More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Barton Kunstler, Ph.D.

Barton Kunstler, Ph.D.

Posted: September 8, 2009 01:00 PM

Where is the Outrage Over Our Current Health Care System?

What's Your Reaction:

Last Wednesday night I attended one of the 3,000 vigils called by MoveOn to show support for health care reform. About 60 people showed up in our town, holding candles, and - as was planned for all the vigils -- taking turns reading 11 pages of one-sentence descriptions of MoveOn members "who are suffering under our broken health care system", as MoveOn's introduction stated. Some of the cases hit me like a punch in the stomach and I -- along with others -- audibly gasped. Others gave me a sinking feeling, a sense of hopelessness.

As the reading went on, I felt a growing outrage and, from what I gathered talking with others afterward, this was widely shared. Not the sort of outrage that would lead me to draw little mustaches on posters of Blue Dog Democrats or John McCain. But pretty pissed off nonetheless.

The vigil's organizer said that it was a fair guess most of us in attendance did have some sort of health care. Later, though, I happened to be standing nearby when a woman told him that she owed $125,00 in medical bills and had been forced to leave her home for subsidized housing. The stories on MoveOn's list are everywhere -- they are our neighbors' stories, family members' stories, the stories of other people just like us, trying to survive and flourish in an America that -- according to our national myths - should be compassionate towards and protective of its citizens.

Whom did we hear about as we read the list of people screwed over by our current health care system? "Samantha has been denied coverage since being diagnosed with cancer at the age of 3." "Tracy lost her leg to cancer, and is now getting dropped from Medicaid." "Christine's out-of-pocket expenses are forcing her to live in poverty while dying from kidney cancer." "Malyn died of cancer at age 63 because she couldn't afford health care and her employer didn't provide any." The term "because of a prior condition" appeared often. This is flagrant abuse - insurance companies, among the most cash-rich corporations in the world, can refuse to insure you if you have "a prior condition". That is, if you have colitis, as does one of the people on the list whom insurers would not cover, they won't cover you for anything. What if you get hit by a car, which has nothing to do with colitis? No health insurance -- because you have colitis.

"Ian is 20, has Type 1 diabetes, and has been denied health insurance by Medicaid, insurance companies, and Medicare/Social Security." "Michelle has breast cancer and her insurance will run out on October 9th of this year." "Jack's company forced its retirees out of its health insurance program by raising the premiums from $47.93 to over $600 per month." "Kerry is battling stage III breast cancer that went undiagnosed for too long because she had no insurance to cover routine health screenings." Another common term is "lost their home". Medical expenses are a leading cause of foreclosure and eviction, so the sicker you get, the more likely you'll get thrown out onto the streets.

On it goes. The real list is millions of names long. So where is the outrage? Where are the Democratic politicians telling these stories to their constituents, their colleagues, and to the nation as proof that the current system is failing so many? Why are Republicans and Blue Dogs playing low-life political tricks just to defend insurance companies (heavy campaign donors) and peddling a perverted version of an America where the government aiding its citizens is treated like a heinous act of treason?

Why has the media ignored the real outrage - not that of the fanatics who think the health plan will lead to a totalitarian state, but the outrage over the millions of people falling through the cracks...Excuse me, was I about to say "cracks" in the system? Let's change that to "widening crevices" in our health care system.

"Jackie has MS and no health insurance." Seven words that speak to an individual's courage and pain, to social injustice, and the chance for rescue and redemption, rescue for "Jackie" and redemption for a nation that must do a much better job of serving its people.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:15 PM on 09/09/2009
i guess things will get worse faster and faster through time
until we reach a tipping point
and then watch out

then the pitch forks come out
and the stupid top of the food chain will regret allowing the masses to be so heavily armed for political gain.

ooops!!!
big mistake
01:13 PM on 09/09/2009
MONEY
our system is corupt
and getting worse through time

where's the outrage...?
good question.....
I don't know

maybe the angry masses are too programmed to respond
or
maybe they are just not televised
?????

it will get much, much worse before it gets better
photo
longtalldrink
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you wan
12:34 PM on 09/09/2009
What I don't understand are those that fight and scream against their own best interest. When their insurance rates go up 35%, who will they scream to next? It will be too late then.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
csavage
12:26 PM on 09/09/2009
The wingnuts consider healthcare to be a privilege and the town hall disruptions are just an easy way of getting out of the question "If you consider yourself part of the Culture of Life, how can you justify 22,000 Americans dying every year of lack of access to healthcare?" C'mon now, they were the "distract and deflect" party for the last 8 years and they still are
12:23 PM on 09/09/2009
There is plenty of outrage concerning insurance-but-you-call-it-health-care reform. But, the outrage is misplaced. Instead of being outraged at BigPharma and the FDA for giving us poor quality health care, we are blaming the insurance company for charging too much to pay for our poor quality health care. This is like blaming VISA when we order a CD from Amazon, and asking VISA to lower its interest rates, when we should be inquiring with Amazon, or UPS or even the CD production company for why our CD is broken in the first place.

, insurance can't pay for treatments or procedures that don't exist, and for many of us, the critically and terminally or chronically ill, there are no treatments or procedures that will give us back our lives, meanwhile the rest of you continue to bicker over how much you'll have to pay to get a sprained ankle set, or get your jock itch cream.

Sorry, my life is more important than your discomfort, and the only forms of medicine that is being discussed is prevention of obesity and its related effects, and it does not require an MD to tell us to eat right, exercise, and not smoke and drink. Sadly, there are many of us who it doesn't matter what we eat or if we smoke and drink, because we will be disabled, whether we have insurance or not, and we will be terminally ill, whether we have insurance or not
11:01 AM on 09/09/2009
Below is an excerpt from the site given that describes Palin's religious beliefs. Be sure to check out the first and last videos on the page. Since I do not speak in tongues, they want to drive me from this land. And it will explain why she attacks the media. Why, I am sure those who follow this doctrine have no heart for others. Hearsay, but I heard Bachmannwas associated, too.

"High level leaders in that movement directly tied to vice presidential candidate Palin were on public record urging Christians to 'infiltrate' key sectors of society such as government and business and proposing a program of religious and social cleansing in which entire population groups would convert to the form of Christianity espoused by the New Apostolic Reformation or else be 'displaced', driven from 'the land'."

http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/11/5/13585/8320
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lemeritus
Been there, done that, lived to tell
10:59 AM on 09/09/2009
This was exactly the argument that should have been taking place in townhalls and in the media during August. That no one seemed troubled to do it only reinforces what wildedge said below: "...what the politicians are doing is redefining a market so that profits can increase, it never was about health care reform."
09:59 AM on 09/09/2009
"Why are Republicans and Blue Dogs playing low-life political tricks just to defend insurance companies (heavy campaign donors) and peddling a perverted version of an America where the government aiding its citizens is treated like a heinous act of treason? " Barton Kunstler, Phd.



Money, money changes everything.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
09:37 AM on 09/09/2009
In the Clinton administration the "health care reform" (it didn't deserve the term really) was defeated and Newt Gingrich was the spokesman for the opposition. I recall him proudly announcing that "We have studied the issue and concluded there is no crisis!"

In 2001, a study found that over 18,000 Americans died not just from a lack of health care (that number is far larger) but from a lack of health care due to a lack of insurance. That's 6 times the number that died in the 9/11 attacks.

Clearly any rational nation would have declared war on Newt Gingrich as the much deadlier threat to Americans but I see ol Newt is coming back as a spokesman for the right.

I bet we listen to him again and go right on dying in the name of corporate profits. Where's the outrage? Mine's largely burned out or buried under mounds of incredulity.
08:49 AM on 09/09/2009
"Where are the Democratic politicians telling these stories to their constituents, their colleagues, and to the nation as proof that the current system is failing so many? "
Read Tabibi's article in therecet Rolling Stone. This discussion has been a boon-doggle from the first; what the politicians are doing is redefining a market so that profits can increase, it never was about health care reform.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Barton Kunstler, Ph.D.
03:26 PM on 09/09/2009
I hope tonight's speech clarifies Obama's position one way or another. The tip-off will be whether he remains "ambiguous" - as he has termed himself - on issues such as people having to accept their employer's plan over a government plan; the extension of the prohibition on generic drugs for an extra 12 years if you're on the plan (which is a gift to big pharma); and whether the plan will be significantly less expensive than those of private insurers. All these can go through under the rubric of "public option" - and remain as watered down as it can get. Matt Taibbi's article is, like all his stuff, outstanding. Tonight we should get an indication of whether Baucus or the Obama we voted for is running the show - and just how committed Obama is to the electorate that gave him the presidency.
mamalisa38
I love you Thomas and I miss you like crazy RIP
08:46 AM on 09/09/2009
For profit health insurance is immoral. The only way to maximize profits, and that's what Wall Street demands, is to raise premiums and deductibles and deny claims. The top twenty insurance and drug executives earned $285 million in 2008 (JUST 20 PEOPLE!) plus profits for share holders. If ever we need proof that we must get corporate money out of our elections this is it. The health care industry has been spending $1.4 million A DAY since January on lobbying and campaign contributions. Bacus and Grassley have taken millions of dollars from these people. Do we really think they will vote against them? They have proven that they care more about money than those mentioned in your article or the 18,000 of us who die each because of a lack of affordable health care.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NotStarvingArtist
"Art is the signature of civilizations."
11:21 PM on 09/08/2009
I'm outraged, but I'm also afraid. I live in Texas where people are taking guns to healthcare rallies and where idiots are standing on the capital steps and talking about secession. They're saying things like they know there will have to be a bloody war and they're willing to have one, to get the government out of "their" business. Yes, I'm afraid to go to a pro-healthcare rally because someday one of these idiots is going to show up with a gun ready and willing to use it. Maybe that makes me a coward, but I'm a 62-year-old woman and I'm not willing to risk my life over a shouting match with a right wing nut. I have called my senators and representatives and sent email to my governor expressing my position, but in Texas that is like whistling in the wind. I did volunteer for Obama during the campaign and worked hard to get out the vote, but back then things were not quite so frightening. I'd be willing to bet I'm not the only one who doesn't go to pro-healthcare rallies out of fear of the lunatics who may show up armed.
photo
longtalldrink
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you wan
12:30 PM on 09/09/2009
You are right, you are not the only one. I too am afraid. The authorities don't do anything to stop these loonies, and I don't carry a gun, so I will be at the mercy of these fanatics.

Plus, "Jackie has MS and no health insurance." Seven words that speak to an individual's courage and pain, to social injustice" only gets one booed at these "forums."
12:46 PM on 09/09/2009
No, maam, you're no coward. You have plenty of reasons to be concerned for your safety because intimidation with guns, yelling, or both are signs of their cowardice. Consider Fannie Lou Hamer( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fannie_Lou_Hamer). A geniune American Hero.

But continue to speak about what's right, especially to those in authority. We all will share in the success or failure of this effort. I find the easiest question to ask is "What would you do?" to all that are against reform. If they believe there's no problem, then ask what are we to do with the 45 million that are uninsured, the potential for financial ruin due to illness, and the rising costs that DO hurt businesses that have to provide coverage for employees.

If they agree that there's a problem, then aside from "tort reform" (which hasn't worked in Texas) what so different from what the President wants to do?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Barton Kunstler, Ph.D.
03:31 PM on 09/09/2009
I agree with phillyphil - it's not cowardice to tread cautiously around complete numskulls who think their right to carry guns openly is sacrosanct while health care is a privilege. As longtalldrink says above, a lot of these people and their families have lousy health coverage and they're still ranting about government incursion. Perhaps we stop giving any government grants to medical schools. That would set health care back a few decades - but at least we'd have a system purified of any government interference.
jhNY
Mercy.
01:26 PM on 09/08/2009
Americans have stepped over the homeless for years now with but the slightest twinge of conscience, on their way into Starbuck's for a $5 cup of coffee. Those of us who feel compassion for our fellows are a wee minority here, otherwise known as 'bleeding hearts.' When more and more people become victims of the health care debacle and cease to see themselves as worthy winners, there might be a tipping point in sentiment, but that's a ways off yet.

It was Gentleman Jim Corbett, heavyweight champion, who said it best: "If you're looking for sympathy, it's in the dictionary, right between sh-t and syphilis.".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:10 PM on 09/08/2009
". . .a nation that must do a much better job of serving its people. . ." Despite the popular myth, this country has never been about taking care of the down and out, the poor, the elderly, the disabled. America was founded by rich white men, and only male landowners were allowed to vote for a very long time. The rest of the populace was ignored and marginalized, just as it is today. This is not Europe, where countries actually care for each individual to a great degree. This is the flip side of the American Dream: Yes, anyone can strike it rich, but it's also true that anyone can die sick and penniless on the street.

To change from this reality to one in which we care for each citizen would take a major revolution not only in perception and goals but in funding and the priorities of those in charge. That isn't going to happen.
09:03 AM on 09/09/2009
I'm afraid you are so right. It takes a courageous, independent, elected official to challenge, fight and survive the gauntlet craftily designed by the rich. Look how long it's been,over 70 years, this war for health care for all. If it were not so damnably profitable there would be no war. But the rich and greedy will continue to fight and indeed destroy to maintain their profits.

President Obama is not the Bernie Sanders of President's. He's a captive of his staff and the powers of Goldman-Sachs, who rely upon the Insurance industry for a goodly share of their profits. So we must either turn to a Congress which can override a Presidential veto, or revolution.

Voters will need to decide on next Nov. to support their convictions by voting in Progressives to replace the frightened Democrats and the Obstrutionist in the Republican party, or accept the status quo, slink away from the fray, and continue to step over the homeless, hapless, and underclass.
01:07 PM on 09/09/2009
What's worst they look down upon the very people who keep them rich as if they are doing the us a favor. Yeah, sure the rich are providers of goods and services and jobs, however, its in their best interest to have a strong, healthy, and happy workforce. What is wrong with paying more in taxes because you earn more? Can they comprehend the benefits of doing so, they'll be paying into a stronger happier citizenry as well as a stronger corporation. And guess what? They'll still be rich. its unfortunate that these people cannot see past their greed and gluttony to look at the bigger picture.

Everything that this planet has to offer we have to share whether we like it or not. Once its gone, its gone to all. Its in the best interest of every living breathing human being to look out for each other. Without each other we have nothing and we are nothing. It takes many hands to build, create and maintain.

And the rich will sit at their gold plated desks watching their workforce drop like flies because they are too greedy to share.