<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Laurie David</title>
  <link href="http://huffingtonpost.com/author/index.php?author=laurie-david"/>
  <updated>2013-05-22T09:23:09-04:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Laurie David</name>
  </author>
  <id xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/index.php?author=laurie-david</id>
  <rights>Copyright 2008, HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.</rights>
  <subtitle>HuffingtonPost Blogger Feed for Laurie David</subtitle>
  <generator>Good old fashioned elbow grease.</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Taylor Swift: You Are Sweet Enough</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/taylor-swift-diet-coke-ads_b_2619017.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.2619017</id>
    <published>2013-02-05T10:25:59-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-04-07T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Just two weeks ago, Coca-Cola made a big show of "caring" about our country's obesity epidemic, releasing an ad that declared, "We are concerned, we care and we are all in this together." The next week, they announce their successful seduction of Taylor Swift, signing her up to promote Diet Coke.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[Coca-Cola has gone too far. Just two weeks ago, Coca-Cola made a big show of "caring" about our country's obesity epidemic, releasing an ad that declared, "We are concerned, we care and we are all in this together."  The next week, they announce their successful seduction of our children's favorite music star, Taylor Swift, signing her up to promote Diet Coke. Yup, the soda that recent research links to <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/01/09/nih-study-links-soda-with-depression" target="_hplink">depression</a> and new studies warn can actually <a href="http://www.organicauthority.com/foodie-buzz/diet-soda-makes-you-fat.html" target="_hplink">make you hungrier</a>. Unabashedly aiming right for the youth market that should not be drinking it, Diet Coke is a beverage with artificial coloring and other chemicals that have <a href="http://www.stonyfield.com/blog/2012/08/27/food-dyes-linked-to-hyperactivity-in-children/" target="_hplink">links to ADHD</a>, and a drink with caffeine! Tweens on caffeine? Is this right?<br />
 <br />
Don't be fooled into thinking that the "diet" label is healthier just because the sugar is replaced by artificial sweeteners. Studies show that those manmade chemicals can predispose us to <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080210183902.htm" target="_hplink">becoming overweight</a> (how ironic!), developing <a href="http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/sugary-drinks-fact-sheet/" target="_hplink">diabetes</a> and possibly <a href="http://www.cspinet.org/new/201206261.html" target="_hplink">cancer</a>.<br />
 <br />
Taylor may not be aware of the dangers of Diet Coke, but I promise you, the Coca-Cola Corporation is. And other adults in her world, like her managers and lawyers. The Coca-Cola Corporation also knows very well that if they hook kids early in life to Coke, or any other of their many artificial or natural sugary drinks, they are likely to be customers for life. A shortened life, of course, but hey that's business.<br />
 <br />
Children have no choice but to trust grownups. But too many grownups are doing a really lousy job protecting them. Why do we continue to allow the soda and junk food industry to exploit our kids? Our celebrities are either disconnected or oblivious to how sick their fans are becoming but we are all to blame -- Coke for preying on kids, parents for not demanding a stop to marketing aimed at their kids, our government for not regulating, our celebrities for collaborating with the entertainment industry in its push to embed the products and boost sales. The only innocent ones here are the kids.<br />
 <br />
Maybe part of the problem is we haven't noticed the extent to which the fast food and soda industry has permeated our children's worlds. Junk marketing, advertising and promotions have invaded everywhere our kids go, their mobile phones, their apps, their videogames, television shows, the basketball hoop at their school, the score board, enticing them with contests and access to their favorite soda-drinking stars. Accessibility to the beverage itself, no problem, its in your fridge, at your corner store, in vending machines at school, the local Y, your park or campus, gas station, mall, in every restaurant and snack bar.<br />
 <br />
The average American child sees some <a href="http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7618.pdf" target="_hplink">30,000 ads a year</a> for these unhealthy items. We know, and so do the companies, that kids <a href="http://kidshealth.org/parent/positive/family/tv_affects_child.html#" target="_hplink">don't understand</a> the difference between commercials and the program till at least the age of eight.  By then hey, they can already be diet coke drinkers! Having problems sleeping? Is your son or daughter too hyper, can't focus? We are seriously letting our kids down.<br />
 <br />
I love Taylor Swift. I discovered her way before my kids did, the moment I heard her crooning to Tim McGraw. Taylor is hardly more than a kid herself, barely out of her teens. She shouldn't be regularly drinking Diet Coke either, a beverage many consider <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/03/01/diet.soda.health/index.html" target="_hplink">addictive</a>. When she holds that coke can in her hand, and smiles, and says it's her "second love," millions of kids smile with her. I can easily see young girls in their bedrooms all over America practicing her songs in their mirror, holding the pretend microphone/hairbrush in one hand and a can of Diet Coke in the other.<br />
 <br />
Yes, parents are responsible, but sometimes they aren't. It's a lot of mind-altering advertising to be up against. Many buy and drink it themselves.  Let's be truthful, advertising works, that's why the food industry spends billions of dollars targeting our young ones.<br />
 <br />
Kids are the innocent victims here. No one wants to be overweight, feel crappy, or be bullied in school. Kids don't understand the potential dangers of caramel coloring and artificial sweeteners. Or why drinking a Diet Coke isn't going to help them lose weight or curb their growing appetite for sugar. Many adults don't understand this either.<br />
<br />
We have to start looking at what is happening here with open eyes. It is a war against our children. Innocent kids whose bodies and minds are still developing pitted against the highest paid ad executives and creative minds in the business funded by billion dollar companies whose main goal is to double sales. Double the amount of soda our kids are already drinking, diet or regular. No child left behind, not drinking soda. If that weren't the goal why would they hire the adored and talented young star Taylor Swift? Do we stand by and do nothing? Diet Coke hooks kids on to the taste of sweet. Taylor is sweet enough without that. And so are her fans.]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/930436/thumbs/s-TAYLOR-SWIFT-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Investiture d'Obama: Beyoncé, porte-parole de l'obésité?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/laurie-david/investiture-d-obama-beyonce_b_2501826.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.2501826</id>
    <published>2013-01-19T00:30:47-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-03-20T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[INVESTITURE D'OBAMA - Est-ce qu'on veut vraiment aider les enfants de notre pays -les Etats-Unis- à avoir une vie saine ou pas? Si nous le faisons, nous devons arrêter de prétendre que c'est une bonne idée de donner ]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[INVESTITURE D'OBAMA - Pourquoi Beyonc&eacute; n'est pas la bonne star pour l'hymne international.<br />
<br />
Est-ce qu'on veut vraiment aider les enfants de notre pays -les Etats-Unis- &agrave; avoir une vie saine ou pas? Si nous le faisons, nous devons arr&ecirc;ter de pr&eacute;tendre que c'est une bonne id&eacute;e de donner <a href="http://www.metrofrance.com/people/pepsi-s-offre-beyonce-pour-50-millions-de-dollars/mllj!Ve3VCPW7mj2/" target="_hplink">au nouveau visage de Pepsi, alias Beyonc&eacute;, </a>l'honneur de <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2013/01/10/beyonce-hymne-americain-investiture-obama_n_2445423.html" target="_hplink">chanter notre hymne national</a> lors de la deuxi&egrave;me inauguration du pr&eacute;sident Obama lundi. Car ce n'est pas une bonne id&eacute;e. <br />
<br />
Prenons un peu de recul et donnons &agrave; cette belle et talentueuse m&eacute;ga star le b&eacute;n&eacute;fice du doute. Peut-&ecirc;tre qu'elle n'a pas r&eacute;alis&eacute; la mont&eacute;e en fl&egrave;che de<a href="http://sante.lefigaro.fr/actualite/2012/01/18/17049-lobesite-se-stabilise-etats-unis" target="_hplink"> l'&eacute;pid&eacute;mie d'ob&eacute;sit&eacute;</a>: le fait qu'un enfant sur trois en Am&eacute;rique soit en surpoids ou ob&egrave;se. Mais elle a certainement un cercle rapproch&eacute; de managers, d'agents, d'avocats, d'attach&eacute;s de presse, de stylistes, de maquilleurs, et d'autres encore qui auraient pu lui expliquer l'ironie de se vendre pour du soda &agrave; un moment o&ugrave; le monde entier s'inqui&egrave;te de l'ob&eacute;sit&eacute;. <br />
<br />
La Maison-Blanche le sait. Michelle Obama est tr&egrave;s impliqu&eacute;e dans cette question. D'ailleurs, elle a entra&icirc;n&eacute; son amie Beyonc&eacute; &agrave; filmer son num&eacute;ro de danse "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wc_PizWNp6k" target="_hplink">Move Your Body</a>" pour la m&ecirc;me raison que Pepsi a engag&eacute; l'artiste -elle a une grand influence sur ses jeunes fans, y compris les millions d'entre eux appartenant aux communaut&eacute;s afro-am&eacute;ricaine et hispanique dont les enfants souffrent de fa&ccedil;on disproportionn&eacute;e de diab&egrave;te et d'ob&eacute;sit&eacute;. <br />
<br />
Dommage que la Premi&egrave;re Dame et Beyonc&eacute; n'aient pas eu l'occasion de se parler durant ce qui a du &ecirc;tre une tr&egrave;s longue n&eacute;gociation entre Pepsi et "l'&eacute;quipe" de l'artiste. Est ensuite sortie l'annonce du contrat &agrave; 50 millions de dollars, la photo reprise partout de Beyonc&eacute; en short court (tr&egrave;s tr&egrave;s court) poussant un caddy rempli du soda sucr&eacute;. Consommer une canette de soda par jour augmente la probabilit&eacute; pour un enfant de devenir ob&egrave;se de 60%. Beyonc&eacute; a pourtant l'air de vouloir qu'on en ach&egrave;te par caddys entiers!<br />
<br />
H&eacute;las, les c&eacute;l&eacute;brit&eacute;s ne prennent pas toujours la bonne d&eacute;cision quand il est question de pub grassement pay&eacute;e. D'un autre c&ocirc;t&eacute;, les gars des relations publiques de Pepsi ont aujourd'hui l'air de g&eacute;nies. En confiant &agrave; Beyonc&eacute; l'honneur de <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2013/01/10/beyonce-hymne-americain-investiture-obama_n_2445423.html" target="_hplink">chanter l'hymne international</a>, la Maison-Blanche a choisi de mettre en lumi&egrave;re, sous les yeux du monde entier, Pepsi, oups, je veux dire Beyonc&eacute;. C'est l'&eacute;quivalent d'une publicit&eacute; &agrave; 100 millions de dollars gratuite pour un produit que nous commen&ccedil;ons &agrave; consid&eacute;rer comme &eacute;tant aussi mauvais pour la sant&eacute; que les cigarettes. <br />
<br />
Peut-&ecirc;tre que Beyonc&eacute; est en train de remettre en question cette d&eacute;cision &agrave; l'heure actuelle. Peut-&ecirc;tre que tout en ber&ccedil;ant son b&eacute;b&eacute; pour l'endormir, elle a regard&eacute; l'&eacute;mission sp&eacute;ciale de sa copine Oprah la semaine derni&egrave;re, durant laquelle <a href="http://www.slateafrique.com/33567/culture-maya-angelou-icone-vive-de-l-amerique-noire" target="_hplink">Maya Angelou</a> nous a toutes exhort&eacute;es: "Mes s&oelig;urs, vous savez ce qui est juste. Ce qui est juste n'est pas forc&eacute;ment utile, ce n'est pas forc&eacute;ment rentable, ni toujours facile, mais vous aurez la conscience tranquille. Vous pourrez ainsi vivre votre vie d'une fa&ccedil;on que vous ne regretterez pas."<br />
<br />
Angelou nous a encourag&eacute; &agrave; "reprendre le combat et &agrave; aider &agrave; rendre le monde meilleur". Oprah elle-m&ecirc;me a conclu que nous devons tous "agir pour le bien. Cela signifie &ecirc;tre honn&ecirc;te m&ecirc;me quand c'est dur. Faire des sacrifices au nom de l'int&eacute;grit&eacute;". Se faire l'avocate d'un soda aupr&egrave;s d'un pays d&eacute;j&agrave; malade ne correspond certainement pas &agrave; cette recommandation. Nous devons arr&ecirc;ter de faire comme si &ccedil;a ne posait pas de probl&egrave;me de promouvoir de la malbouffe &agrave; des enfants qui ne savent pas faire la distinction entre des publicit&eacute;s et leurs contenus.  Nous devons au minimum donner &agrave; tous nos enfants la chance d'avoir une vie &eacute;quilibr&eacute;e.<br />
<br />
Trop, c'est trop. L'arrangement entre Beyonc&eacute; et Pepsi &eacute;tait une s&eacute;rieuse erreur de jugement. Et la Maison-Blanche ternit sa propre "marque" en encourageant involontairement l'industrie du soda. Il est temps de faire cesser l'hypocrisie, d'admettre l'erreur, de d&eacute;placer Beyonc&eacute; du haut de la liste des invit&eacute;s et de la remplacer par quelqu'un qui n'est pas reli&eacute; &agrave; un produit rendant malade des millions d'enfants am&eacute;ricains. <br />
<br />
Signez ici <a href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/disinvite-beyonce-singing-star-spangled-banner-inauguration/Vq9qYcdH" target="_hplink">la p&eacute;tition</a> (en anglais).]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/947791/thumbs/s-BEYONCE-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why Beyonce Is the Wrong Star for the Star-Spangled Banner</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/beyonce-inauguration-pepsi-soda_b_2472605.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2013:/theblog//3.2472605</id>
    <published>2013-01-14T12:05:39-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-03-16T05:12:02-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Enough is enough. Beyoncé's Pepsi deal was a serious lapse of judgment. And the White House tarnishes its own "brand" by selecting her to sing the national anthem at the inauguration, unwittingly boosting the beverage industry that is helping to drive the obesity epidemic.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[Are we really going to help the children of our nation lead healthy lives, or not? If we are, we'll have to stop pretending it's a good idea to give the new face of Pepsi, aka Beyonc&eacute;, the honor of singing our national anthem at President Obama's second inauguration. It's not. What's right is right and what's wrong is wrong.<br />
<br />
Let's take a step back and give this gorgeous, talented megastar the benefit of the doubt. Maybe she doesn't realize the extent of the obesity epidemic: that one in three kids in America are overweight or obese. But surely she has an inner circle of managers, agents, attorneys, PR people, stylists, make-up artists, and others who might have clued her in to the irony of pimping soda at a time of worldwide concern?<br />
<br />
The White House knows. Michelle Obama has been one of the leading voices on this crisis. In fact, she enlisted her friend Beyonc&eacute; to film the "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYP4MgxDV2U" \t "_blank" target="_hplink">Move Your Body</a>"&nbsp;dance number for the same reason Pepsi recruited her -- she's a huge influence on her young fans, including millions in the African American and Hispanic communities where children suffer disproportionately from diabetes and obesity.<br />
<br />
Too bad there wasn't a conversation between the First Lady and Beyonc&eacute; during what must have been many months of negotiations between Pepsi and Beyonc&eacute;'s "team." Then came the big fifty million dollar sponsorship announcement, the widely released <a href="http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/sugary-drinks-fact-sheet/" \t "_blank" target="_hplink">photo</a> of Beyonc&eacute; in short shorts (really&nbsp;short) pushing a shopping cart filled with sugary soda. One can of soda consumed per day <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=2&amp;ved=0CD8QFjAB&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kickthecan.info%2Fdocument%2F206&amp;ei=XDn0UMTyKtO20AGDh4C4Bw&amp;usg=AFQjCNHoS897kxHwX7AvQmRAqeG736sxTQ&amp;sig2=JmSosBm8C4jnf73aohwvRA&amp;bvm=bv.1357700187,d.dmQ&amp;cad=rja" target="_hplink">increases</a> the likelihood of a child becoming obese by SIXTY percent. Apparently, Beyonc&eacute; wants us to buy them by the cartful.<br />
<br />
Sadly, celebrities don't always make the right decision when it comes to big ad dollars. Pepsi's PR folks, on the other hand, are looking like geniuses right about now. When the White House handed Beyonc&eacute; the plum task of singing the Star Spangled Banner, it chose to shine its enormous spotlight, with the whole world watching, on Pepsi, eh, I mean, Beyonc&eacute;. That's another 100 million dollars or so of <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/08/03/is-soda-the-new-tobacco.aspx" \t "_blank" target="_hplink">free branding publicity </a>for a product we're starting to realize is as unhealthful as cigarettes.<br />
<br />
Maybe Beyonc&eacute; is second guessing this decision right about now. Perhaps while lulling her new baby to sleep she watched her friend Oprah's <em>Master Class</em> special this past week. In it, Maya Angelou entreated us all, "sista, you&nbsp;know&nbsp;what's right. Right may not be expedient, it may not be profitable, it's not always easy, but it will satisfy your soul. Live your life in a way you will not regret."<br />
<br />
Angelou urged us to "pick up the battle and make it a better world." Oprah herself concluded we all must "just do right. That might mean being honest even when it's hard. Making sacrifices in the name of integrity."<br />
<br />
Shilling soda to an already sick nation surely doesn't fit that prescription. We've got to stop <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/the-right-to-sell-kids-junk/" \t "_blank" target="_hplink">acting</a> as if it's okay to advertise junk to children who can't distinguish between commercials and content. We have to, at the very least, give all of our kids a chance at a healthy life.<br />
<br />
So, enough is enough. Beyonc&eacute;'s Pepsi deal was a serious lapse of judgment. And the White House tarnishes its own "brand" by unwittingly boosting the beverage industry. It's time to end the hypocrisy, admit the mistake, move Beyonc&eacute; from the line-up to the guest list, and replace her with someone who's not affiliated with any product that's sickening millions of America's kids. Sign the <a href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/disinvite-beyonce-singing-star-spangled-banner-inauguration/Vq9qYcdH" \t "_blank" target="_hplink">petition</a> here.<br />
<br />
<em>This story appears in Issue 32 of our weekly iPad magazine, <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/huffington./id517151550?ls=1&amp;mt=8" target="_hplink">Huffington, in the iTunes App store</a>, available Friday, Jan. 18.</em><br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/898541/thumbs/s-BEYONCE-PEPSI-DEAL-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Real Military Sex Scandal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maria-cuomo-cole/the-real-military-sex-sca_b_2157997.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.2157997</id>
    <published>2012-11-19T08:28:48-05:00</published>
    <updated>2013-01-19T05:12:01-05:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Flirtatious emails. Jealous threats. Consensual sex. Scandalous? Hardly. Try... Foolish. Ubiquitous. All too human adult behavior. And frankly none of our business. But here's what is.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[Flirtatious emails. Jealous threats. Consensual sex. Scandalous? Hardly. Try... Foolish. Ubiquitous. All too human adult behavior. And frankly none of our business. <br />
<br />
The real scandal is that this type of behavior -- stumbled upon via highly questionable investigative practices -- is what garners nonstop media coverage and glaring headlines while a real military sexual scandal, our U.S. military's horrific rape epidemic, affecting tens of thousands of our service members (annually!!), goes unreported and ignored.<br />
<br />
And thanks to widespread institutional coverup and lack of responsible media attention, allowed to continue unabated, inflicting debilitating damage on victims, imperiling troop cohesion, and posing a much more grave threat to our national security than a highly forgettable personal drama of soap opera import.<br />
<br />
A recent film out of Sundance, <a href="http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/independent/theinvisiblewar/" target="_hplink"><em>The Invisible War</em></a>, exposes the truth about the real sex scandal in our U.S. military. It's a wrenching, damning, searing indictment of flagrant criminal practices that have gone on without respite for far too long.<br />
<br />
We watch as countless young service members (both male and female), who have pledged their lives to protect our country, undergo vicious assault and then are, all too often, themselves blamed and exiled in a kafkaesque miscarriage of justice, their lives shattered and worlds transformed into a never ending echo chamber of horrors.<br />
<br />
Watch <a href="https://itunes.apple.com/us/movie/the-invisible-war/id552443741" target="_hplink">this movie</a>. It's your civic duty. The stories will leave you stunned, shaken and compelled to act -- a much more productive way of channeling our energies than chasing idle gossip. Talk about it with others. And make noise. This is the type of scandal we must all be talking about and working on eradicating. <br />
<br />
The fact that we haven't been doing so until now... now that's another real scandal.<br />
<br />
Petraeus has stepped down, taking these actions out of "duty and honor".<br />
<br />
Where is the duty and honor to protect our service members from vicious unsolicited sexual assault? <br />
<br />
This week Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, ordered a military ethics review. The first act of the review board should be to watch this documentary.  <br />
<br />
Failure to do so would be simply scandalous.]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/422126/thumbs/s-MILITARY-WOMEN-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Kick the Can</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/kick-the-can-campaign_b_1341242.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.1341242</id>
    <published>2012-03-13T08:47:38-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-05-13T05:12:02-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[In the midst of an epidemic that threatens to kill far too many of our kids, we appeal to the common sense and decency of our celebrities and ask them -- no, beg them -- to stop accepting soda and sugary drink endorsements.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[<p>It's time to start naming names. So, here goes: Beyonc&eacute;, Christina Aguilera, Janet Jackson, Mariah Carey, Mary J. Blige, Kelly Clarkson, Elton John, Lebron James, David Beckham and Michael Jordan. These are just a few of the athletes and singers who've recently lent (well, OK, <em>sold</em>) their name, cachet, and influence to promote soda, a product that's a <a href="http://www.kickthecan.info/obesity-epidemic" >key culprit</a> in making our kids sick. Ads featuring celebrities touting bubbly beverages are everywhere, like an endless series of public <em>dis</em>-service announcements. Why don't we react the same way we would if they were peddling cigarettes or alcohol?</p><p><br />
After all, we now know that excess sugar consumption is, along with smoking and drinking, one of the greatest <a href="http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/120/11/1011.full.pdf" >risk factors</a> for chronic disease. Sugar consumption has <a href="http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/02/11437/societal-control-sugar-essential-ease-public-health-burden" >tripled</a> in the past fifty years, and we've seen a corresponding rise in obesity, along with diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, and other diet-induced illnesses. When it comes to the childhood obesity epidemic, soda is <a href="http://www.kickthecan.info/obesity-epidemic" >Public Enemy #1</a>.<br /><br />
As <a href="http://ihps.medschool.ucsf.edu/people/core/schmidt_laura.aspx" >Laura Schmidt</a>, a medical sociologist who co-authored the recent report <a href="http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/02/11437/societal-control-sugar-essential-ease-public-health-burden" ><em>The Toxic Truth About Sugar</em></a> for the science journal <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7383/full/482027a.html" ><em>Nature</em></a>, explained to <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/01/health/opinion-regulate-sugar-alcohol/index.html" >CNN</a>, "One of the saddest effects of sugar overconsumption is to dampen the natural hormones that tell kids' bodies when they've eaten enough, leading them to feel hungry even as they overeat." </p><p><br />
The beverage industry insists that soda is being unfairly scapegoated; the real problem, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,156252,00.html" >they say</a>, is that kids just aren't getting enough exercise. Soda spokespersons are fond of pointing out that carbonated beverages have been around for over two hundred years. So, why blame soda for an epidemic that's only a few decades old? </p><p><br />
Well, consider those iconic, downright dainty 8-ounce bottles of Coke, now replaced by the outlandishly oversized Big Gulp, which weighs in at as much as 64 ounces. Let's also factor in an explosion of <a href="http://www.kickthecan.info/soda-soda-everywhere" >availability</a>, vending machines everywhere you turn, prime supermarket shelves piled high and aggressive advertising towards African-Americans and Hispanics. And the same sugary drinks that were once an occasional treat are now sucked down at an astonishing rate of <a href="http://www.kickthecan.info/soda-facts/" >45 gallons per person per year</a>. That's <em>42 pounds</em> of sugar.</p><p><br />
Soda is the single largest <a href="http://www.kickthecan.info/files/documents/ktc_facts_health_consequences_R1_1.pdf" >source of calories</a> for teens and, not coincidentally, it's the "food" product most marketed to children (to the tune of <a href="http://www.bmsg.org/sites/default/files/bmsg_framing_brief_sugar_water_gets_a_facelift.pdf" >$500 million dollars annually</a>), who are so easily influenced, and love to imitate their favorite celebrities. Couple this with the industry's mandate to increase sales... i.e. <a href="http://adage.com/article/news/coca-cola-lays-vision-future-2010-meeting/140664/" >double consumption</a>!, as they launch a <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28964312/ns/business-retail/t/coke-pepsi-ready-new-round-soda-wars/" >new round of soda wars</a>. Well, Houston, we have a problem.</p><p><br />
Of course, parents have the primary responsibility for teaching their kids healthy habits and protecting them from harm. But what parent, no matter how well-intentioned, could possibly compete with the infinite celebrity firepower the soda industry unleashes to captivate impressionable taste buds and cultivate lifelong brand loyalty? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=po0jY4WvCIc" >Michael Jackson</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrHkvQ3qMmA" >Britney Spears</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oaiV8MQH7s" >Mean Joe Green</a> are just a few of the famous folks who helped to make soda-guzzling seem essential to the good life. Popular television shows are compounding this fizzy folly by brazenly embedding the product throughout their programs. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/2002-09-08-idol_x.htm" ><em>American Idol</em></a>, the worst of the offenders, sells out its fan base nightly.</p><p><br />
A generation ago, celebrities invited young people to share a smoke, be cool with Kool or get macho with Marlboro -- a deplorable misuse of celebrity clout that we look back on with regret. Clark Gable did it. Spencer Tracy, John Wayne and Bette Davis too. They didn't know any better at the time. But we do know now the terrible consequences of cigarettes -- and of soda too. With childhood obesity rates <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/data.html" >tripling since 1980</a>, it's time for an "all hands on deck" moment.</p><p><br />
So, here's the ask: in the midst of an epidemic that threatens to kill far too many of our kids, we appeal to the common sense and decency of our celebrities and ask them -- no, <em>beg</em> them -- to stop accepting soda and sugary drink endorsements. </p><p><br />
It's going to take a major societal shift to get our children healthy again and we are going to need all the role models we have to help make it happen.</p><p><br />
If you are a public figure who possesses the kind of influence over kids that a soda company craves, think twice before saying yes, and then say no. Join the California Center for Public Health Advocacy's <a href="https://www.thedatabank.com/dpg/280/personal2.asp?formid=joinkickthecan" >Kick the Can</a> campaign and help give our kids a fighting chance at a healthy future.</p>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/299703/thumbs/s-LIQUID-CALORIES-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Prince's Speech</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/the-princes-speech_b_1274790.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.1274790</id>
    <published>2012-02-14T08:34:55-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-15T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Last spring, right on the heels of one of the biggest events in his life, his son's wedding -- and with the eyes of the world upon his family -- Prince Charles came to the United States to deliver a speech at Georgetown University about the future of food.
]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[Last spring, right on the heels of one of the biggest events in his life, his son's wedding -- and with the eyes of the world upon his family -- Prince Charles came to the United States to deliver a speech at Georgetown University about the future of food.<br />
<br />
There's nothing like sitting in an audience and getting goose bumps listening to a great visionary tell it the way it is. They say lightning doesn't strike twice, but when I heard Prince Charles's speech that day, I felt the same kind of jolt I got the first time I saw Al Gore's slide show on global warming. Gore's power point stood out because it was the clearest, most concise explanation of our climate crisis I had ever heard.<br />
<br />
Now, another elder statesman, Prince Charles, is boldly speaking out about another crisis that we urgently need to address. With eloquent words, clarity and heartfelt passion, the prince explained, what's gone so terribly wrong with our food chain -- and what we can do to make it right.<br />
<br />
The prince's speech was both terrifying and uplifting. Terrifying, because we really have screwed up our food system -- and our food system is, as a result, screwing us up- our health, our environment, our climate.<br />
<br />
But the speech was ultimately uplifting because, as the prince noted, "There are alternative ways to grow our food ... which would go a very long way to resolving some of the problems we face."<br />
<br />
It was truly impressive to see Prince Charles use his considerable clout to promote a vision for a more ecologically enlightened food system. He has been living and breathing these issues for decades, a brave public voice against massive, aggressive interests. I was so inspired that I wanted to help the prince's speech find a wider audience. Happily, the folks at Rodale Books, assisted by the Grace Foundation and Patrick Holden, shared my enthusiasm and helped publish it.<br />
<br />
<em>The Prince's Speech</em> is actually more of a booklet -- just 48 pages, even counting the moving forward from Wendell Berry and an equally inspiring afterward from Will Allen and Eric Schlosser.<br />
<br />
It's a lovely paperback with a cover that manages to evoke both Michael Pollan and Peter Rabbit (thank you, Kelly Doe). You could breeze through it on your lunch break or read it in an evening, and you'd be up to speed on all the ways you can support a saner, less fossil-fueled food chain and as Prince Charles declares, "put Nature back at the heart of the equation."<br />
<br />
It won't be easy. But, as <em>The Prince's Speech</em> emphasizes, we can still do this, we do not have to continue to do things the same old way, especially since we can clearly see it is unsustainable. This booklet is truly a labor of love, so I think it's only fitting that its official publication date is Valentine's Day. As a friend said to me recently, "I like that it's being released on February 14, because it's like a love poem to the future."<br />
<br />
Please read this booklet, share it with friends and family, tweet, talk, and blog about it, buy copies and hand them out, do whatever you can to help spread the word. Because the future of food is the future of us all. Learn more at <a href="http://OnTheFutureofFood.org" target="_hplink">OnTheFutureofFood.org</a>.<br />
 <br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/97312/thumbs/s-FARMERS-MARKET-WEEK-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Paula Deen Should Turn Lemons Into Lemonade</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/paula-deen-diabetes_b_1245604.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.1245604</id>
    <published>2012-02-01T08:54:27-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-02T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Paula Deen's problem -- hers and America's -- won't be solved with a prescription from the pharmacy. But it can be solved with changes in the way we all cook, and eat.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[Dear Paula Deen,<br />
<br />
I can't stop thinking about you. Worrying, really, because from the text of your tweets it sounds like you aren't really on board for the lifestyle overhaul your diabetes diagnosis demands. I am sure you are stressed too from the public relations debacle your affiliation with a pharmaceutical company is causing. Oh, and people are upset about the three years you kept silent about your disease while continuing to pitch disease causing foods on all those morning shows.<br />
<br />
But how about turning lemons into lemonade (preferably sweetened with just a touch of stevia)! You can still come out of this not only saving your life but potentially the lives of many of your followers. Now that is powerful! Talk about an Oprah moment. We may even have to update that expression to a "Paula Deen" moment. What a beautiful turnaround of events!<br />
<br />
Diabetes is an American problem and unfortunately, you are not alone. 24 million American adults and children <a href="http://diabetes.webmd.com/news/20080624/nearly-24-million-have-diabetes" target="_hplink">have diabetes</a>, an increase of more than 3 million people in two years. 74 million people today have pre-diabetes, a condition that puts a person at an increased risk of developing the disease. It was this rapid and alarming increase in diabetes and obesity that led to the now too common lament that for the first time in history, younger generations are on a course to lead shorter life spans than their predecessors. <br />
<br />
Back to your situation. I urge you to grab this teachable moment with all the gusto, charm and humor which you have used to turn a poor but determined lunch lady into a multimillion dollar celebrity chef.  Paula, this problem, yours and America's, won't be solved with a prescription from the pharmacy. But it can be solved with changes in the way you -- all of us -- cook, and eat.<br />
<br />
Read the studies, watch the documentary <em>Forks Over Knives</em>, get really serious about what you are promoting in your recipes. We need to eat less fat, less meat, less dairy, burn more calories and get our bodies working right. Be the example America needs.]]></content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Parenting Trap # 84: The Date Who Doesn't Ring The Bell</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/daughters-dating-etiquette_b_1184884.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2012:/theblog//3.1184884</id>
    <published>2012-01-05T09:17:29-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-03-06T05:12:01-05:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Cell phones are undermining centuries of date etiquette. The doorbell is becoming extinct, and with it the one opportunity you have to look the kid (friend, date) in the eye, assess his demeanor (i.e., sobriety) and make sure he knows I'm watching. ]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[The scary issues of raising kids in the digital age are well documented, but I want to red flag the subtle changes in parenting that occur because of the ubiquitous cell phone,  without our even noticing. One of those very moments occurred in my house this week.<br />
<br />
It's after dinner -- a long, leisurely one -- and still sitting around the table is my ex-husband and another couple we have been friends with for years, along with their three pretty great kids. Suddenly our seventeen year old disappears and then reappears back in the kitchen, coat on, bag packed (ready for the next in a long line of constant sleepovers, but that's a topic for another blog) and cell phone "superglued" to her right hand. <br />
<br />
"I'm leaving. Steven's outside. Bye!"  Before my mouth closes she's out the door, unaware of the hour-long discussion that's about to ensue. I have been down this road with my daughter before. "It is important to me that your date or whoever is picking you up, come inside the house to say hello." Her response: abject horror, as if this is the single most insane thing I have ever said (until the next time I say something.) How can I be so insensitive, embarrassing...? (You fill in the blanks). <br />
<br />
Right under our noses, cell phones are undermining centuries of date etiquette. The result is not pretty. Along with landlines, the doorbell is becoming extinct, and with it, the one opportunity you have to look the kid (friend, date) in the eye, assess his/her demeanor (ie: sobriety) and make sure he knows <em>I'm watching</em>. <br />
<br />
Larry jumps in: "What difference does it make? I know the kid. It's fine." I disagree, and here is why: How are teenagers going to learn basic manners if they are never given the opportunity to practice? We're underestimating the power of contact, conversation and accountability. It's that important. <br />
<br />
The other couple concurs with me, saying that just last week their daughter was picked up by a suitor who sent her a text when he arrived, prompting her to run out the door. It bothered them at the time, but they hadn't thought much about it. The father said, "Never again!" <br />
<br />
It's a subtle thing, but it matters. It is tempting to be the "cool" parent, and to go with the flow of today's way of doing things. But as outdated as some traditional rituals may be, there are others that we should hang on to. Like insisting our daughters' suitors look us in the eye before taking them out, engaging in a little friendly small talk, and making sure they know that this girl has parents who are involved. We may be annoying, but love sometimes is.  When our girls become women, hopefully they'll do the same thing for their own daughters -- and thank us for caring enough to show them how it's done.<br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/456615/thumbs/s-DATE-DOORBELL-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thanksgiving Conversation Starter: Is It Time to Ban Soda Ads on Prime Time Television?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/thanksgiving-conversation_1_b_1110056.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.1110056</id>
    <published>2011-11-23T13:58:43-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-01-23T05:12:01-05:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Corporations are no longer allowed to advertise cigarettes on TV due to the potential impact it could have on our kids. When it comes to hard liquor, the government didn't ban it, the companies did it voluntarily. So, isn't it sugary sodas' turn?]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[<p>Did you know Coca-Cola's first television ad aired on Thanksgiving Day in 1950? It was part of a special live production featuring the ventriloquist <a href="http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/ccmphtml/colahist.html" target="_blank">Edger Bergen</a> and his sidekick Charlie McCarthy? It was a humble foray into the new but powerful advertising medium for the soft drink giant. However, it didn't take long for the company to realize the power of TV, particularly on younger audiences. </p><br />
<br />
<p>I have to admit few commercials evoke warm holiday memories more than the ubiquitous Coca-Cola ads such as those <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql-iGGxyGuo&amp;amp;feature=related" target="_blank">polar bear</a> commercials. Remember the one that starts with two polar bear cubs struggling to pull a Christmas tree up a snowy hill? After some help from mom (or possibly dad) -- the little ones are rewarded with an ice-cold coke for a job well done. Knowing what I know now about the effects of sugary drinks on children the image of kids chugging down a Coke [or in this case polar bear cubs] evokes the same feelings I'd get if they were taking a deep drag on cigarettes. </p><br />
<br />
<p>Oh give me a break -- it's just a soda, I can hear the comments already. A little soda once in a while is not going to harm anyone. Sadly, many kids are drinking a lot more than just a little bit of soda every day. The <a href="http://www.sugarydrinkfacts.org/resources/SugaryDrinkFACTS_ReportSummary.pdf" target="_blank">statistics</a> are sobering -- Americans suck down about 30 percent more calories from sugar-sweetened drinks now than they did just 10 years ago. When it comes to children, they're gulping down up to 15 percent of their total calories for the day from these liquid candies. For teens its worse, soft drinks are the number one source of calories in a their diet. Did you know that a 12-ounce can of regular soda can contain as much as 10 and a &frac12; teaspoons of sugar. That's as much <a href="http://www.fcs.uga.edu/ext/pubs/fdns/FDNS-E-67a.pdf" target="_blank">sugar</a> found in two 1 &frac12; ounce chocolate candy bars.</p><br />
<br />
<p>Those numbers are shocking enough, however, what should give us all pause are the findings from one study that found if a child consumes just one drink filled with added sugar a day his or her chance of becoming obese increases by 60 percent! It's not surprising then that soda consumption is linked to <a href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2009/04/06/substituting.water.sugar.sweetened.beverages.can.reduce.excess.calorie.consumption" target="_blank">childhood obesity</a>, <a href="http://health.usnews.com/health-news/diet-fitness/diabetes/articles/2010/10/27/even-1-soda-a-day-can-hike-your-diabetes-risk" target="_blank">type-2 diabetes</a>, <a href="http://www.webmd.com/hypertension-high-blood-pressure/news/20100524/cut-back-on-sodas-to-lower-blood-pressure" target="_blank">high blood pressure</a> and <a href="http://yourlife.usatoday.com/health/story/2011-11-14/Sugar-sweetened-drinks-may-pose-heart-risks-to-women/51193236/1" target="_blank">heart disease</a>.</p><br />
<br />
<p>These facts are fairly well known by now. Groups like Yale's <a href="http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/" target="_blank">Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity</a> have been sounding the alarms for quite sometime. You'd think with all this information, the least soft drink companies could do is cut back on the advertising -- at least those focused on kids. Right? Wrong! According to our friends at the <a href="http://www.sugarydrinkfacts.org/" target="_blank">Rudd Center</a> kids are getting bombarded with more and more ads every year. Take a look at their latest <a href="http://www.sugarydrinkfacts.org/resources/sugarydrinkfacts_targetedmarketing.pdf" target="_blank">findings</a>:</p><br />
<br />
<p><b>Soda Ad Exposure</b></p><br />
<ul><li>From 2008 to 2010, exposure to TV advertising for regular soda doubled for children.</li><br />
<li>In 2010, while children saw 50% more ads on TV for sugary fruit drinks, adults saw twice as many ads for 100% juice.</li><br />
<li>Capri Sun, Kool-Aid and Sunny D dominated children's exposure to sugary drinks on TV, together comprising 40% of children's total exposure to sugary drinks.</li></ul><br />
<br />
<br />
<p>We should all find the fact that food companies are spending so much money on advertising directly to kids -- <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2008/07/foodmkting.shtm" target="_blank">nearly $2 Billion a year</a> -- truly disturbing. It doesn't sit well with our nation's pediatricians either. In 2006, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a <a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/6/2563.full" target="_blank">policy statement</a> which said exposure to advertising, "may contribute significantly to childhood and adolescent obesity, poor nutrition, and cigarette and alcohol use." According to the AAP, kids and teens view more than 3,000 ads a year, on television alone. They say research has shown, "that young children -- younger than 8 years -- are cognitively and psychologically defenseless against advertising." </p><br />
<br />
<p>Coke and Pepsi have gone even further, aided by spineless show producers, and their networks, by purchasing embedded ads directly into the shows content. The blurred line between the show and the ads pummel young viewers. The average age of an <a href="http://www.baycitizen.org/blogs/quality-of-life/study-coke-uses-american-idol-market/" target="_blank"><em>American Idol</em></a> or <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/glees-mchale-goes-behind-scenes-x-factor-135017" target="_blank"><em>X factor</em></a> fan is 6-12! The beloved judges sip it as they dole out advice to the contestants. Celebrities chug it during the commercial breaks. Hardly seems right, does it. </p><br />
<br />
<p>For a while there it looked like the FTC and several other regulatory agencies, which are part of the so-called <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/04/foodmarket.shtm" target="_blank">Interagency Working Group on Food Marketed to Children</a>, were poised to take a strong stand on the issue. That was until last month when they <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/19/opinion/selling-candy-to-kids.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ref=opinion" target="_blank">caved-in</a> to pressure from industry, which complained that the group's original recommended voluntary guidelines designed to limit the way unhealthy foods are sold to children between the ages of 2 and 17 was, "unworkable." Now the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/testimony/111012foodmarketing.pdf" target="_blank">working group</a> is thinking of changing the recommended age limits to kids between 2 and 11. Not only that, they're thinking of looking the other way when it comes advertising "seasonal or holiday confections" like Halloween or Easter candy, or at places such as theme parks or sporting events.</p><br />
<br />
<p>When will regulators get a backbone? They have to stop letting industry kick them around and keeping them from protecting the health of America's children? I know I'm not alone in my disgust. </p><br />
<br />
<p>Corporations are no longer allowed to <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/by_topic/policy/legislation/index.htm" target="_blank">advertise cigarettes</a> on TV due to the potential impact it could have on our kids. When it comes to hard liquor, the government didn't ban it, the companies did it voluntarily. Can you imagine! It is now time to institute a similar TV advertising ban on soda. We are in the midst of a health epidemic. Some one has to start caring. Some food for thought as you sit down and give thanks for our children this holiday season.</p>]]></content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Perennial Plate Comes to Visit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/kale-cabbage-recipes_b_958370.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.958370</id>
    <published>2011-09-12T12:07:39-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-11-12T05:12:02-05:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Its pretty great having chefs as friends, but when they make house calls, well, that's off the charts. Last week, Daniel and Mirra, the traveling duo behind web series The Perennial Plate, landed for their first visit to Martha's Vineyard.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[<p><strong>Laurie:</strong> It's pretty great having chefs as friends, but when they make house calls, well, that's off the charts. Last week, Daniel and Mirra, the cross-country traveling duo behind my favorite web series <a href="http://ThePerennialPlate.com" target="_hplink">The Perennial Plate</a> landed for their first visit to Martha's Vineyard.<p><br />
<br />
<p>A tad road weary, the couple has been traveling for months now, living out of their Prius and covering a wide array of stories about farmers, farms, food and sustainable agriculture. (Watch them at: <a href="http://ThePerrennialPlate.com" target="_hplink">ThePerrennialPlate.com</a>.) Their food adventures have included hunting for frogs at the crack of dawn, noodling for catfish deep in Mississippi and foraging seaweed in the cold lakes of Maine. Okay, maybe a two-day respite on my farm wasn't exactly roughing it, even if they had to make dinner and do the dishes!</p> <br />
<br />
<p><strong>Daniel:</strong> I've never been to Martha's Vineyard, so when it worked out that our cross-country film shoot would have us very close to the famed island -- I checked in with Laurie David. She had been telling me about her organic garden since we first met and it was time to pay a visit. I figured it would be a little bit of a rest from our break neck trip around America. Little did I know she would put me to work. Actually, it's the great pleasure of any cook to go into a beautiful garden and create a menu from what is available. &nbsp;Inspiration is at its height. Laurie did have her influence though: She was very proud of the cabbages and kale, not so fond of Swiss chard or raw tomatoes (I know, <em>totally</em> crazy!), and didn't know much about cooking turnips. So it was decided (unbeknownst to her) that in those challenges would lie the night's meal.</p><br />
<br />
<p><strong>Laurie:</strong> I have had a few meals with Daniel, but until now none have been cooked by him. So you can imagine my excitement at the prospect of what he might make from my garden. We set the ground rules early -- no trips to the store were allowed, ensuring a local meal at its best, since nothing is more local than your own backyard. The garden was a bit torn up from Hurricane Irene's visit the week before but surprisingly we still had tomatoes ripening on the vines, turnips popping out of the soil, bok choy galore and the miracle of all miracle plants -- and the one that keeps on giving all summer long -- kale. (Plant a pot of that baby and feed your family for months!)</p><br />
<br />
<p>Bossy boots me started to prod Daniel, "What are you going to make? How about the beets? What about this lettuce, amazing we still have lettuce in August, huh?!" Apparently chefs need some time to think, so I busied myself cutting a cabbage and stacking the large outer leaves for Mirra to feed to the goats. Pretty soon he had a basket full of bounty and we headed (ran) for the kitchen.</p><br />
<br />
<center><img alt="2011-09-12-IMG_2079.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-09-12-IMG_2079.jpg" width="400" height="267" /></center><br />
<br />
<p><strong>Daniel:</strong> Mirra (camera woman/girlfriend/co-conspirator) and I had just come from Maine where we had collected a couple different types of amazing seaweed. So I started off with a broth made with the kelp. I then used that same broth to braise the turnips (along with some onion, ginger, star anise and the stems of various herbs). It was beautifully aromatic and just slightly hinted at the taste of the sea. We served the soup with a bouquet of vegetables from the garden: saut&eacute;ed eggplant and turnip greens, bok choy, and just picked baby carrots. Raw nasturtium leaves were the last addition to the bowl, floating delicately on the surface -- a tasty ode to Lilly pads.</p> <img alt="2011-09-12-IMG_21211.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-09-12-IMG_21211.jpg" width="150" height="225" style="float: right; margin:10px" /><br />
<br />
<p>The soup course was followed by a kale and chard (because Laurie unknowingly proposed a challenge by vocalizing her distaste of chard) salad. This dish was a cross between a marinated chard salad I had at the Walrus and the Carpenter in Washington and a Kale Caesar from the Tartine Bread Cookbook. It's basically a creamy dressing using pecorino cheese and a little Martha's Vineyard honey, and topped with a beautiful fried egg&nbsp;(with a bright orange egg yolk, courtesy of Laurie's chickens). It was simple and to the point. In my opinion, delicious.</p><img alt="2011-09-12-IMG_21231.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-09-12-IMG_21231.jpg" width="150" height="225" style="float: left; margin:10px" /> <br />
<br />
<p>And on to the final course: Laurie and I had been talking a lot about the use of meat at restaurants and in our day-to-day lives. Both of us are trying to reduce the amount we eat, so I knew this meal should go all out vegetarian. It's easy with starters, but the main course can be a challenge without pasta or risotto. In comes the cabbage. A wonderfully versatile vegetable, of which I have started to grill. In this case I cut steak-sized wedges, and marinated them in good olive oil, balsamic and minced oregano. Let it sit till we were ready to eat and then charred each side. The sweet came through and it was almost everything a steak could have been.</p><br />
<br />
With healthy food picked only moments before. Martha's Vineyard was a good place to cook.<center><img alt="2011-09-12-IMG_2124.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-09-12-IMG_2124.jpg" width="400" height="267" /></center><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<p><strong>Laurie:</strong> Not to put too fine a point on it, but OMG was that a fantastic dinner! It was everything I had dreamed of... and more! Every drop devoured. Savored. Dessert was simple blueberries and strawberries frozen from earlier in the summer, a gorgeous sunset and a hilarious verbal game that required everyone to name one of their idiosyncrasies (no better way to get to know someone fast!). The game's highlight was Mirra who revealed that both she and her mother love to drink... pickle juice. No kidding. Play this game at your dinner tonight and try the kale salad and cabbage main course. I plan on perfecting both by the time The Perennial Plate team makes their next house call.</p>  <br />
<br />
<center><img alt="2011-09-12-IMG_2085.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-09-12-IMG_2085.jpg" width="400" height="267" /></center><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>Recipes:</strong><br />
<u><strong><br />
Kale Salad Recipe:</strong></u> <br />
<center><img alt="2011-09-12-IMG_2126.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-09-12-IMG_2126.jpg" width="400" height="267" /></center><br />
<br />
2 Bunches of Kale (enough for four).<br />
<br />
Creamy Dressing&nbsp;<br />
1 egg yolk<br />
1 clove garlic, minced<br />
1 tablespoon mustard<br />
1 lemon<br />
1/2 cup grated pecorino romano<br />
1 teaspoon white wine vinegar<br />
1/4 cup extra virgin olive oil<br />
salt and pepper<br />
1 teaspoon honey<br />
<br />
Blend together all the ingredients except the olive oil and cheese. Then slowly add the olive oil to emulsify the sauce. Then blend in the cheese. If it is too thick, add a little lemon juice, vinegar or water. Serve with a fried egg.<br />
<br />
<strong><u>Grilled&nbsp;Cabbage&nbsp;With Cherry Tomatoes and Yogurt</u></strong><br />
<center><img alt="2011-09-12-IMG_2131.jpg" src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2011-09-12-IMG_2131.jpg" width="400" height="267" /></center><br />
<br />
1/2 a&nbsp;cabbage<br />
2 Tablespoons olive oil<br />
2 Tablespoons balsamic vinegar<br />
2 Tablespoons minced oregano<br />
Plenty of salt and pepper<br />
<br />
Cut the&nbsp;cabbage&nbsp;into 1 inch thick slices like pieces of pie, maintaining the core so the&nbsp;cabbage&nbsp;stays together. Slice for as many people as are eating. Marinade with the balsamic, oregano, salt, pepper and olive oil for at least an hour. With the grill on high, char each side of the&nbsp;cabbage, about a minute and a half on each side. Remove from the heat.<br />
<br />
Yogurt sauce<br />
<br />
2 sprigs of mint, leaves removed and minced<br />
1/2 cup yogurt<br />
4 tablespoons olive oil<br />
salt<br />
the zest 1/2 a preserved lemon, minced (or lemon salt, or just lemon zest)<br />
1 Tablespoon honey<br />
lots of black pepper<br />
1 teaspoon coriander powder<br />
<br />
For the yogurt, mix together all the ingredients for the sauce except the olive oil, which you should whisk in at the end.<br />
<br />
Blistered tomatoes -- these would be great raw too, but Laurie doesn't like raw tomatoes...<br />
1 cup cherry tomatoes, sliced in half<br />
1 teaspoon Balsamic vinegar<br />
2 tablespoons olive oil<br />
1 sprig of thyme<br />
salt<br />
<br />
Heat the olive oil until just before smoking, toss in the tomatoes for 1 minute, then add the thyme and vinegar. &nbsp;cook on high for another minute and then turn off the heat. &nbsp;<br />
<br />
To serve, drizzle the yogurt over the&nbsp;cabbage, garnish with the tomatoes and maybe a few herbs -- I like the idea of dill flowers, I had picked them, but forgot to add them.<br />
<br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/197853/thumbs/s-ANTICANCER-FOODS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Every Mother's Nightmare: Bacteria in Recalled Ground Turkey Is Resistant to Antibiotics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/post_2248_b_921077.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.921077</id>
    <published>2011-08-08T12:01:36-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-10-08T05:12:02-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[It is maddening that our so-called "food safety system" is designed to protect giant food corporations more than individuals.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[If you have ever woken up in the middle of the night panicked that you won't make it to the bathroom in time, or heard a scream from your child and sat with them shaking over a garbage can for hours on end, you know how brutal food poisoning can be. It is not something you want anyone, even your worst enemy, to ever to have to go through. Avoid it at all costs. Which makes it doubly maddening that the United States Department of Agriculture has been so irresponsibly slow in identifying the latest deadly antibiotic-resistant <em>Salmonella</em> outbreak, one that was first identified in MARCH. So far the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/080411/index.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/" target="_hplink">confirmed</a> that the nasty <em>Salmonella Heidelberg</em> strain has killed one person and infected nearly 80. Those are just the ones we know about. Who knows how many people or children it has really sickened? <br />
<br />
It is also maddening that our so-called "food safety system" is designed to protect giant food corporations more than individuals. Consider this scenario: That package of ground turkey sitting in your freezer right now could be tainted with the potentially deadly <em>Salmonella Heidelberg</em> bacteria. Imagine for a moment that you served your family a turkey burger tomorrow tonight and that your youngest child becomes violently ill -- the poisoning is so severe that she ends up in the hospital needing antibiotics. The physician comes in -- you're praying for an end to this torture for your child -- and the doctor says the antibiotics aren't working. The <em>Salmonella Heidelberg</em> bacteria raging through your child's body are resistant to not one but several antibiotics -- ampicillin, tetracycline and streptomycin- why?  <br />
<br />
Perhaps it has something to do with the massive amounts of antibiotics used on factory farms every day. Food Animals <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/080411/index.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/" target="_hplink">use up </a>about 29 million pounds of antibiotics a year, compared to the 7 million used in people. The overuse and misuse of antibiotics on factory farms can lead to the development of antibiotic resistant bacteria, such as <em>Salmonella Heidelberg</em>. You might recall <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/080411/index.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/" target="_hplink">last May</a> when I asked Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack: "When will the government do something to stop producers from squandering 70% of our antibiotics on healthy farm animals?" And he answered with the question, "How do you basically legislate that?"  <br />
<br />
Well, Mr. Secretary, one thing you can do immediately is to demand that the Department of Agriculture stop turning a blind-eye to <em>Salmonella</em> contamination in our meat supply. When it comes to routine <em>Salmonella</em> testing in ground turkey meat, <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/080411/index.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/" target="_hplink">according to the Consumers Union</a>, current USDA standards allow 49.9 percent of samples in a test run to be positive for <em>Salmonella</em> -- 44.6 percent for ground chicken. Are you kidding me?  <br />
<br />
I was astounded to learn that inspectors will not immediately issue a recall if they find resistant-Salmonella bacteria in ground turkey. The USDA and CDC <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/080411/index.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/" target="_hplink">admitted</a> that 4 routine samples of retail ground turkey tested positive for the resistant Salmonella Heidelberg strain between March and June, but they waited until late July to find "proof" that it would make people sick. And it still took nearly a week before Cargill recalled the 36 million pounds of turkey meat, sold under several brands in 26 states. Tough time recalling a product already eaten!! It's not an automobile! <br />
<br />
What is going on? I thought the goal of "food safety agencies" was to do something before people get sick. Waiting until dozens of people are sent to the hospital and one to the morgue is unacceptable!   <br />
<br />
Why would you wait if you have a good idea that the meat poses serious health risks? To save companies like Cargill time and money? What about the pain and suffering of the family members who lost a loved one, or the parents of 1-year-old Ruby Lee? <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/080411/index.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/" target="_hplink">According to the <em>Oregonian</em></a>, little Ruby spent 7 days in the hospital in June after she was sickened by Salmonella-tainted ground turkey.  <br />
<br />
Before this recent outbreak, the Center for Science in the Public Interest <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/080411/index.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/" target="_hplink">demanded</a> that the USDA ban the sale of any ground meat that contain 4 known resistant-Salmonella strains that have been linked to outbreaks in the past, including Salmonella Heidelberg. It sounds like a no-brainer to me. They already order immediate recalls for meat that contain the potentially deadly <em>E. coli</em> O157:H7. <br />
<br />
Tightening food safety regulations is important. But it is equally important to ensure that the will and resources are there to enforce them. The government can not be afraid or hampered from enforcing the rules designed to protect our health and our children's health! We must empower food safety agencies to not fear the wrath of huge corporations that do not want to be bothered with regulations. Scares like this are proof positive these huge companies can not be trusted to regulate themselves. <br />
<br />
So what can you do to help stop the madness? Tell your congressperson to vote to maintain and increase funding for all government agencies entrusted with protecting our food supply. You can also tell them to support the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/080411/index.htmlhttp://livepage.apple.com/" target="_hplink">Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act</a>, which would require producers from routinely using antibiotics that are important to human health in farm animals. And when you are at the grocery store, ask your grocer if your meat is "antibiotic free." If the answer is no, make a veggie stir fry for dinner instead. ]]></content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New Girlfriends</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/new-girlfriends_b_875774.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.875774</id>
    <published>2011-06-14T10:23:19-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-08-14T05:12:02-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[I'm one of those women who falls in love with girlfriends hard and fast. Occasionally its short-lived, I get too excited too quickly, but when the real thing comes along, now that's a beautiful thing. ]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[Want to be my friend? Feed me. Feed me ideas, wisdom, good food, laughs, knowledge. That is what great friendships are about and that is what makes me happy. Feed me. And when you do that, I feed you. Nourishment, mind and body, is what makes a healthy, mature female friendship of such enormous value. She knows something I don't. She has a talent, a touch, a wisdom I don't. She can teach me something and as a return gift, I can teach her something too. <br />
<br />
I'm one of those women who falls in love with girlfriends hard and fast. Occasionally its short-lived, I get too excited too quickly, but when the real thing comes along, now that's a beautiful thing. <br />
<br />
Surprisingly, you're never too old to fall in love. I am shocked myself, that at the life-altering age of 50 (plus), I am still falling in love and making new, deep, profound female friendships. My most unexpected new friendship started two years ago with a woman born and raised in Vietnam. At 17, as war broke out, she was rushed out of her country with two days notice. No suitcase, no backpack, no English. A few weeks later she was a freshman at Boston University. She is also over 50 (plus) and an internationally-recognized designer. I have been wearing her beautiful jewelry creations for years before I found out she lives three doors away from me! A mutual girlfriend of ours introduced us. Now we walk to each other's house for dinner. She taught me how to make pad thai, and I taught her the joys of composting! Win, win. <br />
<br />
The best girlfriends enrich you. They add color and texture to your life, even when they aren't fashion designers. Together we grow. Love!<br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/255645/thumbs/s-FEMALE-FRIENDSHIP-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Montana, Could Your Congressman's Actions Someday Make Your Child Sick?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/montana-could-your-congre_b_873052.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.873052</id>
    <published>2011-06-08T10:09:52-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-08-08T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Why should parents take more chances of their children getting sick because we are squandering their best medicines to fatten animals faster? Is this really what Montanans elected their sole congressman to do?]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[Hey Montana moms and dads, do you know what your sole Congressman, Rep. Denny Rehberg is up to these days? Thanks to one of his proposed amendments targeting the Food and Drug Administration the "miracle drug" that your children depend on to fight nasty ear infections or pneumonia could lose one of its strongest defenders from being rendered useless. The Republican led House Appropriations Committee approved last week an <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&amp;PressRelease_id=305" target="_hplink">agriculture bill</a> containing your congressman's amendment, which could leave the FDA powerless to stop antibiotics on healthy food animals and needlessly increase the risk of developing new superbugs.<br />
<br />
It seems like everywhere we turn new and dangerous superbugs that are resistant to antibiotics are popping up on a daily basis. Interestingly, they almost always seem to have a link to food animals. Just last week, researchers in Europe <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/03/news/la-heb-mrsa-cows-06032011" target="_hplink">warned</a> of a newly discovered methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is showing up in milk and that the origins are likely from cows. While German scientists say it is too early to officially pinpoint the source of its latest E. coli outbreak, which has killed more than 20 people and sickened at least 1,600, they are not ruling out food animals.<br />
 <br />
According to FDA data, <a href="http://www.livablefutureblog.com/2010/12/new-fda-numbers-reveal-food-animals-consume-lion%E2%80%99s-share-of-antibiotics/" target="_hplink">80% of the antibiotics</a> purchased in the United States are reserved for food animals. Crazy you say? What's even crazier is that most of those antibiotics are used in the absence of infections -- can you imagine your pediatrician prescribing that for your toddler?<br />
<br />
It's such an insane and dangerous concept that the Natural Resources Defense Council <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/groups-sue-fda-for-puttin_b_867562.html" target="_hplink">filed a lawsuit</a> this month against the FDA for failing to protect consumers from the dangers of misusing antibiotics in livestock. Over the past two years leaders from both the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control have stated in front of Congress that the scientific evidence of a link between antibiotic-use in food animals and antibiotic resistance in people is undeniable and something should be done about it.<br />
<br />
While the government hasn't done anything substantial about it yet, Rehberg doesn't want to take any chances. So he came up with an "amendment" that would <a href="http://www.ombwatch.org/node/11704" target="_hplink">block funding</a> for the FDA to enforce desperately overdue regulations on antibiotic-use unless they meet "strict" requirements. His provision proposes to block the FDA from ordering regulations or guidances unless they are based on "hard science" --  as opposed to "soft" science? It gets worse. It would also stop the FDA from restricting a substance unless it can demonstrate that it is "... more harmful to users than a product that does not contain such substance... " -- whatever that means.<br />
<br />
According to NRDC lawyers, Rehberg's amendment is poorly written and confusing, but it could be interpreted to prevent the FDA from keeping factory farms from wasting our antibiotics on healthy animals. That was exactly what Rehberg had in mind. According to the Des Moines Register's Philip Brasher, Rehberg said, "his concern had to do with the FDA's regulation of animal drugs." <br />
<br />
Rehberg's proposal will only delay the inevitable. The risks of wasting antibiotics on healthy animals to our health are well documented and too great to ignore for long. I just can't believe that the citizens of Montana would knowingly want to take those risks. Why should parents take more chances of their children getting sick because we are squandering their best medicines to fatten animals faster? I can't believe that is what they elected Congressman Rehberg to do. Montana moms and dads, please, call your congressman. There is no time, or antibiotics, to waste!]]></content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Groups Sue FDA for Putting Pigs Before People</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/groups-sue-fda-for-puttin_b_867562.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.867562</id>
    <published>2011-05-26T13:35:41-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-26T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Force-feeding prescription drugs to healthy people, just to make them grow faster, would be considered ludicrous by any doctor. Possibly even criminal. But the FDA allows factory farms to essentially to just that.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[Force-feeding prescription drugs to healthy people, just to make them grow faster, would be considered ludicrous by any doctor. Possibly even criminal.  <br />
<br />
That's why the Natural Resources Defense Council, Union of Concerned Scientists, and other health and science groups <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110525.asp" target="_hplink">filed suit</a> yesterday against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for allowing factory farms to do just that -- waste our precious antibiotics on healthy livestock, just to help them grow fatter faster.<br />
<br />
Here's the disturbing truth. Approximately <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110525.asp" target="_hplink">70% of all antibiotics </a>in our country are being squandered on healthy cows, pigs and chickens for unnecessary (and unnatural!) reasons like growth promotion, creating vast amounts of drug-resistant superbugs that put our children and families at risk.<br />
<br />
For decades, antibiotics have saved us from diseases that were once a death sentence, ranging from bacterial meningitis to tuberculosis and pneumonia. But now, multi-drug resistant infections are on the rise, while the development of costly new antibiotics has slowed to a snail's pace. Around the world, leading health organizations are warning that we're on the verge of a global public health crisis.<br />
<br />
And industrial agriculture keeps pouring gasoline on the fire, by regularly feeding important human antibiotics to our food animals at doses too low to treat disease -- but perfect for breeding drug-resistant, dangerous bacteria.<br />
<br />
The problem is so big and so bad that even our government officials openly admit that squandering antibiotics on livestock is a major threat to public health -- and that we will not be able to win the battle against drug-resistance unless we end the practice. <br />
<br />
Take it straight<a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110525.asp" target="_hplink"> from the National Academy of Sciences</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>A decrease in the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in human medicine alone is not enough. Substantial efforts must be made to decrease inappropriate overuse of antimicrobials in animals and agriculture as well.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Translation? The insanity has to stop now.<br />
<br />
And that's where FDA comes into the picture.<br />
<br />
Even though FDA has known for decades that giving human antibiotics to healthy animals can breed monster bacteria that threaten human health, and even though the agency has a legal obligation to take action -- FDA has done nothing. <br />
<br />
Thank goodness they're not getting away with it. The <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110525.asp" target="_hplink">Natural Resources Defense Council</a> (NRDC), together with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), Food Animal Concerns Trust (FACT), and Public Citizen,<a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110525.asp" target="_hplink"> filed suit</a> on Wednesday to make the FDA get off the sidelines and into the game, doing its job to protect the health of our families.<br />
<br />
The coalition lawsuit will force the FDA to pull its head out of the sand and address this serious threat to public health now.<br />
<br />
It will not only make the agency withdraw approval for giving penicillins and tetracyclines to healthy animals, but will also make FDA reevaluate whether it is safe to keep feeding ANY antibiotics important for human medicine to healthy animals.<br />
<br />
The lawsuit couldn't come at a more urgent time. Currently, while your family doctor carefully weighs the options before prescribing an antibiotic to your sick child, industrial farms are doling out the same antibiotics to animals like candy, undermining their ability to protect our health.<br />
<br />
Maybe factory farms think they can stuff 25 million pounds of antibiotics into animal feed and water, and we won't notice. Or maybe they think we won't care. <br />
<br />
But they're wrong.<br />
<br />
We've noticed and we're not staying quiet.<br />
<br />
In fact, <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110525.asp" target="_hplink">according to a survey</a> conducted by PEW Charitable Trusts earlier this month, 80 percent of moms are concerned about antibiotics being used in meat production.  <br />
<br />
Why? Because, even if big agriculture doesn't get it, parents know the value of a working antibiotic. We've stayed up all night with sick kids, worrying about whether a fever will break or when a doctor's prescription will kick in. We know firsthand that ending this dangerous practice is about common sense, preparedness, and putting the health of people first. <br />
<br />
There are no more excuses for delay. The science is in. More than 300 of the world's leading health and consumer organizations have already come forward to demand that this practice come to an end. Countries around the globe -- including all 27 member states of the European Union -- have already banned the use of important human antibiotics for growth promotion. <br />
<br />
And it's time for us to do the same here at home. <br />
<br />
Learn more about this life threatening issue <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110525.asp" target="_hplink">from NRDC</a>. Then sign a petition (http://www.nrdc.org/media/2011/110525.asp) to support legislation that would help stop the outrageous misuse of these precious medicines on factory farms.<br />
]]></content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Perfect Harmony or Imperfect Hormone-y?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/perfect-harmony-or-imperf_b_865012.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.865012</id>
    <published>2011-05-23T12:56:53-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-23T05:12:01-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[The average age of American Idol's young fans has to be around 11. So why is the show pushing high-calorie, BPA-lined Coca-Cola so aggressively?]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Laurie David</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/"><![CDATA[I love <em>American Idol</em>. Sorry to see it end this week. I watch from the early city auditions to the bitter end, even when my fave is unceremoniously voted off (Durbin rules!). But I have to say there is something really disturbing about those Coca-Cola ads and I can't pretend I don't see them anymore. I tried that for awhile. But they aren't regular ads that you can TiVo past. They're embedded, like a dogged reporter, throughout the content of the show. They are more supersized than the high flying contestants themselves and more attention-grabbing than Ryan Seacrest's side jokes, Steven Tyler's swears and J-Lo's glow. And plastic tumblers filled with the stuff are worked into almost every shot of the beloved judges.<br />
<br />
But the average age of <em>Idol's</em> young fans has to be around 11. And hello, we have an obesity epidemic in America. Soda now comprises <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101001105211.htm" target="_hplink">nearly ten percent</a> of our kid's calories... empty, tooth rotting, diabetes-provoking, sticky sweet calories! It's bad enough that the corporate sponsor <em>American Idol</em> has chosen for their product placement is loaded with sugar and calories. But to make things worse, its soda cans are coated with Bisphenol A -- commonly called BPA -- a factory-made hormone-mimicking chemical <a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/p6724x4h8755605n/" target="_hplink">linked to</a> obesity promotion (<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1570083/" target="_hplink">and possibly cancer</a>), too.<br />
<br />
Hey American idol, according to a <a href="http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/ohat/bisphenol/bisphenol.pdf" target="_hplink">CDC survey</a>, a whopping 93% of your viewers could have BPA sneaking into their systems. A handful of U.S. states <a href="http://www.enviroblog.org/2010/04/maryland-bans-bpa-in-some-childrens-products.html" target="_hplink">have already banned</a> BPA for various uses. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/14/world/americas/14bpa.html" target="_hplink">Canadian</a> and <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/11/europe-ban-bpa/1" target="_hplink">European</a> lawmakers banned BPA for use in products such as baby bottles or food containers designed for young children, and even China is thinking of<a href="http://environment.about.com/od/bisphenolabpa/a/China-Considers-Banning-BPA.htm" target="_hplink"> instituting a ban</a>. So my question is, is it perfect harmony (Coke's clever ad line for their Idol campaign) to be selling a product with a can lined with this <a href="http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/endocrine/index.cfm" target="_hplink">hormone-twisting</a> (endocrine disruptor) chemical that has <a href="https://login.medscape.com/login/sso/getlogin?urlCache=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tZWRzY2FwZS5jb20vdmlld2FydGljbGUvNzI1NzU2&amp;ac=401" target="_hplink">been connected</a> to breast cancer, <a href="https://login.medscape.com/login/sso/getlogin?urlCache=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tZWRzY2FwZS5jb20vdmlld2FydGljbGUvNzQwMDQ4&amp;ac=401" target="_hplink">ADHD</a> and infertility?<br />
<br />
And now back to Ryan Seacrest. Hey Ry, how ironic that when you leave the <em>American Idol</em> set, you head over to produce ABC's <em>Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution</em>, a show working its butt off to get kids eating and drinking better. A show whose mantra is that the American diet is killing us. How do you reconcile that? <br />
<br />
Ryan, if you can help summon 90 million call-in votes, surely you can use some of your clout to push the Idol producers to consider a saner, healthier choice for next year's sponsor. Or at least lose the tacky embedding. That would be a good start. <br />
<br />
And, hey, Coca-Cola, remember your great old slogan, "It's the real thing!" Well, now it's time to do the right thing: Call back your board of directors and make them abandon their <a href="http://www.ajc.com/business/coca-cola-shareholder-resolution-927658.html" target="_hplink">decision to continue </a>to line all your cans with this endocrine disrupting chemical. It's too late to give James Durbin a do-over, but let's give your board of directors another chance to do the real thing for our kids. <br />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>