iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bernard Schlager, Ph.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Bernard Schlager, Ph.D.
 

Let's Hear It For Catholic Leaders Who Defend Marriage Equality!

Posted: 06/18/2012 4:35 pm

Last month -- just a week before the president announced his support for marriage equality -- I had the privilege of hearing Governors Chris Gregoire of Washington and Martin O'Malley of Maryland speak (at the Human Rights Campaign [HRC] offices in Washington DC) about their hard-fought battles to secure marriage equality in their respective states. To listen to these two Catholic politicians eloquently and passionately defend the right of same-sex couples to get married in the eyes of the state was a wonderfully refreshing and genuinely empowering experience. And it made me proud to be Catholic especially at a time when many American bishops are ratcheting up -- in truly unprecedented ways -- their divisive and un-Christian attacks on queer people.

What should we make of the fact that five Catholic governors have come out in support of marriage equality? To date -- in addition to Gregoire and O'Malley -- former Governor John Baldacci of Maine, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, and Governor John Lynch of New Hampshire have all worked to extend the civil right of marriage to their lesbian and gay constituents and all of them are practicing Catholics.

With the news full of stories about Catholic bishops lining up (and often coughing up millions of dollars) to deny marriage equality to same-sex couples, it is indeed remarkable to see these five governors do the right thing and advance significantly one of the most important social justice movements in our country today. And their actions find firm theological support (surprising to many) in the rich Catholic tradition of social justice which is rooted in centuries-old church teachings on the dignity of the human person and the duty of the individual to follow her/his conscience in all matters (see, for instance, The Second Vatican Council's Declaration on Religious Freedom [1965]: §2 and §3).

Perhaps the most eloquent explanations of how her Catholic faith played an important role in her decision to defend marriage equality comes from Governor Gregoire who had initially opposed, on religious grounds, civil marriage for lesbian and gay couples. Speaking in a television interview on Seattle's KING Channel 5 on 4 Jan. 2012, the governor related how she had been hesitant to support marriage equality, in large part, because of her Catholic faith. It was in talking with her own daughters, however, that she began to understand that marriage equality was a civil rights issue similar in some ways to the Civil Rights movements of the 1960s which she had supported passionately as a child. After talking with a priest friend who supported her change of heart on the matter and after entering into respectful dialogue with her local bishop (who did not support marriage equality), Gregoire made the bold and faith-filled decision that she could not in good conscience deny the right of civil marriage to lesbian and gay couples in her state. Moreover, it was as a person of faith, as a Catholic, that she realized that she had a moral obligation to support marriage equality.

This good news about Catholic support for marriage equality is that it extends well beyond gubernatorial offices, of course, as is demonstrated by an Oct. 2011 poll conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. According to the poll, a full 52 percent of Catholics now support same-sex marriage (versus 37 percent in the opposition) which is a significant increase over a 2010 survey of Catholics which indicated only 46 percent of those polled in support of same-sex marriage (vs. 42 percent opposed). This means, according to the same poll, that Catholics now trail only slightly the views of white mainline Protestants who show the strongest support among American Christians for same-sex marriage (54 percent) and it reveals that Catholics are far more supportive of same-sex marriage than white evangelical Protestants (74 percent of whom oppose it).

While the march to full marriage equality in the United States seems to advance at an agonizingly slow pace, it is important for us to recognize that most American Catholics (who now represent the largest single religious denomination in the country and, with just over 68 million members, make up approximately 22 percent of the American population) support marriage for lesbian and gay couples. Although it is the increasingly conservative bishops of the US church who get the lion's share of press coverage on the issue, more newsworthy stories are actually those that report that five Catholic governors have worked, often at considerable risk to their political careers, to advance marriage equality. Even better news is that they are working in concert with the beliefs of millions of other American Catholics who understand that the Gospel AND important church teachings support marriage for all.

So, Let's Hear It For The Millions of American Catholics Who Support Marriage Equality!

 
FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:25 PM on 07/02/2012
Marriage is an institution given by God, not by Man, not to be re-defined by man and this has nothing to do with equality. What works for children is a mom, a dad and a strong extended family and community. Gay marriage is not marriage, it is an invention of man and contrary to God and nature, as only a union of male and female can produce life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mustbelove
Rumi wannabe
08:51 PM on 06/25/2012
I think there are fewer and fewer Catholics who relate to the teachings as they are now in the church. The Pope and others need to recognize that their message is out of touch. I think the ----people--- need to vote for their popes rather than have them appointed by other religious authorities who are also harming the future of the church by being so out of touch with what the people want from their church experience. Not too many religions expect such blind allegiance anymore.

peace to all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nursedan2014
06:51 PM on 06/22/2012
No, Catholics don't support gay "marriage," an oxymoronic term if ever there was one. I know nominal Catholics might, and "dissenting Catholics" (another oxymoron) often do. But that's not the Catholic view. Impossible for you to understand that for us there is no line between the Church and ourselves. We ARE the Church, and the Church is us. So dissent for a Catholic isn't possible in reality. To be Catholic is to be obedient to the magesterium of the Church. Stop doing that (for example, by supporting gay "marriage") and one immediately loses the essence of Catholicism.
02:26 AM on 06/25/2012
The trouble you have is that you misread the article and misunderstand the situation. First, it's same-sex marriage, not "gay marriage." Two, believing it is theologically sound versus politically sound are different. The governors may or may not support it theologically, but they do support it legally. Many Catholics fall in this category, especially the ones learned enough to know the Catholic Church didn't define marriage until a few centuries after the Roman Empire became Christian. Marriage was a part of the state and the Church blessed the union. You can see that the Church accepted the two titles of marriage from St. Gregory Nazianzen and his discussion on marriage (still not defined yet though). There is historical precedence for the Church to have one view of marriage while the state has another. Third, a good Catholic doesn't accept the words of the Magesterium wholesale. If you accept without challenge, you've given up your free will (and free will is very important to Catholicism). This doesn't mean you dismiss either. Rather you wrestle and challenge and accept defeat when you realize your wrestling and challenging were wrong. But the Magesterium makes changes too and this only happens when challenged. However, to be (blindly) obedient to the Magesterium is to lose the essence of Catholicism.

As for same-sex marriage, not it's not just nominal and dissenting, but very faithful Catholics are also in support.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mustbelove
Rumi wannabe
08:55 PM on 06/25/2012
Actually, 52% of Catholics do support it now. Alhamdulillah!
05:13 AM on 06/21/2012
That's funny I asked all the churches in my town and they said they were never asked, and opposed it as well!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mustbelove
Rumi wannabe
08:58 PM on 06/25/2012
Can you quote me the number of people you asked and how many of them said they didn't support it? You must live in a very conservative area.
11:41 AM on 06/26/2012
70% said no, 2% said yes!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsttho557949
What is Job's Crucible?
07:19 PM on 06/19/2012
They and you didn't get my opinion on gay marraige. Where did you get that "most Catholics" are in favor for that?

hre is the bottom line: the day God changes HIs mind about those "black and white" issues, is the day the REAL church will change its mind about that. This si God's Universe-not manikind's. Most are alrad on his list for not accepting Jesus. He says His Word will never change..that rules us out.
02:21 PM on 06/19/2012
2 Corinthians 11:14
And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
F-BVFF
03:42 PM on 06/19/2012
Can you expand on what this means?
02:20 PM on 06/19/2012
1 Timothy 5:15
Some have in fact already turned away to follow Satan.
02:12 PM on 06/19/2012
Galatians 2:4
This matter arose because some false believers had infiltrated our ranks to spy on the freedom we have in Christ Jesus and to make us slaves.
01:10 PM on 06/19/2012
These are secular leaders and are making choices based on their political future. I think you are overstating it to label them as "Catholic Leaders." The Church has been pretty clear on this issue.
03:10 PM on 06/19/2012
Yes they have. They were also very clear on the immorality of birth control and allowed millions of people in Africa to contract HIV. They have also been very clear that they will do nothing to punish the many pedophiles and rapists among their ranks. The church is also involved in quite a few corrupt financial practices, claim supported by the current news of the silencing of a vatican butler who took evidence of such practices.

Do you really want to take moral advice from an institution such as this? I'm from Atlanta so you know where I stand on this : )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Calabrese
07:27 PM on 06/19/2012
Actually where abstinence before marriage and monogamy is emphasized HIV propagation rates are down. Uganda (Google it) is the best example of how promoting virtue has helped. Think about it condom failure rate is between 2 and 10%. Have sex 100 times and statistically you are likely to spread the AIDS virus and possibly. Would you consider a parachute brand that failed 3 in 100 times to be "safe". I don;t think so. Safe sex is not safe when you are talking about AIDS. It is a false hope. The Church is right on this one.
Bring up the sex abuse scandal is easy pickings yet the Department of Educations has a study which admits the problems in public schools are far more than the Catholic Church's issues in that area. But that would spoil the meme and force local governments to fork over the same settlements the Church has had to fork over so the will bury that dirty little report they themselves did.
11:47 AM on 06/19/2012
From the same church that gave us the Spanish Inquisition.................
“many true and faithful Christians, because of the testimony of enemies, rivals, slaves and other low people—and still less appropriate—without tests of any kind, have been locked up in secular prisons, tortured and condemned like relapsed heretics, deprived of their goods and properties, and given over to the secular arm to be executed, at great danger to their souls, giving a pernicious example and causing scandal to many”
Pope Sixtus IV 1492

The key words with most anti-gay groups are “tax exempt”. If all the money made by groups like this were TAXED, they would fine a real job. I just do not think gay life is that big a deal for most people? Most of us have a hard time worrying about our own life. For anti-gay groups it is all about the money. But if you DO spend every day of your life worrying about “the gays”, you may just want to talk to someone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
01:23 PM on 06/19/2012
Would you include any secular or Atheist organisations with charitable status that are anti gay in the "tax 'em" category, too?
03:28 PM on 06/19/2012
I would have to say yes, if there are any.

Can you name me some of these organizations you are referring to? I would find it incredibly surprising if you could point me to some mainstream secular groups with an anti-gay agenda.
12:10 AM on 07/05/2012
Less than 3,000 died during the Spanish Inquisition...More Catholics died under Henry VIII. Get your facts straight before you post. Thanks - Nick Scaglietti.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Calabrese
10:50 AM on 06/19/2012
The right to follow one's conscience also carries the duty to form it properly. One cannot justify supporting evil by malforming their conscience according to politically correct precepts and asserting, "I am following my conscience." "It's OK, it's 'only civil marriage'" fails because the state has no right to declare intrinsic moral evils goods that it has an interest in promoting. It is NOT a civil rights issue. There is no civil right to have one's sexual or romantic proclivities declared a marriage. In promoting and regulating marriage the state is not defining but affirming what is intrinsic in humanity: male/female couples form themselves into the basic unit of society - the family - for mutual affirmation, protection and procreation and raising of children. Married heterosexual couples who cannot bear their own children mirror the design inherent in human nature. Calling one's friendships or romantic relationships marriages and emulating natural families through adoption or resorting to immoral procreative methods is not a good that Catholics are obliged in conscience to allow or promote. It is a distortion of human nature. There are many things that naturally occur in humanity that are not according to true human nature. Existence of a trait does not make it a natural good to be affirmed. These governors are not to be applauded for allowing their children or any one else to distort their consciences based on a false sense of civil rights. I pray that they may return to the truth of the Faith.
12:28 PM on 06/19/2012
Civil marraige is state legal matter. It is solely up to the state to define and regulate it. If your religious institutions do not wish to allow such unions to be made in their houses of worship, they are within their right to refuse, but they have no say in what the state chooses to do within its own civl, legal frame work.
09:10 AM on 06/20/2012
But citizens do and may vote based on their conscience and beliefs. I have heard no convincing argument as to why religious conscience must be excluded in law making. I do not suppose that you would have any opposition to a person voting to eliminate the death penalty based on their religious beliefs. The abolitionist movement was largely led and formed by religion. The civil rights movements most significant individual was a cleric who preached to the nation. I have never heard anyone come forward with an argument as to why the religious cannot support laws conforming to the teachings of Jesus, Buddha or Mohammed but that the secular can seek laws conforming to the views of Hobbes, Darwin or Marx. Obviously, the religious cannot impose their practice on others. But the religious can support a definition of marriage.
04:37 AM on 06/19/2012
As a Catholic, (and a gay man), I can tell you that many Catholics I know are slowly but surely turning their backs on the Vatican's political machine, and making decisions with regard to Gays on their own. Further, I am finding that more and more of them are supporting "us".
12:25 PM on 06/19/2012
How do you define "Support"?

If you go sit in a pew and toss money in a coffer, it doesn't matter what comes out of your mouth. You are aiding and abetting oppression and you are part of the problem. Your words mean nothing. It's your actions that matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Canary503
An opinionated Iowan
02:29 PM on 06/19/2012
You can withhold your tithing, or commit it to dedicated funds which don't do political advocacy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Unrine
Commit to the Lord whatever you do - Prov 16:3
02:25 PM on 06/19/2012
Just like condoms and birth control usage - how many 'faithful' Catholics go to bat nowadays with protection to prevent unplanned pregnancies.

Catholics have known since the 70s that their clergy have much growing up to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Calabrese
07:30 PM on 06/19/2012
Failure to heed Paul VI's Humane Vitae has lead to everything the Pope predicted: expanded use of pornography, expanded violence against women and higher divorce rates. But don't let his predictions' fulfillment cloud your judgment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wayne Peterson
11:22 PM on 06/18/2012
....too bad we have to include religion at all in the discussion of civil rights!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
01:16 PM on 06/19/2012
OK. Let's blot out MLK and Malcolm X. Lets blot out all the religious peoples in favour of civil rights FOR women, FOR people of colour, FOR gender identity and FOR gender expression.

Then, we will have to deal with all the Atheist groups who are AGAINST gay rights and AGAINST marriage equality.

It is an uphill battle. (sigh)
03:25 PM on 06/19/2012
atheists are overwhelmingly for equality of all kinds. there would be no need to worry about civil rights if outdated cultures weren't trying to dictate morality and clinging on to tradition (understandable since it is all they have)

I hope you were not trying to suggest that there are many secular groups that waste time denying people rights. That would be an extraordinary charge to make