iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill Moyers

GET UPDATES FROM Bill Moyers
 

WATCH: What Obama Should Say About Climate Change

Posted: 01/02/2013 5:34 pm

What should President Obama say about climate change in his State of the Union address? Actions speak louder than words, but some words will have more resonance and meaning than others.

So we asked scientist Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, to make his suggestion to the president in this extended preview clip from the next Moyers & Company.




In another excerpt, Leiserowitz explains that single-digit degree changes in our climate are comparable to single-digit degree changes in our body temperature when we get sick.

"I think there's an analogy here -- that little difference in global average temperature, just like that little difference in body temperature, can have huge implications as you keep going," Leiserowitz tells Bill.



Use this tool to find Moyers & Company times and channels in your area.

 
 
 

Follow Bill Moyers on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BillMoyers

FOLLOW GREEN
What should President Obama say about climate change in his State of the Union address? Actions speak louder than words, but some words will have more resonance and meaning than others. So we asked ...
What should President Obama say about climate change in his State of the Union address? Actions speak louder than words, but some words will have more resonance and meaning than others. So we asked ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
01:06 AM on 01/08/2013
I just watched the whole interview on PBS. No solutions to the c02 problem were discussed. Here is a complete solution, not only to c02 emissions, but c02 reduction. Another benefit is that it will solve the world's energy problems.

http://www.coal2nuclear.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cormagh
What does an independent mind say?
03:42 PM on 01/06/2013
A guy from Yale that makes unscientific comments should not influence anyone, let alone the President. I agree that this should not be apolitical issue. Democrats and Republicans that are pushing the issue of climate change against the evidence that the models have failed and the earth has stopped warming should give up the issue, let scientists return to doing the business of science again and stay out of politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
07:32 PM on 01/03/2013
He should say we are going to do whatever it takes to prevent catastrophic climate change.
04:52 AM on 01/04/2013
Yeah he should say although a lot of the predictions are about events over a decade away, some of the most dire consequences are already happening and much worse could happen as soon as this year -- especially global drought and famine, and jet stream collapse with the kinds of catastrophic blocking highs we've already seen and are seeing right now over Siberia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
08:36 AM on 01/04/2013
Very true.

The "whatever it takes" part of my recommendation is intended to provide an opening for bold action.

As you note, if he uses this language, the glass is also half empty -- nothing in the statement says how urgent the situation is. I would hope that he could use language that is widely acceptable (almost everyone will agree we don't want a climate catastrophe) and also starts to shift the national attention toward the need for more action.

We need to keep the pressure on all our elected leaders to shape policy that will move us to clean energy, and also do whatever we can individually in the meantime. (also make sure we elect people who understand the issue!)
11:53 AM on 01/03/2013
The Republican party is funded and supported by the oil, coal, and nuclear industries.

Republicans in Congress are doing all they can to stop the transition to safe, clean alternative energy sources because they provide competition to the fossil fuel industry.

More Republicans need to be voted out of office, local, state and federal.
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
11:51 AM on 01/03/2013
The Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, of which Mr. Leiserowitz is director, has great information about what Americans think about climate change. The rantings of anti-science politicians, ideologues, and HP posters can give you a very distorted view of what Americans actually think about this subject. Check out their excellent site: http://environment.yale.edu/climate/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cormagh
What does an independent mind say?
04:43 PM on 01/06/2013
How do you know these people are anti-science? Is it because I think I know science better, or is it because the sources you trust tell you to?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bthompson18
09:31 AM on 01/03/2013
what's arguably the greatest single threat facing humanity. OR THE GREATEST HOAX.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dazed not Confused
A peaceful place, or so it looks from space
12:38 PM on 01/03/2013
A very complicated scientific problem is no longer 'arguable' when 98% of all the scientists that matter (being the ones who are not employed by or otherwise connected to Big Fossil, including them the # is still 82%) agree that human activity has some effect on climate change. What O. should say is 'We have clearly crossed the line from anticipation of future effects. The effects are clearly upon us and will almost certainly become worse, that is, unless we take decisive action NOW. In addition, there will be huge economic opportunity for those countries who take such action....it is all of our patriotic duty to stop squabbling and start acting, which will require some short-term sacrifices for long-term physical and economic security.'
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bthompson18
01:17 PM on 01/03/2013
98% of those that believe in climate change. you didnt mention those that disagree on climate change hoax. High school science teachers dont count as scientists.
07:03 AM on 01/03/2013
What he should say is something like this:
"We made a big big mistake in taking the CO2 scare so seriously when the evidence for it was and remains so sparse. Poor people the world over have sufffered the most from this mistake, from increased levels of starvation thanks to bio-fuels pushing up the price of food, through increased fuel-poverty due to subsidies for renewables, to the destruction of one low-cost resource of great importance - the natural environment. Furthermore, we have harmed our children by trying to recrcuit them as eco-activists using scare stories about polar bears and suchlike. Let us move on from here, and celebrate our abilities to cope, to innovate, and to progress despite what the climate may bring us. Let us admit we are in awe of the climate system and its great power. But let us no longer delude ourselves about the scale of our impact on it, or our ability to control it."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:19 AM on 01/03/2013
but then he would be as disillusioned as you will be when you wake up from this day dream
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Demitasse
Ars longa, vita brevis
12:48 PM on 01/03/2013
"....the CO2 scare so seriously when the evidence for it was and remains so sparse."

The evidence is sparse? So what else could cause sea level rise, global temperature rise, warming oceans, declining Arctic sea ice, glacial retreat, extreme weather events, & ocean acidification? If rising amounts of GHGs aren't the cause then what is? Has NASA, the IPCC, the AMS, the APS, the AGU, the AAAS, the National Science Academies, & numerous other scientific institutions along with 97% of the world's climatologists & scientists overlooked something? If so please inform them. I'm sure they would like to know. Because they believe (because of the evidence) that drought, exacerbated by climate change, is primarily the cause for food shortages. And subsidies for renewables pale when compared to fossil fuel subsidies. And fossil fuel companies have a long, well documented history of destroying the environment by polluting the water, land & air, and this has adversely affected the quality of life & health of many children, making it harder for them to grow up to be healthy, productive adults - adults who, if they live long enough, will curse us & the hot, degraded, prehistoric-like future we will have left them because we were unable to lower the world's CO2 levels.
06:16 PM on 01/03/2013
Quote "sea level rise, global temperature rise, warming oceans, declining Arctic sea ice, glacial retreat, extreme weather events, & ocean acidification".
All these things were going on before the last half of the 20th century, the later part of which is the period we are told the rising CO2 levels were the cause of all bad weather events. To which I say, pull the other leg, it has bells on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mlabudaphotos
Photographer Toledo, Ohio
07:03 AM on 01/03/2013
Does it matter what he says? Climate change affects the planet, and many still deny the changes are real. World leaders can't agree on much, but, an issue affecting us, seems, to be one they could try to come together on, but, we know it will take a crisis like, Hurricane Sandy to get our leaders attention for a few minutes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neillevine
want to go into waterwheel business
01:26 PM on 01/03/2013
Were Obama to support an affordable source of clean energy, he would solve the problem and bring the debate to an end. Thus far, all he has been doing is pick on the coal and oil companies in something of a left wing hate campaign that makes lite economic sense. Makng currently afffordable technology too expensive and replacing them with high priced alternatives.
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
07:02 AM on 01/03/2013
The reason it has become a partisan issue is that addressing climate change means transitioning away from fossil fuels. About 80% of the known fossil fuel reserves have to stay in the ground if we are going to seriously address climate change.

Not surprisingly the fossil fuel corporations do not agree. They want to use all of the known reserves and are constantly searching out new reserves.

The fossil fuel corporations have some political support in both parties but much more so in one party. (Hint: it is the "Drill Baby Drill" party.) So that turns the science issue into a political issue.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Nadine B. Hack
CEO beCause Global Consulting
06:16 AM on 01/03/2013
As Leiserowitz tells Moyers, climate change is not a partisan issue and affects everyone. In this second term, Obama must make a strong case for acting on the science.
11:55 PM on 01/02/2013
Leiserowitz is a great spokesman. He is correct. In addition to those conceptual points he might add the reality check of sea level which is very timely given the kind of damage caused by Sandy.
Sea level is determined by the size of the ice sheets and glaciers on land. There are natural climate cycles, most prominently the ice ages that occur about every hundred thousand years. As I explain in my recent book, High Tide On Main Street, sea level goes up and down almost 400 feet with each ice age. For the last 6,000 years sea level has been stable, meaning the coastline has hardly moved. Now the great ice sheets and glaciers are in melt mode due to the greenhouse gas levels -- a science that was established more than a century ago. The shorelines will move far inland. There will be no greater impact on our society. We need to adapt. As Leiserowitz says, we also need to focus our intellect and creativity to slow this rise in temperature that we have caused, altering the Earth's natural cycles.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
shockmagog
Infrared hair, UV shades, SPF 110 dome.
07:49 PM on 01/02/2013
I hope the president lists specific points and steps on what we as citizens of an undivided nation, are doing, can do, and should do to address the serious fact of Anthropogenic Global Warming.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
svasol
Environment means we are all in this together
07:07 PM on 01/02/2013
Obama should take Leiserowitz's words verbatim. So should the media and every other responsible public figure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
06:43 PM on 01/02/2013
Well, the CLIMATE would really applaud every one on earth if they called for the ABOLITION of the now century old CARBON ECONOMY and replace it with the now emerging HYDROGEN ECONOMY.

So, we need someone to load the following segment, that was loaded into the teleprompter in 2003 when G. Bush read his State of the Union address, into the teleprompter that Obama will read from this year.

--“With a new national commitment, our scientists and engineers will overcome obstacles to taking these (hydrogen fuel cell) cars from laboratory to showroom, so that the first car driven by a child born today could be powered by hydrogen, and pollution-free.”.

OMG, just 10 years later, this woman actress in CA has her pollution-free Mercedes-Benz Hydrogen Fuel Cell electric SUV; http://bit.ly/Jk5oCG .

But, she can't start driving around America until this Oil Giant installs this splendid Hydrogen Gas Pump; http://bit.ly/RoFCoT , on all of its service station lots to enable her to do so!

And, since the Comander-in-Chief is down in Hawaii, have him go to this military base and take a drive in a POLLUTION-FREE hydrogen fuel cell SUV; http://bit.ly/KF7WMA , so he knows what the hell they are all about !!!!