More

Betwa Sharma

Betwa Sharma

Posted: August 12, 2009 01:13 PM

Asking Pakistanis, When?


"So when does a revolution happen," a fellow journalist asked, as we talked about situation in Iran and Pakistan. 'Revolution' is a big word. Its watered down version could be, when do people say enough is enough?

Why have Pakistanis endured decades of bad politics and their violent consequences? Why do they watch their leaders play a foolhardy game with the Taliban? Can they not do more to take back their country?

"Sharam nahin aati! Why do you want to be on TV?" strangers asked Havovi Cooper while she was reporting a story two years ago. Having grown up as a Parsee in Karachi where women can walk unrebuked with a duppatta over their heads, she thought for the very first time, "Bloody hell -- this country is being Talibanized'"

The journalist now works in New York, and may not return for a long time. "Parents want their children to be safe and home is not safe right now," she says. A deluge of suicide attacks have killed scores of civilians and the extremists are moving from the feral borders to the cities.

But how 'Talibanized' is Pakistan really? It is well-known that their twisted ideology has trapped the poorer, more vulnerable, factions of society. The large swathes of the middle and upper class, however, have warded off their religious fanaticism.

"It is sick, violent and has absolutely nothing to do with Islam," says Azar, a Shiite businessman whose sect the Taliban have declared as infidels. "They cut our throats, blow our mosques, blow our processions, and curse our beliefs."

Many Pakistanis describe themselves as devout but their religiosity differs from radicalism. "People from various classes are moving towards their own definition of religion," says Uzair, who runs a uniform shop in Karachi.

Faith has also become succor for the growing numbers suffering in the harsh economy and unrelenting violence. But, this does not catapult into banning women from education and hating the radio. A writer from Islamabad, Changez Ali, underlines the difference between deeply religious citizens and fanatics. "Pakistanis don't want their religion to be defined by extremists."

Then, there are the social classes that are not burqa savvy, drink alcohol, root for Susan Boyle, and tend to be very liberal. The militants, bereft of mainstream support, may never gain control of the realm. "The Taliban in power is really beyond people's imagination," says Sehrish Shaban, a Karachi-based reporter.

But until they are defeated, however, the country will continue its free fall. So why does the populace stand by while these rogues take an inch and then a mile? Talk shows, editorials, street processions and Facebook groups mark the frail pillars of public outrage.

After the take-over of Swat Valley, uncomfortably close to the capital, one might imagine that the situation demands a bolder gesture. A citizen's movement of sorts?

Building momentum against a common enemy, it turns out, is not easy. "Pakistanis can be apathetic because we've gone through so much," says Shaban, referring to decades of political turmoil. Sixteen-hour electricity cuts are choking the average Pakistani who struggles to feed a family. The rich and powerful groups fear retaliation.

Occasionally, it is the community whose homes are invaded, and schools burnt by the insurgents that join the fight against them. For the majority, the discomfort level is still a nervous sensation in the cricket stadium, waiting in long security lines, and grimacing at the rising death toll. Those who can, leave the country.

Despair is confined to countless 'drawing-room discussions.' Years of a dictatorship-like polity has crushed public spirit and stifled community leadership. "Civil society in Pakistan didn't exist," says Ali. "It is now beginning to rediscover itself."

Anger and frustration has surfaced, in some cases, like the lawyers strike and recent protests following the flogging of a young girl in Swat Valley, when it was ruled by the Taliban.

Part of the problem is that Pakistanis (and the rest of the world) don't get all the facts. The public distrust their own government and army and remain deeply skeptical of the American agenda. "It's all very shady," says Cooper. "People don't know what's going on behind the scenes." Conspiracy theories trump reliable information needed for a collective response.

The unrelenting cycle of bloodshed has busted the denial but not the lethargy of the Pakistanis. The question now -- what is the "enough is enough" point for a suffering citizenry and how does it practically manifest itself?

Again, 'a revolution' sounds a bit fantastic -- even silly -- but something? What about ordinary citizens? Especially teachers and religious leaders cleaning up the madrassas that produce students willing to blow themselves up?

If this is about 'hearts and minds,' then how many more will the Taliban be allowed to hijack? A few Taliban players may shoot each other in gun fights but more are bound to creep out of the caves.

Follow Betwa Sharma on Twitter: www.twitter.com/betwasharma

"So when does a revolution happen," a fellow journalist asked, as we talked about situation in Iran and Pakistan. 'Revolution' is a big word. Its watered down version could be, when do people say enou...
"So when does a revolution happen," a fellow journalist asked, as we talked about situation in Iran and Pakistan. 'Revolution' is a big word. Its watered down version could be, when do people say enou...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:13 PM on 08/21/2009
A nuclear armed country with an army which devours democratic institutions at will. Has played into the hands of the Americans by choice and is now paying the price for nurturing terrorism as an extension of its foreign policy. The ruling elite have done it all and have left the average Pakistani to bear the brunt. Perhaps it would be better to ask- Asking Pakistanis, How?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Romeover
Civilization is for weaklings.
07:44 PM on 08/13/2009
Why have Americans endured decades of bad politics and their violent consequences? Why do they watch their leaders play a foolhardy game with the rest of the world?

Because they're uninvolved or ignorant or complicit.
06:00 AM on 08/13/2009
Betwa, you are obviously far too inteligant to be able to apply rational thoughts to such situations.
I'm afraid we shall never know why these mad men do what they do.
We need more individuals like you & less of them.
GodYesOrNo.com
11:58 PM on 08/12/2009
This article is funny. Please do not try to fool anyone with nonsense. The Pakistani people have endured the tragedy that is their government because the US has propped up every dictator in that country and supported the terrorists from that country for how many years? You can answer that, Betwa. And people’s distrust of the government is characterized as "conspiracy theory"? Where do you get your facts? "talibanized"? You have to be kidding. The US created the taliban, the US created al qaeda. the US government financed them, the US government supplied them with arms and training. pakistan is only a problem because the US government made it that way.

Another point, you have to be stoned to believe that US citizens don’t know the difference between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, do you think that a Shiite opinion on PAKISTAN is going to give legitimacy to any point you make ABOUT THE TALIBAN(Sunni Muslims)! Some might argue that the Shia religion has nothing to do with Islam. A staged color revolution in pakistan will only further destabilize that country and its government. Then what will happen to the nuclear weapons that country has?

I have a solution, it is really simple, The US government should stop supporting the dictators in that country and around the world
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
buttonz
05:01 AM on 08/13/2009
Get your facts straight. The Taliban was a creation of the Pakistani ISI, your confusing them with Al Qaeda which is a different organization; which the US supported in its fight with the Russians. The US doesn't prop up dictators it decides whether to work with them or not. In the case of Pakistan, we have SOME mutual interests. Remember when Obama was talking about going into Pakistan during his campaign? That's because their stronghold is there and the seven or so ISI officials and generals who are trying to overthrow the government have been keeping their pet organization safe from the Pakistani army. Do you know how many too well coordinated, too suspicious assassination attempts occur there each year? These guys are hosting the terrorism.

The Pakistani people used to believe that the Taliban and Al Qaeda were looking out for their interests, a line of defense against Western interference. They stubbornly believed that these people could not be evil, at least not until they saw on TV what these guys were doing when they "peacefully took over" Swat Valley and threw boys and girls into vats of acid (yes, they actually did that), and saw on TV how people their own people were publicly executed to be set as examples. After that the stubborn beliefs of many Pakistanis quickly diminished.

The US is a scapegoat and always will be. As proven many times, things actually fall apart even when the US isn't involved.
06:33 AM on 08/13/2009
Your response is pure comedy. The United States is no "scapegoat" we need to face our crimes if we are to be the nation we have always learned we were. The US did create, supply, and fund the taliban and al qaeda. do any google search and that will be verified by any number of news agencies. it is public record. so whose facts arent straight?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uansari1
09:26 AM on 08/13/2009
You clearly need to read up on your history of the region. The Taliban and Al Qaeda didn't exist when the Soviets were at war in Afghanistan. Back then the U.S., via Pakistan, supported the Mujahideen. The Mujahideen later separated along their natural lines into these two groups. The Taliban were the Afghani Mujahideen and what is now Al Qaeda were the foreign fighters that fought alongside the Afghans.