iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Benjamin R. Barber

Benjamin R. Barber

Posted: February 25, 2011 04:16 PM

What's With Libya? Who Are the Gaddafis?


It is absurd to think that you can predict or even know anything in the middle of a revolution in a foreign country with desultory communications. But because so much turns on what happens next in Libya for the Libyans, as well as for Africa and the Middle East, and for the U.S., too -- just look at what has happened to oil prices even though Libya controls only 2 percent of the world output -- we must try to be prophets. Perhaps the only justification for doing so is that so many others are speaking nonsense based on ignorance, bias, and the whims of the blogosphere. Just a few days ago the British Foreign Secretary was telling us Colonel Gaddafi had fled to Caracas into the waiting arms of another nemesis of the West, President Chavez. How convenient that would have been for our preconceptions!

So let me again hazard a guess about where things are and might be heading. First some historical facts and context for the current Libyan situation:

  • Until 1931, Libya was not one, but three countries, Tripolitania, Fezzan and Cyrenaica. North Africa, even more than the Middle East, has been a region dominated by clans and tribes. There are 160 tribes in the country today, and Gaddafi is not just another dictator like Ben Ali or Mubarak, but denotes a powerful clan which, with allied clans, has dominated Tripoli for a long time. Tripoli was Tripolitania's core. And Cyrenaica? Here is a list of its principal towns: Al Marj, Ajdabiya, Darnah, Tobruk, Al Bayda and Benghazi. Sound familiar from recent headlines? They are the cities where the uprising against Tripoli began last week... and 40 and 80 years ago too.
  • Colonel Gaddafi himself came to power in 1969 in the era of Nasser and Castro as a revolutionary founder of the modern Libyan state. Ironically, he defined his revolution in part as "nationalist," aimed at rescuing Libya not only from the weak monarchy and the vestigial oversight of Italian neocolonialism, but also from the rule of the clans and tribes that had run free under them.
  • The failure of Gaddafi's revolution is evident then not just in the failure to give any reality to his dreams of socialism and participatory democracy (see his Green Book of the 70s), but in his failure to establish a true national state. The tribes and clans still play a silent but powerful role, both in the effort to take him down and to prop him up.
  • Gaddafi's original revolution was also secular on the model of national liberation movements, and opposed Islamism from the start. Fundamentalism never made incursions in Libya, and under Gaddafi, though his was a rogue and terrorist state in the 80s and 90s, it was always an enemy of Saudi Wahhabism, of fundamentalism, and therefore of al Qaeda. Recently, there has been close intelligence cooperation between the U.S. and Libya against al Qaeda, which has put Gaddafi on its hit list.

With this background in mind, we can hazard a few risky guesses about where Libya may be headed.

1. As a kind of metaphorical heir to Tripolitania's power, and the head of the Gaddafi clan and its allies in the region, Gaddafi may have more staying power than caricatures of him as a buffoon and lunatic would suggest. He controls considerable military power -- three battalions under the direct command of his sons Sa'ad, Moutassim, and Khemis; the air force; and his pan-African force (the "mercenaries") actually drawn from the Sahara region of Southern Libya and Northern Niger and Chad. He is still able to orchestrate demonstrations of thousands of followers (yesterday in Green Square). And there are many more associated with his regime who will have an interest in his survival. He cannot take out the insurgents, but they lack the military force to overthrow him. Stalemate?

2. Despite the Colonel's reputation as delusional and out of touch, he still controls his own propaganda machine and media, in part through his son Saif, the Western-educated, English-speaking Ph.D. whose remarkable interview in English yesterday on Turkish CNN is a must-see. Saif declared his fealty to family -- we will live and die in Libya! -- but also launched a potent propaganda campaign denying nearly every report coming out of Libya about repression and blaming rival clans for the violence. An assassin's bullet could find its mark, things could disintegrate from within, but the Gaddafi clan is far from done, and doubters might want to recall that other villainous clan documented in The Godfather, where another "good" and "civilian-minded" son unexpectedly embraces a beleaguered father under siege and saves the family from extinction. (Pacino got a lot more sympathy than Saif).

3. Even if the Gaddafis do fall over the next days or weeks or months, Libya's fate in the short term is likely to be turmoil, civic unrest and the possibility of an Iraqi- or Somalian-style civil war where the "losers" in "Tripolitania" continue to wage an insurgency against the "winners" in "Cyrenaica." This will make stability and progress towards reform difficult, and could even pave the way to some new autocracy in the name of "order" or to stave off fundamentalists or al Qaeda that might try to take advantage of the strife. Many will be glad to see Gaddafi go, but fewer will be content if his successor is the head of another tribe or clan trying to speak on behalf of "Libya."

4. The key to the future might be whether or not there is a sufficiently "modern" class of lawyers, engineers, businessmen, teachers and doctors who can constitute a new nation-wide "middle class" free from tribe who, on the model of Egypt, can begin to constitute a true Libyan nation, one that is also democratic. Not impossible but extremely difficult. For Saif Gaddafi has to some extent become the face of and gatekeeper to "modern free market" Libya, and some of the potential reformers worked closely with him on his human rights and e-democracy and economic reform projects associated with the Saif Gaddafi Foundation. Those genuine reformers could be tainted now by that association, and hence -- like Saif himself -- disqualified from further participation in post-Gaddafi change.

5. Outside intervention, as with U.S. or NATO warplanes enforcing a "no-fly zone" over Tripoli to disarm Gaddafi's air force, is out of the question. The one thing that could give new legitimacy to Gaddafi's delusional claim that Europe and America are conspiring to bring him down, would be the return of American war planes to Libyan air space! Forget about that.

None of this means the Gaddafi clan will survive the next days or weeks. But it means that it could, and that, even if it does not, there are complications and obstacles ahead for those who care about finding a road to Libyan democracy that must be anticipated and planned for.

 

Follow Benjamin R. Barber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BenjaminRBarber

It is absurd to think that you can predict or even know anything in the middle of a revolution in a foreign country with desultory communications. But because so much turns on what happens next in Li...
It is absurd to think that you can predict or even know anything in the middle of a revolution in a foreign country with desultory communications. But because so much turns on what happens next in Li...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sherifdxb
12:55 PM on 02/27/2011
Firstly, the reason for the spike in oil prices is that virtually all Libyan crudes 1.5 million barrels in exports per day are gasoline-rich super light crudes that refineries in Europe are weaned on. They were the justification used by countries like Italy and Germany in refusing to join the embargo on Libya over Lockerbie.

Secondly, the author obviously doesn't understand Arabic and therefore he is unable to listen to a host of highly intelligent folks in Libya, who have belittled the influence of the tribes in today's Libya. Such tactics of using old facts and figures to scare people of the unknown has failed to work in Tunisia and Egypt -- when both dictators had warned either them or chaos!!

Let the people decide and we must only respect their wish, if we are unable to lend a hand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nb693
11:46 AM on 02/27/2011
The author is out of touch or he can't dissociate himself from his strong links with Gaddafi. In either case he's wrong about many things.

1) Libya has been one country at least since 1950, almost 20 years before Gaddafi showed up. The author skipped that portion of the history.

2) Perhaps the author has not heard Libya say that "Libya is one, and Tripoli is its eternal capital". This statement came from the various tribes as well.

3) Stalemate??? Are you kidding: Gaddafi is limited to a part of Tripoli that is getting smaller. The regime shoots at people to prevent them from gathering if they are to protest the regime. This is not a recipe to win support from the populationÂŹ.

4) It is amazing how this author is repeating Gaddafi's argument, fear of civil war, Al Qaeda, foreign intervention.

Gaddafi era is over.
08:40 AM on 02/27/2011
So... with only 2 percent of the world's oil output... all I wanna is this, and maybe someone can answer this... why are we being told that's one of the key reasons why gas has jumped so much? Egypt doesn't have the reserves Libya does... so, is this merely another excuse for Big Oil to squeeze the pockets of the middle class?

My country, Canada... we have the SECOND largest reserves in the world... haven't heard about our output. No one cares about us. It's all about dirty, Middle Eastern oil. It's almost like they don't WANT to improve and get off terrorist oil.

Seems like.
12:10 PM on 02/28/2011
*know
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
11:52 PM on 02/26/2011
Libya is another country run for the exclusive benefit of the ruler and his family. He's delusional, but it's probably best to take him at his word that he's got no plans to leave. Why haven't members of his own clan turned on him yet? It's best that they take care of Gaddafi themselves to save themselves from a destructive civil war and, if they lose, a subordinate position in any new regime that emerges.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fein
Either everybody counts or nobody does.
11:05 PM on 02/26/2011
Interesting article, which verifies some of what I suspected. Which is, that the truth of what's happening isn't so simple as the media portrays.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MohammedAbbasi
Co-Director, Association of British Muslims
10:25 PM on 02/26/2011
democracy is not just for rich corps
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fernando
My Micro-bio is empty? Really?
10:17 PM on 02/26/2011
The author seems too emphatic about the unlikeliness of a no-fly zone. I am pretty sure the rebel forces will welcome with open arms all the help they can get while the hostilities last and last I heard, many in Libya were calling for it. The air raid in '86 was, after all, against Gaddafi and something I am sure they see much differently now than even a year ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
09:22 PM on 02/26/2011
Mr. Barber, there is a revolution happening including Libya. To segregate any nation at this time is foolhardy at best. No one cares about Qaddafi as he has rendered himself useless. The people in the Middle East and Africa are looking for a better way of life, and are willing to die for it. History as we understand it has no place although a part of the future. It is time for the Western nations to support these revolutionaries, and help them to find what it is that they want. That is where your questioning should be directed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sherifdxb
12:57 PM on 02/27/2011
Good point Whitlejacked. Fanned and faved.
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
08:10 PM on 02/26/2011
One further aspect needs to be taken into account: Libya is important for the European Union as a bullwark against African mass migration into Europe at a level that would destabilize Europe if more Africans come than can be funded from social security. With current budget cuts that situation is getting close. Europeans are very wary of maroding masses in the streets. None of us could take pleasure from a Europe that descends into street rule. I think, Gaddafi knows this and may derive some of his staying power from that position.
The question is how to get a system that shares the oil wealth with the people, not just tribal elders AND is strong enough to prevent African mass migration into Europe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fernando
My Micro-bio is empty? Really?
10:12 PM on 02/26/2011
Not sure what you mean by that. Illegal immigration into Europe is easier through Morocco, Algiers and even Tunisia.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
07:05 PM on 02/26/2011
"Outside intervention, as with U.S. or NATO warplanes enforcing a "no-fly zone" over Tripoli to disarm Gaddafi's air force, is out of the question."

Disagree totally, I bet "no-fly" is already in effect. Nato and US planes don't need to be flying around Tripoli, they can and will scramble from carriers and take out Libyan planes quickly.

Libyans will not see it as US interference. Won't see it all, Libyan pilots won't dare fly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smithn
~ 13.7 Billion Years:::: i am not. BANG! I am.
08:22 PM on 02/26/2011
Good to know--thanks!
photo
read matt taibbi
Neither left, nor right. Forward!
06:21 PM on 02/26/2011
Why don't we just completely redraw the map of Africa, respecting local tribe allegiances, rather than forcing the whole continent into a straight jacket designed by European powers during the colonization.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MichelleB
07:44 PM on 02/26/2011
Who are "we"?
photo
read matt taibbi
Neither left, nor right. Forward!
08:22 PM on 02/26/2011
Humankind.

But here it is mostly a figure of speech/shorthand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joeinvt
the human being and fish can coexist
07:27 AM on 02/27/2011
Let's resurrect the Ottoman Empire whose design for the mideast was far better than those meddling European colonialists.
06:18 PM on 02/26/2011
Benjamin Barber protected the Gaddafi's defended them just as early as this week and "held" board positions with them. The Gaddafi's have never been considered honorable people, their entire regime is marred with corruption and terrorism. Barber has no reason to believe that anyone should see his views as credible. His character should be called into question. He is not a reliable source for what Libya is about, but he is a very reliable source for what corruption is about. The libyan people are watching him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
06:55 PM on 02/26/2011
I know that I have heard Arab reporters and commentators tell a very different story of Libya, and part of it is that Qaddafi's tribe is a minority one. And that he has held power by playing one tribe against another.
05:03 PM on 02/26/2011
You forgot the dark horse option: Bravo moves the clan to an undisclosed location and begins filming "Getting up with the Gaddafis"

Truly, we all lose with that one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Power To Unelect
Corruption Is Destroying The Nation
04:06 PM on 02/26/2011
There will be NO CHANGE in Lybia...


Just like there was NO CHANGE in Egypt.

Military Dictator Mubarak resigns...

And with the US/Obama blessing... the Military takes over.

Where is the change...?


FAKE CHANGE-NO CHANGE is the new scam... being played on the people of the world.

Lybia is just the latest example.
05:22 PM on 02/26/2011
They are putting together a brand spankin' new Constitution right now, with term limits for the president. It has only been days, it takes a while to build a new country.

Middle East will never be the same again.
06:18 PM on 02/26/2011
try learning to libya before commenting on it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dannyisme
Venceremos
02:33 PM on 02/26/2011
Some of the assumptions behind this article are questionable. There were never three states in Libya, there were three provinces, going back in time, under the Italians, Ottomans, Egyptians, and Ummayads. On the other hand, why is the possible partition of Libya to reflect strong regional differences to be rejected? Fezzan would probably be unfeasible as a state, since it lacks an outlet to the sea. On the other hand, Tripolitania and Cyrenaica could be viable and relieve some of the tension between the areas. The current boundaries are essentially colonial, held together by a weak monarch from Cyrenaica or a mad strongman. Perhaps it is time to let Libya become two states.
06:19 PM on 02/26/2011
libya is one country and will never be divided.
09:13 PM on 02/26/2011
This sounds too much like Biden's "partition Iraq" idea during his campaign. The fact is : whatever shape Libya takes post-Quadaffi should and will inevitably be determined by the proper people: the Libyans.
It's a domestic thing: everyone else stay out of the house.