Crossposted with www.TheGreenGrok.com.
According to a new report: We need to put a carbon price on oil to keep the price of oil down.
You know how the climate-denier politicians love to warn the public that any climate legislation will increase energy costs and destroy our economy? A recent report pokes some holes in that reasoning. The authors of the report? None other than the International Energy Agency or IEA.
The IEA is an intergovernmental organization originally set up to provide energy analysis to its 28 member governments in the wake of the 1973-74 oil crisis. One of its main tasks is to produce an annual report on the state of global energy -- it's called the World Energy Outlook. If you're an energy wonk, and who isn't these days, it's pretty heady stuff, filled with cool facts and figures about what has happened and predictions based on economic and energy models about what is likely to happen.
The IEA has always been focused on fossil fuels. Two of its founding objectives were to:
And even though its mandate included "improv[ing] the world's energy supply and demand structure by developing alternative energy sources and increasing the efficiency of energy use," the IEA's reports tended to focus on fossil fuels while largely marginalizing the role of renewable energy. But that has changed.
IEA's about-face began two years ago when, in a departure from its typically confident projections for petroleum supply, the organization reported that fields were declining at double the rate of earlier projections and projected that conventional oil would peak in 2030. Previously, the idea that oil supplies might one day peak had been "dismissed," to quote one reporter referring to IEA's 2005 report. The IEA's executive director even went on record referring to those concerned about peak oil as "doomsayers." Not so anymore ... especially for petroleum -- the scarcest of fossil fuels. By some reports it took a whistle-blower at the IEA to get the agency to fess up about impending oil shortages. But that was a couple of years ago. Flash forward to 2010.
IEA's three-volume, 700-plus-page outlook for 2010 is hot off the presses, and one of its major conclusions [pdf], once again, is that the age of cheap oil is behind us. It's a perfect storm headed our way -- a steady rise in global demand for oil crashing up against an increasingly limited supply of economically recoverable oil. By 2035, the group projects, demand for oil will increase from about 84 million [xls] to 107 million barrels per day, and prices will rise to $135 per barrel -- a range we painfully visited briefly during the spring and early summer of 2008. (The current price of oil is about $80 a barrel.)
That's definitely going to put a sizable dent in our wallets and end up sending a lot of dollars to foreign shores. But the IEA points out that there is one way to get off the oil-price roller coaster. If we enacted policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (and promote renewable energy), demand could be as much as 10 percent less, a prospect that would in turn reduce each barrel of oil by about $20 in 2035.
The bottom line is that alternatives to fossil fuels are needed to rein in their prices and ease supply constraints while they are a dominant player on the world stage, and economists tell us that the most effective way to get there is to put a price on carbon.
It's kind of odd, but it could turn out that the best way for us to save money in the long run is to put a price on carbon and thus discourage people from consuming so much gasoline and driving the price up.
Now, I realize that this might upset the anti-cappers and anti-carbon taxers, but, hey, don't blame me -- I'm just the messenger.
Follow Bill Chameides on Twitter: www.twitter.com/theGreenGrok
But still, it is about time we seriously started planning for Peak Oil, and some viable options we can begin switching to.
Here are some great ideas to start with: http://bit.ly/aC9mXQ
The time to shift our priorities and begin planning for a serious alternative energy future was 1980. I agree with the good Professor - it's too late now to begin planning. We can only muddle through from here on out.
In the 1970s, a 5% gap between production and demand produced a 300% or higher oil price spike. Well, we're going to have a 70% production-demand gap. If a gap 14 times larger than the one in the 70s were to only produce a 300% increase in oil prices it'd bring oil up to $250/barrel or more. Obviously it will be far worse than that. FAR worse.
Oil affects food production. When the oil production levels drop, food prices will spike along with oil prices. Let's say that realistically we end up with $350/barrel for oil in 2030 (I think it will be higher myself). That's four times today's price. Food will increase just as much. So when you come home from the grocery store, look at your bill, and imagine it being four times higher. Will your income support that? What will you have to give up to continue eating? You should be thinking about these things NOW.
The graph of the IMF food cost index and the price of oil follow each other very closely. Anyone with an internet connection can get the data and examine it themselves. The connection between energy and food prices is clear. And fuel shortages will soon produce food shortages.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-impending-world-energy-mess-2010-11
that will quickly bring the reader to date
http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/11/chart-day-peak-oil
http://www.fcnp.com/commentary/national/7696-the-peak-oil-crisis-the-leading-edge.html
try these out, and google anything from the oildrum.com and fallschurch.com
Be prepared to live in the city as $300/barrel will end commuting along with fossil fuel emissions. Urban farming will be next. 40% of the countries veggies in WW II were from Victory Gardens. 'A Crude Awakening' is a good documentary on the subject along w/ others. Scientific American had an article on world Peak Oil in 1998 but the pols can't talk about it, of course, or world wide panic could ensue.. Do a Google News section for your account to see how the Big Oil (which is buying up their shares so they won't have to share) is fignting the concept, Deep Water drilling is what's left.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100310134255.htm
one of the biggest issues facing us today,
and there are only 5 comments so far......
The IEA's 2035 numbers are based on 50% the oil produced each day, in 2035, to be from "Fields yet to be found." That's half... Their own number show known reserves producing under 20% of todays numbers based on normal depletion rates. The remaining 30% to be Unconventional oil, like tar sands.
The Pentagon is expecting oil shortages as early as 2012. All of the information is out there. All you need to do is look.