<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Murray Waas</title>
  <link href="http://huffingtonpost.com/author/index.php?author=murray-waas"/>
  <updated>2013-05-21T20:01:54-04:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Murray Waas</name>
  </author>
  <id xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/index.php?author=murray-waas</id>
  <rights>Copyright 2008, HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.</rights>
  <subtitle>HuffingtonPost Blogger Feed for Murray Waas</subtitle>
  <generator>Good old fashioned elbow grease.</generator>

<entry>
    <title>The Life That Christina-Taylor Green Would Have Lived</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/the-life-that-christina-t_b_806575.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2011:/theblog//3.806575</id>
    <published>2011-01-10T15:19:46-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-04T05:08:56-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Christina-Taylor Green came from a loving, devoted family; and she had advantages most children do not have and may never have in their lifetimes. What do I take away from her killing? Every American child is now at the margins.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[Christina-Taylor Green was nine-years-old when she was killed. The gunman who murdered her and stole her from her family has foreclosed us from knowing what her future would have been otherwise. To contemplate who she should would have become only makes the crime that much more unspeakable, but it seems necessary to do so.<br />
<br />
It is important now to consider what the life of Christina-Taylor Green may have been, impossible as that may seem, because it is way to honor the life she already lived. It is important because her family has already begun to do so as part of their mourning process as has the community in which she was raised. But perhaps most importantly of all, to consider what her future might have been, and what she and we have lost, might provide some necessary motivation so that we do not let this happen to another child.<br />
	<br />
In defiance of her murderer, in defiance of those who tolerated the atmosphere that allowed her murder to occur, the murders of five others, and the attempted assassination of Gabby Giffords, we ask: What would Christina have become? Who would she have turned out to be? Would she have had children and grandchildren? Whose lives among us would she have impacted?<br />
	<br />
Christina was already serving and helping others. She already held elected office at age nine, serving on the student council of the Mesa Verde Elementary School. She worked for a charity that helped other children, Kids Helping Kids.  <br />
	<br />
The last place her parents thought she would be harmed would be meeting her Congresswoman.<br />
	<br />
"I allowed her to go, thinking it would be an innocent thing," Christina's mother, Roxanna Green, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/10/us/10green.html?src=ISMR_HP_LO_MST_FB" target="_hplink">told the <em>New York Times</em></a>.<br />
	<br />
At the age of 32, Gabby Giffords had once been the youngest woman elected to the Arizona State Senate, and now she was a Congresswoman. In a state that allowed for and even celebrated the fierce independence and strength of its women, it still was not too long ago that there were few women in elected politics. Gabby was to be a possible role model for Christina, one of the reasons that her parents were hoping that their daughter would be able to spend a few minutes with the Congresswoman.<br />
	 <br />
Christina's dad, John, told the <em>Times</em>, "I could have easily have seen her as a politician."<br />
	<br />
Who is to say that if there has been no gunman in the strip mall, and had Christina  lived, that the events that day might have changed the direction of Christina's life? Maybe it would have a seminal moment in the life of a child, laying the seeds for her to become involved in public service or public life.  <br />
	<br />
Or perhaps it would have been just another and interesting and playful day in the life of a child that she would have enjoyed and meant little more. The answers are another thing stolen, irreplaceable, by the gunman.<br />
	<br />
I remember as young child listening to Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King on the radio and then watching them on television. I would listen on phonograph records to speeches made by John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King. I was mesmerized. Words to a child (although hardly that much different to a grown up) were as commonplace and necessary as the air we breathe, but here these men were turning them into something else, the most powerful thing in the world. But it was as a child actually going to and watching Robert Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey that changed a life's course.<br />
	<br />
Perhaps Christina meeting Gabby Giffords would have changed her life -- and who and what she would have become.  Or perhaps that is my personal projection. <br />
	<br />
Her dad has said in various interviews that envisioned her in public life.<br />
	<br />
But Christina's father is probably like most dads of young children that I know. On other days, or alternatively even on the same day, they imagine their children has been all grown up doing any number of things. <br />
	<br />
I have an acquaintance who adopted their three-year-old from Kazakhstan. His son has his own YouTube video doing a perfect rendition of a song from the <em>Little Mermaid</em>. His dad is convinced, in part because of that performance, that his son will be a politician. Of course the same YouTube performance leads his dad on other occasions to think that his son will be other days be a great actor. And that is only on days when he is not daydreaming his son will be an Olympic snowboard champion, representing, of course, his native Kazakhstan.<br />
	<br />
Christina was an athlete too. She was already an accomplished gymnast, a swimmer, and dancer. But most remarkably she played second base for the Canyon del Oro Pirates. She was the only girl on the little league team. This last fact makes more sense when one learns that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/10/sports/10shoot.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_hplink">her grandfather is Dallas Green</a>, who was the manager of the Philadelphia Phillies in 1980 when they won a World Series title, and later also managed the New York Yankees and New York Mets. Her father, John Green, is a scout for the Los Angeles Dodgers. Her other brother, eleven-years-old, is also named Dallas, and apparently named after their grandfather.  <br />
	<br />
Would Christina have gone on to be a student athlete? Of course she would. But would sports have also become her career as it had for her dad and granddad?  <br />
	<br />
Christina loved animals. At home, she had as pets her very own geckos, and she also cared for the dogs and cats of her neighbors. She had ambitions, she told her parents, to be a veterinarian. At nine, she even had some of the specifics worked out. She would study at New York University. She had been born back east, in a small Pennsylvania town, so she wanted to go back East. She was born on Sept. 11th 2001, even featured in a book of children born on that day. Even at nine, this was part of her identity, something she took pride in, a reason why sometimes she dressed in red, white, and blue. Would she have studies veterinary medicine at NYU? Is that what would have in part become of her life? <br />
	<br />
We will know nothing of what would have become of Christina Green had she been able to live her life to a natural expectancy. It is a void not dissimilar to the one now in her family's heart.<br />
	<br />
But we know a couple of things for sure: "From the very beginning, she was an amazing child," her mother told the <em>New York Times</em>. "She was very bright, very mature, off the charts. She was the brightest thing that happened that day." In short, whatever she would have done with her life would have been amazing.<br />
	<br />
And whatever that was, her life would have been in some way a life of service.<br />
	<br />
We can never know for sure but this was a little girl who was going to give and do for others, whether that was her own family or in his community, or even something larger.<br />
	<br />
While posting about her the last couple of days on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922" target="_hplink">my Facebook page</a>, comments like these were not uncommon:<br />
	<br />
Dawn Frantangelo, the NBC News correspondent, wrote: "Oh my lord in heaven. This is beyond sad and her life and death so emblematic of what the madness has come to. My heart goes out to her family and friends and all the glorious potential she had and symbolized."<br />
	<br />
Mary Lou Butler, an administrative assistant to a fire chief in South Kingstown, Rhode Island, wrote:"I can't help but think that maybe she would have been a future politician to help heal the world. Born on 9/11, just elected to student council..."<br />
	<br />
We should have done more to protect Christina-Taylor Green than we did. Not just because we as a society to be a moral people should do everything we can to protect the lives of our children, but also because we don't know what she would have contributed to us.<br />
	<br />
Some people reading this post will argue that nothing could be done, that her murder was a unpreventable act of senseless violence, a tragedy beyond our control. Without arguing that point, but not conceding that assertion, every day we leave at risk the lives of our country's children.  <br />
	<br />
Take for example Christina's state of Arizona.  <br />
	<br />
As just one example, in Arizona today, there are more children at this moment of time than ever before who are homeless, many of whom who have been thrown out by parents who no longer want to care for them in difficult economic times, or did not care in the first place anyway. According to a <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/01/07/20110107phoenix-homeless-youth-tumbleweed-center.html" target="_hplink">recent story </a>in the <em>Arizona Republic</em>, more than 24,500 Arizona students were homeless during the past school year. That number is double what it was in 2003, and also some 18 percent higher than what it was last year.<br />
	<br />
We know virtually nothing of a single one of these children, who remain largely nameless and invisible to us. If anyone is really outraged about the murder of Christina-Taylor Green, there is absolutely nothing to stop them from helping these children. If they want to honor her or her memory, they should. And one way to do it is simply go down to one of the shelters where these kids hang out, say some kind words, ask what they might do for do them, and become involved in their lives in some small way that may even save their lives. Those with means should even consider taking one of them into their own homes.<br />
	<br />
As a writer, I have seen first hand how this country has allowed too many of its children and young people to be forgotten, unknown, unsafe, and left to die.  A couple of years ago I wrote<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/in-memory-of-spc-nicholas_b_110836.html" target="_hplink"> a story </a>about a young Iraqi war veteran who came safely home from war only to be killed violently for wearing a Red Sox jersey in a Texas bar. When I went to watch a stick ball tournament held in a park, a portion of which was to be dedicated and named in his honor, I learned that several of his friends who he had played with in that same park, Kelly Park, as a child had died as a result of violence. Those kids died in part because they were marginalized by our society.<br />
	<br />
One of <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1994-04-03/magazine/tm-41569_1_forest-haven-bleak-house-institutional-abuse" target="_hplink">the first stories I ever covered</a> as a reporter was about <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1994-04-03/magazine/tm-41569_1_forest-haven-bleak-house-institutional-abuse" target="_hplink">the deaths of dozens of mentally retarded children </a>because of abuse and neglect while they were wards of the District of Columbia government.  Dozens and dozens of these children died over two decades as the local government, the local news media, law enforcement agencies, medical agencies which were supposed to oversee their care, failed in their responsibilities and did nothing.<br />
	<br />
Those particular children died <a href="http://murraywaas.net/id53.html" target="_hplink">because they were marginalized</a>. They were African-African, they were mostly from impoverished and poor families, and they were mentally retarded. They died because we value some human life, including that of some children, over others. <br />
	<br />
Christina-Taylor Green came from a loving, devoted, well to do family; she had a famous grandfather; and she had advantages which most children do not have and may never have.<br />
	<br />
What do I take away from her killing? Every American child is now at the margins.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a> has been posting regularly about Christina-Taylor Green and other events related to the Tuscon shootings on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922" target="_hplink">his Facebook page</a>. <br />
<br />
<strong>Other <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett--steele-awards-104329693.html" target="_hplink">recent articles by Murray Waas</a>:</strong><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/26/us-usa-politics-ensign-idUSTRE74P4N920110526" target="_hplink"> "Special Report:  Disgraced John Ensign Back in Legal Jeopardy,"</a> Reuters, May 26, 2011. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69Q4XS20101027" target="_hplink">"Tea Party Candidates Only A Democrat Could Love,"</a> Reuters, Oct. 27, 2010.<br />
<br />
Nick Carey and <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69Q4XS20101027" target="_hplink">"Virginia Veteran Report Shows High Depression Rate," </a>Reuters, Sept. 27, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69Q4XS20101027" target="_hplink">"WellPoint Routinely Targets Breast Cancer Patients,"</a> Reuters, April 23, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G2DO20100317" target="_hplink">"Insurer Targeted HIV Patients to Drop Coverage,"</a> Reuters, March 17, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/insurance-company-must-pa_b_289841.html" target="_hplink">"Insurance Company Must Pay $10 Million For Revoking Policy of Teen with HIV,"</a> <em>Huffington Post,</em> Sept. 17, 2009..<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray S. Waas</a>,  "<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/04/a-us-attorney-apos-s-story/7416/" target="_hplink">A U.S. Attorney's Story,"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>, April 20, 2009.. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/what-did-bush-tell-gonzales/7064/" target="_hplink">"What Did Bush Tell Gonzales?,"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://sabew.org/2010/10/reuters-milwaukee-j-s-win-11-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/the-case-of-the-gonzales-notes/7051/" target="_hplink">"The Case of the Gonzales Notes,"</a> <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/murray-waas/" target="_hplink"><em>the Atlantic</em></a>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/236418/thumbs/s-CHRISTINA-TAYLOR-GREEN-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Insurance Company Must Pay $10 Million For Revoking Policy Of Teen With HIV</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/insurance-company-must-pa_b_289841.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2009:/thenewswire//2.289841</id>
    <published>2009-09-17T09:56:55-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-03T04:33:56-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[The South Carolina Supreme Court has ordered an insurance company to pay $10 million for wrongly revoking the...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[The South Carolina Supreme Court has ordered an insurance company to pay $10 million for wrongly revoking the insurance policy of a 17-year-old college student after he tested positive for HIV. The court called the 2002 decision by the insurance company "reprehensible." <br />
<br />
That appears to be the most an insurance company has ever been ordered to pay in a case involving the practice known as rescission, in which insurance companies retroactively cancel coverage for policyholders based on alleged misstatements - sometimes right after diagnoses of life-threatening diseases. <br />
<br />
The ruling emerges from a conservative Southern state with one of the most pro-business climates in the country. And it comes as progressive Democrats on Capitol Hill are pressing for health care reforms, such as a public insurance option, that reflect wariness about the private insurance industry's motives.  <br />
<br />
The Supreme Court on Monday <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/09/16/Insurer_to_Pay_$10M_for_Rescission_Based_on_HIV.htm">upheld</a> a lower court's verdict against Fortis Insurance, now known as Assurant. The trial jury had awarded the former college student, Jerome Mitchell, $15 million in punitive damages; the Supreme Court reduced that amount by $5 million. <br />
<br />
Mitchell learned that he had HIV when, while heading to college, he donated blood. Fortis then rescinded his coverage, citing what turned out to be an erroneous note from a nurse in his medical records that indicated that he might have been diagnosed prior to his obtaining his insurance policy. <br />
<br />
Before the cancellation of the policy, an underwriter working for Fortis wrote to a committee considering whether or not to rescind his policy: "Technically, we do not have the results of the HIV tests.  This is the only entry in the medical records regarding HIV status.  Is it sufficient?"  The underwriter's concerns were ignored and the rescission went forward.<br />
 <br />
In the ruling, Chief Justice <a href="http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/supreme/displayJustice.cfm?judgeID=1118">Jean Hoefer Toal</a> wrote: "We find ample support in the record that Fortis' conduct was reprehensible ... Fortis demonstrated an indifference to Mitchell's life and a reckless disregard to his health and safety." <br />
<br />
An <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20090616/rescission_supplemental.pdf">investigation</a> this summer by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and earlier ones by state regulators in California, New York and Connecticut, found that thousands of vulnerable and seriously ill policyholders have had their coverage canceled by many of the nation's largest insurance companies without any legal basis. The congressional committee found that three insurance companies alone made at least $300 million over five years from rescission. One of those three companies was Assurant. <br />
<br />
In Febuary 2008, a private arbitration judge in Los Angeles <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-insure23feb23,1,2568706,full.story">ordered Health Net Inc.</a> to pay more than $9 million to a breast cancer patient whose health insurance it revoked shortly after her diagnosis and while she was undergoing chemotherapy. The plaintiff in that case, Patsy Bates, a then-52-year-old grandmother and hair-salon owner, was unable to continue her chemotherapy for several months.<br />
<br />
During the case, evidence emerged that Health Net had paid bonuses to employees to reward them based on the number of policyholders they had rescinded. The judge who awarded Bates the $9 million said in his decision: "It's difficult to imagine a policy more reprehensible than tying bonuses to encourage the rescission of health insurance that keeps the public well and alive." <br />
<br />
William Shernoff, the attorney who represented Bates, said in an interview Wednesday that he was not unhappy that there was a new verdict larger than the one he won for Bates. "I am glad to see that the courts in other parts of the country are coming down hard on this reprehensible practice of dumping sick patients," he said. "It has been a practice going on decades, is widespread, and ruins lives." <br />
<br />
Shernoff currently said he has more than 100 pending cases against California insurance companies on behalf of patients he alleges were wrongly rescinded.  He said he has already settled about 90 similar cases over the last three years. <br />
<br />
President Obama cited other cases of rescission in his <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-to-a-Joint-Session-of-Congress-on-Health-Care/">recent speech</a> before a joint session of Congress as a major reason that health reform is necessary. <br />
<br />
Obama cited the case of a retired Texas nurse, Robin Beaton, who had her heath insurance canceled by her insurance company as she was about to undergo breast cancer surgery.  As a result, Beaton had to delay her surgery for five months.  In the interim, the size of the mass of her tumor had grown from 2 centimeters to 7 centimeters, greatly reducing her chances of survival. <br />
<br />
A "woman from Texas was about to get a double mastectomy when her insurance company canceled her policy because she forgot to declare a case of acne,"  the President asserted in his speech, "By the time she had insurance reinstated, her breast cancer more then doubled in size.  This is heart breaking. It is wrong. And no one should be treated that way in the United States of America."  <br />
<br />
Obama wasn't exactly correct in his telling of Beaton's ordeal.  Beaton's insurance was canceled because a doctor wrote that she potentially had a precancerous lesion on her face.  Further investigation showed that she instead had acne. But even after her physicians pointed out the error, her insurance remained rescinded.  Only with the help of her congressman, was she able to pressure her insurance company to pay for her breast cancer surgery--five months later. <br />
<br />
Related <a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">stories by Murray Waas </a> (added after publication of original article):<br />
<br />
<a href="http://murraywaas.net/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/04/24-1#" target="_hplink">"WellPoint Routinely Targets Breast Cancer Patients,"</a> <em>Reuters</em>, April 24 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G2DO20100317" target="_hplink">"Insurer Targeted HIV Patients to Drop Coverage,"</a></a><em> Reuters</em>, March 17, 20010<br />
<br />
Paul Krugman, <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">"Demons and Demonization,"</a> the <em>New York Times</em>, March 17, 2010.<br />
<br />
Ryan Chuttum,<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink"> "Reuters is Excellent in Digging of A Health Insurer's Tactics,"</a> <em>Columbia Journalism Review</em>, March 17, 20010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a> can be contacted via his <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922">Facebook page</a>. <br />
</em><br />
<br />
<br />
<center><p style="font-size:large;"><em>Get HuffPost Politics On <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/HuffPost-Politics/56845382910">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/huffpolitics">Twitter!</a></em></p></center>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/105368/thumbs/s-SUPREME-COURT-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Former U.S. Attorney Condemns Bush White House Interference With Renzi Probe</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/former-us-attorney-condem_b_257846.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2009:/thenewswire//2.257846</id>
    <published>2009-08-12T15:43:29-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-01T18:09:14-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[As chronicled in a series of White House e-mails published Tuesday, Harriet Miers pressed a Justice Department official to issue a statement that would vindicate Rep. Rick Renzi.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[With the 2006 mid-term congressional elections rapidly approaching, a top aide to Karl Rove warned Harriet Miers that Republican Rep. Rick Renzi's re-election was in serious jeopardy because of rumors that Renzi was the target of a federal criminal investigation.<br />
<br />
Later the same day, Miers, then the White House counsel, called the Justice Department's second highest ranking official and pressed him to issue a statement that would vindicate the Arizona Republican.<br />
<br />
As chronicled in a series of White House e-mails that were part of a <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/news/090811.html">massive trove of documents</a> Web-published by the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Miers was initially rebuffed in her efforts to get then-deputy attorney general Paul McNulty to issue a statement clearing Renzi. Justice Department policy is ordinarily not to comment on ongoing investigations. <br />
<br />
But on the very next day, news stories simultaneously appeared in the <i>New York Times</i>, the <i>Washington Post</i>, and the Associated Press saying that although there was an ongoing probe of Renzi, the investigation was in a preliminary stage and there had been no evidence uncovered to date that Renzi had done anything wrong at all. <br />
<br />
In fact, the investigation, which had been ongoing for some time, had already amassed enough evidence of alleged criminal misconduct that the U.S. attorney leading the Renzi probe, Paul Charlton, <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">had just obtained approval</a> from the highest levels of the Justice Department to seek an application from a federal judge to wiretap Renzi's telephone.  Over a year later, in Feb. 2008, a federal grand jury indicted Renzi on 38 counts of money laundering, extortion, insurance fraud, and other alleged felonies. <br />
<br />
But the disinformation leaked to media outlets had the desired effect: Renzi won reelection by the narrowest of margins.  (To read more about that disinformation campaign, see <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2009/06/hbc-90005261">here</a>.) <br />
<br />
In an interview Tuesday, Charlton, the U.S. attorney who led the Renzi probe told me:  "It's a great disappointment that the White House not only would ask that the Justice Department comment about an ongoing investigation but also lie about that investigation.  And it is even a greater disappointment that the Gonzales Department of Justice would comment at all about an ongoing investigation let alone make untruthful comments about an investigation." <br />
<br />
Career federal law enforcement officials who worked directly on the Renzi criminal probe <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">told me for this story</a> that I wrote for the <i>Hill</i> in June that they wanted Attorney General Eric Holder to initiate a formal investigation of the matter. <br />
<br />
At the time of their comments, the direct involvement of White House political aides in the matter was not known.  The disclosure that at least three of President Bush's top aides were involved in the damage control effort to protect Renzi is almost certain to renew interest that a formal investigation of the leaks be undertaken. <br />
<br />
Charlton, one of nine U.S. attorneys fired by the Bush administration, told me that he hoped that a federal prosecutor already investigating the firings of nine U.S. attorneys, Nora Dannehy, would attempt to determine whether Bush administration officials had acted improperly or illegally while conducting their damage control effort to bolster Renzi's re-election chances:  "It is my understanding that the new information and documents are almost certainly in the possession  of the U.S. attorney and I expect that she will take the appropriate next steps." <br />
<br />
Miers apparently became involved in the Renzi matter after talking on the phone and receiving an email from Scott Jennings, a senior aide to Karl Rove, indicating that Renzi or someone close to him had called seeking their assistance. <br />
<br />
An Arizona blog had erroneously reported that Renzi was the target of a criminal investigation and that a decision had already been made to criminally charge him, with the charges delayed until after election day.  After the posting, senior officials at the Republican National Committee contacted Jennings to express concerns that reports of a federal investigation of Renzi might harm his chances for re-electon, according to the newly released emails. <br />
<br />
In Miers' deposition by House Judiciary Committee staff, she testified that Rove may have also directly raised the issue with her as well: "I'm not sure how it came to my attention.  It may have been Karl but I don't know that... [T]he sense of the inquiry was this is happening, it's unfair.  I think it was Karl, but I'm not sure."  (A full transcript of Miers' deposition before the House Judiciary Committee <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/issues_Miers2.html">can be found here</a>.)<br />
<br />
In an email to Jennings, Miers provided the White House political aide with a detailed report of her discussion with McNulty: <br />
<br />
<blockquote>Scott, I just finished speaking with [Deputy AG] Paul McNulty. He said what we suspected he would. He has been contacted by a number of frustrated members of the Congress asking why people can't be vindicated in the event nothing is going on. He acknowledged that the situation is frustrating, but reiterated their position that they cannot confirm or deny the existence of an investigation. He said the AG did an interview last week to put things in as good as a perspective as possible by explaining that no one should be talking and that a refusal to deny should be given no meaning beyond that Justice does not admit or deny the existence of an investigation. I observed that at some point, immediately preceding an election, unattributed statements about the existence of an investigation was rankly unfair. He is continuing to think about the situation, but I did not get a lot of encouragement that they will deviate from normal course.</blockquote><br />
<br />
It is unclear what McNulty did next. He did not respond to a request for an interview for this article.  <br />
<br />
But clearly other political appointees at the Justice Department became fully engaged: <br />
Within the next 24 hours, the erroneous articles appeared saying the investigation of Renzi was only in a preliminary stage and that there was no evidence that Renzi had done anything wrong--all but assuring Renzi's reelection. <br />
<br />
The <i>New York Times</i> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/25/washington/25inquire.html">incorrectly reported</a> that "the inquiry was at an early stage" and that "investigators had yet to determine whether there was a basis to open a formal investigation or empanel a grand jury. <br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/24/AR2006102401715.html">lead paragraph of the <i>Post</i> story</a> said that the Renzi probe was only in a "preliminary stage." The <i>Post</i> story sympathetically quoted Renzi's attorney, Grant Woods, as saying: "When I was [Arizona state] attorney general, we dealt with this all the time in the last 30 days before an election, when candidates came to us with an accusation." <br />
<br />
The AP similarly quoted its source saying that the Renzi probe was "in the very early stages," citing a "law enforcement official in Washington." <br />
<br />
For good measure, the day after those three news stories, on Oct. 26, the <i>Arizona</i><i> </i><i>Republic</i> also published a story saying that the Renzi probe was much ado about nothing. <br />
&amp;quot;This is not a well-developed investigation, by any means,&amp;quot; an anonymous Justice Department official <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/congress/articles/1026renzi-tricks1026.html">told the newspaper</a>. &amp;quot;A tip comes into the department. The department is obligated to follow up... and we do that. People are assuming there is evidence of some crime, even though that is not necessarily true." <br />
<br />
In fairness to Miers, she might not have known that Renzi was in fact that subject of a federal criminal investigation of a serious magnitude at the time she asked for McNulty's assistance.  But whoever in the Justice Department spoke to the press must have understood that they were not only misleading the public, and that their falsehoods would improperly affect the outcome of an election, but also that they were compromising a sensitive criminal investigation. For instance, as a result of the disclosures, the wiretap on Renzi's phone was compromised. <br />
<br />
Charlton, saying he could not discuss the Renzi case in particular, did tell me: "Any time you have a wiretap up and the subject or the target becomes aware that there is an investigation, obviously the value of the information you glean from that wiretap will almost certainly be greatly diminished." <br />
<br />
Within weeks of Renzi's reelection, Charlton himself would be told that he was being fired as U.S. Attorney. A report by two Justice Department watchdog agencies, the department's Inspector General and the Office of Professional Responsibility, of the nine U.S. attorneys, concluded that Charlton's firing was most likely unrelated to his prosecution of Renzi. <br />
<br />
Previous internal investigations by the Justice Department's Inspector General and ethics office fell short of recommending further action - although the offices noted in their report that they were <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5912290&amp;amp;page=1">severely hampered</a> by the refusal of the Bush White House to turn over crucial documents.  <br />
<br />
<strong>Related Links</strong> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">"Bush Administration's Leaks Bolstered Rick Renzi's Reelection Bid,"</a> the <i>Hill</i>, June 24, 2009. <br />
<br />
Stephanie Woodrow, <a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/2009/08/12/rove-aide-asked-miers-to-help-clear-renzis-name/">"Rove Aide Asked Miers to Clear Republican's Name,"</a> <a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/tag/murray-waas/"><em>Main Justice</em></a>, Aug. 12, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm">"Administration Withheld E-Mails About Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 10, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a> can be reached via <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922">his Facebook page</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<center><p style="font-size:large;"><em>Get HuffPost Politics On <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/HuffPost-Politics/56845382910">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/huffpolitics">Twitter!</a></em></p></center>  <br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/98398/thumbs/s-USA-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Former U.S. Attorney condemns Bush White House Interference with Corruption Probe</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/former-us-attorney-condem_b_257837.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2009:/theblog//3.257837</id>
    <published>2009-08-12T15:41:54-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T13:50:23-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[With the 2006 mid-term elections approaching, a top aide to Karl Rove warned Harriett Miers that a Republican congressman's re-election was in serious jeopardy. Newly published emails show what happened next. ]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[With the 2006 mid-term congressional elections rapidly approaching, a top aide to Karl Rove warned Harriett Miers that a Republican congressman's re-election was in serious jeopardy because of rumors that the congressman was the target of a federal criminal investigation.<br />
<br />
Later the same day, the-then White House counsel pressed the Justice Department's second highest ranking official to issue a statement that would "vindicate" Rep. Rick Renzi of Arizona.<br />
<br />
As chronicled in a series of White House e-mails that were part of a <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/news/090811.html">massive trove of documents</a> Web-published by the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Miers was initially rebuffed in her efforts to get then-Deputy Attorney General to issue a statement clearing Renzi. Justice Department policy is ordinarily not to comment on ongoing investigations. <br />
<br />
Renzi was at the time locked in a razor-thin reelection campaign. Miers; Karl Rove; Scott Jennings, a top deputy to Rove; as well as officials at the Republican National Committee all believed that a statement clearing Renzi of wrongdoing would likely tilt the election in Renzi's favor, according to the White House emails made public yesterday by the House Judiciary Committee. <br />
<br />
The very next day, after Miers pressed Justice Department officials to say that Renzi had done nothing wrong, news stories simultaneously appeared in the <i>New York Times</i>, the <i>Washington Post</i>, and the Associated Press saying that although there was an ongoing probe of Renzi, the investigation was in a preliminary stage and  there had been no evidence uncovered to date that Renzi had done anything wrong at all. <br />
<br />
In fact, the investigation, which had been ongoing for some time, had already amassed enough evidence of alleged criminal misconduct that the U.S. attorney leading the Renzi probe, Paul Charlton, <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">had just obtained approval</a> from the highest levels of the Justice Department to seek an application from a federal judge to wiretap Renzi's telephone.  Over a year later, in Feb. 2008, a federal grand jury indicted Renzi on 38 counts of money laundering, extortion, insurance fraud, and other alleged felonies. <br />
<br />
But the disinformation leaked to media outlets had the desired effect: Renzi won reelection by the narrowest of margins.  (To read more about that disinformation campaign, see <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2009/06/hbc-90005261">here</a>.) <br />
<br />
In an interview yesterday, Charlton, the U.S. attorney who led the Renzi probe told me:  "It's a great disappointment that the White House not only would ask that the Justice Department to comment about an ongoing investigation but also lie about that investigation.  And it is even a greater disappointment that the Gonzales Department of Justice and would comment at all about an ongoing investigation let alone make untruthful comments about an investigation." <br />
<br />
Career federal law enforcement officials who worked directly on the Renzi criminal probe <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">told me for this story</a> that I wrote for the <i>Hill</i> in June that they wanted Attorney General Eric Holder to initiate a formal investigation of the matter. <br />
<br />
At the time of their comments, the direct involvement of White House political aides in the matter was not known.  The disclosure that at least three of President Bush's top aides were involved in the damage control effort to protect Renzi is almost certain to renew interest that a formal investigation of the leaks be undertaken. <br />
<br />
Charlton, one of nine U.S. attorneys fired by the Bush administration, told me that he hoped that a federal prosecutor already investigating the firings of nine U.S. attorneys, Nora Dannehy, would attempt to determine whether Bush administration officials had acted improperly or illegally while conducting their damage control effort to bolster Renzi's re-election chances:  "It is my understanding that the new information and documents are almost certainly in the possession  of the U.S. attorney and I expect that she will take the appropriate next steps." <br />
<br />
Miers apparently became involved in the Renzi matter after talking on the phone and receiving an email from Scott Jennings, a senior aide to Karl Rove, indicating that Renzi or someone close to him had called seeking their assistance. <br />
<br />
An Arizona blog had erroneously reported that Renzi was the target of a criminal investigation -- but that a decision had already been made to criminally charge him, with the charges delayed until after election day.  After the posting, senior officials at the Republican National Committee contacted Jennings to express concerns that reports of a federal investigation of Renzi might harm his chances for re-electon, according to emails made public by the House Judiciary Committee. <br />
<br />
In Miers' deposition by House Judiciary Committee staff, she testified that Rove may have also directly raised the issue with her as well: "I'm not sure how it came to my attention.  It may have been Karl but I don't know that... [T]he sense of the inquiry was this is happening, it's unfair.  I think it was Karl, but I'm not sure."  (A full transcript of Miers' deposition before the House Judiciary Committee <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/issues_Miers2.html">can be found here</a>. And more background on Miers' deposition can be found on <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/on_election_ever_miers_tried_to_intervene_renzi_case.php">this post</a> on <em>TPM Muckraker</em>.) <br />
<br />
Shortly thereafter, Miers called McNulty.  <br />
<br />
In an Oct. 24, 2006 email to Jennings, Miers provided the White House political aide with a detailed report of her discussion with McNulty: <br />
<br />
<blockquote>Scott, I just finished speaking with [Deputy AG] Paul McNulty. He said what we suspected he would. He has been contacted by a number of frustrated members of the Congress asking why people can't be vindicated in the event nothing is going on. He acknowledged that the situation is frustrating, but reiterated their position that they cannot confirm or deny the existence of an investigation. He said the AG did an interview last week to put things in as good as a perspective as possible by explaining that no one should be talking and that a refusal to deny should be given no meaning beyond that Justice does not admit or deny the existence of an investigation. I observed that at some point, immediately preceding an election, unattributed statements about the existence of an investigation was rankly unfair. He is continuing to think about the situation, but I did not get a lot of encouragement that they will deviate from normal course.</blockquote><br />
<br />
It is unclear what McNulty did next. He did not respond to a request for an interview for this article.  <br />
<br />
But clearly other political appointees at the Justice Department became fully engaged: <br />
Within the next twenty-four hours, the erroneous articles appeared saying the investigation of Renzi was only in a preliminary stage and that there was no evidence that Renzi had done anything wrong -- all but assuring Renzi's reelection. <br />
<br />
The <i>New York Times</i> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/25/washington/25inquire.html">incorrectly reported</a> that "the inquiry was at an early stage" and that "investigators had yet to determine whether there was a basis to open a formal investigation or empanel a grand jury. <br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/24/AR2006102401715.html">lead paragraph of the <i>Post</i> story</a> said that the Renzi probe was only in a "preliminary stage." The <i>Post</i> story sympathetically quoted Renzi's attorney, Grant Woods, as saying: "When I was [Arizona state] attorney general, we dealt with this all the time in the last 30 days before an election, when candidates came to us with an accusation." <br />
<br />
The AP similarly quoted its source saying that the Renzi probe was "in the very early stages," citing a "law enforcement official in Washington." <br />
<br />
For good measure, the day after those three news stories, on Oct. 26, the <i>Arizona</i><i> </i><i>Republic</i> also published a story saying that the Renzi probe was much ado about nothing:<br />
<br />
&amp;quot;This is not a well-developed investigation, by any means,&amp;quot; an anonymous Justice Department official <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/congress/articles/1026renzi-tricks1026.html">told the newspaper</a>. &amp;quot;A tip comes into the department. The department is obligated to follow up . . . and we do that. People are assuming there is evidence of some crime, even though that is not necessarily true." <br />
<br />
In fairness to Miers, she might not have known that Renzi was in fact that subject of a federal criminal investigation of a serious magnitude at the time she asked for McNulty's assistance.  But whoever in the Justice Department spoke to the press must have understood that they were not only misleading the public, and that their falsehoods would improperly affect the outcome of an election, but also that they were compromising a sensitive criminal investigation. For instance, as a result of the disclosures, the wiretap on Renzi's phone was compromised. <br />
<br />
Charlton, saying he could not discuss the Renzi case in particular, did tell me: "Any time you have a wiretap up and the subject or the target becomes aware that there is an investigation, obviously the value of the information you glean from that wiretap will almost certainly be greatly diminished." <br />
<br />
Within weeks of Renzi's reelection, Charlton himself would be told that he was being fired as U.S. Attorney. A report by two Justice Department watchdog agencies, the department's Inspector General and the Office of Professional Responsibility, of the nine U.S. attorneys, concluded that Charlton's firing was most likely unrelated to his prosecution of Renzi. <br />
<br />
Previous internal investigations by the Justice Department's Inspector General and ethics office fell short of recommending further action -- although the offices noted in their report that they were <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5912290&amp;amp;page=1">severely hampered</a> by the refusal of the Bush White House to turn over crucial documents.  <br />
<br />
<strong>Related Links</strong> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National+Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">"Bush Administration's Leaks Bolstered Rick Renzi's Reelection Bid,"</a> the <i>Hill</i>, June 24, 2009. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/murray_waas/" target="_hplink">Scott Horton</a>, <a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2009/06/hbc-90005261">"Did a Bush Justice Figure Obstruct the Renzi Investigation?,"</a> <i>Harper's</i>,  June 26, 2008. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm">"Administration Withheld E-Mails About Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 10, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html">Murray Waas</a></a> can be reached via <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922">his Facebook page</a>. <br />
<br />
<br />
	<br />
]]></content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Torture Memo Author Advocated Presidential Pardons, Jury Nullification</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/pressure-increases-on-tor_b_197764.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2009:/thenewswire//2.197764</id>
    <published>2009-05-06T13:10:50-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-03T14:46:34-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[A Bush administration attorney who approved harsh interrogation techniques of terror suspects advocated in 2006 that...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[A Bush administration attorney who approved harsh interrogation techniques of terror suspects advocated in 2006 that President Bush set aside recommendations by his own Justice Department to bring prosecutions for such practices, that the President should consider pardoning anyone convicted of such offenses, and even that jurors hearing criminal cases about such matters engage in jury nullification.<br />
<br />
That advice came from John Yoo, a former attorney with the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel and author of memos that served as a legal rationale for the Bush administration's interrogation techniques.  Yoo's recommendations constitute one of the most compelling pieces of a body of evidence that Yoo and other government attorneys improperly skewed legal advice to allow such practices, according to sources familiar with a still-confidential Justice Department report.<br />
<br />
A Justice Department internal watchdog agency, the Office of Professional Responsibility, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/06/us/politics/06inquire.html?hp">has concluded</a> that Yoo and a second former Justice Department attorney, Jay Bybee, breached their professional legal ethics by skewing their legal advisory opinion to provide a legal rationale for allowing the harsh interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, according to a senior Department attorney who has reviewed a draft of the report.  President Obama has said that the use of some of the interrogation techniques constituted torture.<br />
<br />
The OPR recommends in the draft report that state bar associations consider taking disciplinary action against Yoo and Bybee, according to the same sources.  The state bar associations could reject the OPR's findings or it could reprimand the attorneys, sanction them in some other fashion, or even hold disbarment proceedings. The draft report does not recommend that the Bush administration lawyers face criminal charges.<br />
		 <br />
Yoo, Bybee, and a third attorney, Stephen Bradbury, as senior attorneys in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), were the primary authors of four memos providing the legal rationale for the Bush administration's controversial interrogation practices.  The current draft of the report is critical of Bradbury's conduct as well, but did not consider his behavior serious enough to warrant potential action by his state bar association.<br />
<br />
Central to the OPR investigation, according to two attorneys involved, has been whether the three administration lawyers engaged in only crafting deficient legal opinions, or whether the they purposely and improperly skewed their advisory opinions to provide a legal rationale for Bush administration policies.<br />
<br />
"Intent is everything," said a Justice Department official who was involved in overseeing the probe. "What their mindset was, whether they were writing legal opinions tailored to meet the desires of their client -- that is key to whether this was just shoddy legal work or them not meeting their professional obligations."<br />
	<br />
The motivations of both Yoo and Bybee will almost certainly be central to whatever action state bar associations take in deciding whether to investigate or discipline the two attorneys. <br />
<br />
In Bybee's case, the stakes are quite high in that he is currently a federal judge. The New York Times' op-ed page, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) and John Podesta, a former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton who currently heads the Center for American Progress, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21780.html">have all called for Bybee's impeachment</a>.<br />
<br />
The new disclosures about Yoo's 2006 comments and recommendations in the OPR report are likely to fuel <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/5/5/senator_russ_feingold_on_obamas_escalation">further demands</a> for a House impeachment inquiry.  Yesterday, on Amy Goodman's syndicated radio show, Democracy Now!, Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wi.), when asked whether Bybee should be impeached, <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/5/5/senator_russ_feingold_on_obamas_escalation">replied</a>: "I don't believe he should be in the office he's in. I'd prefer to see him resign. I would not rule out impeachment. As a senator, my job is to review an impeachment by the House as a juror, just as I did in the case of President Clinton. So I'm not going to prejudge a situation. But on the face of it, I certainly would understand why any member of the House would say, `Wait a minute. Maybe we ought to consider articles of impeachment if he does not resign.' What he did here was truly against American law and against American values." <br />
<br />
In attempting to discern the attorneys' motives, investigators have reviewed emails traded between the three men as they drafted the legal controversial legal opinions, as well as emails between the three OLC attorneys and other Bush administration attorneys, according to sources close to the case.  <br />
<br />
Additionally, the investigators closely tracked drafts of the four legal opinions until they reached final form.  <br />
<br />
In some instances, the drafts changed progressively over time to afford those who wanted to engage in aggressive interrogation techniques additional legal cover, according to people who have read the draft OPR report.<br />
<br />
One source indicated that at least two of the earlier drafts were "equivocal" and "nuanced" -- but noted over time they became "more advocative" of the views of then-Vice President Dick Cheney and others in the Bush administration that aggressive interrogation techniques were necessary to prevent new terror attacks.<br />
<br />
Extraordinarily, however, the most compelling evidence that Yoo skewed his legal advice to facilitate the use of aggressive interrogation techniques is a public statement that Yoo made in 2006 after he retired from government service.  One investigator said that a state bar association is likely to consider Yoo's comments perhaps the most "damning evidence" in considering his intentions while coauthoring his OLC memos.<br />
<br />
In a 2006 memoir of his government service, entitled "War by Other Means," Yoo advocated that a president could take a number of steps so that people criminally charged with allegedly torturing prisoners would go free.<br />
<br />
Yoo wrote:  "There are ways that the legal system could develop effective approaches toward coercive interrogation. A president could decline to prosecute an officer whom he believed properly acted in self-defense or in an emergency, or out of necessity.  A President could pardon those involved.  Even if a prosecution occurs, a jury must find that that the defense is not met, and convict the agents and his superiors of violating the law.  It would require the only juror to agree that it was reasonable for the defendants to believe the coercive interrogation would yield information that would save lives, and that it would be necessary under the circumstances, to prevent the conviction." <br />
<br />
Yoo made the references in respect to the so-called McCain amendment, sponsored by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), which prohibited the use of cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment by military and intelligence officials of detainees or terror suspects.   Yoo complained that the McCain amendment and similar laws "unduly restrict the flexibility of the people who must make good decisions among the shifting complexities" in interrogating terror suspects.<br />
<br />
In an interview, Stephen Gillers, a professor of legal ethics at New York University, referring to the first statement by Yoo that the Justice Department should not pursue prosecutions of those suspected of torture told me:  "Withholding criminal prosecution because the person's conduct advances the president's political or policy agenda undermines the administration of criminal justice, which is supposed to be neutral in application."<br />
<br />
Regarding Yoo's advocacy of the use of presidential pardons, Gillers noted that although presidents have the constitutional right to pardon whomever he wants, and the decision to do so is often a political, it is ethically wrong for attorneys giving advice to Presidents to suggest ahead of time pardons for "entire particular categories of crimes."<br />
<br />
Gillers added:  "The pardon power is abused if the president decides in advance of the commission of a crime if he will forgive it because it serves his political agenda or policy agenda... That subverts the criminal justice system and the constitution. It literally sends the signal ahead of time that it is all right to violate the law."<br />
<br />
And regarding Yoo's comments regarding perspective jurors, who might hear cases against alleged torturers, Gillers told me: "Those comments are unbecoming a Justice Department lawyer.  The laws should not be administered and adopted in the hope or expectation that there might not be a conviction because of a hung jury."<br />
<br />
Collectively, Yoo's recommendations, Gillers said, has the effect of saying to presidential aides and government officials that "you can go ahead and do what we want even if it is a crime," if it is in the furtherance of a policy or activity supported by the President.<br />
<br />
As to the forthcoming OPR report, Gillers said, "It should be interesting to see if they were just bad lawyers.  That would be one thing. But if they falsified or soft pedaled their opinions because the vice president or the president wanted a particular opinion that would be shameful."<br />
<br />
In the meantime supporters of Yoo, Bybee, and the Bush administration's program mounted an effort to blunt the impact of the OPR report and even discredit its author. The Bush administration's outgoing attorney general, Michael Mukasey, and his deputy his deputy, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/05/05/ST2009050502426.html">Mark Filip</a>, wrote a fourteen page critique of a draft o the report, after it was submitted to them shortly before they left office. <br />
<br />
In a speech that Mukasey gave just prior to his leaving his office, he said administration attorneys were facing "almost unimaginable pressure" just right after the Sept. 11th terror attacks and complained that those criticizing them were engaged in second guessing under different circumstances.  To may career officials, Mukasey's remarks appeared to them to be an attempt to interfere or discredit their investigation.<br />
<br />
In a preemptive attempt to discredit the OPR report, Bush administration lawyers sympathetic to Yoo and Bybee not only <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/184801">leaked word to Newsweek</a> not only of Mukasey's and Filip's disapproval of it, but also quoted an administration attorney--anonymously--complaining:  "OPR is not competent to judge [the OLC opinions].  They're not constitutional scholars."<br />
	<br />
One prominent conservative political activist also recently told me that he was approached by backers of Yoo who said that they wanted to attack the credibility of the report by painting it as a partisan probe conducted by President Barack Obama's Justice Department.  The investigation, however, begun during the Bush administration -- more than five years ago.<br />
<br />
In a further effort to discredit the report, conservative backers of Yoo have also attempted to portray its primary author, H. Marshall Jarrett, the head of OPR, as a Democratic partisan.  But Jarrett is a lifetime Justice Department employee and career prosecutor who has <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904u/us-attorney-bogden">never been accused</a> of having a partisan agenda in the past.  During a long career, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904u/us-attorney-bogden">Jarrett has served</a> as either or prosecutor or supervisor in U.S. attorney offices in West Virginia and the District of Columbia and Justice's Public Integrity Section, before being appointed to head OPR.  During the Reagan administration, Jarrett oversaw the prosecution and conviction of one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress--Rep. Dan Rostenkowski (D-Ill.)--hardly the actions of an anti-Republican partisan prosecutor.  <br />
<br />
In any case, that strategy is also likely to fail, in that Attorney General Eric Holder recently reassigned Jarrett from his position as head of OPR to head the executive office of U.S. attorneys, where he will oversee the nation's 94 U.S. attorneys.  It will be left to Jarrett's successor at OPR, Mary Patrice Brown, herself a career prosecutor, who oversaw the criminal division of the U.S. attorney's office for the District of Columbia, to supervise any last minute changes to the release and the release of the report.<br />
<br />
In the meantime, sources caution that the draft report by OPR is subject to revision, and also has not formally been approved by Attorney General Eric Holder or other senior Justice Department officials who must still sign off on its findings. The report is expected to be made public by the end of this month.<br />
<br />
Yoo, Bybee, and Bradbury, the three authors of the contested OLC memos, were either unavailable or declined comment for this post.<br />
<br />
In April, however, Yoo <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-bybee22-2009apr22,0,2274085.story">defended his actions</a> during a public forum on the aggressive interrogation technique issue, saying:  "Three thousand of our fellow citizens had been killed in a deliberate attack by a foreign enemy. That forced us in the government to have to consider measures to gain information using presidential constitutional provisions to protect the country from further attack."<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>Related articles <a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">also by Murray Waas</a></strong>:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett--steele-awards-104329693.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">"Bush Administration's Leaks Bolstered Rick Renzi's Reelection Bid,"</a> the <i>Hill</i>, June 24, 2009. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/04/a-us-attorney-apos-s-story/7416/" target="_hplink">"A U.S. Attorney's Story,"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>,, April 20, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/what-did-bush-tell-gonzales/7064/" target="_hplink"> "What Did Bush Tell Gonzales?"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/the-case-of-the-gonzales-notes/7051/" target="_hplink">"The Case of the Gonzales Notes,"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>, Sept.. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm">"Administration Withheld E-Mails About Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 10, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798" target="_hplink"><strong>Other stories by Murray Waas</strong>:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69Q4XS20101027" target="_hplink">"Tea Party Candidates Only A Democrat Could Love," </a><em>Reuters</em>, Oct. 27, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/04/24-1" target="_hplink">"WellPoint Routinely Targets Breast Cancer Patients,'"</a> <em>Reuters</em>, April 24, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett--steele-awards-104329693.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G2DO20100317" target="_hplink">"Insurer Targeted HIV Patients to Drop Coverage,"</a><em> Reuters</em>, March 17, 2010. <br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National+Reporting" target="_hplink">About Murray Waas</a></strong>:<br />
<br />
Dan Froomkin, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">"A Compelling Story,"</a> the <em>Washington Post</em>, March 31, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Jay Rosen</a>, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">"Murray Waas is Our Woodward Now,"</a> <em>Pressthink</em> (NYU), April 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
Paul Krugman, <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">"Demons and Demonization,"</a> the <em>New York Times</em>, March 17, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html">Howard Kurtz</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">"The Lone Ranger,"</a> the <em>Washington Post</em>, April 17, 2006.<br />
<br />
Liz Halloran, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">"A Muckraker's Day in the Sun,"</a>  <em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em>, May 15, 2006.<br />
<br />
Jim Boyd, <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">"Editorial Pages: Why Courage is Hard to Find,"</a> <em>Nieman Reports</em>, Spring, 2006.<br />
<br />
Paul Krugman, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/opinion/10krugman.html">"Yes He Would,"</a> <em>New York Times</em>, April 10, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-12-13/news/jack-anderson-an-appreciation/">"Jack Anderson: An Appreciation," </a>the <em>Village Voice</em>, Oct. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
Eric Alterman and Dannile Ivory, <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/ta052109.html">"Blogosphere to Mainstream Media:  Get Off the Bus,"</a> Center for Amercan Progress, Mary 4, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/a-reporters-bias_b_23782.html">"A Reporter's Bias,"</a><em> Huffington Post</em>, June 26, 2006.<br />
<br />
Ryan Chuttum,<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink"> "Reuters is Excellent in Digging of A Health Insurer's Tactics,"</a> <em>Columbia Journalism Review</em>, March 10, 2010.<br />
<br />
Glenn Greenwald,<a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/"> "Salon Radio: Murray Waas,"</a> <em>Salon.com</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Douglas Frantz and Murray Waas</a></a>,<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-08-07/news/mn-4847_1"> "Iraq Used American-Built Plant to Develop A-Arms,"</a><em> Los Angeles Times</em>, August 9, 1992. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://mydd.com/2006/4/10/jay-rosen-quotmurray-waas-is-our-bob-woodwardquot" target="_hplink">Douglas Frantz and Murray Waas</a></a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-06-28/news/mn-1990_1_nuclear-weapons" target="_hplink">"High Tech Aid Flowed As Iraq Built Up Forces," </a><em>Los Angeles Times</em>, June 28, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas and Douglas Frantz</a>,<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-05-07/news/mn-2518_1_iran-iraq-war" target="_hplink"> "Bush Tied to `86 Bid to Give Iraq Military Advice,"</a> <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, May 9, 1992.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1993/3/26/goldsmith-prizes-awarded-pinvestigative-reporters-who/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a></a> can <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">be contacted</a> via his <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922http:/www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922http:/www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922">Facebook page</a>.   He is <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">the author</a>, <a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/10/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-murray-waas-and-jeff-lomonaco/">with Jeff Lomonaco</a>, of  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">"The United States v. I. Lewis Libby."<br />
</a><br />
<br><center><p style="font-size:large;"><em>Get HuffPost Politics On <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/HuffPost-Politics/56845382910">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/huffpolitics">Twitter!</a></em></p></center>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/78683/thumbs/s-YOO-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Rumsfeld on Detainees: &quot;I Stand for 8-10 Hours a Day. Why is Standing Limited to 4 Hours?&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/rumsfeld-on-detainees-i-s_b_189833.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2009:/theblog//3.189833</id>
    <published>2009-04-22T00:10:38-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-10T11:09:20-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[If Rumsfeld had any other thoughts at that historic moment in 2002,  thus far, that single one is the only known to have been recorded for posterity.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[It was a historic moment.  On Dec. 2, 2002, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld signed a memorandum authorizing interrogation techniques against detainees at Guantanamo that the current President of the United States, Barack Obama, has described as "torture."<br />
<br />
In a handwritten notation he scrawled at the bottom of the memo,  Rumsfeld wrote, "I stand for 8-10 hours a day.  Why is standing limited to 4  hours?"<br />
<br />
If Rumsfeld had any other thoughts at that historic moment,  thus far, that single one is the only known to have been recorded for posterity.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html" target="_hplink">Also of interest or by Murray Waas:<br />
</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/26/us-usa-politics-ensign-idUSTRE74P4N920110526" target="_hplink"> "Special Report:  Disgraced John Ensign Back in Legal Jeopardy,"</a> Reuters, May 26, 2011. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69Q4XS20101027" target="_hplink">"Tea Party Candidates Only A Democrat Could Love,"</a> Reuters, Oct. 27, 2010.<br />
<br />
Nick Carey and <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69Q4XS20101027" target="_hplink">"Virginia Veteran Report Shows High Depression Rate," </a>Reuters, Sept. 27, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69Q4XS20101027" target="_hplink">"WellPoint Routinely Targets Breast Cancer Patients,"</a> Reuters, April 23, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G2DO20100317" target="_hplink">"Insurer Targeted HIV Patients to Drop Coverage,"</a> Reuters, March 17, 2010.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Ryan Chuttum,<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink"> "Reuters is Excellent in Digging of A Health Insurer's Tactics,"</a> <em>Columbia Journalism Review</em>, March 17, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://murraywaas.net/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/11/alberto_gonzales_quietly_trium.html">"Dropped Call: "Alberto Gonzales Won't Be Charged Over Eavesdropping Testimony,"</a> <a href="http://nymag.com/author/murray%20waas"><em>New York Magazine</em></a>, Nov. 23, 2009.<br />
<br />
Stephanie Woodrow, <a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/2009/08/12/rove-aide-asked-miers-to-help-clear-renzis-name/">"Rove Aide Asked Miers to Help Clear Repubican's Name,"</a> <a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/tag/murray-waas/"><em>Main Justice</em></a>, August 12, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/news_notes/waas_is_the_new_woodward_35143.asp" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">"Bush Administration Leaks Bolstered Rep. Renzi's Reelection Bid,"</a> the <em>Hill</em>, June 24, 2009.<br />
<br />
Eric Alterman and Danielle Ivory, <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/ta052109.html">"Think Again:  Blogosphere to Mainstream Press:  Get Off the Bus,"</a> Center for American Progress, May 21, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/pressure-increases-on-tor_b_197764.html">"Torture Memo Author Advocated Presidential Pardons, Jury Nullificatoin,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>, May 6 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904u/us-attorney-bogden">"A U.S. Attorney's Story,"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>, April 20, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray S. Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/_at_least_eleven_bush.php">"The Big Stone Wall:  Nine Bush-Era Officials Cooperate with DOJ Probes,"</a>  <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/murray_waas_1/2009/02/01-week/"><em>Talking Points Memo</em></a>, Feb. 18, 2009.<br />
<br />
Damozel, <a href="http://bucknakedpolitics.typepad.com/buck_naked_politics/2009/02/one-for-the-books-rove-to-cooperate.html">"Rove to Cooperate?... or Not."</a> Buck Naked Politics, Feb. 9, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Scott Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/attorney_rove_will_cooperate_with_doj_probes.php"> "Attorney: Rove Will Cooperate with DOJ Probe,"</a> <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/murray_waas_1/2009/02/01-week"><em>TPM Muckraker</em></a>, Feb. 8, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/grand_jury_investigation_of_us_attorney_firings_fo.php">"Feds Probe Domenici for Obstruction of Justice in Iglesias Fight,"</a><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/murray_waas_1/2009/02/01-week/"> <em>TPM Muckraker,</em></a> Feb. 4, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/results.asp?ATH=Murray+Waas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/12/23/exclusive-cheneys-admissions-to-the-cia-leak-prosecutor-and-fbi/">"Cheney's Admissions to the CIA Leak Prosecutor,"</a><a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/about/"> personal blog</a>, Dec. 28, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2006/04/13/murray-waas-is-woodward/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/14/mccain-transition-chief-a_n_134595.html">"McCain Transition Chief Aided Saddam Lobbying Effort," </a><em>Huffington Post</em>,  Oct. 14, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/murray_waas/">Murray Waas</a> and Justin Rood, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5912290&amp;page=1">"Report: White House Involved in U.S. Attorney Firings,"</a> <em>ABCNews.com</em>, Sept. 29, 2008.<br />
<br />
Glenn Greenwald,<a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/"> "Salon Radio: Murray Waas,"</a> <em>Salon.com</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1017968939.php" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/09/28/bush-appointees-attempted-to-thwart-us-attorney-probe/">"Bush Appointees Attempted to Thwart U.S. Attorney Probe,"</a> personal blog, Sept. 28, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-investigation"> "What Did Bush Tell Gonzales?,"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/26/us-usa-politics-ensign-idUSTRE74P4N920110526" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-notes">"The Case of the Gonzales Notes,</a>" the<em> Atlantic</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803">Anna Schecter</a> and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5245645&amp;page=1">"DOJ Official Fired in Wake of ABC News Investigation," </a>ABCNews.com, June 25, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas and Anna Schecter</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803&amp;page=1">"Bush White House Pushed Grant for Former Staffer,"</a> ABC News, June 24, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink">Brian Ross, Anna Schecter, and Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5033256&amp;page=1">"Justice Department Official Awards $500,000 Grant to Golf Group,"</a> ABC News, June 9, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray S. Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/17/gonzales-investigated-sub_n_68911.html">"Gonzales Investigated Subordinates Likely to Testify Against Him,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>,  Oct. 17, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/10/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-murray-waas-and-jeff-lomonaco/">"FDL Book Salon Welcomes Murray Waas and Jeff Lomonaco,"</a> Firedoglake, June 10, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070531nj1.htm">"The Scales of Justice,"</a> the <em>National Journal</em>, May 31, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2005/10/12/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm"> "Administration Wittheld Emails About Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 10, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/murray-waas/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070503nj1.htm">"Justice Officials Says He Was Directed to Call Fired Prosecutors, "</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 3, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G2DO20100317" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070430nj1.htm">"Secret Order Delegated Extraordinary Power to Aides,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, April 30, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/murraywaas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0315nj1.htm">"Internal Affairs," </a><em>National Journal</em>, March 15, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.observer.com/author/murray-waas/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a> and Jeff Lomonaco,, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">"The U.S. v. I. Lewis Libby,"</a> Union Square Press, March, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0215nj1.htm">"Cheney's Call,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Feb. 15, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1993/3/26/goldsmith-prizes-awarded-pinvestigative-reporters-who/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0112nj1.htm"> "Inside the Grand Jury Room,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Jan. 12, 2007.<br />
<br />
Jim Boyd, <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">"Why Courage is Hard to Find,"</a> Nieman Reports, Summer, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National+Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nysun.com/opinion/writing-letters/36337/">"Writing Letters," </a><em>New York Sun</em>, July 19, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25rich.html?hp" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0718nj1.htm"> "Bush Blocked Justice Department Investigation,"</a> <em>National Journal,</em> July 18, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0703nj1.htm"> "Bush Directed Cheney to Counter War Critic,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, July 3, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">Shane Harris and Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0525nj2.htm">"Justice Department Probe Foiled,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 25, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0525nj1.htm">"Rove-Novak Call Was of Key Concern to Leak Investigators,"</a><em> National Journal</em>, May 25, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/10/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-murray-waas-and-jeff-lomonaco/">Jane Hamsher</a>, <a href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/17/murray-waas-to-join-yearly-kos-plame-panel/">"Murray Waas to Join Yearly Kos Plame Panel,"</a> <em>Firedoglake</em>, May 17, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes_2.htm">Liz Halloran</a>, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">"A Muckraker's Day in the Sun,"</a> <em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em>, May 15, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="hotstory.nationaljournal.com/articles/0302nj1.htm">"What Bush Was Told About Iraq,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 2, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html">Howard Kurtz,</a><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html"> "Reporters In Glass Houses,"</a> <em>Washington Post</em>, April 16, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0414nj3.htm">"Cheney Authorized Leak of CIA Report,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, April 14, 2006.<br />
<br />
Paul Krugman, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/opinion/10krugman.html">"Yes He Would,"</a> <em>New York Times</em>, April 10, 2006,<br />
<br />
<a href="http://mydd.com/2006/4/10/jay-rosen-quotmurray-waas-is-our-bob-woodwardquot" target="_hplink">Jay Rosen</a>, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">"Murray Waas is Our Woodward Now,"</a> PressThink, April 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Dan Froomkin</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">"A Compelling Question,"</a><em> Washington Post</em>, March 31, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G2DO20100317" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0330nj1.htm">"Insulating Bush,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, March 30, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National+Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray S. Waas</a>, <a href="hotstory.nationaljournal.com/articles/0302nj1.htm">"What Bush Was Told About Iraq,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, March 3, 2006.<br />
<br />
Amy Goodman, <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2006/2/10/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">"How Cheney Authorized Libby to Leak Classified Information,"</a> <em>Democracy Today!,</em> Feb. 10, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray S. Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm">"Cheney `Authorized' Libby to Leak Classified Information,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Feb. 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1216nj2.htm">Why Novak Called Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Dec. 16, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://mydd.com/2006/4/10/jay-rosen-quotmurray-waas-is-our-bob-woodwardquot" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a>,<a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-12-13/news/jack-anderson-an-appreciation/"> "Jack Anderson: An Appreciation,"</a> the <em>Village Voice</em>, Dec. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1113nj_waas.htm">"Senate Ethics Committee Clears Shelby,"</a><em> National Journal</em>, Nov. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/opinion/10krugman.html?scp=5&amp;sq=%22murray+waas%22&amp;st=nyt">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1112nj_waas.htm">"Libby Testimony Key to Rove Inquiry,"</a> <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1112nj_waas.htm">National Journal</a>, Nov. 12, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25rich.html?_r=1&amp;hp" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1030nj1.htm">"Addington's Role in Cheney's Office Draws Fresh Attention,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 30, 2005. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1027nj1.htm"> "Cheney, Libby Blocked Papers to Senate Intelligence Panel,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 27, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1020nj1.htm"> "Secret Service Records Prompted Key Change in Miller Testimony,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 20, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1018nj1.htm">"CIA Leak Prosecutor Focuses on Libby,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 18, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-12-13/news/jack-anderson-an-appreciation/">"Jack Anderson: An Appreciation," </a>the <em>Village Voice</em>, Oct. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
Amy Goodman, <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2005/10/12/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">"How Dick Cheney's Top Aide Misled Federal Prosecutors in the CIA Leak Case," </a><em>Democracy Now!</em>, Oct. 12, 2005,<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink">Murray S. Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1011nj1.htm"> "Libby Did Not Tell Grand Jury About Key Meeting,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 11, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/10/rove-before-grand-jury-in-morning.html">"Rove Before Grand Jury in the Morning,"</a> <em>Whatever Already!</em>, Oct. 6, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1007nj3.htm"> "Rove Assured Bush He Was Not Leaker,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 5, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/09/house-intelligence-committee-votes.html">"House Intelligence Committee Votes Down Plame Resolution of Inquiry," </a><em>Whatever Already</em>!, Sept. 15, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1993/3/26/goldsmith-prizes-awarded-pinvestigative-reporters-who/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=10077">"The Meeting,"</a> the <em>American Prospect</em>, Aug. 6, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=154e1aad-fd18-4efd-8d80-b5dab8559419">"Special Handling: How the Huckabee Administration Worked to Free Rapist Wayne Dumond,"</a> <em>Arkansas Times</em>, Aug. 1, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/07/exclusive-novak-co-operated-with.html">"Exclusive:  Novak Cooperated With Prosecutors," </a><em>Whatever Already!</em>, July 12, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=plame_game_redux">Plame Game Redux,"</a> the <em>American Prospect</em>, May 22, 2005,<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/17/murray-waas-to-join-yearly-kos-plame-panel/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/22020/the_baron%27s_last_exit/">"The Baron's Exit,"</a> the <em>Washington Examiner</em>, May 18, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/what-now-karl/">"What Now, Karl?,"</a> the <em>Village Voice</em>, April 9, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/murraywaas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/17084/">"Pressure on Ashcroft to Recuse Himself Grows,"</a> <a href="http://www.alternet.org/authors/3168/">Alternet</a>, Oct. 31, 2003.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1017968939.php" target="_hplink">Douglas Frantz and Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-08-07/news/mn-4847_1"> "Iraq Used American-Built Plant to Develop A-Arms,"</a><em> Los Angeles Times</em>, August 9, 1992. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/United-States-v-I-Lewis-Libby/Murray-Waas/e/9781402752599" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a> and <a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National+Reporting" target="_hplink">Douglas Frantz</a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-04-18/news/mn-537_1_saudi-arabia-s-transfers?pg=2">"Saudi Arms Link to Iraq Allowed:  Under Reagan and Bush, U.S. Weapons were Secretly Provided to Mideast,"</a> <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/united-states-military-aid-iraq"><em>Los Angeles Times</em></a>,  April 18, 1992. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Douglas Frantz and Murray Waas</a></a>,<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-08-07/news/mn-4847_1"> "Iraq Used American-Built Plant to Develop A-Arms,"</a><em> Los Angeles Times</em>, August 9, 1992. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas and Douglas Frantz</a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-22/news/mn-7320_1_food-aid" target="_hplink">"Abuses in U.S. Aid to Iraqis Ignored,"</a> <em><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/united-states-foreign-aid-iraq" target="_hplink">Los Angeles Times</a></em>, March 22, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1017968939.php" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a> and Douglas Frantz, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-06/news/mn-3321_1_arms-sales">"Despite Ban, U.S. Arms Are Sold to Pakistan,"</a><em> Los Angeles Times</em>, March 6, 1992.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<em><em><a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a> can <a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798">be reached</a> through <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922">his Facebook account</a>.</em> You can also<a href="http://www.murraywaas.net/biography_murray_waas_.html"> follow him</a> on <a href="http://twitter.com/murraywaas">twitter</a></em>.]]></content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Official Who Lobbied For Saddam Donated Heavily To GOP Committees</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/official-who-lobbied-for_b_139648.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2008:/thenewswire//2.139648</id>
    <published>2008-10-31T13:54:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T12:50:18-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[John Venners, a Washington D.C. based public relations man who aided an influence effort to ease international...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[John Venners, a Washington D.C. based public relations man who aided an influence effort to ease international economic sanctions against the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein, made $40,000 in campaign contributions since 2004 to the Republican House and Senate Campaign Committees, according to <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.php?name=venners%2C+john&amp;state=&amp;zip=&amp;employ=&amp;cand=&amp;c2008=Y&amp;c2006=Y&amp;c2004=Y&amp;sort=N&amp;capcode=4t2w8&amp;submit=Submit">public records</a>.<br />
<br />
Venners was a partner in the influence venture on behalf of Saddam Hussein's regime with William Timmons, a Washington lobbyist who was tapped by John McCain to play a leading role in his presidential transition team, according to federal court records and pubic investigative reports by the United Nations.<br />
<br />
As <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/14/mccain-transition-chief-a_n_134595.html">first disclosed by Huffington Post</a>, Timmons played a central role over a five year period in the lobbying campaign on behalf of Saddam's regime to ease sanctions against Iraq shortly after the end of the first Gulf War. <br />
<br />
Timmons declined to comment for that article as well as for this one.  Venners did not respond to messages seeking comment at his office, or that of his wife, a Washington political consultant.<br />
<br />
Samir Vincent, an Iraqi born American citizen who Timmons and Venners worked closely with on the influence campaign, pleaded guilty to criminal charges in January 2005 that he acted as an unregistered agent of Saddam Hussein's regime.   Tongsun Park, a second lobbyist who Timmons and Venners also worked closely with, was convicted by a federal jury in July 2006 on charges that he too violated the Foreign Agent Registration<br />
<br />
During the same period beginning in 1992, when Timmons and Venners worked closely with Vincent and Park on the lobbying campaign, they were also attempting to negotiate a contract with the Iraqi government to purchase and resell Iraqi oil.  The four men stood to share at least $45 million if the business deal went through.  In the end, the arrangement failed because the sanctions were not lifted.<br />
<br />
Federal campaign finance records, some of which are available online, show that between 2004 and 2008, Venners made some $40,000 in campaign contributions to the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee, which raise money to finance, respectively, Republican Senate and House candidates.  Between 2006 and 2008, Venners made more than $16,000 in additional campaign contributions to individual campaigns of House and Senate Republicans, according to public records.  He contributed during the same period to a single Democrat during that period, Sen. Max Baucus, of Montana, whom he gave $1,000.<br />
<br />
On its website, <a href="http://www.nrsc.org/about/">the NRSC says of itself</a>: "The National Republican Senatorial Committee is the only political committee solely dedicated to electing Republicans to the U.S. Senate, and re-taking the majority in 2008.<br />
<br />
"The NRSC provides invaluable support and assistance to current and prospective Republican U.S. Senate candidates in the areas of budget planning, election law compliance, fundraising, communications tools and messaging, research and strategy."<br />
<br />
The National Republican Congressional Committee does much the same thing for Republican House candidates. <br />
<br />
Timmons and Venners were<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/14/mccain-transition-chief-a_n_134595.html" target="_hplink"> cooperating witnesses</a> in the federal investigations of Vincent and Park and were never charged by prosecutors with wrongdoing.  And information made public during the case indicated that Vincent and Park often engaged in illegal activity--such as <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/10/14/the-company-he-keeps-how-bill-timmons-partners-grifted-saddam-hussein/">acting as middlemen on behalf of the Iraqi regime</a> to pay millions of dollars in bribes to U.N. officials to ease economic sanctions against Iraq-- without Timmons and Venners knowing what Vincent and Park were up to. <br />
<br />
But other evidence made public during the trial demonstrated that Timmons knew that he and Vincent were working closely with top aides to Saddam Hussein in the lobbying campaign to ease or lift economic sanctions against the Iraqi regime.<br />
<br />
Testimony and records made public during Park's criminal trial detail that virtually everything Timmons did while working on the lobbying campaign was within days conveyed by Vincent to either one or both of Saddam Hussein's top aides, Tariq Aziz and Nizar Hamdoon. Vincent also testified that he almost always relayed input from the Iraqi aides back to Timmons.<br />
<br />
Talking points that Timmons produced for the lobbyists to help ease the sanctions, for example, were reviewed ahead of time by Aziz, Vincent testified in court. Proposals that Timmons himself circulated to U.S. officials as part of the effort were written with the assistance of the Iraqi officials, and were also sent ahead of time with Timmons' approval to Aziz, other records show.<br />
<br />
Timmons' activities occurred in the years following the first Gulf War, when Washington considered Iraq to be a rogue enemy state and a sponsor of terrorism. His dealings on behalf of the deceased Iraqi leader stand in stark contrast to the views his current employer held at the time.<br />
<br />
John McCain strongly supported the 1991 military action against Iraq, and as recently as last month described Saddam Hussein as a one-time menace to the region who had "stated categorically that he would acquire weapons of mass destruction, and use them whenever he could."<br />
<br />
<strong>Related <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">stories by Murray Waas</a>:</strong> <br />
<br />
 <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/14/mccain-transition-chief-a_n_134595.html">"McCain Transition Chief Aided in Saddam Lobbying Campaign,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>, Oct. 14, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/ta052109.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas and Douglas Frantz</a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-11-29/news/mn-2980_1_gao-report" target="_hplink">"Jordan Gave Broad Assistance to Iraq, Papers Show,"</a><em> Los Angeles Times</em>, Nov. 25, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Douglas Frantz and Murray Waas</a></a>,<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-08-07/news/mn-4847_1"> "Iraq Used American-Built Plant to Develop A-Arms,"</a><em> Los Angeles Times</em>, August 9, 1992. <br />
<br />
Douglas Frantz and <a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-06-28/news/mn-1990_1_nuclear-weapons" target="_hplink">"High Tech Aid Flowed As Iraq Built Up Forces," </a><em>Los Angeles Times</em>, June 28, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas and Douglas Frantz</a>,<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-05-07/news/mn-2518_1_iran-iraq-war" target="_hplink"> "Bush Tied to `86 Bid to Give Iraq Military Advice,"</a> <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, May 9, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas and Douglas Frantz</a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-04-18/news/mn-537_1_saudi-arabia-s-transfers?pg=2">"Saudi Arms Link to Iraq Allowed:  Under Reagan and Bush, U.S. Weapons were Secretly Provided to Mideast,"</a> <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/united-states-military-aid-iraq"><em><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/united-states-foreign-aid-iraq" target="_hplink">Los Angeles Times</a></em></a>,  April 18, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas and Douglas Frantz</a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-22/news/mn-7320_1_food-aid" target="_hplink">"Abuses in U.S. Aid to Iraqis Ignored,"</a> <em><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/united-states-foreign-aid-iraq" target="_hplink">Los Angeles Times</a></em>, March 22, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National+Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas and Douglas Frantz</a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-06/news/mn-3321_1_arms-sales">"Despite Ban, U.S. Arms Are Sold to Pakistan,"</a> Los Angeles Times, March 6, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.miaminewtimes.com/1990-12-12/news/the-man-who-armed-iraq/1/" target="_hplink">"The Man Who Armed Iraq,"</a> Miami New Times, Dec. 12, 1990.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink"><strong>More about Murray Waas</strong>:</a><br />
<br />
Eric Alterman and Dannile Ivory, <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/ta052109.html">"Blogosphere to Mainstream Media:  Get Off the Bus,"</a> Center for Amercan Progress, Mary 4, 2009.<br />
<br />
Glenn Greenwald, <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/index.html">"Salon Radio: Murray Waas,"</a><em> Salon.com</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
Jim Boyd, "<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">Editorial Pages: Why Courage is Hard to Find,"</a><em> Nieman Reports</em>, Summer 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes_2.htm">Liz Halloran</a>, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">"A Muckraker's Day in the Sun,"</a> <em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em>, May 15, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">Howard Kurtz</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html">"Reporters in Glass Houses,"</a> <em>Washington Post</em>, April 17, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://mydd.com/2006/4/10/jay-rosen-quotmurray-waas-is-our-bob-woodwardquot" target="_hplink">Jay Rosen</a>, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">"Murray Waas is Our Woodward Now,"</a> PressThink, April 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Dan Froomkin</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">"A Compelling Question,"</a><em> Washington Post</em>, March 31, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-12-13/news/jack-anderson-an-appreciation/">"Jack Anderson: An Appreciation," </a>the <em>Village Voice</em>, Oct. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
Paul Krugman, <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">"Demons and Demonization,"</a> the <em>New York Times</em>, March 17, 2010.<br />
<br />
Ryan Chuttum,<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink"> "Reuters is Excellent in Digging of A Health Insurer's Tactics,"</a> <em>Columbia Journalism Review</em>, March 17, 20010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/murray-waas/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a></a> can <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">be contacted</a> via his <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922http:/www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922http:/www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922">Facebook page</a>.   He is <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">the author</a>, <a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/10/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-murray-waas-and-jeff-lomonaco/">with Jeff Lomonaco</a>, of  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">"The United States v. I. Lewis Libby."<br />
</a><br />
<br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/46526/thumbs/s-SADDAM-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>McCain Transition Chief Aided Saddam In Lobbying Effort</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/14/mccain-transition-chief-a_n_134595.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2008:/thenewswire//2.134595</id>
    <published>2008-10-14T14:49:03-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T12:50:18-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[William Timmons, the Washington lobbyist who John McCain has named to head his presidential transition team, aided...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[William Timmons, the Washington lobbyist who John McCain has named to head his presidential transition team, aided an influence effort on behalf of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to ease international sanctions against his regime.<br />
<br />
The two lobbyists who Timmons worked closely with over a five year period on the lobbying campaign later either pleaded guilty to or were convicted of federal criminal charges that they had acted as unregistered agents of Saddam Hussein's government.<br />
<br />
During the same period beginning in 1992, Timmons worked closely with the two lobbyists, Samir Vincent and Tongsun Park, on a previously unreported prospective deal with the Iraqis in which they hoped to be awarded a contract to purchase and resell Iraqi oil.  Timmons, Vincent, and Park stood to share at least $45 million if the business deal went through.<br />
<br />
Timmons' activities occurred in the years following the first Gulf War, when Washington considered Iraq to be a rogue enemy state and a sponsor of terrorism. His dealings on behalf of the deceased Iraqi leader stand in stark contrast to the views his current employer held at the time.<br />
<br />
John McCain strongly supported the 1991 military action against Iraq, and as recently as Sunday described Saddam Hussein as a one-time menace to the region who had "stated categorically that he would acquire weapons of mass destruction, and he would use them wherever he could." <br />
<br />
Timmons declined to comment for this story.  An office manager who works for him said that he has made it his practice during his public career to never speak to the press. Timmons previously told investigators that he did not know that either Vincent or Park were acting as unregistered agents of Iraq. He also insisted that he did not fully understand just how closely the two men were tied to Saddam's regime while they collaborated.<br />
<br />
But testimony and records made public during Park's criminal trial, as well as other information uncovered during a United Nations investigation, suggest just the opposite. Virtually everything Timmons did while working on the lobbying campaign was within days conveyed by Vincent to either one or both of Saddam Hussein's top aides, Tariq Aziz and Nizar Hamdoon.  Vincent also testified that he almost always relayed input from the Iraqi aides back to Timmons.<br />
<br />
Talking points that Timmons produced for the lobbyists to help ease the sanctions, for example, were reviewed ahead of time by Aziz, Vincent testified in court.  Proposals that Timmons himself circulated to U.S. officials as part of the effort were written with the assistance of the Iraqi officials, and were also sent ahead of time with Timmons' approval to Aziz, other records show.<br />
  <br />
Moreover, there was a major financial incentive at play for Timmons. The multi-million dollar oil deal that he was pursuing with the two other lobbyists would only be possible if their efforts to ease sanctions against Iraq were successful.<br />
<br />
Vincent, an Iraqi-born American citizen with whom Timmons worked most closely, pleaded guilty to federal criminal charges in January 2005 that he had acted as an unregistered agent of Saddam Hussein's regime.  Tongsun Park, the second lobbyist who Timmons worked closely with, was convicted by a federal jury in July 2006 on charges that he too violated the Foreign Agent Registration Act.<br />
<br />
As part of a plea bargain agreement with the Justice Department, Vincent agreed to testify against Park and others in exchange for a reduced prison sentence.  He was the government's chief witness against Park during Park's trial.  Park was <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E3DC103EF930A15751C0A9619C8B63&amp;scp=4&amp;sq=">sentenced to five years in prison</a> after his conviction. <br />
<br />
A U.N commission headed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker conducted an <a href="http://www.iic-offp.org/story27oct05.htm">exhaustive investigation</a> of the oil-for-food program, in which various individuals were found to have paid illegal kickbacks to Saddam Hussein. The findings of the Volcker Commission detail the roles of Vincent, Park and Timmons in trying to ease the sanctions. <br />
<br />
<center>*  *  *  *  *</center><br />
<br />
Timmons testified that he first introduced Vincent to Tongsun Park and encouraged him to hire Park to work on the deal.<br />
<br />
At the time Timmons introduced the two men, Park's notorious background was well known:<br />
<br />
In the 1970s, Park had admitted to making hundreds of thousands in payments and illegal campaign contributions to U.S. congressmen on behalf of the South Korean government. Park was indicted on 36 counts by a federal grand jury, but fled to South Korea before he could face trial.  All of the charges were later dismissed in exchange for Park providing information about which public officials received funds from the South Korean government.<br />
<br />
Perhaps unsurprisingly, not long after Timmons suggested that Vincent hire Park to assist their influence, lobbying, and back-channel diplomatic efforts on behalf of Saddam Hussein's government, much of that effort became increasingly bizarre, corrupt, and - on occasion - illegal.<br />
<br />
Vincent testified that Park <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/10/14/the-company-he-keeps-how-bill-timmons-partners-grifted-saddam-hussein/">covertly received millions of dollars</a> from Saddam's government that was supposed to be used to bribe then-U.N. Secretary General Boutros Boutros Ghali to ease international sanctions against Iraq. But both men simply pocketed the money, according to Vincent. (There is no evidence that Boutros Ghali even knew of Iraq's intention to bribe him.)<br />
<br />
Investigations by the Justice Department and the Volcker commission disclosed that Park also served as the middleman for a million dollar payment that investigators believed was a bribe for another senior United Nations official.  That official in fact admitted receiving the money from Park, but said he did not know that the funds originated with Saddam's regime.<br />
<br />
Timmons told federal investigators that he was unaware of these particular activities, and investigators were unable to uncover any evidence to contradict that claim.<br />
<br />
Timmons also claimed that he was motivated to push forward with the lobbying campaign with Vincent and Park not only to assist Saddam's regime but also because he believed that his actions would serve U.S. interests, that they would help the people of Iraq obtain needed medicine and food being denied them by sanctions, and would serve to facilitate a rapprochement of relations between Hussein and the U.S. that would be beneficial to both countries.<br />
<br />
But there was a financial incentive in play as well. During the same period, Vincent was hard at work obtaining contracts with Iraq to purchase and resell Iraqi oil allowed under international sanctions; Timmons would have stood to benefit financially from those contracts.<br />
<br />
Timmons claimed to investigators that any contracts offered to him, Vincent, and Park would be awarded solely on merit, and had nothing to do with their lobbying efforts.  <br />
<br />
But Vincent told investigators that their work clearly gave them an inside track.  And in other instances, in which Timmons was not involved, Vincent profited from lucrative oil-for-food contracts awarded by Iraq as compensation for his effort to buy influence in the U.S. and at the U.N. for Saddam's regime. <br />
<br />
At Park's trial, Vincent testified that he, Park, and Timmons stood to make as much as $45 million in profits from one particular oil venture with Saddam's regime had it gone forward.  Park testified that he was unsure exactly what percentage of the proceeds each of the three men would have personally received.  The deal ultimately fell through.<br />
<br />
An investigator who worked on the U.N. investigation of the oil-for-food program told me that Timmons clearly should have or did understand that he was the possible recipient of oil contracts from the Iraqi government because of his lobbying and back channel diplomatic efforts on behalf of Saddam: "He would have to be the most naive person in the world to believe that was not the case," the official told me. "I guess William Timmons is just a natural born oilman.  He is either deceiving himself to rationalize what he has done or taking the rest of us for fools."<br />
<br />
Between 1997 and 2001, according to the Volcker report, Vincent received five such contracts from Saddam's regime. <br />
<br />
In his guilty plea agreement with the Justice Department, Vincent admitted:  "I received those allocations because of the work I had done on behalf of the Government of Iraq in helping set up the oil-for-food program."<br />
<br />
<center>*  *  *  *  *</center><br />
<br />
Samir Vincent was well positioned for the task at hand when he began his influence and back channel diplomacy campaign with the Iraqis; he had been boyhood friends of two of Saddam Hussein's closest advisers, Nizaar Hamdoon and Tariq Aziz.<br />
<br />
Hamdoon, who died in 2003, was Saddam's foreign minister, and Tariq Aziz had variously served as Baghdad's ambassador to the United States, ambassador to the United States, and Iraq's deputy prime minister. <br />
<br />
But Vincent also sought to enlist the help of a Washington insider or lobbyist if his efforts were to have any chance of success. <br />
<br />
His initial plan to purchase Iraqi oil through the American Red Cross faced opposition from the U.S. government. Vincent's partner at the time, an American businessman named John Venners, suggested that they needed "help from some people that he knew very well" who "used to be high up in the government." Venners recommended William Timmons. <br />
<br />
As Time magazine's Michael Scherer <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1840722,00.html">recently reported</a>, Timmons is "a Washington institution," having worked as a senior aide to every Republican president since Richard Nixon. He also serves as chairman emeritus of Timmons and Company, "a small but influential lobbying firm he founded in 1975 shortly after leaving the White House."<br />
<br />
According to Vincent's testimony, Timmons immediately opened doors for the Iraqi-American lobbyist. He talked to then-Deputy Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger on Vincent's behalf. He also contacted then-Sen. Bob Dole and John Bolton, then-undersecretary of state for international affairs, to discuss Vincent's plan.<br />
<br />
In a meeting with U.N. officials, Vincent pressed his case armed with "talking points" that Timmons had written for him. Before using them, Vincent said that he first sent the talking points to Nizaar Hamdoon and Tariq Aziz, with Timmons' approval. <br />
<br />
After the meeting, Vincent traveled all the way to Baghdad to report back to Tariq Aziz what had occurred. Later, he had another meeting with Hamdoon and Aziz at the United Nations mission in New York to plan on next steps. Vincent testified he made formal minutes of that meeting, typed them up, and then traveled to Washington to personally give them to Timmons.  This was routine practice as Vincent, Timmons, and the Iraqis worked together.  <br />
<br />
Timmons himself was apparently loathe to meet with Hamdoon or Aziz personally.  But virtually the entire time they worked together, Vincent would relay to Timmons what the Iraqis had to say and vice versa. <br />
<br />
After Vincent's first meeting with U.N. officials, Aziz and Hamdoon suggested that something called a "non-paper" be presented the next time Vincent met with the same officials.  Non-papers are diplomatic communications in which parties can propose positions in writing, but do not have to fear if they leak to the public or press, because they do not officially represent positions of the government.<br />
<br />
At the request of Aziz and Hamdoon, Timmons authored the non-paper which Vincent could rely on for that second meeting.  Both Aziz and Hamdoon also reviewed the paper before Vincent used it.<br />
<br />
On March 15, 1995, Timmons wrote a memo (which is a matter of public record as an exhibit in the case) advocating that they and the Iraqis should enlist the assistance of U.S. oil companies to make their case.<br />
<br />
Timmons once again apparently understood that his audience was the Iraqi government. Vincent testified that Timmons gave him the memo knowing that the document was "supposed to solicit the thoughts of the Iraqi government, if this is something they would seriously consider."  Vincent dutifully passed Timmons' memo on to Nizaar Hamdoon, he testified.<br />
<br />
Weeks later, in April 1995, Vincent was summoned to Iraq to meet with Saddam Hussein in Baghdad.<br />
<br />
As to Timmons' claims that he kept his distance from Vincent and Park and did not know much about what they and the Iraqis were up to, this exchange between a federal prosecutor and Vincent once again suggests otherwise:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Q: And when you returned to the United States, did you tell anyone about your visit with Saddam Hussein?<br />
<br />
<br />
A:  I told Bill Timmons and Tongsun Park.<br />
<br />
Q: Why did you tell Bill Timmons about your visit with Saddam?<br />
<br />
A: To let him know that we were talking to the leader of Iraq, and in essence we have access and assure him that any messages we were relaying between Iraqi and Tariq Aziz and anyone else, it was being transmitted to the president, Saddam Hussein, in Iraq. </blockquote><br />
<br />
<center>*  *  *  *  *</center><br />
<br />
Presciently, <em>Time</em>'s Scherer noted that McCain's own staffers had early concerns that appointing Timmons could prove detrimental to the Arizona Senator's presidential ambitions:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>His [lobbying] registrations include work on a number of issues that have become flashpoints in the presidential campaign. He has registered to work on bills that deal with the regulations of troubled mortgage lenders Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, a bill to provide farm subsidies and bills that regulate domestic oil-drilling.<br />
<br />
<br />
By tapping Timmons, McCain has turned to one of Washington's steadiest and most senior inside players to guide him in the event of a victory -- but also to someone who represents the antithesis of the kind of outside-of-Washington change he has recently been promising. One Republican familiar with the process said the decision to involve Timmons could become a political liability for the campaign's reformist image, especially in the wake of the controversies over the lobbying backgrounds of other McCain staffers, including campaign manager Rick Davis. "It's one more blind spot for Rick Davis and John McCain," the person said.</blockquote> <br />
<br />
Timmons' work to relax international sanctions against Iraq, as well as to benefit financially from Saddam Hussein's regime, may be another such flashpoint.<br />
<br />
The Volcker report makes clear that when Timmons first got involved with Vincent and the Iraqis, the lure of millions of dollars was at least one incentive. By early 1992, Timmons and his associates were already "pursu[ing] the purchase of sale of Iraqi oil and the exploration by a consortium of companies of the Manjoon field in Iraq," the report said.<br />
<br />
According to the report, the venture was dependent on Vincent's belief "that sanctions against Iraq would be lifted immediately and that the Iraqi government might grant a long-term concession to an American oil company."<br />
<br />
Later, when Timmons pressed the case even more aggressively that sanctions against Saddam's regime be eased, he, Vincent and Park hoped to profit as well, according to the Volcker report.  "Continuing through 1994 and 1995, Mr. Vincent and Mr. Park, along with Mr. Timmons and others, persisted in their efforts to establish a foothold in the Iraqi oil business," the report stated.<br />
<br />
At one point, Timmons even boasted to investigators that it was his ideas that later became the basis for the United Nations' oil-for-food program.<br />
<br />
Under that program, the United Nations allowed Iraq to sell its oil under U.N. supervision, with the proceeds placed in U.N. escrow accounts to buy food, medicine, and other humanitarian goods for the Iraqi people.<br />
<br />
However, a major flaw in the program was that Saddam Hussein's regime was allowed to play a role in the selection of oil companies awarded contracts.  Because of lax oversight of the program, Saddam's government was able to demand that foreign oil companies -- including American ones -- provide more than $1.7 billion in kickbacks to his regime.<br />
<br />
One of the most outspoken critics in the U.S. Senate of the oil-for-food program was John McCain:<br />
<br />
"We need to have a full and complete cooperation on the part of the U.N. about this whole oil-for-food program, which stinks to high heaven," McCain <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,140537,00.html">told Fox News</a> in Dec. 2004.  "We're talking about billions and billions of dollars here that were diverted for many wrong purposes. And this is an example of corruption.<br />
<br />
"And by the way, it's an argument, maybe a small one, but maybe an argument that justifies our action in Iraq. Because clearly the sanctions and the framework of those sanctions was completely eroded."<br />
<br />
<em>Additional reporting by Patrick B. Anderson.</em>]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/43607/thumbs/s-WAAAAS-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Former Bush Counselor Dan Bartlett Unloads on Cheney: &quot;Doesn't Do Touchy-Feely&quot; or &quot;Hug  Babies&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/former-bush-counselor-dan_b_126383.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2008:/theblog//3.126383</id>
    <published>2008-09-15T07:05:44-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T05:21:16-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Here is a gem from a still embargoed portion of Washington Post reporter Barton Gelman's book on Cheney: the vice president turned down a request from Bush to take charge of the federal response to Katrina.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[<em>Washington Post</em> reporter Barton Gelman's book on Dick Cheney is embargoed until Tuesday, although two excerpts have run in the <em>Post</em> on Sunday and Monday.  But the publisher is keeping the rest of the book under wraps for a while.  <br />
<br />
Here is a gem from a still embargoed portion of the book (I obtained my copy through someone other than the publisher, and as such did not break their embargo):  According to the book, Cheney turned down a request from President Bush to take charge of the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, shortly after the Katrina made landfall on August 29, 2005.<br />
<br />
Gellman writes that  Cheney simply turned down the president -- something then-presidential counselor Dan Bartlett apparently remains unhappy about until present day.<br />
<br />
From the book:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Days after the storm had passed, when he finally returned to Washington from Crawford, Bush assembled his senior staff in the Oval Office.  He was going to set up a cabinet-level task force, he said.<br />
<br />
<br />
"I asked Dick if he'd be interested in spearheading this," Bush announced, "Let's just say I didn't get the most positive response."  Bush nodded ironically toward the vice president, putting on a show for the others: Card, Rove, Bartlett, Condi Rice.  His expression, the tone of voice, had a hint of edge.  <em>Can you believe this guy?</em>  <br />
<br />
Anyone who had face time with Bush said he was smarter than the public believed, and meaner.  He spared Cheney the thunderbolts -- Rove got the worst of them, when Bush was in a mood to yell -- but now and then aides saw the president give Cheney the back of his hand.<br />
<br />
"Will you at least go do a fact-finding trip for us?" Bush said.<br />
<br />
"That'll probably be the extent of it, Mr. President, unless you order otherwise,"  Cheney replied.  He was the Cheshire Cat inverted, only the smile dissolving, the rest of him still in the chair.<br />
<br />
As well as he knew the two of them, Bartlett had to fight an impulse to roll his eyes. Katrina was shaping up as a true catastrophe.  New Orleans was four-fifths under water, and the Gulf Coast had suffered grievous losses of life and property.  The leisurely pace of federal action was not doing a bit of good for Bush.  "Cheney wanted nothing to do with it," Bartlett said.  Looking back on that moment, the president's counselor remained of two minds:<br />
<br />
Cheney was the Master of Disaster, one of the government's most capable emergency managers.  "It would send a powerful signal of our level of concern" to put the vice president in charge, Bartlett said. Eventually, though, Bartlett came to see Cheney's demurral "quite frankly as pretty good judgment."  Cheney "doesn't do touchy-feely," Bartlett said, "Understanding what people's problems are and showing compassion -- that is an important part of the job of being the representative of he president... He was not going to go down there and hug babies."</blockquote><br />
<br />
Of course, there always stood the possibility that the vice president believed that the hurricane and its high winds were in their last throes.  <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink">Related articles by Murray Waas:</a></strong><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/12/23/exclusive-cheneys-admissions-to-the-cia-leak-prosecutor-and-fbi/">"Cheney's Admissions to the CIA Leak Prosecutor,"</a> personal blog, Dec. 23, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2006/2/10/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0215nj1.htm">"Cheney's Call,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Feb. 15, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/021907nj1.htm">Libby Testimony Raises More Questions About Cheney's Role in the CIA Leak Case,"</a>  <em> National Journal</em>, Feb. 9, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/murray_waas/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0112nj1.htm">"CIA Leak Probe: Inside the Grand Jury Room," <em>National Journal</em>, </a>Jan. 12, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/10/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-murray-waas-and-jeff-lomonaco/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0406nj1.htm">"Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, April 6, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm">"Cheney's Authorized Libby to Leak Classified Information,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Feb. 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2006/04/13/murray-waas-is-woodward/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/fitzgerald-court-papers-b_b_15078.html">"Fitzgerald Court Papers:  Bush Was Briefed on Joe Wilson,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>, Feb. 3, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1030nj1.htm">"Addington's Role in Cheney's Office Draws Fresh Attention,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 30, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1027nj1.htm">"Cheney, Libby Blocked Papers to Senate Intelligence Committee,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 27, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1020nj1.htm">"Secret Service Records Prompted Key Miller Testimony,"</a><em> National Journal</em>, Oct. 20, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1018nj1.htm">"CIA Leak Prosecutor Focuses on Libby,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 18, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/09/house-republicans-beat-back-plame.html">"House Republicans Beat Back Plame Resolution of Inquiry,"</a> <em>Whatever Already!</em>, Sept. 14, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25rich.html?hp" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=10077">"The Meeting,"</a> the <em>American Prospect</em>, August 6, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=plame_game_redux">"Plame Game Redux,"</a> <em>American Prospect</em>, April 22, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/04/plame-exclusive-attorney-general.html">"Plame Exclusive: Attorney General Refuses to Comply with Congressional Request for Information on the Case,"<a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/"></a> <em>Whatever Already!</em></a>, April 21, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=exclusive_plame_game_over">"Plame Game Over?,"</a> the <em>American Prospect</em>, April 6, 2005.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/murray-waas/" target="_hplink">Also by Murray Waas:<br />
</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett--steele-awards-104329693.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">"Bush Administration Leaks Bolstered Rep. Renzi's Reelection Bid,"</a> the <em>Hill</em>, June 24, 2009.<br />
<br />
Eric Alterman and Danielle Ivory, <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/ta052109.html">"Think Again:  Blogosphere to Mainstream Press:  Get Off the Bus,"</a> Center for American Progress, May 21, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904u/us-attorney-bogden"> "A U.S. Attorney's Story,<em><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/murray_waas" target="_hplink"> the Atlantic</a></em>, April 20, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/_at_least_eleven_bush.php">"The Big Stone Wall:  Nine Bush-Era Officials Cooperate with DOJ Probes,"</a>  <em>Talking Points Memo</em>, Feb. 18, 2009.<br />
<br />
Damozel, <a href="http://bucknakedpolitics.typepad.com/buck_naked_politics/2009/02/one-for-the-books-rove-to-cooperate.html">"Rove to Cooperate?... or Not."</a> Buck Naked Politics, Feb. 9, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a  href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/attorney_rove_will_cooperate_with_doj_probes.php"> "Attorney: Rove Will Cooperate with DOJ Probe,"</a> <em>TPM Muckraker</em>, Feb. 8, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/murraywaas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/grand_jury_investigation_of_us_attorney_firings_fo.php">"Feds Probe Domenici for Obstruction of Justice in Iglesias Fight,"</a> <em>TPM Muckraker,</em> Feb. 4, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/murray_waas/">Murray Waas</a> and <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5912290&amp;page=1">Justin Rood</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5912290&amp;page=1">"Report: White House Involved in U.S. Attorney Firings,"</a> <em>ABCNews.com</em>, Sept. 29, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922" target="_hplink">Murray S.  Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-notes">"The Case of the Gonzales Notes, "</a> The<em> Atlantic</em>, Sept. 26, 2008. <br />
<br />
Glenn Greenwald, <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/">"Salon Radio:  Murray Waas,"</a> <em>Salon.com</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-investigation">"What Bush Told Gonzales,"</a> the<em> Atlantic</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2006/04/13/murray-waas-is-woodward/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/14/mccain-transition-chief-a_n_134595.html">"McCain Transition Chief Aided Saddam Lobbying Effort," </a><em>Huffington Post</em>,  Oct. 14, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803">Anna Schecter</a> and <a href="http://sabew.org/2010/10/reuters-milwaukee-j-s-win-11-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5245645&amp;page=1">"DOJ Official Fired in Wake of ABC News Investigation," </a>ABCNews.com, June 25, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.murraywaas.net/biography_murray_waas_.html">Murray Waas</a> and Anna Schecter, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803">"Bush White House Pushed Grant for Former Staffer," </a><em>ABCNews.com</em>, June 24, 2008.<br />
<br />
Brian Ross, Anna Shecter, and <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=10077">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5033256&amp;page=1">"Justice Department Official Awards $500,000 Grant to Golf Group,"</a> ABC News, June 9, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904u/us-attorney-bogden">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/exclusive-the-paradox-tha_b_38902.html">"The Paradox That is Scooter Libby,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>, July 27, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/10/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-murray-waas-and-jeff-lomonaco/">"FDL Book Salon Welcomes Murray Waas and Jeff Lomonaco,"</a> Firedoglake, June 10, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/17/murray-waas-to-join-yearly-kos-plame-panel/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0315nj1.htm">"Internal Affairs,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, March 15, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0703nj1.htm">"Bush Directed Cheney to Counter War Critic,"</a><em> National Journal</em>, Dec. 13, 2006.<br />
<br />
Jim Boyd, <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">"Why Courage is Hard to Find,"</a> Nieman Reports, Summer, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0718nj1.htm">"Bush Blocked Justice Department Investigation,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, July 18, 2006.<br />
<br />
Shane Harris and <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0525nj2.htm">"Justice Department Probe Foiled," </a><em>National Journal</em>, July 25, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/murray-waas/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0608nj1.htm"> "What Ashcroft Was Told,</a>" <em>National Journal</em>, June 8, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes_2.htm">Liz Halloran</a>, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">"A Muckraker's Day in the Sun,"</a> <em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em>, May 15, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/17/murray-waas-to-join-yearly-kos-plame-panel/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0428nj1.htm">"Why Rove Testified for a Fifth Time,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, April 28, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-notes">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0425nj1.htm">"Is There a Double Standard on Leak Probes?,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>. April 25, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html">Howard Kurtz</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">"Reporters in Glass Houses,"</a> <em>Washington Post</em>, April 16, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/opinion/10krugman.html?scp=5&amp;sq=%22murray+waas%22&amp;st=nyt">Paul Krugman</a>, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/opinion/10krugman.html">"Yes He Would!,"</a> <em>New York Times</em>, April 10, 2006.<br />
<br />
Jay Rosen, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">"Murray Waas is Our Woodward Now,"</a> PressThink, April 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Dan Froomkin</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">"A Compelling Story,"</a> the <em>Washington Post</em>, March 31, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0330nj1.htm">"Insulating Bush,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, March 30, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://hotstory.nationaljournal.com/articles/0302nj1.htm">"What Bush Was Told About Iraq,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>,  March 2, 2006.<br />
<br />
Amy Goodman, <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2006/2/10/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">"How Cheney Authorized Libby to Leak Classified Information,"</a> <em>Democracy Now!,</em> Feb. 10, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/United-States-v-I-Lewis-Libby/Murray-Waas/e/9781402752599" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2006/02/special-prosecutor-in-cia-leak-case.html">"Bush's Briefing About Joe Wilson," </a><em>Whatever Already!</em>, Feb. 2, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0203nj3.htm">"Iraq, Niger, and the CIA,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Feb. 2, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1216nj2.htm">Why Novak Called Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Dec. 16, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/murraywaas">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-12-13/news/jack-anderson-an-appreciation/"> "Jack Anderson: An Appreciation,"</a> the <em>Village Voice</em>, Dec. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1122nj1.htm">"Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept From Hill Panel,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Nov. 22, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett--steele-awards-104329693.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1113nj_waas.htm">"Senate Ethics Committee Clears Shelby,"</a><em> National Journal</em>, Nov. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Murray Waas</a>, "Libby Testimony Key to Rove Inquiry," <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1112nj_waas.htm">National Journal</a>, Nov. 12, 2005.<br />
<br />
Amy Goodman, <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2005/10/12/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">"How Dick Cheney's Top Aide Misled Federal Prosecutors in the CIA Leak Case," </a><em>Democracy Now!</em>, Oct. 12, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1011nj1.htm">"Libby Did Not Tell Grand Jury About Key Conversation," </a><em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 11, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1017968939.php" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1007nj3.htm">"Rove Assured Bush He Was Not Leaker,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 7, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-09-13/news/while-you-were-watching-katrina/">"While You Were Watching Katrina,"</a> <em>Village Voice</em>, Sept. 13, 2005,<br />
<br />
<a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/what-now-karl/">"What Now Karl?," </a><em>Village Voice</em>, Aug. 9, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/publiceye/main500486.shtml?keyword=Murray+Waas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=154e1aad-fd18-4efd-8d80-b5dab8559419">"Special Handling: How the Huckabee Administration Worked to Free Rapist Wayne Dumond,"</a> <em>Arkansas Times</em>, Aug. 1, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas/External_Links_2005-2008">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=an_unlikely_story">"An Unlikely Story,"</a> the <em>American Prospect</em>, July 19, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/bios/murray_s_waas/search?contributorName=murray%20s%20waas" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/07/exclusive-novak-co-operated-with.html">"Exclusive: Novak Cooperated With Prosecutors,</a>" <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/"><em>Whatever Already!</em></a>, July 12, 2005.<br />
<br />
Jim Boyd,<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453"> "Editorial Pages: Why Courage is Hard to Find," </a>Nieman Reports, July 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/17/murray-waas-to-join-yearly-kos-plame-panel/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=8073">"Ashcroft's Interest,"</a> the <em>American Prospect</em>, July 8, 2004.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/murray-waas/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/17084/"> "Pressure on Aschcroft to Recuse Himself Grows,"</a> <a href="http://www.alternet.org/authors/3168/">Alternet</a>, Oct. 30, 2003.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a> and Douglas Frantz, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-04-18/news/mn-537_1_saudi-arabia-s-transfers?pg=2">"Saudi Arms Link to Iraq Allowed:  Under Reagan and Bush, U.S. Weapons were Secretly Provided to Mideast,"</a> <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/united-states-military-aid-iraq"><em>Los Angeles Times</em></a>,  April 18, 1992. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1994-04-03/magazine/tm-41569_1_forest-haven-bleak-house-institutional-abuse" target="_hplink">Murray Waas and Douglas Frantz</a>, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-06/news/mn-3321_1_arms-sales">"Despite Ban, U.S. Arms Are Sold to Pakistan,"</a> Los Angeles Times, March 6, 1992.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://mydd.com/2006/4/10/jay-rosen-quotmurray-waas-is-our-bob-woodwardquot" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/media-specter" target="_hplink">"Media Specter, "</a><a href="http://www.tnr.com/topics/murray-waas" target="_hplink"> the <em>New Repubic</em></a>,  Sept.30, 1985.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a> will be <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/12/23/exclusive-cheneys-admissions-to-the-cia-leak-prosecutor-and-fbi/">writing more</a> on his personal blog <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/12/23/exclusive-cheneys-admissions-to-the-cia-leak-prosecutor-and-fbi/">about Dick Cheney</a>.</em>  <em><a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2006/2/10/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how"> Waas covered Cheney</a> and the <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1122nj1.htm">misuse of prewar intelligence</a> by the Bush administration during the run up to the war with Iraq <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm">for the National Journal</a>.</em> <a href="http://schema-root.org/people/career/journalists/murray_waas/"><em>Murray Waas</em></a> <em>has also written about the same issues for ABC News</em>,<em> the </em><em>American Prospect</em>, <em>and the</em> <em>Huffington Post</em>.<br />
<br />
<em><a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Waas</a> is also the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">co-editor with Jeff Lomonaco</a> of the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/United-States-v-Lewis-Libby/dp/1402752598">United States V. I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby</a>, published in the spring of 2007 <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=NdUcqF8FMmcC&amp;dq=murray+waas&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=QTx_upnY5z&amp;sig=bOyE966fwNjUzxXxCQxizWTWg9s&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=GrXFSdelCoygM7DJ6I0K&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=8&amp;ct=result">by Union Square Press</a>.</em> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm"><em>Murray Waas</em></a> <em>can be reached through his</em> <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922"><em>Facebook page</em></a>.]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/38655/thumbs/s-CHENEY-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New Justice Department Push To Keep Bush Aides From Testifying</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/new-justice-department-pu_b_119821.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2008:/thenewswire//2.119821</id>
    <published>2008-08-19T11:11:29-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-07-04T23:57:42-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[The Justice Department filed papers in court late Monday asking a federal judge to temporarily set aside his own order...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[The Justice Department filed papers in court late Monday asking a federal judge to temporarily set aside his own order directing White House officials to testify before Congress about the firings of nine U.S. attorneys.<br />
<br />
The filing was in response to a July 31 opinion by U.S. District Court Judge John D. Bates that the Bush administration's claims of executive privilege in refusing to allow White House officials to testify about the firings was "unprecedented" and "entirely unsupported by existing case law."<br />
<br />
The Bush administration action indicates that despite recent correspondence to Congress suggesting otherwise, it is still strongly resisting subpoenas of White House officials to testify about the politically sensitive issue of the firings of the U.S. attorneys.<br />
<br />
      In <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/07/104/">his decision</a>, Bates said he doubted that if the White House or administration appealed his decision, they would have an even remote possibility of prevailing:<br />
<br />
      "The aspect of this lawsuit that is unprecedented is the notion that [former White House Counsel Harriett] Miers [one of those subpoenaed] is absolutely immune from compelled testimony."<br />
<br />
      In the past, the Supreme Court had reserved claims by presidents of absolute immunity only for "very narrow circumstances" such as for issues of national security or foreign affairs, Bates wrote in his opinion. Testimony about the firings of U.S. attorneys was not in that class and therefore there was little likelihood that a higher court would reverse his decision, he noted.<br />
<br />
      President Bush has said that he refuses to allow former and current top aides to testify about the firings not because his administration has anything to conceal, but because he believes in upholding the principle of executive privilege, partly for the sake of future presidents.<br />
<br />
      Congress, however, has overwhelmingly voted to compel such testimony.<br />
<br />
      In February, the House of Representatives voted 223-32 to hold Miers and White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten in contempt of Congress for refusing to testify and provide documents about the U.S. attorneys to the House Judiciary Committee.  Both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees have similarly approved contempt citations for former White House chief political aide Karl Rove.<br />
<br />
After Judge Bates' decision, White House counsel Fred Fielding said in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) that the White House wished to await an appeal of Bates's decision before even "entertaining any requesting for Mr. Bolten's compliance with the Senate Judiciary Committee subpoena."<br />
<br />
 Such an appeal would mean that the aides would almost certainly not testify before the current Congress and not until a new president is in office next year.<br />
<br />
      But Fielding seemingly reversed course last week, <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/conyers-welcomes-administrations-negotiation-offer-2008-08-08.html">informing</a> the House Judiciary Committee that the White House now wished to negotiate with Congress about possible testimony.<br />
<br />
In a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), Fielding wrote that members of their respective staff meet as "early as" possible to "re-commence discussing possibilities for reaching an accommodation between the Branches on this matter."   Emmett Flood, the president's special counsel on executive privilege issues, also wished to contact the House committee's counsel "as soon as possible."<br />
<br />
      The appeal by the Justice Department suggests, however, that the Bush administration at a minimum is attempting to obtain a stronger negotiating position with Congress, if not entirely delay compliance with congressional subpoenas until next year. (The Justice Department filing states that a stay of Judge Bates's order is "the best hope of promoting an accommodation between the two branches.")<br />
<br />
 The request for a stay also comes not long after <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/06/justice-department-subpoe_n_117285.html">a report</a> in the <em>Huffington Post</em> that former Bush administration officials in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division have refused to voluntarily talk to investigators with the Department's Inspector General about the politicization of the Civil Rights Division.  Because of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/06/justice-department-subpoe_n_117285.html">their refusal to voluntarily talk</a> to investigators, the Department has taken the extraordinary step of subpoenaing senior attorneys once from within its own ranks to testify before a federal grand jury as a means to compel their cooperation.<br />
<br />
      If Bates' previous opinion is any guide, it appears unlikely that he would agree to the Justice Department's requests. In his 93-page opinion, Bates, a conservative jurist appointed by President Bush in 2001, wrote:<br />
<br />
      "Presidential autonomy, such as it is, cannot mean that the executive's actions are totally insulated from scrutiny by Congress.  That would eviscerate Congress' historical oversight function." <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett--steele-awards-104329693.html" target="_hplink">Related articles by and about Murray Waas</a>:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-22/news/mn-7320_1_food-aid">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/12/former-us-attorney-condem_n_257846.html">"Former U.S. Attorney Condemns Bush White House Interference With Renzi Probe,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>, Aug. 12, 2009.<br />
<br />
Stephanie Woodrow, <a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/2009/08/12/rove-aide-asked-miers-to-help-clear-renzis-name/">"Rove Aide Asked Miers to Help Clear Republican's Name,"</a> <a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/tag/murray-waas/"><em>Main Justice</em></a>, Aug. 12, 2009. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2009/08/01/justice-done-at-justice-us-attorney-fired-by-bush-rehired-by-dan-bogden/">"Justice Done at Justice: U.S. Attorney Fired by Bush Administration Rehired for Old Job by Obama,"</a> personal blog, Aug. 1, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">"Bush Administration Leaks Bolstered Rep. Renzi's Reelection Bid,"</a> the <em>Hill</em>, June 24, 2009.<br />
<br />
Eric Alterman and Danielle Ivory, <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/ta052109.html">"Think Again:  Blogosphere to Mainstream Press:  Get Off the Bus,"</a> Center for American Progress, May 21, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/goldsmith_awards/investigative_reporting.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/06/pressure-increases-on-tor_n_197764.html">"Torture Memo Author Advocated Presidential Pardons, Jury Nullification," </a><em>Huffington Post</em>, May 6, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5033256&amp;page=1">Anna Schecter</a> and <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2006/2/10/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=7473879&amp;page=1">"DOJ Official Breached Ethics Laws,"</a> ABCNews.com, May 1,2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904u/us-attorney-bogden">"A U.S. Attorney's Story,"<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/murray_waas"></a> the <em>Atlantic</em></a>, April 20, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/10/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-murray-waas-and-jeff-lomonaco/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/_at_least_eleven_bush.php">"The Big Stone Wall: Nine Bush-Era Officials Refused to Cooperate with DOJ Probes,"</a> <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/murray_waas_1/2009/02/01-week"><em>TPM Muckraker</em></a>, Feb. 18, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/grand_jury_investigation_of_us_attorney_firings_fo.php">"U.S. Attorney Scandal: Feds Probe Domenici for Obstructing Justice in Iglesias Firing,"</a> <em>TPM Muckraker</em>, Feb. 4, 2009.<br />
<br />
Damozel, <a href="http://bucknakedpolitics.typepad.com/buck_naked_politics/2009/02/one-for-the-books-rove-to-cooperate.htm">"Rove to Cooperate?... or Not,"</a> Buck Naked Politics, Feb. 3, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">Murray Scott Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/attorney_rove_will_cooperate_with_doj_probes.php">"Attorney: Rove Will Cooperate With DOJ Probe," <em>TPM Muckraker</em>, Feb. 2, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.murraywaas.net/biography_murray_waas_.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/12/23/exclusive-cheneys-admissions-to-the-cia-leak-prosecutor-and-fbi/">"Cheney's Admissions to the CIA Leak Prosecutor and FBI,"</a> personal blog, Dec. 23, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/murray_waas/">Murray Waas</a> and Justin Rood, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5912290&amp;page=1">"Report: White House Involved in U.S. Attorney Firings,"</a> <em>ABCNews.com</em>, Sept. 29, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas/External_Links_2005-2008">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/09/28/bush-appointees-attempted-to-thwart-us-attorney-probe/">"Bush Appointees Attempted to Thwart U.S. Attorney Probe,"</a> personal blog, Sept. 28, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-notes">"The Case of the Gonzales Notes,"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://murraywaas.net/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-investigation">"What Did Bush Tell Gonzales?,"</a><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/murray_waas"> the <em>Atlantic</em></a>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
Glenn Greenwald, <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/">"Salon Radio: Murray Waas,"</a> <em>Salon.com</em>, Sept. 26 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/07/white-house-nightmare-sce_n_117548.html">"U.S. Attorney Scandal Enters White House Circle,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>,  Aug. 7, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/06/justice-department-subpoe_n_117285.html">"Justice Department Subpoenas Its Former Lawyers in Civil Rights Probe,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>, Aug. 6, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/07/104/">"Dog Days of Summer and Executive Privilege,"</a> personal blog, Aug. 7, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/07/special-prosecutor-a-possibility-as-us-attorney-and-doj-politicization-probes-reach-into-the-white-house/">"Special Prosecutor A Possibility As U.S. Attorney and DOJ Politicization Probes Reach Into the White House,"</a> personal blog, Aug. 7, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803">Anna Schecter</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5245645&amp;page=1">"DOJ Official Fired In Wake of ABC News Investigation,"</a> <em>ABCNews.com</em>, June 25, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2005/10/12/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">Murray Waas</a> and Anna Schecter, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803">"Bush White House Pushed Grant for Former Staffer,"</a> <em>ABCNews.com</em>, June, 24, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/10/attempted-intimidation-of-career-justice-department-employees/">"Attempted Intimidation of Career Justice Department Employees,"</a> personal blog, June 10, 2008.<br />
<br />
Brian Ross, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803">Anna Shecter</a>, and <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=10077">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5033256&amp;page=1">"Justice Department Official Awards $500,000 Grant to Golf Group,"</a> ABC News, June 9, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/10/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-murray-waas-and-jeff-lomonaco/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/justice-department-reopen_b_72527.html">"Justice Department Reopens Probe into Warantless Domestic Spying," </a><em>Huffington Post</em>, Nov. 13, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/19/justice-department-sought_n_69098.html">Justice Department Sought Guilty Plea in NSA Leak Case,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>, Oct. 19, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas/External_Links_2005-2008">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/17/gonzales-investigated-sub_n_68911.html">"Gonzales Investigated Subordinates Who Were Likely to Testify Against Him,"</a> <em>Huffington Post</em>, Oct. 17, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/the-ninth-man-out-a-fired_b_50562.html">"The Ninth Man Out:  A Fired U.S. Attorney Tells His Story,"</a> <em>Huffington Post,</em> June 4, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://sabew.org/2010/10/reuters-milwaukee-j-s-win-11-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070531nj1.htm"> "Scales of Justice,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 31, 2007.<br />
<br />
<em><a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070531nj1.htm ">'A Republican Operative's Role in attempting to influence the Missouri Senate Race</a>," <em>National Journa</em>l, May 25, 2007.</em><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes_2.htm">Liz Halloran</a>, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">"A Muckraker's Day in the Sun,"</a> <em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em>, May 15, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">Murray Waas,</a> <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm">"Administration Withheld Emails About Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 10, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/murraywaas" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070503nj1.htm">"Justice Official Was Directed to Call Fired Prosecutors,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 3, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070430nj1.htm">"Secret Order by Gonzales Delegated Extraordinary Powers to Aides,</a>"<em> National Journal</em>, April 30, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2005/11/27/opinion/27rich.html">Frank Rich</a>, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25rich.html">"When Will Fredo Be Whacked?,"</a><em> New York Times</em>, March 25, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0315nj1.htm">"Internal Affairs," </a><em>National Journal</em>, March 15, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html">Howard Kurtz</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">"Reporters in Glass Houses,"</a><em> Washington Post</em>, April 17, 2006.<br />
<br />
Jay Rosen, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">"Murray Waas is Our Woodward Now,"</a> PressThink, April 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Dan Froomkin</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">"A Compelling Question,"</a><em> Washington Post</em>, March 31, 2006.<br />
<br />
Jim Boyd, <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">"Why Courage is Hard to Find,"</a> Nieman Reports, Summer, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nysun.com/opinion/writing-letters/36337/">"Writing Letters,"</a> <em>New York Sun</em>, July 19, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0718nj1.htm">"Bush Blocked Justice Department Probe," </a><em>National Journal</em>, July 18, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/murraywaas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0608nj1.htm">"What Ashcroft Was Told,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, June 8, 2006.<br />
<br />
Shane Harris and Murray Waas,  <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0315nj1.htm">"Justice Department Probe Foiled,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 25, 2006.<br />
<br />
Howard Kurtz, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">"Reporters in Glass Houses,"</a> <em>Washington Post</em>, April 16, 2006.<br />
<br />
Frank Rich, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2005/11/27/opinion/27rich.html">"Dishonest, Reprehensible, Corrupt...,"</a> the <em>New York Times</em>, Nov. 27, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas/External_Links_2005-2008">Murray S. Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-12-13/news/jack-anderson-an-appreciation/">"Jack Anderson: An Appreciation," </a>the <em>Village Voice</em>, Oct. 13, 2005 <br />
<br />
Amy Goodman, <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2005/10/12/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">"How Dick Cheney's Top Aide Misled Federal Prosecutors in the CIA Leak Case," </a><em>Democracy Now!</em>, Oct. 12, 2005,<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/09/house-intelligence-committee-votes.html">"House Intelligence Committee Votes Down Plame Resolution of Inquiry," </a><em>Whatever Already</em>!, Sept. 15, 2005.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett--steele-awards-104329693.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a> can be reached at <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">murraywaas@gmail.com</a></em>. <em>One can also follow <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">his work</a> through his <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Murray-Waas/600416922">Facebook account </a>or <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/murraywaas" target="_hplink">via Linkedin</a>.<br />
<br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/34902/thumbs/s-TESTIFY-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>U.S. Attorney Scandal Probe Enters White House Circle</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/white-house-nightmare-sce_b_117548.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2008:/thenewswire//2.117548</id>
    <published>2008-08-07T14:16:37-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T12:40:20-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[The Justice Department investigation into the firings of nine U.S. attorneys has been extended to encompass allegations that...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[The Justice Department investigation into the firings of nine U.S. attorneys has been extended to encompass allegations that senior White House officials played a role in providing false and misleading information to Congress, according to numerous sources involved in the inquiry.<br />
<br />
The widened scope raises the possibility that investigators will pursue criminal charges against some administration officials, and recommend appointment of a special prosecutor if there is evidence of criminal misconduct. <br />
<br />
The investigators have been specifically probing the role of White House officials in the drafting and approval of a Feb. 23, 2007 letter sent to Congress by the Justice Department denying that Karl Rove (President Bush's chief political adviser at the time) had anything to do with the firing of Bud Cummins, a U.S. Attorney from Arkansas. Cummins was fired in Dec. 2006 to make room for Tim Griffin, a prot&eacute;g&eacute; and former top aide of Rove's.<br />
<br />
The February 23 letter stated, "The department is not aware of Karl Rove playing any role in the decision to appoint Mr. Griffin," and that the Justice Department was "not aware of anyone lobbying, either inside or outside of the administration, for Mr. Griffin's appointment."<br />
<br />
Federal investigators have obtained documents showing that Kyle Sampson, then-chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and Chris Oprison, then an associate White House counsel, drafted and approved the letter even though they had first-hand knowledge that the assertions were not true. The Justice Department later had to repudiate the Sampson-Oprison letter and sent a new one informing Congress that it could no longer stand by the earlier assertions.<br />
<br />
The Justice Department's Inspector General (IG) and the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) are jointly conducting the current investigation. Both can initiate disciplinary action only against Justice Department employees and neither has prosecutorial powers.<br />
<br />
People close to the investigation say that the investigators' final report will not only examine the reasons and circumstances behind the firings of the nine U.S. attorneys, but efforts by senior Justice Department and White House officials to mislead the public and Congress about the firings:<br />
<br />
"It will be as much about the cover up as about the firings," said one former senior Justice Department interviewed at length because of his personal role in the firings. This source believes the investigators "are going to tell a narrative, and they have taken their investigation right into the White House."<br />
<br />
If the IG and OPR believe that there is evidence of potential criminal wrongdoing, or evidence of wrongdoing by officials outside its jurisdiction altogether, they can recommend that the Justice Department initiate a criminal investigation.<br />
<br />
If senior administration officials or White House officials come under suspicion, a special prosecutor would likely be named.<br />
<br />
While a central focus for investigators apparently has been the role played by aides to Rove in the Griffin matter, some witnesses to the investigation told me that they have been asked specifically about Rove's own personal efforts.<br />
<br />
Two former senior Justice Department officials, former Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty and principal Associate General William Moscella, have separately provided damaging information to the two internal investigative agencies.<br />
<br />
Both, according to sources familiar with their still-confidential testimony, said they inadvertently gave misleading testimony to Congress about the firings of the U.S. attorneys because they were misled by Rove himself in addition to other White House figures.<br />
<br />
In his March 6, 2007, testimony to Congress, Moscella contended that all but one U.S. attorney was fired because of issues related to their performance. When specifically asked if Rove played any role in the firings, he testified: "I don't know that he played any role."<br />
<br />
But one day before the congressional testimony, on March 5, 2007, McNulty and Moscella attended a strategy session at the White House in which they discussed Moscella's testimony and how he should answer allegations that most of the U.S. attorneys were fired because of politics.<br />
<br />
McNulty and Moscella told investigators that among the attendees were Rove and Sampson, then Gonzales' chief of staff.  Neither Rove nor Sampson, both men told investigators, told them anything about their own role in the firings even as they encouraged Moscella to say politics had nothing to do with it.<br />
<br />
One senior Bush administration official told me that White House staffers talk about their "nightmare scenario" in which any one of the three currently internal DOJ probes "spins out of control" and leads to the appointment of a special prosecutor with broad authority.<br />
<br />
And the probe by the Justice Department's IG and OPR and firings of nine U.S. attorneys is only one of three internal DOJ investigations that have the potential of morphing into criminal probes of the Bush administration--and even the appointment of a special prosecutor. DOJ's IG is probing whether former Attorney General Gonzales testified truthfully to Congress about the administration's warrantless electronic eavesdropping program.  A <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0315nj1.htm">probe by OPR</a> is investigating whether government attorneys acted within the law in authorizing and overseeing the eavesdropping program.<br />
<br />
Former and current Justice Department investigators caution against assuming that just because White House officials are being scrutinized, a criminal investigation or one conducted by a special prosecutor will be the likely result. They noted that the threshold for initiating a criminal probe is relatively high, and the standard for appointing a special prosecutor even higher.  <br />
<br />
They also said that cases involving false statements to Congress are considered by prosecutors one of the most difficult to prove, which in turn could lead officials to be reluctant to act in either requesting a criminal probe or pressing for a special prosecutor in the first place.<br />
<br />
A spokesman for the Inspector General declined to comment about any aspect of the investigation because the probe is still ongoing.<br />
<br />
***<br />
<br />
Apparently, advances in the investigations have been spurred by key emails that the Bush administration has withheld from Congress--claiming executive privilege--and that have now been obtained by DOJ investigators.<br />
<br />
Among other things those documents show that Oprison, the associate White House counsel, knew that Rove was involved in the US Attorney firing when he reviewed drafts of the letter and approved final language claiming Rove was not involved.<br />
<br />
Some of these emails withheld from Congress based on claims of executive privilege were provided to me by an administration official for <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm">this National Journal story</a> posted on May 10,, 2007. <br />
<br />
Additional emails and other material withheld and not provided to Congress were made available to me for this story.<br />
<br />
A senior Justice Department official said in an interview that it was the discovery of a December 19, 2006, e-mail from Sampson to Oprison--in which Sampson wrote that "getting [Griffin] appointed was important" to Rove and to then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers--that prompted the Justice Department to repudiate the February 23, 2007 letter to four Senate Democrats.<br />
<br />
The Dec. 19, 2005 email clearly suggests that both Sampson and Orpison had reason to believe that the letter that Sampson drafted and Oprison edited and approved was false.<br />
<br />
Confronted with the email after it was made public, Sampson was asked during testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 27, 2007 whether Rove had advocated for Griffin to be made a U.S. attorney:<br />
<br />
"I knew that [then-White House political director] Sara Taylor and [Taylor's then deputy] Scott Jennings had expressed interest in promoting Mr. Griffin for appointment to be U.S. attorney, and I assumed, because they reported to Karl Rove, that he was interested in that," Sampson testified.<br />
<br />
So why did Sampson draft and approve the letter saying that there had been no involvement by Rove?<br />
<br />
His explanation to the Senate Judiciary Committee was this: "In February, when I participated in the drafting of that [February 23] letter, I did not remember then ever having talked [directly] to Mr. Rove about it. I don't remember now ever having talked to Mr. Rove about it. I'm not sure whether Mr. Rove was supportive of Mr. Griffin's appointment."<br />
<br />
Before drafting the letter, Sampson made no further effort to talk to Rove, Taylor (who as White House Political Director was Rove's top aide), or to Jennings as to whether the allegations were true, Sampson's attorney Brad Berenson told me in an interview.<br />
<br />
Sampson did, however, send the letter to the White House for Oprison for review. According to Berenson, in sending the letter, Sampson was relying on Oprison to see that it was accurate. Berenson told me:<br />
<br />
"Kyle didn't want to traffic in assumptions, so he circulated the letter to the White House for confirmation whether what he believed to be true was accurate or not. He drafted the letter according to his understanding of the facts, and he circulated it beforehand to other people for clearance to assure that it accorded with their understanding of the facts."<br />
<br />
Why did Oprison in turn approve the letter to be sent knowing what he knew?<br />
<br />
Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, told me that Oprison "had no reason to believe" that the reference to Rove was inaccurate and cleared the letter. Asked about the December 19 e-mail in which Sampson told Oprison that Griffin's appointment was important to Rove and Miers, Fratto said: "Chris did not recall Karl's interest when he reviewed the letter."<br />
<br />
Oprison, in turn, consulted with White House Counsel Fred Fielding and Deputy White House Counsel Bill Kelley in approving the draft of the letter, according to a review of White House records undertaken in response to questions for this story.<br />
<br />
Did Oprison, Fielding, or Kelly think to seek out Rove and Rove aides Taylor and Jennings to see if they played any role in seeking Cummins to be fired and Griffin named to replace him?<br />
<br />
Fratto told me that Oprison and others in the White House counsel were relying on Sampson that such was not the case:  "We have no record of that letter even leaving the White House counsel's office." <br />
<br />
****<br />
<br />
Sampson also played a central role in the drafting of a January 31, 2007 letter from acting Assistant Attorney General Richard Hertling to Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) implying that the White House had never contemplated using an obscure provision in the <a href=" http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:h.r.03162:">USA PATRIOT Act</a> to install Griffin as a U.S. attorney without Senate confirmation.<br />
<br />
Gonzales and Sampson later changed course completely--when confronted with evidence to the contrary--and testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that the Bush administration did indeed consider using the PATRIOT Act to install Griffin as a federal prosecutor.<br />
<br />
Under an obscure provision in the act, the President had authority to permanently install interim U.S. attorneys without their being confirmed by the Senate.  Pryor suspected that this was exactly what was going on--which later turned out to be the case.  But the Bush administration still misled him into thinking otherwise.<br />
<br />
Records withheld from Congress by the Bush administration because of claims of executive privilege--but allowed to be reviewed by IG and OPR investigators--show that Oprison once again assisted Sampson in drafting the response to Congress.<br />
<br />
Despite the fact that Justice Department records show that Sampson and Oprison worked closely together devising the original plan to install Griffin as U.S. attorney under the PATRIOT Act provisions, both men helped write a letter to Congress saying that such plans never existed.<br />
<br />
The January 31, 2007 letter to Pryor contended that "not once" had the Bush "administration sought to avoid the Senate confirmation process" by exploiting the PATRIOT Act. <br />
<br />
In drafting the letter, Sampson consulted with Sara Taylor. Taylor had been aware of the possible use of the PATRIOT Act to permanently install Griffin, according to withheld administration papers.<br />
<br />
In an e-mail to Sampson, after it appeared that Griffin's appointment as U.S. attorney was in trouble, Taylor wrote: "I'm concerned we imply that we'll pull down Griffin's nomination should Pryor object."<br />
<br />
A senior executive branch official who read the e-mail said that it demonstrates that Taylor signed off on the letter despite the fact that she, Oprison, and other White House officials knew that the administration had indeed considered using the PATRIOT Act to make Griffin a U.S. attorney.<br />
<br />
Fratto, the White House spokesman, contends that the email does not show that Taylor wanted to utilize the PATRIOT Act to appoint Griffin but instead only indicated that Taylor wanted Griffin confirmed the ordinary way. "We battle with the Senate with nominations every day," Fratto said. "It is very important to us.... That's what Sara was saying: 'We shouldn't imply we're willing to walk away from the nomination.'"<br />
<br />
But sources familiar with Sampson's interview with Justice's Inspector General tell me that Sampson told quite a different story:  that Taylor, Jennings, and Oprison all had repeatedly pressed him to utilize the PATRIOT Act to install Griffin and other potential U.S. attorney candidates without Senate confirmation.<br />
<br />
Documents made public after Sampson, Taylor, and Oprison collaborated on their letter to Pryor indicate that Sampson himself wanted to invoke the PATRIOT Act to install Griffin--party because he thought it was important to Rove.<br />
<br />
On December 19, 2006, Sampson e-mailed Oprison with his own detailed strategy to have Griffin stay permanently as U.S. attorney, utilizing the PATRIOT Act: "I think we should gum this to death... ask the Senators to give Tim a chance. meet with him. give him some time in office to see how he performs, etc. they ultimately say, 'no never' (and the longer they forestall the better). Then we can tell them we'll look for other candidates, and otherwise run out the clock. All of this should be done in 'good faith' of course."<br />
<br />
By that time, Griffin would have been able to serve out the remainder of the Bush administration because of his appointment as interim U.S. attorney under the emergency provisional authority of the PATRIOT Act.<br />
<br />
Sampson added in his e-mail: "The only thing really at work here is a repeal of the AG's appointment authority. There is some risk that we'll lose that authority, but if we don't ever exercise it then what's the point of having it."<br />
<br />
Then Sampson concluded his email by saying: "I'm not 100 percent sure that Tim was the guy on which to test drive this authority, but know that getting him appointed was important to Harriet, Karl, etc.," The reference is to Harriet Miers and Karl Rove. <br />
<br />
The day after the email was sent, Cummins formally resigned as U.S. attorney and Griffin was named as his interim replacement. Cummins told me that officials at Justice sped up the timetable on his departure, going so far as to call him on a cell phone when he was on a hunting trip with his son to say he must leave on December 20. The abrupt demand for Cummins' departure on that date appears to indicate that Sampson and the White House were attempting to implement their plan.<br />
<br />
Berenson, Sampson's attorney, told me that the letter Sampson had helped draft and approved to be sent to Congress was technically accurate because Sampson and Oprison never ultimately implemented the plan to install Griffin as U.S. attorney through the PATRIOT Act provision. "The principals never adopted it, and it was never done," Berenson said. "The statement in the letter is accurate."<br />
<br />
***<br />
<br />
It is still unknown what conclusions the Inspector General will reach in his much anticipated forthcoming report on the firings of nine U.S. attorneys. <br />
<br />
But it is clear that a priority for his investigation is whether top Justice Department political appointees and senior White House officials purposely mislead Congress about the firings.  Many of those whose conduct has been scrutinized have had senior positions in the administration or the White House: Kyle Sampson was the chief of staff to the Attorney General of the United States.  Sara Taylor was White House political director.  Scott Jennings was Taylor's deputy as well as a top aide to Rove.  And Karl Rove is, of course, Karl Rove.<br />
<br />
Several of those people, under federal regulations, could be the subject of an investigation by a special prosecutor if Fine believes there is evidence of potential crimes.<br />
<br />
At a minimum, if two other reports that Inspector General Fine has already <a href=" http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-justice29-2008jul29,0,5868533.story ">made public</a> about the <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gvTi9T-K6sNV75JqpugrYT2luhAQD926TV100">politicization of the Justice Department</a> during the Bush administration are any guide, the report on the firing of nine U.S. attorneys will be scathing and contain new disclosures embarrassing to the White House.<br />
<br />
Whether the fears of administration officials--their "nightmare scenario" of top White House officials having to face a criminal investigation or even be probed by a special prosecutor turns out to be the case--remains to be seen.  <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>Related</strong>:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2005/10/12/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm"> "Administration Wittheld Emails About Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 10, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070503nj1.htm">"Justice Officials Says He Was Directed to Call Fired Prosecutors, "</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 3, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070430nj1.htm">"Secret Order Delegated Extraordinary Power to Aides,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, April 30, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, "Internal Affairs," <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0315nj1.htm" target="_hplink">National Journal</a>, March, 15, 2007.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/bycat/National-Reporting" target="_hplink">More about Murray Waas</a>:<br />
<br />
Glenn Greenwald, <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/index.html">"Salon Radio: Murray Waas,"</a><em> Salon.com</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
Jim Boyd, "<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">Editorial Pages: Why Courage is Hard to Find,"</a><em> Nieman Reports</em>, Summer 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes_2.htm">Liz Halloran</a>, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">"A Muckraker's Day in the Sun,"</a> <em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em>, May 15, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">Howard Kurtz</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html">"Reporters in Glass Houses,"</a> <em>Washington Post</em>, April 17, 2006.<br />
<br />
Jay Rosen, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">"Murray Waas is Our Woodward Now,"</a> PressThink, April 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
Paul Krugman, <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">"Demons and Demonization,"</a> the <em>New York Times</em>, March 17, 2010.<br />
<br />
Ryan Chuttum,<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/reuters_is_excellent_in_diggin.php" target="_hplink"> "Reuters is Excellent in Digging of A Health Insurer's Tactics,"</a> <em>Columbia Journalism Review</em>, March 17, 20010.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/33353/thumbs/s-GONZBUSH-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Justice Department Subpoenas Its Former Lawyers In Civil Rights Probe</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/justice-department-subpoe_b_117285.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2008:/thenewswire//2.117285</id>
    <published>2008-08-06T12:27:18-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T12:40:20-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[A federal grand jury has subpoenaed several former senior Justice Department attorneys for an investigation into the...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[A federal grand jury has subpoenaed several former senior Justice Department attorneys for an investigation into the politicization of the Department's own Civil Rights Division, according to sources close to the investigation.<br />
    <br />
The extraordinary step by the Justice Department of subpoenaing attorneys once from within its own ranks was taken because several of them refused to voluntarily give interviews to the Department Inspector General, which has been conducting its own probe of the politicization of the Civil Rights Division, the same sources said.<br />
<br />
    The grand jury has been investigating allegations that a former senior Bush administration appointee in the Civil Rights Division, Bradley Schlozman, gave false or misleading testimony on a variety of topics to the Senate Judiciary Committee. <br />
<br />
Sources close to the investigation say that the grand jury is also more broadly examining whether Schlozman and other Department officials violated civil service laws by screening Civil Rights attorneys for political affiliation while hiring them.  <br />
<br />
Investigators for the Inspector General have also asked  whether Schlozman, while an interim U.S. attorney in Missouri, brought certain actions and even a voting fraud indictment for political ends, according to witnesses questioned by the investigators.  But it is unclear whether the grand jury is going to hear testimony on that issue as well.<br />
<br />
One person who has been subpoenaed before the grand jury, sources said, was Hans von Spakovsky, who as a former counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights was a top aide to Schlozman.  An attempt to reach Spakovsky for comment for this story was unsuccessful.<br />
<br />
Earlier this year, Spakovsky withdrew his name from nomination by President Bush to serve on the Federal Election Commission after repeatedly claiming a faulty memory or citing the attorney-client privilege to fend off questions from senators about allegedly using his position to restrict voting rights for minorities -- and that he hindered an investigation of Republican officeholders in Minnesota accused of discriminating against Native American voters.  <br />
<br />
Three current and former Justice Department officials were questioned by investigators about allegations that Schlozman--with Spakovsky advising and assisting him-- made decisions whether to hire and fire attorneys in the Civil Rights Divison on the basis of their political affiliation.<br />
<br />
Another person subpoenaed by the grand jury, according to several sources, was Jason Torchinsky, who, like Spavosky, was also a Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. <br />
<br />
Torchinsky is not under investigation for any wrongdoing himself, but rather subpoenaed as a witness in the probe, sources said.  Previously, however, Torchinsky had refused to voluntarily answer questions from investigators working for the Justice Department's Inspector General about the politicization of the Civil Rights Divison. Reached at his home on Tuesday night, Torchinsky declined to comment for this article.<br />
  <br />
  Sources familiar with the federal grand jury subpoenas say that they were approved at the highest levels of the Justice Department.<br />
<br />
    The sources said that investigators working the case as well as senior Department officials were distressed that some of the Justice Department's most senior political appointees refused to co-operate with an investigation by the very Department they once served.<br />
<br />
    "What does this say for the average person on the street if we want them to co-operate?" said a senior official, "How can we say to the ordinary citizen that you should report crimes, tell the government what you know, when the people who ran the Department of Justice thumb their noses at the system?"<br />
  <br />
  Another federal law enforcement official familiar with the subpoenas said that they believed that senior Justice Department officials had no choice but to approve the subpoenas because to do otherwise would have meant overruling career prosecutors and their actions would appear political if they did.  The official also said that political appointees at the top of the Department had to appear to be aggressive in their investigation of the politicization because to do otherwise might lead to calls for a special prosecutor to take over the investigation from them.<br />
<br />
A former Justice Department attorney who was subpoenaed said that he believed they had been called before the grand jury as "retaliation" for refusing to talk voluntarily to investigators working for Justice's Inspector General.  Current Justice Department employees are required to talk to investigators, while former employees are not.<br />
<br />
    But sources with first-hand knowledge of the investigation said that the former Justice Department officials were subpoenaed because they had information necessary to the Department's probe and without subpoenas there was no other way to compel their testimony.<br />
<br />
    During his tenure in the Civil Rights Division, career employees charged that Schlozman disregarded longstanding voting rights law to electorally favor Republicans over Democrats.<br />
<br />
    Joseph Rich, who was chief of the voting rights section of the Civil Rights Division under Schlozman, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/05/06/missouri_attorney_a_focus_in_firings/">told the Boston Globe</a>: "Schlozman was reshaping the Civil Rights Division.  Schlozman didn't know anything about voting law. . . . All he knew is he wanted to be sure that the Republicans were going to win."<br />
<br />
    Schlozman and other Bush administration appointees in the Justice Department claimed that federal law enforcement authorities had been deficient in prosecuting cases of voter fraud.  Schlozman and other Bush administration officials--most prominently Karl Rove- claimed that the failure to prosecute purported voter fraud benefited Democrats at the expense of Republicans. But most independent assessments suggest that the vast majority of reports of voting fraud are unfounded. <br />
<br />
A <a href="http://projectvote.org/fileadmin/ProjectVote/Publications/Politics_of_Voter_Fraud_Final.pdf">study</a> [PDF] by Lorraine C. Minnite, an assistant professor of political science at Barnard College, found that most reports of voting fraud turned out to be "unsubstantiated or false claims by the loser of a close race, mischief, and administrative or voter error."  Joseph Rich, who was chief of the voting-rights section in Justice's Civil Rights Division until 2005, told me in an interview: "There is virtually no evidence that voter fraud ever occurs except by individuals and in rare instances."<br />
<br />
Democrats and interest groups ranging from the League of Woman Voters to the NAACP to those who protect the rights of the disabled, assert that the White House and Republican activists exaggerate claims of voter fraud as a means to suppress voter participation. Citing allegations of purported voter fraud, the Bush White House has supported state initiatives which would require voters to produce state photo identification at the polls. <br />
<br />
In the courts, however, state and federal judges have said that such requirements might discourage voting by minorities, the disabled, the impoverished, students, and the elderly--all segments of voters who traditionally vote in greater numbers for the Democrats.   <br />
<br />
Von Spakovsky, Schlozman's deputy, who has been subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury because of his refusal to speak to investigators, was also alleged to have to misused his official position by setting aside the law to take actions to help Republican candidates.<br />
<br />
When von Spakovsky was nominated to serve on the Federal Election commission, six career officials of the Justice Department's Voting Rights Section, who had worked under him, <a href="http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/press-2667.html">wrote the Senate</a> asking that he not be confirmed.<br />
<br />
The six <a href="http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/press-2667.html">alleged</a> that "during the 2004 election cycle" von Spakovsky "broke with established Department policy by getting involved with contentious and partisan litigation on the eve of the election.  Mr. von Spakovsky drafted legal briefs between the Republican and Democratic parties in three battleground states, Ohio, Michigan and Florida just before the election, all in favor of the Republican party's position."  The six career officials further asserted: "These briefs ran counter to the well-established practice of the Civil Rights Division not to inject itself into litigation or election monitoring on the eve of an election where it would be viewed as expressing a political preference or could have an impact on a political dispute."<br />
<br />
These briefs, the former Voting Rights attorneys said in their letter, ran counter to the well-established practice of the Civil Rights Division not to inject itself into litigation or election monitoring on the eve of an election where it could be viewed as expressing a political preference or could have an impact on a political dispute. Moreover, in another case between the Republican and Democratic parties which concerned an Ohio law that permitted political parties to challenge voters, he drafted a letter that was sent to the court which supported the Republican Party position even though the law did not implicate any statute that the Department enforces.<br />
<br />
During his tenure with the Civil Rights Division, Schlozman also repeatedly clashed not only with career attorneys in his own office but also with federal prosecutors who he did not believe were taking the issue of voting fraud seriously enough.<br />
<br />
One of those he <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070531nj1.htm">clashed with</a> was Todd Graves, the U.S. Attorney in Kansas City, Missouri, a conservative Republican stalwart who excelled in his job, but who also was fired by the Bush administration in March, 2006-- only to be temporarily replaced by Schlozman.<br />
<br />
As interim U.S. attorney, less than a week before a tightly contested U.S. Senate race in Missouri in 2006, Schlozman <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070531nj1.htm">brought an indictment</a> of voter fraud against four workers with a liberal advocacy group, despite the fact that Justice Department guidelines prohibit such indictments so close to election day.  Schlozman said that he was justified in his actions because he was afraid that more fraud might take place.<br />
<br />
But Robert Kengle, a former deputy chief in the voting-rights section at Justice during the Clinton and Bush administrations, told me in an interview: "They cooked up that there is a general exception to the policy because they wanted to prevent more fraud. But indicting people before the election was not going to change anything. Registration had already closed.... There just wasn't a justification for bending the law."<br />
<br />
The Justice Department guidelines state: "Federal prosecutors and investigators should be extremely careful not to conduct overt investigations during the pre-election period or while the elections are underway."<br />
<br />
One reason for such a policy, the guidelines say, is that "a criminal investigation by armed, badged federal agents runs the obvious risk of chilling legitimate voting and campaign activities."<br />
<br />
In the end, the indictment had to be reissued after the election.  In his haste to bring charges, Schlozman had indicted the wrong person--someone with a name similar to the person he wanted to charge.<br />
<br />
<strong>Related</strong>: <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/the-ninth-man-out-a-fir_b_50562.html">The Ninth Man Out: A Fired U.S. Attorney Tells His Story</a>, the <em>Huffington Post</em>, June 4, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm"> "Administration Wittheld Emails About Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, May 10, 2007.<br />
]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/33162/thumbs/s-DOJ-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>In Memory of Spc. Nicholas Peters and the Other Boys of Kelly Park</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/in-memory-of-spc-nicholas_b_110836.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2008:/theblog//3.110836</id>
    <published>2008-07-04T00:25:28-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T12:35:19-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Nick served in Iraq and came home in one piece while so many of his friends were not so fortunate. He survived the war but not the peace.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[<p>Somerville, Mass, June 28, 2008 -- </p> <p> 	The rules are simple enough for the kids playing in the stickball tournament this morning in Kelly Park:  There are to be three people to a team.  There are four innings per game.  Two outs per inning. You walk on three balls.  You strike out on two strikes.  The second strike can be a foul ball.</p> <p> 	Any ground ball not stopped or caught is a single.  If you hit the ball over the double court line without it being caught or stopped, you have hit a double.  If you smack the ball hard off the fence, you have a triple.  And if you hit  the ball entirely over the fence, of course, you have hit a home run.  If you hit a deep foul ball over the fence, it is unclear whether it is to be counted as a foul ball or home run.  In that case, the final decision is left to the whim of a grown up or the good will of the opposing team.</p> <p> 	If you are eleven years old, and get a chance to bat, there are apparently traditions to uphold:  You must wear an oversized Red Sox jersey with the name Papelbom on the back.  (That is the Sox's closer for those not literate in such things. In an earlier time, one would have had the name Garciaparra on their jersey.) You dramatically roll your head from side to side to get the hair out of the eyes.  Then you check the stick to make sure you are hitting at the ball from the ride end. (This is very important; however you hope that nobody sees you doing this.)  Then you dig hard into the pavement with your converse high tops, lean way way back on your heels, and then smack at the ball -- eyes closed allowed -- with all of your eleven year old might.  Whether you hit the ball or not, all is right with the world.</p> <p> 	You hope you hit the ball of course.  But if you don't, you still get to have your face painted, hang with the older kids, have a hot dog with anything you want it on it -- and then if you are really, really lucky you get to sit on your big brother's shoulder to watch the dedication of the square to an older boy in the neighborhood.</p> <p> 	The corner of Cragie and Summer is to be renamed in dedication for another little boy who once played stick ball in this park.  There are two honor guards, one of which will fire off live rounds, interrupting the morning quiet and send singing birds scattering. A representative of the mayor will say a few words.</p> <p> 	This is the unveiling for a new street sign dedicating Spc. Nicholas Peters Square.</p> <p> 	Nick served of duty in Iraq  and came home in one piece while so many of his friends were not so fortunate.  He survived the war but not the peace.  Stationed at Ft. Hood, in Texas, someone in a bar did not like the fact that he was wearing a Red Sox jersey and killed him.</p> <p> 	Days after his killing, his baseball coach would say:  "I can still see a 6 year old Nick skating at the rink and at 8 years old hitting a baseball."  Nick's little niece, her mother, Shanna, told me the morning of the stickball tournament, still sees Nick all the time.  She declares to her mom: "Uncle is laughing at you!"  One day while coloring, she nonchalantly orders:  "Uncle! Color within the lines!"</p> <p> 	Who is to tell her that she is wrong to believe that her uncle is still with her?</p> <p> 	The stickball tournament in not just in honor of Nick, but also his friend, David Martini, who played stickball and baseball and hockey with Nick, and who too has died too young.  All together, four other boys who played stickball with Nicholas Peters in Kelly Park have died too young deaths -- victims of senseless violence,  suicide, or drug overdoses.</p> <p> 	When I return home from Somerville to Washington D.C., I find out that my friend Brian has been shot on the street because apparently the two kids robbing him did not think he was willing to hand over his cell phone fast enough.  Even though he is shot three times, he is alright -- albeit with one less spleen.</p> <p> 	Unable to sleep, I go online and watch over and over again Bobby Kennedy's speech on the menace of violence in America which he gave on April 5, 1968:  "The victims of the violence are black and white, rich and poor, young and old famous and unknown. They are most important of all human beings whom other human beings loved and needed.  No one can be certain who suffer next from senseless act of violence.  And yet it goes on and on and on...</p> <p> 	"Whenever any American's life is taken by another American unnecessarily... Whenever we tear a the fabric of he lives which some other man has painfully and clumsily woven for himself and his children -- whenever we do this -- the nation is degraded."</p> <p> 	The next morning I have to go visit Brian in the hospital to see with my own eyes that he is all right.  He smiles, banters with friends, nods off, and we are all reassured.</p> <p> 	But what amazes everyone is that despite being shot three times, Brian somehow either walked or ran an entire block and one half to put some distance between himself  and the shooter before the police could arrive.  It makes no sense and perfect sense.  He wanted to get to a safe place.</p> <p> 	My thoughts return to that eleven year old kid playing in the stickball tournament.  You want him to be safe.  You think maybe you should have a heart to heart and tell him that when he gets older all that he has to do is not wear that Red Sox jersey certain places.  If only it were that simple.</p> <br />
<br />
<em>To watch a Youtube video of Robert Kennedy's speech as well as read a longer version of this column, click <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/03/in-memory-of-spc-nicholas-peters-and-the-other-kelly-park-boys/">here</a>.</em> <br />
<br />
<em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a> can be reached via his Facebook page</em>. ]]></content>
    <link href="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/27603/thumbs/s-GUNIN-mini.jpg" type="image/jpeg" rel="enclosure"/>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Price of Favoritism and Cronyism:  Lost Lives and Teenage Suicides</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/the-price-of-favoritism-a_b_107974.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2008:/theblog//3.107974</id>
    <published>2008-06-18T23:16:32-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T12:35:19-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[The staggering human consequences of promoting golf at the expense of worthy programs for teens  is one more example of cronyism by the Bush administration.]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[In the broader scheme of things, the Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is a fairly obscure agency.  By law its core missions are to decrease the disproportional numbers of minority children incarcerated, prevent teenage delinquency, and act to remove children from adult jails, where they are at high risk for both sexual assault and suicide.  But the agency also doles out more than a quarter of a billion dollars in federal grant money every year-with little congressional oversight or attention from the public.  But instead of the money being spent for what Congress intended it, the agency's funding more recently flowed to programs with political, social or religious connections to the White House.  The <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5033256&amp;amp;page=1">agency's new priorities</a> include encouraging teenage abstinence and promoting golf to inner city kids.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5033256&amp;amp;page=1">favoritism and politicization</a> in the awarding of grants by OJJDP would ordinarily be unremarkable compared to such higher profile examples of cronyism by the Bush administration -- except for the staggering human consequences.  To fund his new priorities, J. Robert Flores, the administrator of OJJDP has cut funding for the training of corrections officers to prevent the physical and sexual abuse of incarcerated children. He has cut funds for a program to counsel rape victims that had been praised by President Bush. He has cut funds to prevent the incarceration of mentally ill or mentally retarded children.  And he has cut funding for programs to prevent the suicide of gay and lesbian children.</p> <p>Flores' tenure as head of Justice's OJJDP and the favorism and cronyism which at least a half dozen subordinates and superiors have alleged was the subject of a recent <em>Nightline</em> broadcast which I helped report with ABC chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross and reporters Ana Schecter and Maddy Sauer.  Tomorrow morning, Flores <a href="ttp://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=2024">will be questioned under oath</a> about all of this before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.  </p> <p><br />
<br />
(To read the full version of this story, click <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/18/the-price-of-political-favoritism-and-cronyism-lost-lives/">here</a>).<br />
<br />
And my colleague Anna has a <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5192879&amp;amp;page=1">story</a> disclosing that Flores is also the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5192879&amp;amp;page=1">subject of an investigation</a> by the Justice Department's Inspector General:<br />
<br />
</p> <blockquote><p>The DOJ Inspector General has launched an investigation into fancy trips around the world taken by J. Robert Flores, the Administrator of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, which always included golf and/or tennis... </p> <p>"Flores would golf during the day while on official travel around the country on tax payer funds," said Scott Peterson, a former staff member at OJJDP who traveled with Flores on various occasions. </p> <p>An OIG investigator questioned one staff member about Flores' travel and about an ex-Colonel in the Honduran army hired by Flores who at one time ran for president of Honduras. </p> <p>The staffer said the Human Resources Department [of DOJ] was concerned that giving access to the DOJ computer system to a non-US citizen and a former Honduran Colonel could be dangerous for security reasons. </p> <p>Fonseca, whose Honduran military career spanned three decades, was contracted to work on faith-based and gang issues...</p> </blockquote> <p><!--more--> <br /> </p><blockquote> <p> <!-- page -->Fonseca attended Church with Flores, according to DOJ staffers, and is married to Deborah Lynne De Moss, a major GOP contributor. Fonseca himself donated $2,000 to Bush in 2004, the same year he was hired, and reportedly raised about $50,000 more on behalf of the president... </p> <p>In a farewell to his colleagues in July of 2007, Fonesca wrote in an email:  "It is my hope and prayer that the joy and peace of Jesus Christ will be real to each on of you." </p> </blockquote><br />
<br />
 <p>Historians are already arguing whether the Bush administration has engaged in <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803">cronyism and favoritism</a> at the expense of professionalism and competence.  Presidents of both political parties are routinely accused by those in the opposition of stacking the government with their ideological or political loyalists.  But the Bush administration's handling of Katrina and the reconstruction of Iraq, the firings of nine U.S. attorneys, and the nomination of Harriett Miers to the Supreme Court raise questions as to whether during the Bush presidency, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/02/06/opinion/06krugman.html?scp=2&amp;amp;sq=%22krugman%22+and+%22standard+operating+procedure%22+and+%22katrina%22&amp;amp;st=nyt">as Paul Krugman has written</a> in the <em>New York Times</em>, "politicization and cronyism have become standard operating procedure throughout the federal government."  </p> <p><a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/wp-content/murrayfiles/2008/06/bush_golf.jpg" title="bush_golf.jpg"><img src="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/wp-content/murrayfiles/2008/06/bush_golf.jpg" alt="bush_golf.jpg" /></a> Setting aside its traditional mission, Flores' office awarded a $500,000 federal grant last year to the World Golf Association.  In explaining why he overrode his career staff in awarding the grant, Flores explained:  "We need something... to engage the gangs and the street kids. Golf is the hook."  Flores awarded the grant despite the fact that the group's grant proposal rated 47th best out of 104 applicants.   The honorary chairman the Golf Association's First Tee program is former George Herbert Walker Bush.</p> <p>In <a href="http://youthtoday.org/publication/article.cfm?article_id=1951">a draft of his testimony</a> to be given to Congress tomorrow, Flores has decided to come out swinging against those who criticize the grant to the World Golf Association, claiming that they are "biased against the wealthy." Flores wrote in the draft testimony that he believes that the grant has been "pilloried because it was tied to golf, and I assume for those who are biased against the wealthy, because it has historically been a sport of the well-to-do." </p> <p> Flores also overruled his professional staff and awarded <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5054210&amp;amp;page=1">a million dollar grant to the Best Friends Foundation</a>, an organization that promotes sexual abstinence.  Best Friends ranked 53rd out of 104 grant applicants. Additionally, the organization refused to participate in a congressionally mandated study into the effectiveness of abstinence programs for teens.</p> <p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5054210&amp;amp;page=1">	Why then did Best Friends obtain its grant?</a>  The founder and president of Best Friends is Elayne Bennett.  Her husband, Bill Bennett, had been, respectively, the Secretary of Education during the Reagan administration and the drug czar for the first Bush administration. Now at days, of course, Bill Bennett spends most of his time as a cable television personality supporting the policies of the current Bush administration   Moreover, funding sexual abstinence for teenagers has been a priority for the White House.</p> <p>	While Best Friends and the World Golf Association received their grants, more than forty other organizations that had received higher ratings from Justice Department reviewers received no federal money at all.  Those denied grants included organizations that train youth corrections officers, counsel rape victims, and work to prevent suicide among gay and lesbian youth.</p> <p>A program to help troubled teens in San Diego, Vista, was ranked number two by the staff out of 202 applicants in its category of prevention and intervention but was turned down for a grant to help deal with inner city teen violence in San Diego.  Why was its grant turned down?  Justice Department employees said Flores did not like the fact that group distributed condoms.</p><br />
<br />
<p>Often times, effective programs had their funds curtailed for ideological reasons.  Even the Girl Scouts was not immune.  When one of Flores' superiors wanted to fund a Girl Scouts program to serve girls whose mothers were incarcerated, Flores objected because the group had ties to Planned Parenthood. </p> <p>Another program, designed to train adult guards to deal with teens in custody, also was denied federal money even though it was ranked by the staff number 2 out of 104 in its category. </p> <p>"What Flores did in this situation is he just stomped on the heads of kids who are very much at risk and in trouble in this country," said Earl Dunlap, who runs the guard training program for the National Partnership for Juvenile Services.</p> <p>Another group that was turned down for an OJJDP grant-- despite the strong recommendations of career Department employees that it be awarded one was the Rape Abuse and Incest National Network (RAINN), a Washington D.C. based advocacy group for victims of rape and sexual assault. </p> <p>Among other things, RAINN runs a telephone hotline for victims of rape and sexual assault, which has put hundreds of thousands of victims together with local rape crisis centers.  RAINN ranked 14th best among 104 prospective grantees in the category in which it applied.  The group directly competed against the World Golf Association, which was ranked 47th in the competition, and Best Friends, which ranked 51st.  </p> <p>Flores has refused to answer questions about why he turned overruled his staff in funding RAINN.  One OJJDP employee said Flores expressed concerns to him that some rape victims might possibly be counseled as to how to obtain abortions by rape counseling centers which RAINN refers those who contact the organization's telephone hot line.  President Bush, however, has publicly praised the organization, as have conservative Republicans on Capitol Hill. </p> <p>	But most importantly, Flores' office is by law supposed to take a leading role in removing kids from adult jails, where they are sexually assaulted and at high risk for suicide.  Indeed, that policy objective was central to the OJJDP's creation during the Carter administration.  </p> <p>	In 1986, the Reagan administration's Administrator of OJJDP, <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=5d5ed82c-aa0d-4cac-b514-efdb892649c8">Al Regnery resigned</a> after being confronted with allegations that he, like Flores, had disregarded the recommendations of his career staff and federal regulations to award grants for political or ideological reasons.  Regnery awarded grant money to the dean of the late Jerry Falwell's Liberty College to devise a high-school course on the Constitution.  <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=5d5ed82c-aa0d-4cac-b514-efdb892649c8">He awarded $789,000</a> to a former songwriter for "Captain Kangaroo" to study pornographic cartoons.  </p> <p><a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=4351">	Regnery</a> had also been asked by then-Attorney General Edwin Meese  III to informally spearhead the Regan administration's anti-pornography campaign.  Regnery provided the initial funding to the President's Commission on Pornography with OJJDPF funds diverted from juvenile crime prevention programs. </p> <p><a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/wp-content/murrayfiles/2008/06/kids_jail.jpg" title="kids_jail.jpg"><img src="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/wp-content/murrayfiles/2008/06/kids_jail.jpg" alt="kids_jail.jpg" /></a> But most of all, Regnery ignored the federal law to act to remove children from adult jails.  Regnery and his boss, then-Attorney General Edwin Meese believed that jailing children with adults was a deterrent to crime.  The Reagan administration purposely did little to urge state governments to comply with the law.</p> <p>	The consequences to children were devastating.  When incarcerated with adults, children are subjected to physical and sexual assaults, raped, and even murdered. According to the Justice Department's Bureau of Justice Statistics, for the year 2005, <a href="http://www.campaignforyouthjustice.org/national_reports.html">21% of sexual assault victims in jails were juveniles</a> even though kids only constitute less than 1% of the nation's incarcerated population.</p> <p>	But even more tragic, locking up children with adults in jails and prisons often leads a significant number to commit suicide.  According to one federal study, children incarcerated in adult jails and prisons <a href="http://www.campaignforyouthjustice.org/national_reports.html">commit suicide at 36 times the rate </a>that they do when they are locked up with other juveniles.  </p> <p>	With Regnery's resignation, OJJDP returned to its mission of removing children from adult jails.  But during Flores' current tenure under President Bush, the removal of children from adult jails has once again become less of a priority and children are again at risk. Grant money and staff resources have instead been devoted to programs to encourage abstinence, golf and further other political priorities of the White House. </p> <p>	In the meantime, we have the testimony of at least one victim to the consequences.  A teenager held in a county jail wrote a local district attorney saying he did not want to be exposed to adult criminals because of their bad influences:</p> <blockquote><p>	"A wise person once told me it is not our mistakes in life that define who we are, bur rather how we recover from those mistakes.  With that I would just like you to know that I'm going to use this situation to make me a stronger person and a better person." </p> </blockquote> <p>Two and one half months later, the boy committed suicide.</p> <br />
<br />
<br />
This article was originally posted at my personal blog/online magazine <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/18/the-price-of-political-favoritism-and-cronyism-lost-lives/">here</a>. <br />
<br />
This post was updated as well since original posting. Originally, it contained just the first portion of the article with a link to the original.  Now it has been updated to include the whole article, as well as links to other articles and other information for those interested in this issue.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>For more information on the Justice Department's OJDDP</strong>:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Anna Schecter and Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=7473879&amp;page=1">"DOJ Official Breached Ethics Rules Playing Golf,"</a> ABCNews.com, May 1, 2009.<br />
<br />
Scott Horton, <a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2008/10/hbc-90003725">"Justice in the Gutter,"</a> <em>Harper's</em>, Oct. 9, 2008,<br />
<br />
Johanna Neuman, <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/presidentbush/2008/06/faith-or-cronyi.html">"Faith or Croynism in the White House Faith Based Initiative?"</a>,<em> Los Angeles Times</em>, June 27, 2008<br />
<br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803&amp;page=1">Anna Schecter</a> and <a href="http://schema-root.org/people/career/journalists/murray_waas/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5245645&amp;page=1">"DOJ Official Fired in Wake of ABC News Investigation," </a>ABCNews.com, June 25, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1993/3/26/goldsmith-prizes-awarded-pinvestigative-reporters-who/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a></a> and Anna Schecter, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803&amp;page=1">"Bush White House Pushed Grant for Former Staffer,"</a> ABCNews.com, June 24, 2008.<br />
<br />
Nolan Rosenkrans, "<a href="http://www.winonadailynews.com/articles/2008/06/20/news/00lead.tx">WSU Program Sars on Capitol Hill:  Lawmakers Accuse U.S. Justice Department of Unfair Grant"</a>  <em>Winona Daily News,</em> June 20 2008.<br />
<br />
Carrie Johnson, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/19/AR2008061903132.html">"Juvenile Justice Grant Overseer Subject of Criminal Probe,"</a> Washington Post, June 20, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803&amp;page=1">Anna Schecter</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5033256&amp;page=1">Brian Ross</a>, and <a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/377/75798">Murray Waas</a>:  <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5202782&amp;page=1">"$500,000 Round of Golf?  Congress Probes Official"</a>, ABC News, June 19, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/murray_waas/">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/19/62/"> "House Hearing on DOJ Contracting: One Witness Testifies; Another One Takes the Fifth,"</a> personal blog, June 18, 2008.<br />
<br />
Anna Schecter and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas/External_Links_2005-2008">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5192879&amp;page=1">"Fore!  DOJ Probes Official Golfing on Government Trips,</a>" ABC News, June 18, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/18/the-price-of-political-favoritism-and-cronyism-lost-lives/">The Price of Favoritism and Cronyism: Lost Lives and Teenage Suicides, "</a> <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/about/"><em>Murray Waas personal blog</em></a>, June 18, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.naymz.com/search/murray/waas/1293771">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="ttp://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5054210&amp;page=1">"Questions Surround Govt. Funded Abstinence Program",</a> ABC News June 12, 2008.<br />
<br />
Barron YoungSmith, <a href="http://www.tnr.com/topics/murray-waas">"A Bush Administration Scandal, and its Antecedent,"</a></a> <em>The New Republic,</em> June 10, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/news_notes/waas_is_the_new_woodward_35143.asp" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/10/attempted-intimidation-of-career-justice-department-employees/">"Attempted Intimidation of Career Justice Department Employees,"</a> June 10, 2008.<br />
<br />
Brian Ross, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5234803&amp;page=1">Anna Shecter</a>, and <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=10077">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5033256&amp;page=1">"Justice Department Official Awards $500,000 Grant to Golf Group,"</a> ABC News, June 9, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/United-States-v-I-Lewis-Libby/Murray-Waas/e/9781402752599" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/09/nightline-story-i-worked-on-out-tonight/">"Nightline: Fund Suicide Prevention Programs for Teens or Teach Them Golf?,"</a> personal blog, June 9, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://murraywaas.net/biography_murray_waas_.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4749998&amp;page=1">"Judges' Group Director Pays DOJ Settlement,"</a> ABC News, April 29, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/ta052109.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=5d5ed82c-aa0d-4cac-b514-efdb892649c8">"Al Regnery's Secret Life: The Pathetic Career of Reagan's Juvenile Justice Chief," </a><em>The New Republic</em></a>, June 19, 1986.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink"><strong>Also by Murray Waas:</strong></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69Q4XS20101027" target="_hplink">"Tea Party Candidates Only A Democrat Could Love," </a><em>Reuters</em>, Oct. 27, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/04/24-1" target="_hplink">"WellPoint Routinely Targets Breast Cancer Patients,'"</a> <em>Reuters</em>, April 24, 2010.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett--steele-awards-104329693.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G2DO20100317" target="_hplink">"Insurer Targeted HIV Patients to Drop Coverage,"</a><em> Reuters</em>, March 17, 2010. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/bios/murray_s_waas/search?contributorName=murray%20s%20waas" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/11/alberto_gonzales_quietly_trium.html">"Dropped Call: "Alberto Gonzales Won't Be Charged Over Eavesdropping Testimony,"</a> <a href="http://nymag.com/author/murray%20waas"><em>New York Magazine</em></a>, Nov. 23, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-administration-leaks-bolstered-rick-renzis-reelection-bid-2009-06-24.html">"Bush Administration Leaks Bolstered Rep. Renzi's Reelection Bid,"</a> the <em>Hill</em>, June 24, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904u/us-attorney-bogden">"A U.S. Attorney's Story," <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/murray-waas/" target="_hplink"></a>the <em>Atlantic</em></a>, April 20, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/_at_least_eleven_bush.php">"The Big Stone Wall: Nine Bush-Era Officials Refused to Cooperate with DOJ Probes," </a><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/grand_jury_investigation_of_us_attorney_firings_fo.php">TPM Muckraker</a>, Feb. 18, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/murraywaas">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/attorney_rove_will_cooperate_with_doj_probes.php">"Rove Will Cooperate with Various DOJ Probes," </a><em>TPM Muckraker</em>, Feb. 5, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/grand_jury_investigation_of_us_attorney_firings_fo.php">"U.S. Attorney Scandal: Feds Probe Domenici for Obstructing Justice in Iglesias Firing,"</a> <em>TPM Muckraker</em>, Feb. 4, 2009.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1017968939.php" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a> and Justin Rood, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5912290&amp;page=1">"Report: White House Involved in U.S. Attorney Firings,"</a> <em>ABCNews.com</em>, Sept. 29, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-notes">The Case of the Gonzales Notes,"</a> the <em>Atlantic</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1017968939.php" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200809u/gonzales-investigation">"What Did Bush Tell Gonzales?,"</a> <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/murray_waas"><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/murray_waas">the <em>Atlantic</em></a></a>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0718nj1.htm">"Bush Blocked Justice Department Probe," </a><em>National Journal</em>, July 18, 2007.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/murray_waas/">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0112nj1.htm">"CIA Leak Probe: Inside the Grand Jury Room," <em>National Journal</em>, </a>Jan. 12, 2007.<br />
<br />
Paul Krugman, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/opinion/10krugman.html">"Yes He Would,"</a> <em>New York Times</em>, April 10, 2006,<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/murray-waas/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0330nj1.htm">"Insulating Bush," </a><em>National Journal</em>, March 30, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Murray Waas</a>, "<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1216nj2.htm">Why Novak Called Rove,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Dec. 16, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/04/09/waas_now.html" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-12-13/news/jack-anderson-an-appreciation/"> "Jack Anderson: An Appreciation,"</a> the <em>Village Voice</em>, Dec. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2006/2/10/exclusive_interview_murray_waas_on_how">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1113nj_waas.htm">"Senate Ethics Committee Clears Shelby,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Nov. 13, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/04/reuters-and-milwaukee-journal-sentinel-receive-2010-barlett-steele-awards/" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1007nj3.htm">"Rove Assured Bush He Was Not Leaker,"</a> <em>National Journal</em>, Oct. 7, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm" target="_hplink">Murray Waas</a>,<a href="http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/07/exclusive-novak-co-operated-with.html"> "Exclusive: Rove Cooperated With Prosecutors,"</a> <em>Whatever Already!</em>, June 12, 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/demons-and-demonization/" target="_hplink"><strong>About Murray Waas</strong>:</a><br />
<br />
Eric Alterman and Danielle Ivory, <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/ta052109.html">"Think Again:  Blogosphere to Mainstream Press:  Get Off the Bus,"</a> Center for American Progress, May 21, 2009.<br />
<br />
Glenn Greenwald, <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/26/waas/">"Salon Radio:  Murray Waas,"</a> <em>Salon.com</em>, Sept. 26, 2008.<br />
<br />
Jim Boyd, <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100453">"Why Courage is Hard to Find,"</a> Nieman Reports, Summer, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes_2.htm">Liz Halloran</a>, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm">"A Muckraker's Day in the Sun,"</a> <em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em>, May 15 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027.html">Howard Kurtz</a>,<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html"> "Reporters in Glass Houses,"</a><em> Washington Post</em>, April 17, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://mydd.com/2006/4/10/jay-rosen-quotmurray-waas-is-our-bob-woodwardquot" target="_hplink">Jay Rosen</a>, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">"Murray Waas is Our Woodward Now,"</a> PressThink, April 9, 2006.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/white-house-watched.html">Dan Froomkin</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">"A Compelling Story,"</a> the <em>Washington Post</em>, March 31, 2006.<br />
<br />
<br />
<em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/16/AR2006041601027_pf.html">Additional background</a> on <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html">Murray Waas</a> can be found<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/04/09/waas_now.html"> here,</a>  <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060515/15mediatakes.htm",  http://www.murraywaas.net/biography_murray_waas_.html,<a href="http://www.jdlasica.com/articles/salonsider.html">here,</</a>  <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Murray_Waas",>here,</a>  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/03/31/BL2006033100695.html">here, <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/06-2NRsummer/p92-0602-boyd.html">here</a>, </a>     and<a href="http://murraywaas.crooksandliars.com/about/"> here</a>. His <a href="http://www.hs.facebook.com/people/Murray_Waas/600416922">profile on Facebook</a> can be found <a href="http://www.hs.facebook.com/people/Murray_Waas/600416922">here</a>. <br />
<br />
]]></content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Former Aide Contradicts Huckabee Defense Of Rapist's Release</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/05/former-aide-contradicts-h_n_75519.html"/>
    <id>tag:www.huffingtonpost.com,2007:/thenewswire//2.75519</id>
    <published>2007-12-05T17:42:12-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-05-25T12:20:21-04:00</updated>
    <summary><![CDATA[Directly contradicting Mike Huckabee's claims, his former senior aide tells the Huffington Post that, as governor of Arkansas,...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Murray Waas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/murray-waas/"><![CDATA[Directly contradicting Mike Huckabee's claims, his former senior aide tells the Huffington Post that, as governor of Arkansas, Huckabee indeed told the state's parole board that he supported the release of a convicted rapist.<br />
<br />
The senior aide, Olan W. "Butch" Reeves, personally attended a controversial parole board meeting with Huckabee in Oct. 1996.<br />
<br />
"The clear impression that I came away with from the meeting was that he favored Dumond's release," Reeves said, referring to convicted rapist Wayne Dumond. "And I can understand why board members would believe that to be the case."<br />
<br />
This stands in stark contrast to Huckabee's assertion, repeated at a press conference today that he "did not ask [the board] to do anything." When asked directly about trying to influence the board, Huckabee responded: "No. I did not. Let me categorically say that I did not."<br />
<br />
But, according to Reeves, Huckabee actually told the parole board members that the prison sentence meted out to Dumond for his rape conviction was "outlandish" and "way out of bounds for his crime." Huckabee believed there "was something nefarious" about the how the state's criminal justice system had treated Dumond, Reeves said.<br />
<br />
Reeves's admission comes as a surprise since the interview was encouraged by Huckabee's presidential campaign. Reeves served as chief counsel to then-Gov. Huckabee until 2003, and was subsequently appointed by Huckabee as chairman of the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission. Reeves has donated to Huckabee's presidential campaign.<br />
<br />
The Huffington Post reported on Tuesday that Huckabee's gubernatorial office had been <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/04/documents-expose-huckabee_n_75362.html">privately warned by numerous women</a> that Dumond had sexually assaulted them or their family members, and would likely strike again. Huckabee pushed for the rapists release from prison anyway, and Dumond went on to rape and murder at least one other woman.<br />
<br />
In a 2002 story I wrote for the Arkansas Times about Huckabee's role in freeing Dumond, four board members -- three of whom spoke on the record -- said that Huckabee lobbied and pressured board members on the matter. This included the 1996 parole meeting at which the board's recording secretary -- who ordinarily tapes the entire sessions -- was asked to leave the room. Several board members and members of the state legislature have said the secret session violated state law.<br />
<br />
Huckabee, in turn, has said that all four parole board members have lied about his role in Dumond's release from prison.<br />
<br />
Huckabee has also noted that all of the parole board members who have said he lobbied them Dumond were Democrats and that they were pursuing a partisan agenda in making their allegations.<br />
<br />
Alleging that the parole board members had attempted to "politicize" the matter, Huckabee told CNN on Wednesday: "We ought to extend our grief and heartfelt sorrow to these families.  I just regret that politics is reduced to that."<br />
<br />
Informed that Reeves had corroborated accounts given by parole board members, a senior aide to Huckabee, speaking on the campaign's behalf, said that they had no immediate comment as to whether Reeves was telling the truth. The aide offered no explanation as to why Reeves, a loyal Huckabee aide and friend, would be motivated to give an account so directly at odds with that of the governor.]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>