David Brosch had a problem many Americans can relate to. He wanted solar power, but wasn't able to put it on his house. His roof had the wrong orientation, a tree partially blocked the sun, and it was more than he could afford. Many of his neighbors were in the same situation -- some were renters, others were too busy to handle the process of an installation on their house.
They got together and formed a company, University Park Community Solar, and approached a local church with a large roof and good solar orientation. In exchange for placing solar panels on it's roof, the church would be guaranteed a long-term low price of electricity. David told us: "We wanted a project that could stand on it's own. Not one funded by donations, but something that was financially viable that folks would be willing to invest in. A solar project done right can turn a profit, so we thought, let's pool our money and do it together." Sounds simple enough, right?
As far as we can tell, no one had ever pulled off a project quite like that before. UPCS needed to come up with the right legal entity, faced securities regulations that restrict non-accredited investors (i.e. non-wealthy people) from investing in the project, and had to figure out how to utilize federal credits that required "passive income" to apply it to. It took nearly three years, but this Maryland group finally installed the 21.9 kW system this past May. It is believed to be one of the first community-initiated and owned solar electric systems in the U.S.
The project is expected to generate a 7-8% return on investment over the life of the project for the 30-plus area members. By providing clean electricity for the Church of the Brethren, UPCS will be reducing the region's reliance on coal-based power. PEPCO, the major electric utility for Washington D.C. and the Maryland suburbs, purchases more than half of its power from coal-burning generating plants, which get their coal from destructive Mountaintop Removal mining operations in Appalachia. [Check www.ilovemountains.org to see if your electricity comes at the expense of mountains too.]
You'd think the federal government would do anything it could to support the replication of the University Park model. It's a market-based solution to the unemployment problem, while also helping achieve clean energy and climate objectives. But it's actually the federal government that's in the way.
One of the biggest roadblocks is the 1933 Securities Act that was designed to protect "widows and orphans" from crooked securities dealers during the era's financial depression. Today it prevents people who make less than $200k a year or who hold liquid assets of less than $1 million from investing in a whole host of unregistered securities, including most clean-energy projects. There should to be a way for average people to invest without the need for deal-killing securities registration requirements.
Another roadblock is that most of the incentives for clean-energy development are structured as tax credits, so most potential community organizations (including non-profits like churches and schools, Native American tribes, etc.) can't take advantage of them. Because UPCS completed their project prior to the end of 2010, it can trade the tax credits for a 30% grant through the US Treasury as a result of the federal stimulus bill. However, solar projects completed after 2010 will not be able to receive the grant, reducing their financial viability.
The University Park Community Solar ran into every bureaucratic red-taped government wall and jumped over, dug under, and blew it up and changed the model. They are one of many groups across the country working to not only clean up, but also democratize energy in America, with community solar power. They're already planning a second project. We hope others follow their lead.
Written with Daniel Rosen and cross-posted from Grist.org.
Follow Billy Parish on Twitter: www.twitter.com/billyparish
FITs have been wildly successful in Europe, but totally ignored or undercut here in the US. Why? Do we really envision a future of Chevron Solar and BP Wind as a good one? These Big Energy mercenaries are wiping out entire ecosystems in the Mojave (public land!) for private profits and they are doing it WITH OUR MONEY SO THEY CAN TURN AROUND AND CHARGE US.
The other thing that is stopping us from realizing a SUSTAINABLE reality is Fannie and Freddie's corrupt maneuvers to block PACE lending which is treated as an assessment on your property taxes, even though the improvements RAISE the value of the property and LOWER the monthly overhead. Where were they when all the assessments that DON'T improve our property values were stuck onto our property tax bills???
Total fan of Solar Gardens (see www.solargardens.org) which are doing the same thing you are promoting, but if we had PACE loans and FITs, we could ALL participate, which would create twice as many jobs as Big Solar and 3 times as many as Big Wind, with all the economic benefits staying local and no dead wilderness and LOWER ENERGY BILLS for all of us.
http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/community-solar-new-model-local-ownership