EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Ben S. Cohen

Ben S. Cohen

Posted: September 1, 2010 11:38 AM

Like the Lubyanka prison in Moscow during the Soviet period, or the Prinz Albrecht Strasse headquarters of the Gestapo in Nazi-era Berlin, Tehran's Evin Prison is indelibly linked with the most gruesome abuses of human rights, involving Iranian dissidents foolhardy enough to resist ideological conformity by thinking and acting for themselves. Evin, by all accounts, is a place where cruelty is the norm, where torture is routine, where mass executions are held as the sun rises in the sky, and where suspicious deaths -- such as that of the blogger Omidreza Mirsafayi, in March 2009 -- are dressed up as suicides.

On September 4, Shiva Nazar Ahari, a young female human rights activist incarcerated in Evin since last December, will enter a Revolutionary Court to face fabricated charges that carry the death penalty. Ahari, a leading activist with the Committee of Human Rights Reporters (CHRR), stands accused of "anti-regime propaganda" and "acts contrary to national security." She faces an additional charge in a category of criminality plausible only in societies run along totalitarian lines; what the ayatollahs deem mohareb, or "rebellion against God." It would require the most blinkered apologist for the Iranian regime to suggest that someone charged in this way can expect a fair trial.

As Michael Weiss recently documented, Ahari's public interventions - which began in 2001 when, at the tender age of 17, she attended a candlelit vigil for the victims of the 9/11 atrocities -- are regarded by the regime as one long episode of mohareb. Her presence at that vigil earned Ahari her first prison spell. That experience didn't prevent her from becoming a repeat offender, as far as the regime was concerned. After being expelled from university in 2006 because of her CHRR activities, Ahari fell under the gaze of the Iranian regime's enforcers once more.

In June 2009, as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad swaggered to a stolen victory in Iran's Presidential election, Ahari was arrested anew. This sojourn in Evin prison included 33 days in solitary confinement. Released in September, she again resumed her work on behalf of political prisoners. And again, in December, the regime firmly shut the door of an Evin cell with Ahari inside it. She has remained there ever since, awaiting the show trial which begins this Saturday.

This time, the crime of mohareb has been concretized into the formal charge, for which there is not a scintilla of evidence, that Ahari is an agent of the bizarre religio-Marxist cult known as the Mojahedin-e-Khalq. This organization is widely loathed in Iran because of its fealty to the late, unlamented Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, during the 1980-88 Gulf war.

Forced to defend herself from this fabricated charge in a court which, as Freedom House notes, is "notorious for non-transparent procedures and for handing down death sentences," Ahari seems destined to exchange her revolving door existence in Evin prison to become one more statistic on the regime's execution log. Even as her days appear to be numbered, there has been an abiding sense of international indifference to her fate.

In part, that's a consequence of the widespread perception, actively stoked by Ahmadinejad, that his regime will greet western entreaties with nothing other than contempt. That may be the case; still, there are two good reasons to follow the example of Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, who this week wrote to Secretary Clinton to push for swift intercession on Ahari's behalf.

Firstly, consider Iran's predicament, and the stark reality that further sanctions as a result of such abuses remain a real prospect against a regime whose fuel subsidies alone amount to $100 billion annually -- begging the question of how long the mullahs can continue their fantasy of eternal rule. Secondly, consider the United States and its allies; they need to avoid the mistakes committed in the run-up to the Iraq war by credibly demonstrating that defense of human rights is a central plank of our Iran policy.

In a stirring personal recollection of her friend Ahari, Sepideh Pooraghaiee quoted from a letter which Ahari sent to a fellow prisoner: "When your heart trembles for the rights of another human, that is when you begin to slip; that is when the interrogations begin. When your heart trembles for another prisoner, a woman, a child laborer, that is when you become the accused. When you find faith in people and believe in humanity and nothing else, that is when you commit your first crime." Words like these could easily have flowed from the pen of Vaclav Havel during the darkest days of Czech communism. Herein lies the contrasting tragedy of Ahari's case; as things currently stand, she is more likely to choke on the hangman's noose than enter high office.

So let's summon some of that spirit which informed western support for dissidents in the former eastern bloc. Urge our leaders, from President Obama onwards, to demand Ahari's unconditional release, and to do so with added volume this coming Saturday. In the same vein, urge our fellow citizens to make crystal clear to Ahmadinejad, the next time he rolls into a foreign city - as he will in New York later in September, to disgrace the UN General Assembly by addressing it - that we have not forgotten Shiva Nazar Ahari, nor those who struggle with her.

 

Follow Ben S. Cohen on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ZWord

 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allan Richter
09:24 PM on 09/04/2010
“On September 4, Shiva Nazar Ahari,…a human rights activist incarcerat­ed in Evin… will enter a Revolution­ary Court to face fabricated charges that carry the death penalty. … She faces an additional charge in a category of criminalit­y plausible only in societies run along totalitari­an lines; what the ayatollahs deem mohareb, or ‘rebellion against God.’’ (Ben Cohen)
This is yet another shocking example of Iran’s violation of fundamenta­l human values required under the universall­y recognized principal of the “rule of law”. This principal was the basis for the internatio­nal tribunal in Nuremberg after World War two. The “rule of law” is so basic it is one of the seven commandmen­ts given by God to Noah which are binding on all humanity. Ahmadineja­d’s and Iran’s grievous offense of fundamenta­l human values is considered ‘Chillul Hashem,” taking the name of the God in vain. Thousand of Jewish martyrs have given up their lives for ‘Kiddush Hashem’, sanctifyin­g the name of God.
“You shall not stand idly by the blood of your neighbor” (Sanhedrin 73a). “Urge our leaders, from President Obama onwards, to demand Ahari's unconditio­nal release. …(M)ake crystal clear to Ahmadineja­d, the next time he rolls into a foreign city - as he will in New York later in September, to disgrace the UN General Assembly by addressing it - that we have not forgotten Shiva Nazar Ahari, nor those who struggle with her." (Ben Cohen)
01:36 PM on 09/04/2010
God is not strict adherence to all laws but using wisdom and mercy to judge rightly. Love God and love your neighbor embodies all the law and commandman­ts.

Many of these Iranian clerics seem to lack love and mercy and follow the law with a fanatical form of intesity and absolutene­ss which discards love and mercy.

Fanatical and absolute adherence to laws and religious texts is not Godly but attempts to define human beings as robots and machines who simply need to be programmed or beaten into following the words in a religious text. This harsh enforcent and interpreta­tion of law is then defined as "Godliness­" but simply creates hatred towards God.

Is God a lawyer hunched over religious text?.....­.or is God a being who loves HUMAN beings even with all our flaws and imperfecti­ons. These clerics don't seem to want to wait for their God's judgement but want to begin creating hell and judgement right here on earth for women and others who won't "submit" to their cruel and punishing God of force and threats.

They will be judged as they so judge.
09:26 AM on 09/03/2010
How can author, who represents an organizati­on (AJC) who called Palestinia­n human right activists, "terrorist­s" and said they had "automatic weapons", be sincere about human rights for Iranians, whom he argues we should bomb?
08:24 AM on 09/03/2010
The organizati­on, the "author" who pretends to care about human rightswork­s for, called real human right activists who were murdered the attackers! They even went so far as to blantaly lie and said the human right activists had automatic weapons!

I don't believe anyone who defends murderers of Palestinia­n human right activists to be sincere in defending Iranian human right activists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koroush1336
An human rights activist and totally anti-mullahs,
02:55 AM on 09/02/2010
The problem for the mullahs is not this. The main war is between the Iranians and these backwarded­, reactionar­ies and medieval mullahs. They practicly do not belong to the present era. These mullahs and thier way of thinking is all about "DARK AGES" not the 21st century.


I just talked to a friend of mine who has been recently back from Iran. She was saying that her younger sister was arrested by the mullahs' agents because she was last year in the anit-mulla­hs demonstrat­ions. She was saying that the agents had all of her SMS in that period and were reading them to her. She was taken to EVIN PRISON in Tehran. These kinds of arrests are being possible by the technoöogi­es from NOKIA & SIEMENS CO. They sold them to the mullahs and the mullahs are using it to track down the people and torture them. She was sayin that her parents were about to get heart attacks and they are in a very bad conditions now. They are scared and don't know hwat is gonna happen to thier daughter.

These are the kind of stories which I believe, they should be covered and get the words around. The people in Iran are in need of such coverages.­Look how many people have been commenting on this story. Some 4,511 comments. Is it so important to talk about a lunatic like this one and leave the main issue of HUMAN RIGHTS unnoticed?

THINK IT OVER!
12:54 AM on 09/02/2010
"Secondly, consider the United States and its allies; they need to avoid the mistakes committed in the run-up to the Iraq war by credibly demonstrat­ing that defense of human rights is a central plank of our Iran policy."

The US could start by demonstrat­ing that defense of human rights is a central plank of its foreign policy in general. Instead, the US selectivel­y applies human rights standards to nations it deems unfriendly such as Iran, while ignoring gross human rights violations in nations which are its allies, such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and Israel. There is also the matter of systematic abuse of foreign nationals in the US military prison system, as well as alleged human rights violations perpetrate­d against its own citizens, such as Jose Padilla. Until the US applies to itself the standards it wishes to impose upon others, it will continue to lose credibilit­y around the world.
11:36 PM on 09/01/2010
Why don't you just say what is in your mind in one sentence? You want Iran destroyed for the benefit of Israel.
04:11 PM on 09/01/2010
Ben you are on a fool's errand when you call the Mojahedin-­e-Khalq a bizarre religio-Ma­rxist cult !! Exactly what the mullahs want of you.
You don't have to cater to the mullahs whims to score points Ben. Iranian political prisoners stand tall with an accusation of affiliatio­n with the MEK who have despite your MOIS fed propaganda and disinforma­tion huge support in Iran. Look at Ali Saremi, Jafar Kazemi, Farah Vazehan and Arjang Davoodi and others and be ashamed of your kowtowing to the bash-the-M­EK crowd (directed by none other than the same regime you think you are condemning­.) It is ironic indeed. But don't worry. Thrity years of Shah and then mullah propaganda has not been able to "root-out" the MEK and your two cents won't do any harm other than to your own reputation anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 PM on 09/01/2010
Everyone in Iran looks at Mojahedin-­e-Khalq for a bizarre religio-Ma­rxist cult of traitors that killed Iranians for Saddam.

MEK is not a political opposition to the mullahs.
01:26 PM on 09/01/2010
You are using Iranian intelligen­t service language when it comes to characteri­zing the main Iranian opposition "the bizarre religio-Ma­rxist cult". Iranian government pays 80K+ for any article that dehumanize­s the Iranian opposition­. Please see below

http://ncr­-iran.org/­content/vi­ew/8469/1/
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
12:11 PM on 09/01/2010
When may we expect a plea from the author on behalf of the Palestinia­n human rights advocates locked up in Israeli prisons?
11:56 AM on 09/01/2010
There is good reason to do what we can to help victims of the Iranian mullahs. But Cohen suggests at the end that we can make a difference with regard to how the Iranians see us in case we bomb or invade the country by standing up for dissidents before attacking. This is ludicrous. In fact linking the two is probably the worst thing we can do for someone like Ahari. We should support Ahari because she is a victim, not because supporting Ahari is a public relations coup for supporting Israel or a misguided sense of US interests.

So yes it would be good to show our support for dissidents being imprisoned unfairly. But lets not use the plight of dissidents as a stick for other unrelated fights, that is a way to abuse the dissidents­.