More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bob Burnett

Bob Burnett

Posted: September 17, 2010 09:59 AM

Proud to Be a Liberal

What's Your Reaction:

Recent polls indicate that only twenty percent of voters describe themselves as "Liberal." I'm one of them, proud to be a Liberal.

In the run up to the midterm elections, many Democratic candidates avoid the liberal label. Some even deny the accomplishments of the 111th Congress. On Face the Nation CBS Correspondent Nancy Cordes noted, "Not only are [Democratic congressional candidates] running away from President Obama, they're running away from being Democrats." Shame on them! I'm proud of what President Obama and the Democratically-controlled Congress have done.

The Democrats' problem is not that they are too liberal, but rather that they are not liberal enough.

Robert Reich observed that embedded in the fabric of the American ethos are two hopeful stories: Liberal myths.

The Triumphant Individual "is the familiar tale of the little guy who works hard, takes risks, believes in himself, and eventually gains wealth, fame, and honor." This is the story of Abraham Lincoln and, more recently, Barack Obama. It's one of the cornerstones of American liberalism.

This narrative presumes a level playing field where every man or woman who wants to get ahead, provide a better life for themselves and their family, can do it. Liberals believe in the importance of individual responsibility, it's up to each person to take the steps necessary to move forward. Nonetheless, Liberals also support equal opportunity: an individual shouldn't be held back because of their gender, race, ethnicity, or what side of the tracks that were born on. Liberals believe that all children need to be brought up in safe households with enough food to eat and access to quality schools and medical services. We believe that government must set limits, proclaim that all Americans have inalienable rights that must be guaranteed.

Liberals believe in government as a force for good. It is the US government rather than the corporation or the church that guarantees our human rights. It is the government that levels the playing field. And it is the government that protects us against the excesses of capitalism, against those who engage in fraudulent business practices, charge excessive interest, abuse their employees, or pollute the environment. Liberals believe that the government must provide a social safety net to protect Americans' human rights.

The Benevolent Community is the second cornerstone of American liberalism. "The story of neighbors and friends who roll up their sleeves and pitch in for the common good." One of the early mottos of the United States was E Pluribus Unum, "out of many, one." Liberals believe in citizens working together to better our communities: to ensure quality schools, safe streets, comprehensive transportation and energy systems, and clean water and air.

While Liberals emphasize individual responsibility, we also promote collective action. We're in favor of unions and cooperatives. We don't believe that wealth and power should influence democratic process and we don't accept that corporations have the same rights as do individuals. We believe that a healthy public enterprise is a vital and essential part of our democracy.

The United States is struggling through the worst recession eighty years. In January of 2009, the Obama Administration intervened with a stimulus package. It was the right thing to do and kept the US from sliding into a terrible depression. Unfortunately it wasn't sufficient; the US is stuck in a flat recovery with high unemployment. Liberals contend the US needs an additional stimulus package to create jobs.

Liberals believe that all Americans have the right to a decent job paying a living wage. When the market fails, Liberals expect the government to intervene.

Meanwhile, the environment continues to deteriorate and 2010 is on track to be the hottest year ever recorded. Every day we hear news of global climate events ranging from floods to massive forest fires. Liberals believe that to protect the common good, to preserve the precious resources of the United States, we must drastically reduce our carbon consumption and take steps to remedy the environmental damage already inflicted on our communities.

On June 26, 2009, the House approved the American Clean Energy and Security Act but the GOP blocked similar legislation in the Senate. Liberals want a strengthened version of this bill passed in the 112th Congress. We believe that our children and grandchildren should live in a healthy environment.

Liberals believe in comprehensive campaign finance reform, reducing the influence of moneyed interests and lobbyists. In June the House passed campaign finance reform legislation that alleviated the impact of the Citizens United vs. FEC Supreme Court ruling; Senate Republicans blocked this legislation. Liberals want a strengthened version of this bill passed in the 112th Congress. We believe that in a Democracy each vote should carry the same weight.

These are only a few of the reasons I'm proud to be a Liberal, to stand up for values, visions, and legislation that strengthen the American dream.

I invite you all to join me: get up out of your chairs, open the window, stick your head out, and yell, "I'm proud to be a Liberal and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 77
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:43 PM on 09/23/2010
To make any difference of historic dimension liberal Democrats have to found a new political party modeled roughly on the British Liberal Democrats and seek to attract the entire "Democratic wing of the Democratic Party" into it.

Working through a Democratic Party that has become addicted to war, corporatism, extreme inequality & mass incarceration, and has since the days of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt co-increased (along with rightist Republicans) every metric of social injustice, is to be complicit with the (undeniable) neo-fascist trajectory of American society and government.

To pretend that alternations between neo-conservatives and neo-liberal pols really matter is a proven folly by now (given the negative trends in all the indicies of civilization and decency persons of goodwill care about). Because neoliberal Dems generally agree with (and certainly don't despise) cowboy capitalism and conservative values, they never discredit the rightist creed by attacking it at the root as opposed to (tepidly) at the branch. Hence, as now, neoliberals' success leads to neoconservative revivals. To paraphrase Al Gore, it's time for them (mainstream Dems) to go!

Liberal Democrats urgently need our own party. Currently we are serving as a bulwark against the very change we profess to support. Either you are a neoliberal, or a LibDem. To the latter: don't you ever get tired of being used, disrespected and governed by amoral ciphers, ie. your hawkish, opportunistic, inept, soulless mainstream neoliberal Dem inferiors?

Eric C. Jacobson
Public Interest Lawyer
Culver City, California
http://www.libdems.us
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marthamothra
11:07 AM on 09/20/2010
I, too, am proud to be a liberal, and use that label instead of "progressive." I'm proud of what liberals have accomplished throughout our history -- we have produced change in the old, stubborn, antiquated systems that kept people down. We keep working to make the principles of our American constitution, a reality. It's a long road.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skeptical Patriot
10:18 AM on 09/18/2010
The fact that you believe that gov't is a instrument of good and neighbors help neighbors sounds great but is a cotton candy version of truth. The truth is that government (Fed/local) has grown enormously over the past 30 years from 22% of GDP to 33% of GDP. It has consolidated power and money inside the beltway and become a self-serving institution made up on people that hold to power and position at all costs, run every decision through the lens of self-preservation, self-interest, partisanship and election politics, grow the functions of government continuously with no regard to measurable outcome and Never, Never, acceptable any culpability for their own actions.

Dictatorships (like Singapore) can do great good by 99% of the time, they succumb to the evils of power and self-interest. Our government, its bureaucrats and "elected" officials are no different.

The original intent was to never have more than 60K in a congressional block. Today its greater than 700K people per congressman. If you want representative government rather, bring back elected officials that represent the people rather than their interest and maybe, just maybe liberalism would work
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whoknew42
In bad times: the good go crazy, the smart go bad
08:51 PM on 09/17/2010
I'm a proud progressive liberal - and I don't care who knows it!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TRex86
Enjoying life in West Ohio
08:29 PM on 09/17/2010
I'm proud to be far to the left of liberals. Classical liberalism is great--on paper. Liberals wrung their hands during Vietnam and voted for the Iraq war. Progressives took to the streets and got our heads cracked by liberals. Liberals did welfare reform (sic.) and stuck it to poor people. Liberals backed deregulation and let Wall Street rape the country. Liberals settled for "don't ask, don't tell." Liberals took single payer and public option off the table in the rush to pass legislation that may never be implemented.

I'm with Phil Ochs: "Love me I'm a liberal." That wasn't a compliment, folks. Liberal feebleness has allowed a handful of reactionary billionaires to threaten our democracy. Liberals don't call out the Republican disaster that lies ahead. Liberals have stayed with bi-partisanship 18 months too long. Yes, progressives blew it when they voted for Nader. Criticism taken. In the long run the liberals need an infusion of resoluteness. They need to step out and articulate the issues in ways even the Republicans can understand. No more triangulation. No more Mr. Nice Guy. Get fired up or see this country go down to the plutocracy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Don't settle for less evil, demand good
08:01 AM on 09/18/2010
F & F But not sure Nader was a wrong vote in a field of corporatist free marketers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TRex86
Enjoying life in West Ohio
10:56 AM on 09/18/2010
In California the Nader vote was a protest, but in Florida it was a disaster. In hindsight, we could have thought through the implications of a 3rd party vote in a close state. Nader wasn't the only problem in 2000 of course. Florida was stolen by JEB Bush and title granted to his brother via the "states' rights affirming" Supremes. The Republicans set this up beautifully with the impeachment. They took Clinton out of the equation so that Gore lost TN and AR, either of which wins the electoral vote regardless of FL. Brilliant chess move.

Among my many puzzlements with the current administration is its diffidence. Bush lost the pop vote and was "selected," yet he acted like he had a landslide, starting with hijacking the Clinton budget surplus for his base. Here again I disdain the feckless liberals, who whimped out in the face of blatant lies and manipulation. Fear of Republican rhetoric is a pathological trait among the breed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emma richmond
08:02 PM on 09/17/2010
We are Proud to be Democratic Liberal, we are Loyal Democratics Liberals, we are people who care about people Need, we don't believe in those Blue Dog Democrat's because they are not true Democrats they Republicans Dressed in Democrats Clothes, and we have the President back even when things get Bad, we are still there, this is why we say Democrats don't hide, before I retied Our group had a Union, but you have to have a strong union that fight for his People, we even formed a Union, back to what we was going to say is People Respect you more when you stand up for yourself as long as you know it's right, you stand your grounds, most of the time you will win your cases, sure you might lose some, you don't stop, you keep charging forward, don't step back, others tools Fait, Hope and Believe in it, And Remember YES WE CAN, because everything is Possible with the Almighty GOD these are the TOOLS WE USE. We don't play with GOD. WE AS DEMOCRATS, TOGETHER WE STAND, DIVIDE WE FALL.
05:00 PM on 09/17/2010
I did my research and feel good about voting in November. I found gubernatorial, senatorial, and congressional candidates to vote for who want to cut military spending, ban corporate personhood, pass single-payer health care, restore progressive taxation, ban usury, enact a revenue-neutral carbon tax, end the expensive and violent prohibition of marijuana, fund green public works, change trade agreements to improve labor, environmental and safety standards, and pass sweeping electoral, campaign finance and anti-corruption reforms

I'm going to vote and not feel like vomiting this election. And that's a cheering prospect indeed.
04:53 PM on 09/17/2010
Mostly yes. When I talk to conservative people about the Democrats, they almost immediately (in lock step with the propagandists) play the Socialist card. It is really quite sad. I have no interest at all in the death dealing Stalinist Communists whose focus was violence and terror, not human economic equality. We in the United States do share things in common, like parks, firemen, streets, etc. Are these evil because they are socialist (common property) creations? Is Social Security inherently evil?

I have travelled extensively in Canada and France. In these more socialist countries, the people seem happier because they are more economically equal and secure. Do we in the United States insist on a Right to live in Poverty?

There are things the government does badly, and things it does well. I'm not enthused by Federal Government involvment in education. I think it is simply awful that tax dollars go to professional sports complexes. However, government involvement to ensure the minimum egalitarian standard that all Americans are adequately fed, clothed and housed would sem to be above reproach. Are we so poor that we can't afford the basics for everyone when the GDP is between $40,000 and $50,000 for every man, woman and child. The real problem is that our rich folks are so consumed by RAVENOUS GREED that they can no longer even perceive the rest of us having a right to even breathe.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
03:48 PM on 09/17/2010
McCarthy proved that America can outlaw an entire political ideology.

It's long past the time we need to put conservative ideology up on that same outlaw shelf along with communism, and disallow anything about it to ever enter into our political judgement ever again.
03:29 PM on 09/17/2010
You articulate your positions well, Mr. Burnett. Perhaps you should consider running for elected office.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
middleoftheroad
01:49 PM on 09/17/2010
"The Democrats' problem is not that they are too liberal, but rather that they are not liberal enough."

hahahahahahahahaha aha ha aha hahaha aa hahaha ha ...soda coming hahahaha out my nose..hahahahah....are you for real? You really think??? Go ask blue dogs in moderate districts where they would be?
05:01 PM on 09/17/2010
Blanche Lincoln's primary challenger polled better against Republicans than she did, but the Democratic Party spent $11 million to keep her on the ticket (and the Koch brothers threw in $18,000).

Last I heard she was down 38 points.

That Blue Dog strategy is some strategy.
12:52 PM on 09/17/2010
Let's take a stroll down memory lane.

Heading into the 2006 mid-terms, the Democrats were saying give us the House and to a lesser degree the Senate and they would stop the Bush agenda.

The country rallied to their cry where the Republicans had losses across the board and the Democrats didn't lose a single seat. We gave them the House AND Senate, and what did they do?
Caved into Bush's demands time after and time and gave excuse and excuse.

They then said, "we can't do anything without the White House."

2008 came and they were given stronger majorities in House and Senate AND the White House.

With 59 to 60 votes in the Senate, after they said they needed a filibuster proof majority, they caved yet again to the Republicans.

What excuse do you have now Democrats?

You need a majority in the Senate of 80 votes?

You need a majority in the House of 300 votes?

You need the White House to keep it from the Republicans?

What excuse do you have now?

No more excuses.

It's judgment day!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JR49
01:14 PM on 09/17/2010
Well if system is broken then it needs to be repaired...may be time for new party is coming...but not Republican Tea Party or Libertarians who are just failed Republicans and Democrats. Remember it was the same in England...two parties all the time when third party was tailing. Then came boom and now Liberal Democrats are part of their Coalition...so may be one day we'll see something similar here...for our own sake.
05:02 PM on 09/17/2010
I did my research and feel good about voting in November. I found gubernatorial, senatorial, and congressional candidates to vote for who want to cut military spending, ban corporate personhood, pass single-payer health care, restore progressive taxation, ban usury, enact a revenue-neutral carbon tax, legalize marijuana, fund green public works, change trade agreements to improve labor, environmental and safety standards, and pass sweeping electoral, campaign finance and anti-corruption reforms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TRex86
Enjoying life in West Ohio
08:36 PM on 09/17/2010
The Democrats need to match the empty slogans spewed from the right wing with clear, well articulated facts. They have turned health care reform into mush because they can't stay on message. Wall Street reform? Hash. What did we do. Sorry, but wonky jargon doesn't bring out voters. Take a page from the Republicans--only keep it factual. Moreover, honestly address the fiscal problems that lie ahead. Get real. Get honest. Read my lips, more new taxes--on the super-rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
minerva117
This space for rent. Cheap!
09:21 PM on 09/17/2010
I hate to break it to you, but even college studies showed that people who are willfully ignorant could care less about "clear, well articulated facts". You can give them absolutely solid facts and well researched ideas and they will put their noses in the air and say, no thanks!
12:48 PM on 09/17/2010
Only is this country is "liberal" a four letter words. Being from Canada "liberal" means modern, adapting with the time, and being socialy responsible. The U.S. is going back to the wild west mentality. It's conservative population is so out of touch with reality it's scary.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lipps
Capitalist Pig Taxpayer
09:25 PM on 09/17/2010
We don't care how you do it in Canada; we are talking about the US.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Don't settle for less evil, demand good
08:04 AM on 09/18/2010
Because we're no 1, except in that stupid quality of life for the People stuff.
05:49 PM on 10/27/2010
That's one of the reason why the U.S. is such in a big sh*t. Because it doesn't care what others are doing to solve problems.
12:42 PM on 09/17/2010
I read the book "Reading Lolita in Tehran" by Azar Nafisi (2003) and in this memoir of the revolution in Iran and how it affected the author, she describes a point at which both the communists and the Islamic theocrats were vying for power after the Shah was overthrown. We all know who won. However, she states that both of those groups shared a common hatred for the liberals. Considering myself a common sense liberal I felt I understood why that would be and it made me feel proud. On another note, when I look up the meaning of liberal in the dictionary it seems to largely relate to feeling comfortable with change. I recognize in myself that with new information I am open to changing my mind. The definition of conservative in the dictionary has to do with preserving. I feel that way about many things, like clean water, genetic diversity, etc. Sometimes I think the healthiest way to be is to have both sides to one's self. The trick is to know what deserves to be changed and what deserves to be preserved at any given point in time.
12:29 PM on 09/17/2010
We need more Democrats in the "Democratic wing of the Democratic party."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Don't settle for less evil, demand good
08:06 AM on 09/18/2010
There's a higher percentage of voters in that wing than candidates.