More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill Barol

Bill Barol

Posted: March 22, 2010 11:20 AM

Obama's "Failure"

What's Your Reaction:

Some of my friends -- the ones who would probably describe themselves as progressives -- are unhappy this morning. They're complaining over their coffee and Danish about the flaws in the legislative package passed last night, and about the shortcomings of incrementalism as an approach to real change. I respect their passion, but would say this: Last night was more than a legislative moment. It was also, and the implications of this will be deeper and broader than any legislation, a political one. (God help me, this is a part of the argument David Frum made yesterday.) Had the administration been turned back on health care it would have been crippled, probably irreversibly, in its ability to do big things in the areas that still need big things done: Energy, jobs and immigration, to pick just three. Anybody who thinks the recalcitrant, obstructionist fringe that's been driving the Republican car won't dig in like crazy on immigration reform hasn't been paying attention. This morning they have less, maybe a lot less, to dig in with. And Obama has the wind at his back heading into the midterms, and a renewed chance to do everything that still needs doing -- including further fixes to health care, although he probably won't want to lead with that.

Would it have been nice to get it all? Yes. Did the administration make mistakes -- not writing its own bill early on, wasting months on a quixotic, hands-across-America dream of bipartisanship? You bet. But we don't live in a magical, friction-free world, and the opposition to this president has been historically ferocious, cynical and mean. The right guys won yesterday. I'll take that as a start.

 
 
 

Follow Bill Barol on Twitter: www.twitter.com/billbarol

 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:45 AM on 03/24/2010
LADIES AND GENTS WE HAVE A REAL PRESIDENT FOR A CHANGE.THE WAY HE PULLED THOSE CONGRESSIONAL DEMS OVER THE FINISH LINE AND ABLOLUTELY CHECKMATED OR AS I LIKE TO CALL IT WATERLOOD THE REPUGS.THE GOP WILL NEVER RECOVER FROM THIS.THEY LOOK LIKE A BUNCH OF LYING FEAR MONGERING OBSTRUCTING RACIST BIRTHERS.
07:41 PM on 03/23/2010
A few weeks ago a former governor of Alaska sarcastically asked an audience "How's that hopey changey thing workin' out for ya?" At last the Democrats have an answer: "Just fine. And how are YOU doin' with fear and anger?"

God Bless America.
12:25 AM on 03/23/2010
The author has it right. As an avid pro-choice progressive, I'm not all that happy about the end product or how long it took - but gee wiz - we made history last night. I'm happy that there were zero republican votes in favor of reform and that McCain today said there would be NO more republican "cooperation." Let the American people see what the opposition has to offer - nothing but obstructionism. A party that embraces the far right extremes including the racist, homophobic thugs that their corporate sponsors send to these "tea parties". I'm proud to be a Democrat today.
10:41 PM on 03/22/2010
Mr. Barol.

You stated that President Obama should have written his own bill early on. Note, if he would have written his own bill a la Hillary and Bill, it would have met the same demise as 1994.

A good poker player holds and play his/her hand only when required.

Take the passage of HCR bill as a first step in the journey.
10:11 PM on 03/22/2010
I hope you are right.

I have a hard time imagining this empowers the Obama administration. The mistakes you mention illustrate an administration out of touch with average citizens. Bring on the change already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve MacGregor
10:03 PM on 03/22/2010
'I'll take that as a start' - you and me both - oh, and about 30,000,000 others.

P.S I've known about David Frum for 30 years. He's Canadian. He married a Canadian. His Father in Law is Peter Worthington who writes for The Toronto Sun,( a frightful little fascist rag). David Frum has been advising the Republicans about the health for profit system in the States and has been and still is the beneficiary of our Socialized medicine - THE ENTIRE TIME!
God, I love Conservatives. For lessons in utter shamelessness, it just doesn't get any better than them.
stevemacgregor
10:03 PM on 03/22/2010
Conrad, Nelson and Lieberman are the "right" guys?

Because this bill is tailor-made for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mch321
09:20 PM on 03/22/2010
Thank you. An excellent article. Fair, reasoned.
09:09 PM on 03/22/2010
I think it's pretty naive not to see how the Republicans will handle this. They've already started.
1) You will be forced to purchase an expensive product from companies you hate
2) If you do not, the IRS will come after you
3) You may be taxed on this product that you've been forced to buy.

That's going to well up the anger on the right. And it's gonna turn the independents off the bill. The left is already upset because cost controls like the public option, medicare buy-in, drug reimportation, direct medicare drug-price negotiation and a rate regulator were culled from the bill.

There is a serious messaging challenge ahead and if Democrats don't stop congratulating themselves and get to work on the central issues, they're in trouble in November.

The only time the mandates ever polled well was when coupled with the public option. That's not going to change between now and November.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Bimrose
a liberal
08:59 PM on 03/22/2010
The good guys certainly won yesterday! Go Dems!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smithn
Different strokes for different folks.
08:50 PM on 03/22/2010
it's a date future: Obama, a retired 8 year USA President, releases his memoirs. In that lyrical tell-all he shares how he taught 'Politics & Gov't 101' to class the size of a nation. How he followed his gut instinct believing that it was, indeed, his time to lead Hope and Change for all Americans. Do you think I can pre-order it, now?
10:06 PM on 03/22/2010
He dropped the ball, big time.

With 60 votes in the Senate, a Super-majority in the House and a landslide election victory, you're telling me this is the best he could do?:

Mandates to buy PRIVATE Insurance
No Public Option
No Drug Importation
No Drug price negotiation
10:44 PM on 03/22/2010
If you really think he had 60 votes, then I will sell you a bridge in Brooklyn
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smithn
Different strokes for different folks.
11:36 PM on 03/22/2010
Please let me know when you run for office--I'd really get a kick out of following your effort. Do it soon, tho; I'm an old woman.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
davidpkronmiller
08:17 PM on 03/22/2010
How this all went down is somewhat perfect. Yes faster would have been more satisfying - public option right now would have been fun but because it stretched out he's been able to weaken the opposition in a way that they can not recover from. He has allowed them to come off as fringe, bigoted and uniformed. Many GOP leaders now appear to endorse racism, secession and even armed rebellion - making campaign ads against them nearly effortless.

This is all good. There is no bad here.
04:46 AM on 03/23/2010
I hadn't reached your post until after my comments above.
I agree with you - strategically very impressive.
To be crude - what the Congress has needed was a huge enema
With a cherry ( Health care ) on top.
I can't wait until the "coup de grace"
I might die a happy man after all.
I loathe the right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MelanieMatthias
I am President Obama's biggest fan!
07:26 PM on 03/22/2010
"historically ferocious, cynical and mean" this is an understatement.
I have never seen anyone treated the way our President has been treated, they should be so ashamed of themselves!
photo
GiveUsFree
Teapublicans are destroying America.
06:19 PM on 03/22/2010
I almost agree, but if Obama had written his own bill earlier it would have been that much easier for House and Senate members to reject the bill for any reason they made up. With the approach President Obama took, Congress had a vested interest in the bill. Their staffers worked on it and didn't want to see all that hard work go down the drain.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
07:34 PM on 03/22/2010
I agree with you. The president played this far better than many are giving him credit for. Ms. Pelosi served to pull the well-roasted progressive chestnuts out of the fire.
10:49 PM on 03/22/2010
spot on

too many people on these posts think tactical vs strategic.

The President worked this strategically since April 09, smartly he waited until some of the dust had cleared before executing his plan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mw-maryland
06:11 PM on 03/22/2010
I agree also.