More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Ben Lear

GET UPDATES FROM Ben Lear
 

How Adam Schatz and "Search and Restore" Just Might Save Jazz...With Our Help

Posted: 11/29/2010 8:39 am

Over the last few decades, our culture has all but abandoned the notion of jazz as a living, breathing art form. I'll even bet that, if you're not already a fan, the moment you realized this post was about jazz, you considered clicking away. It seems distant and boring; a highbrow art form that takes some musical proficiency and a large wallet to enjoy. And if you are a fan, you've noticed that jazz nowadays exists in three places: New Orleans, behind glass at institutions like Jazz at Lincoln Center, and in a handful of old venues that require a steep admission and drink minimum to enter. It's as if somebody took this music, which is inherently underground and rebellious and locked it away, leaving us with Kenny G and a History Channel box set.

What's truly unfair is that the enormous attention we place on jazz's glorious past shapes our view of its present as being less popular and inferior by comparison. So, while Coltrane's records continue to inspire young players around the world, its no wonder the genre as a whole fails to resonate with the my generation. Kids today can't access the spirit that once surrounded jazz as an underground musical revolution. However, I'm fairly confident my friend, Adam Schatz, has discovered a way to provide this access.

A couple of weeks ago, I heard that Adam, founder of Search and Restore, an essential resource for new jazz in New York City, launched a highly ambitious and risky fundraising venture on Kickstarter. He hopes to raise $75,000 to fund the most comprehensive documentation of new jazz ever. By filming over 200 concerts in one year and integrating the footage onto his site, Adam will give a taste of this amazing music to thousands more, who would have otherwise never found it, inspiring them to go out and see the real thing live.

When Adam arrived in New York in the fall of 2006 to study Saxophone at NYU, he began seeing shows right away. Like a good jazz student, he wrote down the names of every player, who blew his mind and like a great jazz student, made sure to see that player every time he or she performed thereafter. Naturally, this led Adam to a lot of shows. One for every night of the week in fact. What he began to notice, contrary to his previous beliefs, was that jazz was not this distant, fading artifact but a vital and exciting new music, who's varied and brilliant sounds went wildly unnoticed. There existed an enormous semantic gap between the jazz, which our culture has found irrelevant, and the jazz, which continued to move Adam night after night. At the start of his sophomore year, Adam made it his mission to close this gap.

He started a monthly concert series at the Knitting Factory called Search and Restore. Using the connections he made as an avid fan, Adam put together impressive bills in a unique format--tickets under $15 to bring an audience out and two headliners a night to keep them around. After only a few shows, the response from audiences and players alike was so great, it became clear that Adam had stumbled upon something this community needed desperately. An organizer. Since then, Adam has worked closely with such leading artists as Vijay Iyer, Kneebody, Theo Bleckmann and Miles Okazaki just to name a few, he has received some wonderful praise from critics and the players he admires most, and, this Monday, November 29th, he will host a benefit concert at (Le) Poisson Rouge featuring non-stop duets by some of the biggest names in the new jazz scene.

While I have played jazz for much of my life and feel invested in its well-being, it has been the privilege of knowing Adam and feeding off his indelible devotion to this music, which has inspired me most to help him succeed.

Recently, I've come to learn the value of a person's ability to follow-through. So many of us, especially at my young age of 22, dream up truly great ideas but never act on them. It is that process, after the initial creative magic wears off and all that's left is the work, which frightens us onto the next idea. This has been a problem for me, especially, and I find that the closer I get to Adam and his indefatigable work ethic, the better I feel about my own capacity to act. This is what friends are for, I guess, to help each other along the way.

So, if you have a moment, check out his Kickstarter. Check out his website. Donate if you'd like. And remember, if you're a kid beginning to discover John Coltrane's later records, this music is for you. If you're into rock music and are looking for the heaviest live show around, this music is for you. If you are an older jazz fan, clinging to your 45s but uninterested in anything else, the music is still for you. What I'm trying to say is this music is for everyone. Enjoy it!

 

Follow Ben Lear on Twitter: www.twitter.com/benjaminlear

Over the last few decades, our culture has all but abandoned the notion of jazz as a living, breathing art form. I'll even bet that, if you're not already a fan, the moment you realized this post was ...
Over the last few decades, our culture has all but abandoned the notion of jazz as a living, breathing art form. I'll even bet that, if you're not already a fan, the moment you realized this post was ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:40 PM on 11/29/2010
Anything that gets live music before an audience is a good thing.
07:39 PM on 11/29/2010
From the moment that Miles Davis threw an arrogant Marsalis off his stage –prompted by Crouch, (Marsalis ‘strode’ onstage as self appointed heir apparent in the middle of a piece at Carnegie Hall), he has pitted himself against ‘new’ music with true vengeance ~‘new’ being anything more complex than New Orleans and swing. Marsalis has moved Jazz backward instead of forward as genius does. The fact is that Wynton Marsalis has failed to produce one truly original contribution to the trove of Jazz genius for one reason: he is not a genius but a jealous Solieri who generally waits till his competition is dead to assault them . In this, he has been used by Stanley Crouch to attack those who did not respect him either and to re-fashion history to reflect the narrow constraints of Marsalis, a good technical musician who can only repeat what has been done modestly. However he is not able to repeat the music of Cool and the throbbing later music. He is incapable of the sorts of performances of Coltrane or Miles Davis. I don’t hold that against him. I do hold this against him: grave robbing and defamatory assault against those great geniuses who are dead in order to ‘in-fame’ and enrich himself is 'dead' wrong. Both Stanley Crouch, a pompous ‘wizard of jazz’ and Marsalis should be ashamed of what they have done. It's cowardly and jealous.
05:21 PM on 12/28/2010
"Marsalis ‘strode’ onstage as self appointed heir apparent in the middle of a piece at Carnegie Hall"

That happened in Vancouver, Canada. Check it out:

http://www.jazzstreetvancouver.ca/events/22
07:29 PM on 11/29/2010
A noble undertaking but I think it fails to address the core issues.

The genius of ‘jazz’ itself, arose out of the foment of its times.
The ‘becoming’ of power and liberation that was the civil rights
movement, in a life and death environment, which was not exclusive to African Americans. This was a time when people experienced real solidarity and still remembered how to communicate, and in fact, relied on it in order to survive. However, the communications of those days is far from the technological abstraction which we have resorted to today. Jazz is ultimately a very high minded communication and reliance on one another.tweeting and texting hardly suffices to capture those ephemera and nuance to say nothing of the raw power that characterized the likes of John Coltrane, Miles Davis, Charlie Parker, Billie Holiday and others.

The notion that the ‘past’ (pre bop) is Mecca has been perpetrated as a distortion.
The ‘past’ which has been designated as Mecca is confined to one period,
pre-bop, and the music of early 20th century New Orleans . The Perpetrators have been Stanley Crouch, a failed avant garde drummer and his puppet mouthpiece, Wynton Marsalis. Together they
have profited materially and egoistically to the detriment of the rich wealth of true genius.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:40 PM on 11/30/2010
Yes. The purists are part of the problem. Jazz was never meant to stay in the same place for too long. To not advance into the future and explore the musical landscape goes directly against the spirit of jazz. I appreciate what Louis Armstrong has done for the music, and we all owe him a debt of gratitude for what he helped to start, but he has been dead for 40 years, and his day and age might not be relevant to the new generation. We have already absorbed the past, time to think about how we can take it into the future. It might sound and feel different, but who's to say that's a bad thing? Crouch? That guy has proved his irrelevance beyond reasonable doubt.
06:57 PM on 11/29/2010
There is just so much more music. Globally, jazz has its performers and audiences. I don't think it needs saving. It needs acoustic venues where people can listen AND TALK. Demanding full attention of audience by means of amplifier is for big venues. Acoustic jazz cafes where are you?
06:15 PM on 11/29/2010
If you want to hear great jazz from all eras and sub-genres check out www.jazz.fm. It is a radio station in Toronto that broadcasts to the world. Toronto and the surrounding communities have a very vibrant and eclectic jazz scene as well as several festivals each summer and fall. Great stuff!
10:39 PM on 12/01/2010
I live in Toronto, and yes, they do an ok job, but they tend to overplay a lot of embarrassing "soul jazz" recordings from the 70's that guys did to make a buck. I understand that they do it to reach out to a younger audience. It's very pragmatic programming, and some of the hosts aint the most knowledgable folks in the jazz world. We can't all have Phil Schaap in our backyard, though!
05:46 PM on 11/29/2010
In the immortal words of Frank Zappa - "Jazz isn't dead; it just smells funny."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raphi
05:26 PM on 11/29/2010
My comments on Huffpo are usually regarding economic divisions. Occasionally spiritual issues. But finally a subject about which I feel a deep passion. Jazz!

Very encouraging to read (and hear) about contemporary artists. I look forward to their contributions to the art. And to their innovations which keep the tradition a living archetype.

We long time jazz afficionados can appreciate what's happening. However, those not very familiar with jazz may find the really abstract stuff simply too alien. That's to be expected.

I started with 30's Harlem big bands, Gershwin, and 70's fusion. As my experience grew, my tastes became refined. I got into be-bop. Coltrane, et al. Then free jazz, like Eric Dolphy, my favorite.

So I sympathize with Judith Martin's comment below. The big band and NOLA trad jazz, and the rock-derived fusion could be danced to. But that's not all jazz is. Like Euro-classical music, it's an intellectual form. It can take you to realms way beyond consensus reality. But also like Euro-classical, it can move your soul deeply.

Therefore we need the explorations of these young artists. As benjorama says, let them function free of institutions and established festivals. The young will find territories we older folks never imagined. They will send us notes from the underground; maybe cosmic spaces as well. We should be listening.
photo
triplettam
Mind Bender
05:14 PM on 11/29/2010
Well, when I was growing up, I was studying to be a musician and I was exposed and sought out many types of music: blues, obscure and/or progressive rock bands, ethnic folk and jazz (old and new). And I got to play it in college. There's so many different styles that it's a shame many people have a certain notion of what jazz is. And the popularity of "smooth jazz" hasn't helped inspire people who might like more challenging music to seek out some of the great artists. Jazz is an American treasure. And I really doubt it will ever fade away.
photo
darquelourd
You Get What You Play For
05:08 PM on 11/29/2010
between being killed by the crap jazz became in the 70's and the birth of "smooth" jazz in the 80's - I say you guys have your work cut out for you, but Good Luck!
tqcobb
Free your mind and the rest will follow
04:57 PM on 11/29/2010
great stuff!...I will support this
04:04 PM on 11/29/2010
I'm happy to report that Jazz is alive and well if you're living in Philadelphia. Between the West Oak Lane Jazz festival, the dozen or more jazz clubs (or restaurant/cafes that feature jazz) like the Five Spot and musicians like Tim Warfield, Lear's depiction of jazz as a dusty relic just doesn't resonate at all here. We even have a website: www.phillyjazz.org
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:42 PM on 11/29/2010
"It's as if somebody took this music, which is inherently underground and rebellious and locked it away, leaving us with Kenny G and a History Channel box set."

This pretty much explains it all. If we want to revitalize the jazz, we need to take it back to the underground from which the music was created in the first place. Create a scene that is separate from the expensive Jazz societies, festivals, and Universities which dominates jazz and diminishes accessibility. It is up to the new generation of jazz musicians to take the music from the institutions and back to the underground to establish a base of talent and fans that jazz so desperately needs right now.
10:22 PM on 12/01/2010
If it goes anymore "underground" it would cease to exist. You think Monk and Trane et al wanted to be working in bars, unable to pay their rent? It's not about reverting back to a romanticized hip subculture; it's about one thing: artistic integrity. Whether you're playing blues, bop, dixieland, free, whatever. Jazz doesn't need anyone revitalizing it any more than Indian classical music needs it. Revitalization is an inherent part of good jazz improvisation. The weakness is not with the music, but with the musician.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:39 PM on 12/01/2010
You're confusing underground with institutionalization. If it got anymore institutionalized, it will become nothing but background music for the elite academic types where the only gigs available are reserved for the top 1 percent of performers. I would hardly use the word "underground" to describe that. You're right, Trane and Monk probably didn't like playing in bars struggling to pay rent, but you know what? They where playing great music with the highest of "artistic integrity" in a setting that could be described as a "romanticized hip subculture". They where also accessible to the common man where all they had to pay was a two drink minimum, unlike the 50 bucks to listen to two 40 minute sets at some Jazz society. So where has the integrity gone? There is some great stuff in the institutions, but those artists are so pampered by the short term security that the institutions provide (and I don't blame them for that, who would?), that they would never leave that behind and take their music back to the streets where regular people could hear it. You could be right that jazz doesn't need to be revitalized, after all there will always be a place for it in the elite music halls, but wouldn't it be nice if a group of talented young musicians took a risk and brought it back down to the nitty gritty and took the music in a different direction? Isn't that part of what jazz is about?
Judith Martin
Retired librarian
03:41 PM on 11/29/2010
The litmus test I use for "real jazz" is whether or not you can dance to it. Modern jazz, to me, is impossible to dance to.

The issue in this article, of course, seems to be that the "old masters" are dying off sooner than the younger generations can step in to adequately fill their shoes.

Here in New Orleans, especially since the post-Katrina floods in 2005, there has been an extra effort being made throughout the area to encourage young music students to start learning to play classic jazz. (I'm not trying to advertise anything here, but a lot of Mardi Gras music is good, solid jazz.)

But will people still dance to jazz? Will any of you out there dance to it? I gaar-on-tee that you will do well to keep a white handkerchief with you, for one day, you will need it to twirl in the air for second-lining. You won't need lessons to learn how to dance, either. "Shake your bootie" and the "buck and wing" will come to you so naturally you won't believe it so, because you will be having so much fun!
10:42 PM on 12/01/2010
Personally, I listen to music. Your criteria is ridiculous.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:16 PM on 11/29/2010
I remember when I was 20 years old and I read an interview with Eddie Murphy, who was not much older than I at the time. After commenting on Wynton Marsalis' intellectual approach to music, Murphy said, "How can music without words make you think?" Eddie is not dumb, but that was a dumb view that many people hold.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:13 PM on 11/29/2010
I get two reactions when I say that I play jazz piano -- both bad. One reaction is that jazz doesn't require any skill, that it is a lot of hit and miss and guessing -- no real thinking going on. The other reaction is -- "Oh, I hate that stuff. It's boring."

Jazz is a bad name for American Classical Music.