More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill McKibben

GET UPDATES FROM Bill McKibben
 

Over 600,000 Messages Against Keystone XL Flood the Senate

Posted: 02/14/2012 12:38 pm

*** Updated at 1:00 pm ET: We're now at 777,000 signatures and going even higher. Stay up to date at 350.org/kxl ***

This has been an amazing 24 hours, the third in a trio of events that took Keystone XL from an obscure pipeline project to the country's central environmental issue.

The first was in August, when the largest civil disobedience action in 30 years saw 1,253 people arrested outside the White House. Next, in November, over 12,000 surrounded the president's house five deep, leading the president to slow down the permitting process

And now we're wrapping up a day when we turned from bodies on the line to keystrokes online -- the most concentrated blitz of environmental organizing since the start of the digital age.

With rumors that Senate Democrats were starting to go mushy instead of backing their president, the leaders of every major environmental group in the country made a quick call over the weekend -- they'd combine forces for a full-on day of pushing their members into action. We set a target of 500,000 messages to the Senate, knowing it was a high bar but also knowing that we had to convince the leadership there that this had become a litmus test for environmentalists, the one issue that even moderately-informed environmental voters knew about this election cycle.

It turned out we were wrong. Half a million was not a high bar at all -- people across the country were so enthusiastic that we blew past that mark 6 hours and 54 minutes into the day. The 500,000th signature, appropriately, was from a Nebraskan, pointing out that the only independent study of the pipeline that would bisect her state showed it would yield a paltry 1400 temporary jobs, not the bonanza big oil keeps promising.

Messages keep flooding in -- I half wish we were still in the good old days of telegrams, because this would look like a Jimmy Stewart movie, with Western Union boys hauling bales of paper into Senate offices. Good environmentalists, we'll deliver dozens of jump drives to the Senate leadership later today.

But those jump drives and the bumper crop of messages they contain harken back to a different day in U.S. environmental history, that decade after the first Earth Day when most of the environmental laws that cleaned up our air and water were passed -- the day when environmentalists had real clout in DC. We're not there yet -- big oil outspends us by orders of magnitude, and the new campaign finance rules magnify its power. And of course climate change is a tougher challenge than smog.

Still, we've re-learned some lessons in the last 24 hours. Unity matters -- how wonderful to see the leaders of every environmental group on the same page, and progressive communities like MoveOn.org Political Action and CREDO Mobile joining in to help. And more important, a big swath of the American people remain deeply committed to a world that works. Right now Keystone is the battle that defines that hope -- we'll do our best to see that our "leaders" don't quash it.

 

Follow Bill McKibben on Twitter: www.twitter.com/billmckibben

 
 
  • Comments
  • 148
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:23 PM on 02/15/2012
what people don't understand is the oil isn't staying in America for our use it is to ship off shore to othere nations so why then should we destroy our lands for China?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:15 AM on 02/15/2012
Again, what is the big rush for the pipeline and tar sands development? There sure doesn't seem to be a real oil shortage at this time. Seems they want to get it done before too many people find out how destructive the whole thing will be. That pseudo-oil isn't going anywhere soon, so what really is the rush? Canadians don't want a pipeline to their west coast so lets just put it all the way across the US, to a trade zone refinery and send it to China that way. And the gop voting farmers in the midwest can pay higher fuel costs. This is accurately predicted to happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
10:33 PM on 02/14/2012
Final (really) count on our Keystone XL Blitz: 802,180 Messages.
mijjy
Read, Be Aware, Prepare
11:16 AM on 02/15/2012
Thank you from Ohio, where we're looking West, towards the Keystone debacle, and to the East, to our shale deposit, with an Ohioan politician-hopeful of only one party stating, "The boom is on." Push back, push back, push back. I go to get my neighbors to send their voices, too. Thx for the #
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
12:20 PM on 02/15/2012
You are welcome
09:53 PM on 02/14/2012
As a lifelong environmental regulator, my first questions when this controversy arose were, "Surely, many other pipelines cross the Ogallala Aquifer? And if so, why all the fuss about this one?"
As it turns out it appears the Keystone XL pipeline would cross about 250 miles of land above the Aquifer. By contrast, it appears about 20,500 miles of pipelines (including 3,000 miles of hazardous liquid pipelines) are in Nebraska and many miles cross the aquifer. Oil wells have been drilled and are in production within areas overlying the Aquifer.
In additon, I suspect not all portions of the aquifer are equally exposed to contamination. The vulnerability of groundwater to a spill is determined by hyrologists by an assessment of soils, near surface geology above the aquifer; depth to groundwater; and presence of confining layers, if any. Like most aquifers, I suspect that some parts of the Aquifer are isolated by impervious materials such as clays and glacial till which would prevent pollution from entering these parts in the event of spill.
These factors need to be in the public debate when decsions are made about the merits of the pipeline. I recommend interested people see the Nebraska data on the USDOT, "Office of Pipeline Safety" site.
Weaning off fossil fuels that have been the backbone of the US economy for over 200 years must evolve. We need to embrace all fuels and evolve toward a future renewables economy for the sake of US jobs, security, and the environment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:05 AM on 02/15/2012
Thanks for your work in environmental enforcement. As an field soil scientist for nearly 4 decades I have a lot of experience in soils and shallow groundwater hydrology. Is it true the tar sands product in this pipeline sinks in water? When most petroleum products float on top? If so leaks from the Keystone line could really be much more serious than other pipelines. I live in MT, we weren't too happy with the oil leak into our Yellowstone River last year. When the lease for the Conoco pipeline across the Salish Kootnai Reservation expired several years ago the tribe would not renew it because of the poor response to leaks and cleanup. For several years they ran tankers between Missoula and Thompson Falls, completely tearing the road up, now it's all rail. I agree pipelines should be safer and for the most part are but the pipeline company in this case didn't seem to care about safety or cleanup.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
09:18 PM on 02/14/2012
Thanks, Bill. This is no time to ease up. Time to ratchet up the struggle. 2012 will be the first election based on the environment. Thank you GOP!!!!! You didn't know it could work the other way didjya?
07:31 PM on 02/14/2012
Here's the deal: On the one hand, we can all debate the specific merits of the pipeline including costs, benefits, possibilities of pollution, etc. But this leaves out something that we, as individuals, societies and nations seem to be having an awful lot of trouble wrapping our minds around- we have a very limited amount of additional carbon (in the form of CO2) we can put into the atmosphere before the costs of climate change dwarf any costs we would see from transitioning from fossil fuels beginning NOW (the costs will mount exponentially with further delay). That's it. That's what every scientific institution in the word (forget the IPCC if you want to-that is just a compendium report of all of these institutions) concludes. Unless you or I is a trained climate scientist- we have nothing to say about the scientific validity of this conclusion. NOTHING. And we, the USA-who has put more carbon into the atmosphere than any other country on the planet (by far) must lead the way. We can, of course debate the merits of the different methods of complying with the physics of the situation... Just like an unhealthy eater whose habits have caused heart disease and diabetes- we have to make healthy, adult choices or suffer the consequences. Mr. McKibben is an adult in this room who is leading the way. Period.
10:20 PM on 02/14/2012
Leading the way toward what, restructuring the economy to suit who? He is not a scientist, he is a ivy league writer and "activist" with a poltical agenda. The rest of us inadequate state university earth scientists need to see independent valid peer reviewed studies. The riduculous theories and conjectural junk I read in these comments and posts is so far from reality I cannot take any of it seriously.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
06:15 PM on 02/14/2012
Actually more that 730,000 so far.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
05:46 PM on 02/14/2012
"24 Hours to Stop the Pipeline" Senate Delivery

800,000 Emails

http://www.flickr.com/photos/350org/sets/72157629321396069/with/6877618903/
05:45 PM on 02/14/2012
We the people are winning - yay for us!!!

We have already won a major battle between people and corporations. We have cost Big Oil a lot of time and money. Every day more people come over to our side.

Every day that we delay Keystone is another day that clean energy moves forward in our labs and on the ground, and in people's hearst and minds. People know we are on their side!

Let's keep fighting Keystone XL. Let's take away Big Oil subsidies. Let's build the new economy. We mite lose a few but we won't stop!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Why does this generation ask for a sign?
05:12 PM on 02/14/2012
Canada suddenly realizes that America's monopsony stinks. They now have a renewed drive to get the oil to their own coasts for sale to China or the US East Coast. The faster they do that, the more stability they'll have.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
10:21 PM on 02/14/2012
Canadians say NO
05:02 PM on 02/14/2012
And what percentage of our 300+ million population does 600,000 represent? I figure about 0.2%, a relatively insignificant amount.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
05:41 PM on 02/14/2012
It represents much more than 'no one' doing anything.

BTW what percentage of GOP are voting in the primaries and are selecting the GOP candidate? I believe you will find it to be well below 1% in some states.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tikiman
Just out taking my dogma for a walk.
06:28 PM on 02/14/2012
Statistically it is significant. Or did you not take that class?
04:47 PM on 02/14/2012
Germany who has many alternitive energy sources is doing just fine without raping the earth. France is not faring well as they depend on electric for fuel.. US is still raping and destroying the earth but we will make a difference to change this..It is time to get sustainable energy and take care of earth. After all she takes care of us......
photo
Grichde
Little Hope, Wrong Change
04:37 PM on 02/14/2012
I have no doubt the pipeline will be built, not until next year. Until then Warren Buffet will ship the oil by train, bet he won't ask to pay higher taxes to do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Why does this generation ask for a sign?
04:04 PM on 02/14/2012
"We set a target of 500,000 messages to the Senate"

That message is being sent to Canada too. That is, send the oil to China instead.
04:23 PM on 02/14/2012
Most of it was going to be transhipped anyway.

Why, exactly do you care that it is sold to China, rather than Europe, Africa, or South America?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Why does this generation ask for a sign?
05:06 PM on 02/14/2012
Funny. You forgot America. I'd rather that the oil was shipped to Texas and sold to Americans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
04:02 PM on 02/14/2012
This is one more step in the ongoing job of fighting out of control greedy corporations who put profits before people and the health of the planetary environment. Thank you Bill McKibben for helping with this fight.