As first reported by the Huffington Post, on Tuesday, April 6, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs blasted radio talk show host and CNN contributor Erick Erickson for telling listeners he would greet any census worker at his door with a shotgun.
Gibbs was responding to my question: "Robert, on the census. Erick Erickson's a commentator for CNN. A couple of days ago, he said he was not going to fill out his census form and if a census worker came to the door, quote, he said he would "pull out my wife's shotgun and see how that little twerp likes being scared at the door."
And what's the response from the rabid, right-wing blogs? Unable to defend Erickson, they've decided to attack -- me! Witness this headline on Newsbusters.org: "Former CA Dem Chairman Bill Press Smears Erick Erickson with False Census Quotation."
Echoing comments I heard directly from CNN, Newsbusters's Lachlan Markay levels four accusations against me: posing as a journalist; blaming Erickson for telling his listeners not to fill out the Census; failing to identify his target as an ACS worker; and trying to turn the whole issue into an attack on CNN. He's dead wrong on all counts.
1. Phony Journalist. True, I did serve as volunteer Chair of the California Democratic Party from 1993 to 1996. Before that, I had already worked as a TV commentator and radio talk show host for 13 years. I continued in those jobs while State Chair. And, since leaving California in 1996, I have served as co-host of CNN's "Crossfire," co-host of CNN's "Spin Room," co-host of MSNBC's "Buchanan and Press," co-host of WMAL's morning drive, and, for the last five years, host of the nationally-syndicated "Bill Press Show." I also write a weekly column for Tribune Media Services, blog for The Hill newspaper, and have written five books. I am no press room poseur.
2. Census Form. Read my question to Gibbs again. Clearly, I never accused Erickson of telling listeners not to fill out their census forms. Nor did I imply so. I simply quoted him directly, from comments on his radio show. Here's the audio. Listen to him yourself, where he boasts: "I'm not filling out this form."
3. ACS Worker. True, I said "census worker," and not "ACS employee." But what's the difference? The American Community Survey, which conducts more in-depth surveys in some households, is part of the 2010 Census. ACS employees work for the Commerce Department. They are federal employees. Again, what's the difference between pulling a gun on a regular census worker or an ACS census worker? Indeed, what's OK about pulling a gun on anybody who comes to your door, whether it's the postman or the pizza deliveryman?
4. Attack on CNN? This is pure rubbish. I identified Erick Erickson as a CNN contributor for one simple reason: Because he is! Period. End of story. Except for this: as a former CNN-er myself, I believe Erickson is unworthy of sharing the same political stage as Paul Begala, Mary Matalin, Donna Brazile, David Gergen, John King, Wolf Blitzer, Candy Crowley and other great CNN talent who know how to debate politics without threatening to pull out their wife's shotgun.
Bottom line: Feeble attempts to shoot me, the messenger, won't work. Because there are still two huge, unanswered questions:
1. Last week, nine members of a Michigan militia were arrested and thrown in jail for threatening the lives of federal agents. Three men have been arrested and jailed for threatening the lives of Nancy Pelosi, Eric Cantor, and Patty Murray. Erick Erickson also threatened the life of a federal employee. Why isn't he in jail?
2. And why is Erick Erickson still on CNN's payroll?
Follow Bill Press on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bpshow
Mark Greenbaum: CNN's Rapid Decline and the Future of Cable News
CNN has failed to adapt to the opinion-dominated trends which Fox created and MSNBC has embraced. Executives are still commitmed to having primetime hosts deliver material without a partisan point of view.
Michael J.W. Stickings: CNN: It's Enough to Make You Throw Up
CNN, once a "respected name in news," has hired RedState blogger Erick Erickson as a so-called "political contributor," desperately trying to pull up its ratings by turning into Fox News Lite.
Chez Pazienza: Partisan Crashers: CNN Knows What It's Getting with Erickson
You don't give a forum to a guy who worships at the swollen feet of Rush Limbaugh and not expect him to draw controversy; on the contrary, it's why you hire him in the first place.
"How is holding a shotgun when opening one's door to a stranger a threat?"
ummm, when you go on national TV and THREATen to scare the twerp----with your WIFE's shotgun (i tell ya, i just CANNOT hear that too many times, it's the gift that just gives and gives!!)
Love you Bill!!!!! dont let this doughy creep off the hook, i didnt think there was anything LOWER than glenn beck---until i heard this discount-priced imitator!
Personally, I hope he didn't fill out his Census form, because 1) gov't funding might just well go elsewhere because of his inaction, and 2) the Census will then have to send someone back to his door to try to persuade him to do so - more income for the workers!
form of 'Factuality.' Any speech that is offered otherwise is
'Fraudulent' or 'Deceptive' or 'Simple Opinion', and when so it must be
acknowledged as such in order to be 'Protected'. We could be entering
an era where 'accountability' must be applied to any 'Author' offering
any such element of 'Free Speech.' Simply uttering a blanket label such as
'Entertainment' does not suffice.
In action, a person like this guy, or Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, or Rush Limbaugh
must identify which is fact and which is opinion before offering either.
In My Humble OPINION, that is!
Brick
But when one side constantly repeats lies, it is no longer speech but propaganda.
So what can we do about it?
I don't have a clue. Except media Matters is extremely important.
you cant even compare our "mainstream liberal media" and BBC---it would be like Paris Hilton and steven hawking each presenting on the theory of relativity.
if you REALLY loved your country, you'd watch BBC-----and learn FACTS, not corporate talking points!!!
"for threatening the lives of federal agents."
Technically, they only planned to kill local/state law enforcement personnel. Having an opportunity to kill Federal law enforcement personnel would have simply been a bonus and would have probably gotten the Hutaree their own luxury suite in heaven.
You had it all (both Houses) and lost it in 2 years. So sad. We'll have to come in and drain the swamp.
That's the only thing you said that I disagree with, Bill.
Erickson and Blitzer definitely do not share a stage.