iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill Moyers

GET UPDATES FROM Bill Moyers
 

WATCH: Living Under the Gun

Posted: 07/20/2012 7:45 pm

You might think Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President of and spokesman for the mighty American gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, has an almost cosmic sense of timing. In 2007, at the NRA's annual convention in St. Louis, he warned the crowd that, "Today, there is not one firearm owner whose freedom is secure."

Two days later, a young man opened fire on the campus of Virginia Tech, killing 32 students, staff and teachers. Just last week LaPierre showed up at the United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty here in New York and spoke out against what he called "anti-freedom policies that disregard American citizens' right to self-defense."

Now at least 12 are dead in Aurora, Colo., gunned down by a mad man at a showing of the new Batman movie filled with make-believe violence. One of the guns the shooter used was an AK-47 type, assault weapon that was banned in 1994. The National Rifle Association saw to it that the ban expired in 2004. The NRA is the best friend a killer's instinct ever had.

Obviously, LaPierre's timing isn't cosmic, just coincidental; as Shakespeare famously wrote, "The fault is not in our stars, but in ourselves." In other words, people. People with guns. There are an estimated 300 million guns in the United States; one in four adult Americans owns at least one and most of them are men. The British newspaper The Guardian reminds us that over the last 30 years, "The number of states with a law that automatically approves licenses to carry concealed weapons provided an applicant clears a criminal background check has risen from eight to 38."

Every year there are 30,000 gun deaths and 300,000 gun-related assaults in the U.S. Firearm violence may cost our country as much as $100 billion a year. Toys are regulated with greater care and safety concerns.

So why do we always act so surprised? Violence is alter ego, wired into our Stone Age brains, so intrinsic its toxic eruptions no longer shock, except momentarily when we hear of a mass shooting like this latest in Colorado. But this, too, will pass and the nation of the short attention span quickly finds the next thing to divert us from the hard realities of America in 2012.

We are after all a country that began with the forced subjugation into slavery of millions of Africans and the reliance on arms against Native Americans for its Westward expansion. In truth, more settlers traveling the Oregon Trail died from accidental, self-inflicted gunshots wounds than Indian attacks -- we were not only bloodthirsty but also inept.

Nonetheless, we have become so gun-loving, so blasé about home-grown violence that in my lifetime alone, far more Americans have been casualties of domestic gunfire than have died in all our wars combined. In Arizona last year, just days after the Gabby Giffords shooting, sales of the weapon used in the slaughter -- a 9 millimeter Glock semi-automatic pistol -- doubled.

We are fooling ourselves. That the law could allow even an inflamed lunatic to easily acquire murderous weapons and not expect murderous consequences. Fooling ourselves that the Second Amendment's guarantee of a "well-regulated militia" be construed as a God-given right to purchase and own just about any weapon of destruction you like. That's a license for murder and mayhem and it's a great fraud that has entered our history.

There's a video of which I'd like to remind you. You can see it on YouTube. In it, Adam Gadahn, an American-born member of al-Qaeda, the first U.S. citizen charged with treason since 1952, urges terrorists to carry out attacks on the United States. Right before your eyes he says:

"America is absolutely awash with easily obtainable firearms. You can go down to a gun show at the local convention center and come away with a fully automatic assault rifle, without a background check, and most likely, without having to show an identification card. So what are you waiting for?"

The killer in Colorado waited only for an opportunity, and there you have it -- the arsenal of democracy transformed into the arsenal of death and the NRA, the NRA is the enabler of death -- paranoid, delusional, and as venomous as a scorpion. With the weak-kneed acquiescence of our politicians, the National Rifle Association has turned the Second Amendment of the Constitution into a cruel hoax, a cruel and deadly hoax. I'm Bill Moyers.


Watch Moyers & Company weekly on public television, and explore more at BillMoyers.com.

 
 
 

Follow Bill Moyers on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BillMoyers

FOLLOW POLITICS
You might think Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President of and spokesman for the mighty American gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, has an almost cosmic sense of timing. In 2007, at the NRA's...
You might think Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President of and spokesman for the mighty American gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, has an almost cosmic sense of timing. In 2007, at the NRA's...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 118
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:07 PM on 07/22/2012
Which of the three branches of government should take the initiative?
The NRA members disagree with the NRA's policy but they have no voice presumably because the money and hence power comes from the arms manufacturers. Could taxation help in the same way that tobacco addiction has been reduced?
photo
tnkeating
Dyslexic agnostic insomniac
03:53 PM on 07/22/2012
Every year 90,000 people are killed from Doctors mistakes, does that make Doctors more dangerous than guns?
02:40 PM on 07/22/2012
It's about time that the NRA take responsibility for the club they have made.
10:44 AM on 07/22/2012
The word "assault" is defined as a "vigorous armed attack, a violent critical attack". The very meaning of assigning a weapon as an "assault weapon" tells you that the intent for its use is for violence. If our government feels that allowing these weapons designed for use in violence, a right for every American then we are certainly on the wrong track. A hand gun or a rifle is a totally different issue. Perhaps a common ground to start a serious dialog, would be that a yearly license fee and interview for license holders every year for the ownership of any weapon other than a handgun and a rifle. If you feel the need to have an assault weapon, just what are your intents and why do you feel you need that mass death weapon?
10:38 AM on 07/22/2012
Experience indicates that gun restrictions have minimal effect on access to weapons by criminals and deranged people. We have the proof that Gun control measures do not stop violence. Only 0.2% of guns are involved in crimes that means a ban on firearms would be 99.8% over inclusive. In 2004, the National Academy of Sciences reviewed 253 journal articles, 99 books and 43 government publications evaluating 80 gun-control measures. Researchers could not identify a single regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. A year earlier, the Centers for Disease Control reported on ammunition bans, restrictions on acquisition, waiting periods, registration, licensing, child access prevention and zero tolerance laws. CDC's conclusion: There was no conclusive evidence that the laws reduced gun violence. We know anti-gun regulations do not address the deep-rooted causes of violent crime, illegitimacy, drugs, alcohol abuse and dysfunctional schools, much less mental instability. Washington banned hand guns for 33 years and during some of those years the city was still know as the nations murder capitol. Killers were not deterred by the law against hand guns.
04:03 AM on 07/22/2012
BIl Moyers lost me when he talked about the "30,000 gun deaths a year" and not mention that nearly 20,000 of those are self inflicted (I got that from google and the 2007 CDC report on deaths in the US that year). When he omits that fact, he loses all credibility in my eyes. Basically the gun control debate is getting more black and white...either you want gun control laws passed or you see any law that limits gun ownership as an assault on the 2nd amendment. Honestly, it's people like Moyers who have turned me into the latter...honestly some gun control measures sound completely reasonable, but I know people like him won't stop until gun ownership is seen as a privilege rather than a right...which is why, even if it sounds reasonable...I'll oppose it because the slippery slope has already been proven.
06:43 PM on 07/22/2012
Based on 2009 statistics, 12,129 people were murdered (at a cost of $60.8 billion). 592 accidents ($2.96 billion), and another 18,223. However, another 18,610 people are shot accidentally - 3,588 of which are children. Point is, close to $70 billion could be saved per year if more legitimate measures were taken to prevent this stuff from happening. To accuse Moyers as assaulting the 2nd Amendment, and for your change in decision is pointless and blame shifting. Moyers is a man who wants to see a heavy decline in violence. Regardless of what Moyers' philosophy is on the 2nd Amendment, many studies conducted since the early '90's has shown that there is a direct and very strong correlation with the number of households with gun, and violence - across counties, states, and countries. There's information to be used objectively, but there's nothing objective in accusing someone like Moyers as trying to undermine civil liberty. The average 32,000 people who have died every year since 1990 have no liberties or freedom now thanks to a very anarchistic and strict (albiet strangled) interpretation of the 2nd Amendment.
12:29 AM on 07/23/2012
when the measures many gun control advocates pursue are attempting to chip away at our constitutional rights...then it's a no go for me. 12k deaths due to gun violence in 2009 doesn't mean we have to pass laws that violate the US constitution.
12:34 AM on 07/22/2012
I remember my dad going hunting for food. He had to have a license to hunt back then( I am 66). I think guns are ok if using for sport related affairs and food. Nobody needs an atomatic gun for any reason. If we don't have some laws for gun controll we might just need xray machines or metal detecters in place when we go to the store, malls,schools,movie houses.or any place in the public. I say if the NRA wants to sell guns they need to pay for these machines to protect the public then they might change their toon about gun controlls.
04:08 AM on 07/22/2012
so you think the government should force an organization practicing their 1st amendment rights should be forced to pay for completely unnecessary metal detectors/xray machines that everybody will hate so they and infringes on 4th amendment rights because they oppose gun control??? I don't see your logic...in fact, you're the kind of person that has led me to oppose any gun control measures because you just plain don't respect/and or understand the reason for the 2nd amendment....let me give you a hint, it wasn't to protect the right of the individual to own a gun so he could hunt.
08:14 AM on 07/22/2012
So what you are saying is that anyone should be able to collect an arsenal of weaponry to protect themselves - against what? Because all that happens is that I get a shot gun and you get an ak47 and then the government starts arming all of the small towns with bulletproof hummers and bearcats and then..........where does it stop? The only one's that win here are the munitions manufacturers.

I don't want to live (or raise my family for that matter) in an OK Corral type atmosphere. I can remember reading about Tombstone, Arizona in the Wild West days - any idiot with a gun could come into town, have a few whiskey's at the saloon and come out shooting. Women, children, innocent bystanders - anyone was fair game. That is until the sheriff made a law that anyone coming into town had to check their firearms in at the sheriff's office. They could collect them again on their way out of town. And that, to me, was the beginning of civilization in Arizona. When people could walk into town to carry out their business in safety and not have to worry about some person with a Napoleonic complex carrying a six shooter to make him feel like a man.

If you want my opinion, it would be much more effective to invest in a years supply of Viagra.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
07:15 PM on 07/21/2012
My giving up my rights (which I will not ever do) will not make you or anyone else any safer. We should be expanding all of our rights, including our gun rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
memito
12:43 AM on 07/22/2012
Bad idea bird brain.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
12:23 PM on 07/22/2012
Our constitution is not an ala carte menu.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
04:37 PM on 07/21/2012
its impossible to predict how many lives guns save every year....how many break ins dont occur, car jackings that dont happen.
photo
Sansculotte
I never did like Tea
02:03 PM on 07/21/2012
That was absolutely spot on. The 2nd Amendment has been manipulated into an enabler for massive gun violence in our society. And it's a hoax. pure and simple. Proof, that P.T. Barnum was a prophet.
12:51 PM on 07/21/2012
Who allowed the ban on assault weapons to expire in 2004? Was the bill buried? If so, who was in charge of that decision? How many congresspeople supported the ban? We need to know NOW what our congressional leaders did and will do. The US is the #1 manufacturer of guns and weapons, or as George W put it, "weapons of mass destruction". Which people in Congress, get contributions from the NRA? How much money does the NRA spend on lobbying? As a proud citizen of WI, hunting is a tradition like Thanksgiving and Christmas. Assault weapons DO NOT work very well with hunting, unless you want to destroy your target. Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of hunting? I have too many friends who love to hunt and process the animal killed for food. That's how most peope lived at the beginning of our country. That is how the majority of hunters are. Assault weapons in our country are fodder for disaster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charleyvldm9
He thinks outside the box.
11:32 AM on 07/21/2012
Bill, every word you said is the truth, if it was said by me I would'nt have any friends or fans ,hope the powers that be listens.
photo
Rob Gadianton
Reeking Havoc In America Since 52 AD
01:29 PM on 07/21/2012
Hope is so '08.
elogco
Borincua from Ohio the buckeye state
02:24 PM on 07/21/2012
Charley, there are millions of us that agree with Moyers. We must make our collective voices heard.
11:11 AM on 07/21/2012
You would think that homeland security would take away easy access to
guns instead of taking away privacy. I am surprised that the
terrorist, if they exist, which I doubt, have not used this easy
access to weapons of mass destruction in the US.
08:45 AM on 07/22/2012
Nope, IMO, the DHS is just a a middle man - they put together a package, your tax dollars coupled with a munitions manufacturer or ex-ray screening company and gift it to some small town, or airport under the pretense of protection against people who buy AK 47's. Look at what happened after the Underwear Bomber - Mr. Chertoff, ex-director of DHS (who now works for a private scanner company) goes on national television and explains how we would all be much safer if every airport was equipped with full body scanners. So the airports begin buying full body scanners from Rapiscan, Chertoff gets paid, and everybody's happy right? Except the scanners have significant detection flaws, not to mention the possibility of over radiating the public and the invasion of your personal privacy.

I find it interesting that right before the underwear bomber, there was a printer loaded with plastic explosives that was put on a passenger plane as commercial cargo. The printer wasn't tracked down until, I think, the plane was over Chicago. You would think, if the powers that be were so concerned about the public's safety that they would disallow business cargo to be transported on the same planes as passengers. Would make sense, right? But no. That would cut into the domestic airplane's profit - and we can't sacrifice safety for profit now, can we?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html

http://shiftfrequency.com/tag/lenco-bearcat/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allene Stucki
10:56 AM on 07/21/2012
There are also 30,000 motor vehicle deaths every year and, unlike the 30,000 gun deaths, more than half of them are not suicides, but nobody wants to control motor vehicles.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
luvsox
Progressive by Choice, Democrat by Default
01:30 PM on 07/21/2012
Motor vehicles are strictly licensed and controlled, and the purpose of automobiles is transportation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allene Stucki
07:31 PM on 07/21/2012
And the purpose of "control and license" is revenue, right?
photo
Sansculotte
I never did like Tea
01:57 PM on 07/21/2012
What a ridiculous analogy.
And there have been many controls applied to cars aimed at decreasing accidental deaths. Seat belts, air bags, front end construction rules, anti-roll over stability rules.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
I just don't understand people
09:04 AM on 07/21/2012
" With the weak-kneed acquiescence of our politicians, the National Rifle Association has turned the Second Amendment of the Constitution into a cruel hoax, a cruel and deadly hoax."
The weak-kneed acquiescence of our politicians brought us wars we never should have started, the dismantling of Glass-Steagall, the exporting of American jobs, citizens united and are marching us towards plutocracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesse Kelly 1
I didn't choose to be American, it just happened.
07:23 PM on 07/21/2012
To be fair, Citizens United was brought to us by SCOTUS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
10:10 PM on 07/21/2012
Yes, the five right wingers on SCOTUS.