iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bernard Whitman

GET UPDATES FROM Bernard Whitman
 

52 Reasons to Vote for Obama, #14: Making the United States a Leader in Energy Production

Posted: 08/24/2012 11:53 am

Whether you're PRObama, NObama, or still undecided, 52 Reasons to Vote for Obama gives you all the information you need to share with friends, debate with relatives and decide for yourself as we head toward one of the most important elections of our lifetime. I'll post a new reason in random order every Monday through Friday from now 'til the election.

Despite what you may hear from the right, the Obama administration's record on energy is extraordinary. United States oil production is at an eight-year high, natural gas production is at an all-time high, and renewable energy production is up 27 percent.

Here are the facts:

  • The United States now has more oil rigs (1,994) than any other country in the world, by far.

  • In 2011, less than half the petroleum consumed by the United States (45 percent) was imported from foreign countries, the lowest level since 1995.

  • By the end of 2013, the United States is expected to surpass Saudi Arabia and Russia in oil and gas production.

  • Natural gas production has regained its edge under Obama, leading to all-time highs, and this growth is projected to create more than 500,000 jobs by the end of this decade.

  • Since 2009, President Obama has approved twenty nine onshore renewable energy projects, including sixteen solar, five wind, and eight geothermal projects.

  • By the end of this year, the administration will issue permits for enough renewable power from our public lands and our offshore waters to power three million additional homes.

  • Obama authorized the first nuclear reactors to be built in the United States in three decades, creating thousands of jobs and cutting carbon pollution by sixteen million tons each year compared to a similar coal plan, the equivalent of taking 3.5 million cars off the road.

2012-08-23-energy.jpgSince President Obama took office, America's dependence on foreign oil has decreased every year. In 2010, the United States imported less than half of all the oil it consumed -- a first in thirteen years. In fact, net imports as a share of total consumption declined from 57 percent in 2008 to 45 percent in 2011 -- the lowest level in sixteen years. In the last year alone, we have cut net oil imports by 10 percent -- a million barrels per day. Domestic oil and natural gas production have increased every year President Obama has been in office.

Thanks to the largest investment in clean energy in American history, the United States has nearly doubled renewable energy generation from wind, solar and geothermal sources since 2008. Last year, the United States regained its title as the world's leading investor in clean energy technologies, beating countries such as China, India, and Germany.

In addition, President Obama has repeatedly called on Congress to eliminate the unnecessary and wasteful tax breaks for the oil and gas industry, which would save American taxpayers $4 billion per year.

Smart leadership... Forward-thinking strategies...Integrated innovation.

I encourage you to join in the conversation and share your thoughts on Reason #14 or your own reasons by visiting 52 Reasons to Vote for Obama on Facebook... I'd love to hear from you!

To purchase a copy of 52 Reasons to Vote for Obama, visit Amazon.

 
 
 

Follow Bernard Whitman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@BernardWhitman

FOLLOW POLITICS
Whether you're PRObama, NObama, or still undecided, 52 Reasons to Vote for Obama gives you all the information you need to share with friends, debate with relatives and decide for yourself as we head ...
Whether you're PRObama, NObama, or still undecided, 52 Reasons to Vote for Obama gives you all the information you need to share with friends, debate with relatives and decide for yourself as we head ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neillevine
want to go into waterwheel business
05:40 PM on 09/03/2012
Obama has chosen high priced wind and solar over much cheaper hydro and waterwheels. Only 3% of existing dams generate electricity and Obama does not want to export nor use excess wind and hydro to generate burnable hydrogen, which can supplement natural gas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
07:56 PM on 08/27/2012
I thought increasing natural gas production through hydraulic fracturing was supposed to be a horrible, evil, destructive rape of our planet. The author seems to be saying its a reason to vote for President Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neillevine
want to go into waterwheel business
03:36 PM on 08/27/2012
Unfortunately, Obama is blocking hydro, waterwheels and hydrogen, which would help a lot. Only 3% of existing dwms generate. Edison used waterwheels and if excess hydo is used the hydrogen would be cheap.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
03:10 PM on 08/27/2012
"extraordinary"

Still headed straight for the cliff.

"extraordinary"

Urgency of let's just wait until its too late.

"extraordinary"

Maybe nobody will notice.

"extraordinary"

Fingers in ears. La-la-la.

"extraordinary"

I can't do anything about it because I might not get credit!

"extraordinary"

Yes it certainly is.
04:40 AM on 08/27/2012
Drilling faster is only a solution if achieving complete resource depletion as fast as possible is the problem that we are trying to solve. Are we trying to deplete all of our resources faster? Is that it?

:-)
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
03:30 AM on 08/26/2012
Obama and Romney are not the only choices. I will vote Green Party because they best represent my views.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
06:41 PM on 08/26/2012
You get my vote! Notice how environmentalism today is watered down to one issue, alternative energies without regard to the ecology of our ecosystem dependent Earth. Some scientists are more concerned about land use changes than cc because Earth's natural, wild ecosystems are in the business of life itself. Only ecosystems supply humans with all of his life giving and supporting cycles, systems and services.

What sits on the surface of Earth influences climate. Skinning terrestrial ecosystems feedsback to a hotter and drier climate because plant biodiversity transpires the climate cooling water cycle, which is destroyed when they chop down the plants and trees. Terrestrial ecosystems also not only release oxygen, they naturally take care of those heat trapping gases through the soil and plants and trees.

Obama proposes 20 million more acres of fragile desert ecosystems for the sustainable energies and 300,000 acres of federal lands, most assuredly ecosystems for sustainable energies. He is about to kill everything that sustains all life and that which naturally takes care of those greenhouse gases for Earth that will be re-released when the soil is disturbed and the climate cooling plants/trees sent to their graves. Solar panels are mined from a rare earth mineral, and the manufacture of aluminum and cement for wind uses huge amounts of fossil fuels. Scouring the Earth for cement and aluminum are anything but life sustaining. Plus, new roads have to be built for access.

We are devouring and scouring the Earth and life itself!
05:17 PM on 08/25/2012
I am a foreigner (German) so much of the political debate/ viewpoints about "going Green" (or not) in the US don't matter to me.

However, I think there is some water to pour into the wine of the facts as represented here. For me, two main points stick out: Ofc (not only given the sheer size of the US/ US economy) it's a low hanging fruit to be a top investor. After all, the US has for decades not exactly been the "speartip" in Green investments. It's a little bit like China's economic growth rates: It's natural, when you play catch up from a distance to have amazing rates.

Secondly, and IMO that's structurally FAR more important and should be a major point of concern in the US: The electrical grid, which is as far as I can know/ deduct (blackouts??) extremely old. I mean, it's easy to individually provide homes and offices with solar energy. But the real challenge is: how to provide 24/7 the energy for industries, etc. . How to deal with the feed ins, particular the spikes from wind and solar? And particularly the wind farms wont be where older energy plants where; in all likeliness, they even wont be near the industry they ought to supply so you need entirely new gridlines. ENRON, the fact that you still have so much of the grid above the surface, etc. etc. - this all convinces me you need an entirely new grid - and that's a challenge!
photo
americancapitalist90
'Merica! Free markets, responsibility
03:18 PM on 08/25/2012
Drill the gulf.

Drill ANWAR,

Obama is denying drilling permits...
04:41 AM on 08/27/2012
In what parallel universe?

:-)
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
09:03 AM on 08/27/2012
Hah!

BP loves you!
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
11:12 PM on 08/24/2012
It's the climate, stupid.
photo
americancapitalist90
'Merica! Free markets, responsibility
03:18 PM on 08/25/2012
It's the economy...
05:36 PM on 08/24/2012
Thank you! They aren't listening, but we are.
hroark314
The handle says it all, doesn't it?
05:11 PM on 08/24/2012
You're giving him credit for shale oil and gas? I guess that makes sense for a supporter of the guy who thinks that if you have a business, you didn't build it - the government (that is, Obama) did!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joey Call
01:29 PM on 08/25/2012
Umm that part was out of context. Obama was talking about roads and bridges which of course the did build because the Government pays/builds those. Oh and most businesses get some type of tax subsidy and uses things as roads, sewer and other public things so the Government does help it grow.

But i guess you wouldn't realize that because you believe in a guy who says corporations are people and that wasn't taken out context.
hroark314
The handle says it all, doesn't it?
09:49 AM on 08/27/2012
I've read the context for the Obama comment and also watched the clip of his speech on Youtube. First, the comment grammatically had to refer to businesses, not roads and bridges. However, even if you accept the President's explanation and assume he misspoke, the entire speech was about individuals' contributions being unimportant to their own success.
 
Oh, and most businesses get some kind of subsidy, because liberals have created a massively invasive government that levies heavy taxes coupled with giant subsidies for 'good' behavior. See the entire renewables industry for an example.
01:46 PM on 08/27/2012
WRONG - The government does not pay for road and bridges - taxpayers do.

You can take away the government and we would still have businesses. However, if you take away the business - you won't have road and bridges because there will be no one paying the taxes to fund these projects.

What you call a tax subsidy is simply a reduced tax rate. The businesses still pay taxes, just not as many. And their employees still pay all of their individual taxes.

Even if the federal government got totally out of the highway business, we'd still have roads since they are funded by fuel tax dollars. States, counties and cities would still build roads and we'd all still be able to travel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
03:47 PM on 08/24/2012
Way too much energy is used for this DOD program!

WHY in the World are They Spraying? FULL LENGTH VIDEO

http://farmwars.info/?p=9095
photo
John Galt2
My life is my own...
03:38 PM on 08/24/2012
The only reason oil production is up at all is because of permits issued by Bush2's admin & the fact that BHO can't stop drilling on private property. He has stalled or prevented any new permits from being issued during his admin. This will affect the US over the coming 5-8 years.

Alternatives are only in existence because of massive government subsidies, loan guarantees, tax credits for producers and users and usage mandates.

Take away the taxpayer & coerced consumer funded income and solar and wind wither away.

Biofuels are horrible to the environment and drive the cost of food crops & livestock up; 40% of the US corn crop goes towards ethanol production. It's less energy-dense than gasoline and causes faster rates of engine wear,

The only responsible course of action is for the government to completely abstain from supporting or hamstringing sources of energy and let the people decide what they want.

And the Dems & BHO have no intention of encouraging the people to take control over their own lives...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hikerguy22
This is your carbon footprint
08:24 PM on 08/25/2012
Say no to BIG OIL and Coal. Fanned.
photo
realsurfin
Pardon me, can you help out a fellow American
03:17 PM on 08/24/2012
ROMNEY IS A BISHOP... in the game where the oil and casino men are the kings... congress is the knights and we the taxpayers are the pawns.

THIS IS THE 21ST CENTURY not the 19th century... renewable power is real and it is here to stay.. you young people... the Elon Musks and Bill Gates of the future.. you will bring it... you will make it work in spite of the ROMNEY'S KOCH'S AND ADELSON'S .... YOU WILL KEEP MOVING FORWARD.

OBAMA/BIDEN 2012 AND THEN HIT THEM HARD .... HILLARY IN 2016'
03:15 PM on 08/24/2012
One reason not to vote for Obama - J O B S! Biden would say that is a 3 letter word (I suppose he didn't have the right teacher to build that for him). Another reason is - Obamacare! A job killing, wage reduction, benefit killing massive piece of legislation. This will make LBJ's "war on poverty" entitlements look like peanuts.