousness for they shall be filled." If the beatitudes delineate the character of the Christian community, the slaves represented so many bibles reminding a guilty nation of its failure to live up to this model. Indeed, slave Christians stood in prophetic condemnation of the nation's original sin, in the midst of the massive denial and the obstinate pride that prompted white people to think of America as the Promised Land and the Redeemer Nation despite the existence of slavery. No, the slaves said, America isn't the New Israel; she's the Old Egypt. By witnessing to the failure of American Christianity, the slaves called Americans to conversion, to the possibility of redemption, and offered a model of a different interpretation of Christian life.<br />
	<br />
In particular, slaves revealed that Americans had a deeply flawed understanding of what it meant to be chosen by God. To be chosen does not bring preeminence, elevation and glory in this world, as most 19th-century Americans expected. Indeed, as slave Christians well knew, to be chosen by God brings humiliation, suffering and rejection. Choseness, as revealed in the life of Jesus, led to a cross. The lives of his disciples have been signed with that cross. To be chosen means joining company with those who suffer, the outcast, the poor and the wretched of the earth. Choseness requires entering the mystery of suffering. This was (and remains) a profoundly Christian condemnation of the nation's dominant idea of American choseness.  African-American Christians believed they were chosen because their history fit the pattern of redemption revealed in the Bible. In weakness lies strength, in loss, gain, in death, life.  <br />
	<br />
When Howard and Sue Bailey Thurman visited Gandhi in the 1930s, he asked them to sing for him the old spiritual "Where you there when they crucified my Lord," which he felt got at "the root of the experience of the entire human race under the spread of the healing wings of suffering."  What Gandhi, and many others around the world, recognized in the spirituals that came out of slave suffering was the authenticity (what James Baldwin called "the matchless authority") that comes, that can only come from suffering. Suffering stripped slaves of illusions. It revealed the bare fact of the human person's total dependence upon God. "Trustin' in the Lord," not in oneself or in other men became their watchword. Life, indeed every breath, is grounded in God. Poverty and poverty of spirit revealed the God-shaped emptiness at the core of the person.<br />
	<br />
James Baldwin's first novel, <em>Go Tell It On The Mountain</em>, in a passage redolent with allusions to scripture, the spirituals and gospel music, eloquently captures the paradoxical history of suffering and triumph of slaves and their descendants. The novel focuses on one day in the life of John Grimes, a black adolescent in Harlem, who seeks to escape the squalid tenements, the racial oppression and desperate poverty of his people. On his 14th birthday John is cast down upon the dusty floor of a storefront sanctified church, "astonished under the power of God." There he experiences the rebirth of a conversion experience. In his trance he confronts an army of people and is engulfed by a company of the suffering. Struggling to flee, he realizes there is no escape. And suddenly their suffering becomes a sound, a sound John not only recognizes but internalizes: <br />
	<br />
<blockquote>And now in his moaning ... he heard it in himself -- it rose from his ... cracked-open heart. It was a sound of rage and weeping which filled the grave ... rage that had no language, weeping with no voice -- which yet spoke now to John's startled soul, of boundless melancholy, of the bitterest patience, and the longest night; of the deepest water, the strongest chains, the most cruel lash ... and most bloody, unspeakable sudden death. Yes the body in the fire, the body on the tree.<br />
<br />
He struggles to flee, but there is no escape. He must go through this suffering of his peoples past to viscerally experience the paradox that it is precisely these wretched who are the chosen ones of God.<br />
	<br />
No power could hold this army back, no water disperse them, no fire consume them.  One day they would compel the earth to heave upward, and surrender the waiting dead.  They sang where the darkness gathered, where the lion waited, where the fire cried and where the blood ran down ... No, the fire could not hurt them, and yes, the lion's jaws were stopped; the serpent was not their master, the grave was not their resting-place, the earth was not their home.  Job bore them witness and Abraham was their father. Moses had elected to suffer with 	them ... Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego had gone before them into the fire, their grief had been sung by David, and Jeremiah had wept for them. Ezekiel had prophesied upon them, these scattered bones, these slain, and, in the fullness of time, the prophet, John, had come out of the wilderness, crying that the promise was for them. They were encompassed with a very cloud of witnesses ... And they looked unto Jesus, the author and the finisher of their faith, running with patience the race He had set before them; they endured the cross, and they despised the shame, and waited to join Him one day, in glory, at the right hand of the Father.</blockquote>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/251628/thumbs/s-SLAVE-CHRISTIANS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Black History Meditation:  Remembering The Presence Of Our Ancestors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/black-history-meditation-_b_825285.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.825285</id>
    <published>2011-02-20T20:22:23-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T18:35:25-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Our nation, constituted by diverse ethnic, racial, and religious groups achieves a unified identity, not only through a set of shared principles articulated in civic institutions, but through memory.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Albert Raboteau</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/"><![CDATA[First initiated as Negro History Week in 1926 by the black historian Carter G. Woodson (1875-1950) and the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History to remedy the wide-spread ignorance, neglect and distortion of African-American history due to racism, the observance was extended to a month in 1976 (and every year since) by Presidential Proclamation. Groups, like persons, have memories that serve to preserve their identities as groups. Our nation, constituted by diverse ethnic, racial, and religious groups achieves a unified identity, not only through a set of shared principles articulated in civic institutions, but through memory. A prime source of American identity is history, construed as a set of interlocking stories that we tell one another about our origins and our past (Lincoln's "mystic chords of memory"). Our sense of common history changes over time to accommodate our expanding awareness of the variety of who we are ethnically, racially, and religiously. Usually this expansion of historical vision occurs in response to social pressure from a group whose story has been left out of the national story. So responding to successive and vociferous complaints by African-Americans, Native Americans, Asian-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and women; books, curricula, and the media, have changed dramatically since the 1960s.<br />
<br />
The flexibility of our culture to include the stories of the invisible or the forgotten, disguises the fact that their stories have been included, but not fully incorporated. We, black and white, suffer a form of partial amnesia, which distorts our perceptions because we have not adequately remembered and mourned what we have suffered. I am talking about a mourning that is not an episode, but an attitude, a state of awareness. I experienced a poignant example of our need for memory and mourning during Black History Month several years ago. PBS broadcast a documentary on the murder of Emmett Till, focusing not only on his death, but on the crusade of his mother Mamie Till Mobley to achieve justice in her son's case. A few minutes after the program ended, the telephone rang and a voice at the other end of the line asked to speak with me. It was a college classmate whom I hadn't seen in years, a Jesuit priest and psychologist. He began to sob uncontrollably, as he stammered out an explanation that he had just seen the film about Till. He couldn't stop crying because he was so upset at the atrocity he had glimpsed, a crime committed over fifty years ago, but recalled by vivid images on the T.V. screen. And, in his grief he reached out to me (perhaps because we first met when I was only a year older than Till at the time of his murder.) During that same week a radio interview on NPR featured a panel discussion of race relations during which a black participant (a black historian) broke down in tears when he recalled the question his parents had never been able to answer for him as a child: "Why did white people hate us so? When they lynched us, why did they mutilate our bodies?" His tears brought to my mind Howard Thurman's assertion that black people carry the memory of lynching in their bodies and that the nation as a whole still has not healed from the wound of race. In Brooklyn, St. Paul Community Baptist Church sponsors an annual pilgrimage to the ocean in Far Rockaway to mourn for the millions of Africans who died in the transatlantic slave trade. "We have not properly mourned nor repented past atrocities afflicted upon us as a people of color," the pastor of St. Paul's explains. "Clearly, a trauma of this magnitude in the life of a people must be acknowledged and mourned."<br />
<br />
Our nation has need of tears, tears for all those lynched, maimed, whipped, shamed, and debased by our history of race hatred. Our country has need of tears for those who suffered and for those at whose hands they suffered. For they, by denying the humanity of others, denied their own. We remain connected to the past by memory, and the nation, like individuals, must come to terms with the past. There is a way out of the evasion and willed amnesia of our racial trauma -- listening to the voices of our ancestors, expressed in story, song, sermon, and texts, offers one such way as a telling of memories, an expression of mourning, and, by means of listening and mourning, to begin the process of healing the wounds, personal and social, inflicted by racism. <br />
<br />
In my work over the past forty years on African-American religious history, I have encountered texts that resonate powerfully within me, stirring up deep memories and awakening mourning. In this series I offer five of these texts for reflection, discussion, and common mourning, as a way for us to move toward re-membering our still riven communities. The first, by way of introduction to the series, is a poem by the Senegalese poet and storyteller Birago Diop (1906-1989), a poem about the ongoing presence of the ancestors in our lives:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><em><strong>Spirits</strong></em><br />
Listen to Things<br />
More often than Beings,<br />
Hear the voice of fire,<br />
Hear the voice of water.<br />
Listen in the wind,<br />
To the sighs of the bush;<br />
This is the ancestors breathing.<br />
 <br />
Those who are dead are never gone; <br />
They are in the darkness that grows lighter<br />
And in the darkness that grows darker.<br />
The dead are not down in the earth;<br />
They are in the trembling of the trees<br />
In the groaning of the woods,<br />
In the water that runs,<br />
In the water that sleeps,<br />
They are in the hut, they are in the crowd:<br />
The dead are not dead.<br />
<br />
Each day they renew ancient bonds,<br />
Ancient bonds that hold fast<br />
Binding our lot to their law,<br />
To the will of the spirits stronger than we<br />
To the spell of our dead who are not really dead,<br />
Whose covenant binds us to life,<br />
Whose authority binds to their will,<br />
The will of the spirits that stir<br />
In the bed of the river, on the banks of the river,<br />
The breathing of spirits<br />
Who moan in the rocks and weep in the grasses.<br />
<br />
Listen to Things <br />
More often than Beings,<br />
Hear the voice of fire,<br />
Hear the voice of water.<br />
Listen in the wind,<br />
To the bush that is sobbing:<br />
This is the ancestors, breathing.<br />
 <br />
Source:<br />
The Negritude Poets, ed. Ellen Conroy Kennedy. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 1989. For the complete poem: www.hu.mtu.edu/~dshoos/HU3262/Negritudepoems.htm<br />
</blockquote>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/249534/thumbs/s-EMMETT-TILL-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>'The Least of These' --  Martin Luther King's Advocacy for the Poor</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/roboteau-on-mlk_b_809347.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.809347</id>
    <published>2011-01-16T18:24:55-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T18:25:24-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[As economic crisis threatens severe cutbacks to social services for the needy, we would do well to celebrate Martin Luther King Day by emulating his advocacy of the poor in our personal and political actions.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Albert Raboteau</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/albert-raboteau/"><![CDATA[Martin Luther King Day memorials tend to celebrate King the Civil Rights leader, stressing his activism on behalf of interracial equality and reconciliation. We slight his emphasis on the link between racism and poverty and so neglect King the advocate of the poor. At the time of his assassination King was participating in the Memphis Sanitation Workers' struggle to achieve a decent wage while simultaneously planning the Poor People's Campaign.  King's sermons, speeches and writings echo ancient Christian teachings on poverty and wealth, which may still serve as a resource for the contemporary struggle to overcome economic inequality. He was a 20th century exemplar of a very old tradition.<br />
<br />
Princeton Historian Peter Brown argues convincingly that "a revolution in the social imagination occurred between 300 and 600 C.E. closely associated with the rise to power of the Christian bishop. For the Christian bishop was held by contemporaries to owe his position in no small part to his role as the guardian of the poor. He was the 'lover of the poor' par excellence." The 4th century bishops, St. Basil of Caesarea, St. Gregory of Nyssa, and St. Gregory of Nazianzus elucidated this novel virtue and its centrality to the community life of Christians. In 369 a severe drought followed by famine prompted Basil to preach a sermon on the parable of the rich fool (Luke 12:16-18), the man who decides to tear down his barns and build new ones to hold his surplus grain. "But God said to him, 'Fool! This night your soul is required of you; and the things you have prepared, whose will they be? So is he who lays up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God."  Basil elaborates:<br />
<br />
<blockquote> "Who, then, is greedy? -- The one who does not remain content with self sufficiency. Who is the one who deprives others? The one who hoards what belongs to everyone. Are you not greedy? Are you not one who deprives others? You have received these things for stewardship, and have turned them into your own property! Is not the one who tears off what another is wearing called a clothes-robber? But the one who does not clothe the naked, when he was able to do so -- what other name does he deserve? The bread that you hold on to belongs to the hungry; the cloak you keep locked in your storeroom belongs to the naked; the shoe that is moldering in your possession belongs to the person with no shoes; the silver that you have buried belongs to the person in need. You do an injury to as many people as you might have helped with all these things!"</blockquote><br />
<br />
Basil enacted the Christian social vision he preached by establishing a hospice and soup kitchen for the famine victims and later developed a large complex to house the poor, tend the sick, and where the poor who could work were employed or trained in various trades. Around 369, St. Gregory of Nyssa preached on almsgiving: "Do not look down on those who lie at your feet, as if you judged them worthless. Consider who they are, and you will discover their dignity: they have put on the countenance of our Savior; for the one who loves humanity has lent them his own face, so that through it they might shame those who lack compassion and hate the poor."  In a sermon on the Last Judgment scene in Matthew 25:31-46, in which care for the poor is the standard of judgment "for in as much as you did it [or did it not] to the least of these you did it to me."  St. Gregory of Nazianzus warns that we should fear condemnation if we "have not ministered to Christ through those in need ... Let us take care of Christ, then, while there is still time: let us visit Christ in his sickness, let us give to Christ to eat, let us clothe Christ in his nakedness, let us do honor to Christ in his needy ones, in those who lie on the ground here before us this day." .<br />
<br />
In 1956, King preached a sermon that echoed Basil's condemnation of greed: "God never intended for a group of people to live in superfluous, inordinate wealth while others live in abject, deadening poverty.  God intends for all of His children to have the basic necessities of life, and He has left in this universe enough and to spare for that purpose.  So I call upon you to bridge the gulf between abject poverty and superfluous wealth."  In 1962, King preached, "I see hungry boys and girls in this nation and other nations and think about the fact that we spend more than a million dollars a day storing surplus food.  And I say to myself 'I know where we can store that food free of charge - in the wrinkled stomachs of the millions of people in our nation and in this world who go to bed hungry at night.'" <br />
<br />
In 1961, preaching on the same text from Luke as Basil, King linked racism and poverty, "You see this man was foolish because the richer he became materially the poorer he became spiritually.... This man was a fool because he failed to realize his dependence on others... Now this text has a great deal of bearing on our struggle in race relations... For what is white supremacy but the foolish notion that God made a mistake and stamped an eternal stigma of inferiority on a certain race of people; what is white supremacy but the foolishness of believing that one race is good enough to dominate another race?...And there was a final reason why this man was foolish.  He failed to realize his dependence on God...because he felt that he was the creator instead of the creature."<br />
<br />
Like the ancient "Fathers of the Church" King emphasized that "the least of these" are children and "icons" of God, whose treatment is the measure of our "salvation or damnation" as persons and as a nation.  Like them he argued that excess wealth is "robbed from the poor." Like them he cautioned us against the ineluctable tendency of consumption to addict us to status and power.  Like them he exhorted us to "move from being a thing-oriented, to a person-oriented" society. This year, as economic crisis threatens severe cutbacks to social services for the needy, we would do well to celebrate Martin Luther King Day by remembering and resolving to emulate his advocacy of the poor in our personal and political actions.]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/237984/thumbs/s-KING-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>
</feed>