More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bob Burnett

GET UPDATES FROM Bob Burnett
 

Roll Over, Karl Marx

Posted: 06/10/11 12:31 PM ET

In 1883, Karl Marx died as an obscure philosopher, but since then he's become notorious. A 1999 BBC poll judged Marx "the thinker of the millennium" but for the last 60 years he's been infamous in America, where being called a Marxist is equivalent to being labeled a terrorist or pedophile. Despite the controversy, Marx's analysis was correct on many issues and his insights help explain America's growing economic and political divide.

Marx examined the human condition from the perspective of economics. An idealist, he emphasized "universal" principles of group dynamics. He was fascinated by class struggle and capitalism. Influenced by Hegel, Marx subscribed to the concept of inevitability and predicted that capitalism would produce class conflict causing a socialist revolution.

Marx viewed industrial society as a constant struggle between workers (the proletariat) and capitalists (the bourgeoisie). He argued that capitalism always produced a small number of rich and powerful capitalists; if not counteracted, this concentration of power inevitably caused class polarization and, ultimately, a revolution that would destroy capitalism and produce socialism.

In the US, the Great Depression produced extreme income imbalance and then class polarization. As a consequence, Marx's notion of class struggle became a hot intellectual commodity. In 1933 President Franklin Roosevelt promoted the New Deal to provide employment and address income inequality. Big business initially resisted but FDR twisted capitalist arms, warning that if they did cooperate with his reforms there would be "class warfare."

In the thirties and forties, the American Left embraced Marxist ideas, but in the fifties Communism and Marxism fell out of favor; first because of revelations about the genocidal policies of Russian dictator Joseph Stalin and then due to the "red scare" launched by Senator Joseph McCarthy. Nonetheless, income inequality gradually lessened, reaching historic lows during the Johnson Administration.

Since 1968 income inequality has increased, reaching a historic high in 2007 (the last year reported). As a consequence, the United States is again confronted with class polarization.

The Great Recession has produced extreme income imbalance and devastated the middle class. Nonetheless, despite Karl Marx' dire prediction, it's unlikely the US will witness class warfare.

American capitalists have gained the political upper hand while workers are disorganized and dispirited. Several factors that Marx did not anticipate have produced this imbalance. First, there's an additional actor in the socio-political drama: multinational corporations. While the key principles of modern corporations emerged during his lifetime -- limited liability and corporate personhood -- Marx did not anticipate that corporations would grow stronger, while unions would not.

Second, corporations and wealthy individuals heavily influence the American political process either directly through political contributions or indirectly by managing the dominant narrative -- because of their control of the mainstream media. American workers don't have a strong alternate voice.

Third, starting in 1971 with the Lewis Powell memorandum, capitalists set in motion a comprehensive, well-funded strategy to enhance their power. This included public relations to improve the image of corporations and executives, as well as "disinformation campaigns" about the consequences of corporate policies such as union busting and pollution. Since 1981, at the start of the Reagan presidency, capitalist economic ideology has dominated American political discourse with three malignant notions: helping the rich get richer would inevitably help everyone else, "a rising tide lifts all boats;" markets are inherently self correcting and there is no need for government regulation; and the US does not need an economic strategy because that's a natural consequence of the free market. The consequences were devastating to workers, the environment, and the American economy. Millions of good jobs were shipped overseas and worker wages became stagnant.

Fourth, capitalists attacked unions and their membership decreased from a high of 32.5 percent of the workforce to a 2010 low of 11.9 percent. (The attack on collective bargaining agreements in Wisconsin and other states is the latest chapter in this campaign.) In parallel, capitalists distracted workers with fundamentalist religion, emphasizing social issues such as abortion to divert attention from poor wages and living conditions.

Finally, if Karl Marx were alive today, he'd observe that in America the Republican Party is the political arm of capitalists but there is no comparable vehicle for the concerns of workers -- whereas in European countries there are Labor or Social Democrat political parties to represent the proletariat. Since World War II the Democratic Party has become a centrist Party, "capitalism lite." Because of the obscene amounts of money involved in American politics, Democrats have found it increasingly difficult to take a hard line on capitalism. That's why, with the exception of Senator Bernie Sanders and a handful of other brave Congresspeople, workers have no consistent voice in the American political process.

Marx was half right. Unfettered capitalism has promoted class polarization in the US. But it's far from inevitable that this will produce class conflict, revolution, and a new social order. American workers are too weak and disorganized.

Karl Marx is rolling over in his grave.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 876
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
photo
GoodbyeRubyTuesday
Daring Denouncer of Dominionists
05:16 PM on 06/13/2011
4 comments from today?
What happened to my comment?
08:50 AM on 06/13/2011
You seem to have left out some of Marx ideas. What happens if socialism takes over. It is a system that is doomed for failure. When a person learns he/she will recieve as much for doing nothing as working which will they choose? As countries inact more intittlement programs the unemployement rate increases. As union get more control and lose the idea they are representative opf the workers and want to run the businesses and the country both fail. Marx believes this to be a circle as one will keep replacing the other. Myself I still like the founding fathers idea more. A governemnt of the people for the people by the people. Reduce the role and scope of federal government and give it back to the states.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcus1
Trickledownscam
10:09 AM on 06/13/2011
You fail to look at the world around you. Sweden is a society that is 75% unionized along with many other countries such as Finland, Norway,Canada and Germany at a lesser extent at 60%. Most of these counties have universal health care, lower unemployment, much lower poverty along with a a large host of very healthy entitlement programs for the all their citizens. They are not ideologically driven to do things , they simply do whats best for their citizens. Therefore we have many fine examples of mixed economies which incorporate socialism and use capitilism where it works best.
On the other hand I do not see , anywhere in the world where there are purely capitilist models that take care of all of citizens the way the mixed economies of the world do.
mataylor16
You all want it one way. But, its the other way. -
01:51 PM on 06/16/2011
Nothing which is supported and wanted by the people is ever doomed to failure. Quite the contrary in fact. Right now, people want our form of Capitalism. Its obvious for all to see that it has major holes in it, but it is at least for now, wanted and supported, and the problems are ignored. And another thing, the founding fathers were not gods, they were men. And thier ideas were primarily political/philosophical. Marx is far more pragmatic, and much more of a materialist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
08:16 AM on 06/13/2011
The GOP is pitting worker against worker and, at times, it is an effective strategy. It will take time for the non-union worker to realize that Union workers are not 'blessed' with above average benefits and wages but that the Union worker is receiving what all American workers should demand. Argument is that America's businesses would then move overseas if the cost of production should rise thus taking away profits. Maybe yes and maybe no. But what good is an America where the average worker receives no more than minimum wage? If that takes place, where will the wealthy find consumers? Certainly not here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
08:08 AM on 06/13/2011
"Karl Marx is rolling over in his grave."

He's rolling over in his grave and he's also saying, "I told you so."
photo
quorthon
Big government IS the answer!
11:52 PM on 06/12/2011
Capitalism will die not because the working class will wise up and overthrow their oppressors, but simply because we will run out of resources, i.e. environmental exhaustion. We are then confronted by two choices: nasty atavistic theo-plutarchy as advocated by the GOP/Tea Party, or something truly sustainable and equitable. Hopefully it will be the latter, but don't 'bank' on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph LeCompte
The USA isnt broke.It was robbed.
03:48 PM on 06/12/2011
The power of money trumps the power of democracy today. The GOP worships Capitalism and hates Democracy. Democrats are only a few years behind the GOP.
01:29 PM on 06/12/2011
Maybe it is time to revisit Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto of 1848, and Das Kapital in 1867, to remind ourselves of the motivation for the blood spilled for 80 years that almost eliminated the income discrepancy by the late 1940s/early 1950s before the counter attack on workers by the rich Capitalists under Nixon and then Reagan.

Das Kapital - http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Das_Kapital
The Communist Manifesto - http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Das_Kapital

"Marx examined the human condition from the perspective of economics. An idealist, he emphasized "universal" principles of group dynamics. He was fascinated by class struggle and capitalism. Influenced by Hegel, Marx subscribed to the concept of inevitability and predicted that capitalism would produce class conflict causing a socialist revolution.

Marx viewed industrial society as a constant struggle between workers (the proletariat) and capitalists (the bourgeoisie). He argued that capitalism always produced a small number of rich and powerful capitalists; if not counteracted, this concentration of power inevitably caused class polarization and, ultimately, a revolution that would destroy capitalism and produce socialism."
01:39 PM on 06/12/2011
oops

Should be:

The Communist Manifesto - http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
01:47 PM on 06/12/2011
Hayek is the new Marx... his ideas are way better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nunnenj
Einstein, disguised as Robin Hood
01:28 PM on 06/12/2011
Well said and I agree completely. Those in power (the wealthy) have managed to make workers with decent benefits the enemy of the masses. Instead of striving for better wages and better conditions, the public at large demands that union workers should be forced to have low wages and sub-standard benefits, just like them. Pretty soon, corporations will have leveled the playing field and we will be earning wages just like those in third world countries.
01:04 PM on 06/12/2011
The revolution will not come from the workers, revolutions come from a disappointed middle class. All the educated young people who can't find jobs, that's what will fuel revolution in this country, plus all the decimated middle class middle aged people and older people who are watching the oligarchs destroy their safety nets. Marx was only wrong about putting too much faith in the peasants and working class...it's those who have lost everything, who once had a bright future who become angry enough and desperate enough to rise up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Left-Populist
New Deal Dems are still here and won't be silent
05:23 AM on 06/13/2011
I seriously doubt that. Nobody is going to start a bloody revolution in where millions die because they can't get a bigger house and have to settle on a 50k a year job.
photo
Rus Viking
"The opposite of courage, is conformity."
09:43 AM on 06/12/2011
The reason for stagnation of wages and class polarization.

Demographics.

The number of women (10's of Millions.) that have entered the work force since 1960 has flooded the worker pool to overflowing. And, by their own admission they allow themselves to be paid .70 cents on the $1.00 and work extra hours for free. Add 10~20 Million 'Illegal' Migrant workers who work for .50 on the $1.00 and 'Voila!!! you have stagnated and even depressed wages, despite increased productivity.

There! That was easy!

No plots. No conspiracies. Just simple whole numbers. (Integers, for you pedantic progressives.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:06 PM on 06/12/2011
No, the reduction in wages has been the result of corporate leveraging against developing world labor. The massive shift of wealth to the top shows us where the capital generated by all labor has gone. Women are simply more exploited than men doing similar work for the same reasons; greed and a disconnect between economic theory and the human condition.

The Norquist doctrine and ALEC lay out the strategy of bankrupting the commons by shifting tax burdens from corporations and the rich to the middle class and poor; under the certainty that declining wages would tank tax receipts and force privatization. That makes society a jungle where any stunted mind like Trump and Palin can escape their developmental status with the false rank of wealth. Therein is the existential/psychological attraction to right wing ideology by underdeveloped people. Its also the source of ecological degradation, anthropogenic climate change, inequity, disparity and systemic social dysfunction.
photo
Rus Viking
"The opposite of courage, is conformity."
01:31 PM on 06/12/2011
"No, the reduction in wages has been the result of corporate leveraging against developing world labor. "

As in, U.S. Women entering the workforce by the 10's of Millions!

Demographics.

Thanx for making my point.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:38 PM on 06/12/2011
I have not made your point; I've assigned blame to those who received the wealth labor generated. That wealth is far more than is required to pay living wages to all workers. So contrary to your deflecting, the source of social dysfunction is greed on the part of corporations and the absurdly rich. That they use an expanding labor pool to drive wages down below equity is not ethical or moral; its pathological.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
01:45 PM on 06/12/2011
You promote greed in government. This is far worse than greed in the private sector.
photo
Rus Viking
"The opposite of courage, is conformity."
02:22 PM on 06/12/2011
By your own admission wealth is a 'false rank' Yet, you use this as a yard marker to gauge the supposed inequity in this country. The poorest of the poor in America have access to wealth that was inconceivable 50 years ago. More food, better food. More education, better education. More technology, better technology....More of everything you could possibly want. All the result of Capitalism.

What is actually 'pathological' is the Left's insistence that the 'worker' has no responsibility in the current construct and more Government involvement is needed to insure your demented view of 'Justice'

See: Learned Helplessness, Seligman

http://thehistoryofpsychology.blogspot.com/2010/12/martin-seligman-learned-helplessness.html

There's your true 'Conspiracy'!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
07:35 AM on 06/12/2011
Ironically, marx's prediction may come to pass sooner rather than later as a result of the naked power grab by capitalists. when you take away labor's capacity to feed their families AND deny them any political or social power to alleviate the situation through social means, you create a situation ripe for anger and rebellion. People will not go quietly into starvation and unabated misery. If they must, they will fight for the right to survive. Capitalism will likely collapse very soon under the weight of its own greed and cruelty. We're probably witnessing the first wave of that collapse right here, right now.
08:59 PM on 06/11/2011
great article the working familys need a voice . time for a knew workingmans party a party of the workingman by the workingman and for the workingman.ALL WORKING MEN MUST UNITE!!!!!!
photo
Rus Viking
"The opposite of courage, is conformity."
09:58 AM on 06/12/2011
To be exploited by the corrupt Union Bosses?

No!

ALL WORKING MEN MUST 'INDIVIDUALIZE' !!!!!!!!!!

Little BOYS join gangs when they are afraid of the big, scary World around them.
(See Government, Unions, Gangs, etc...)

Grown MEN set out on their own as individuals to make their mark on the World.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:07 PM on 06/12/2011
Unions secure only modest middle class wages and benefits. If you demand more than this from the social contract you have no ethical standing to condemn unions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph LeCompte
The USA isnt broke.It was robbed.
03:52 PM on 06/12/2011
Then why do they give millions to the Chamber of Commerce and Buy up every politician they can find? They buy favors from Congress and buy up tax breaks from congress then use the money saved to buy up some more influence.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
08:09 PM on 06/11/2011
"The 5000 Year Leap" by W. Cleon Skousen. http://www.amazon.com/5000-Year-Leap-Original-Authorized/dp/0880801484
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randolph Greer
I am a Poet .
06:08 PM on 06/11/2011
Mr. Burnett has written his column too late or too soon. My guess is that he wrote this column just after the November elections. Since then, I assume he has not been paying attention to the world news. Virtually all of it is a contradiction of his central theme that no revolution is in the cards. It is obvious, or should be, that all the Arab revolutions have a large economic and socialist component. In addition to that, here in America, the citizens of Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Maine, Indiana, and other states have seen and felt, for the very first time, the direct connection between the Republican Party and corporate corruption and subversion of the lives of the middle class. In other words, people all over the world are "GETTING IT."Not just what is happening, but who is to blame for it. Now, admittedly, there is some way to go. These things will take some time. But one thing is certain. Either there is going to be a gradual, peaceful revolution in America or there will be such a store of powder built up that it will explode in a violent one. Frankly, I don't know which it will be. But that will be determined by the people, not the multi-nationals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Shook
02:57 AM on 06/13/2011
Randolph,

The revolution may turn out to be peaceful, but it is not going to be gradual. That's the missing part of the puzzle that no one of any weight is talking about on any side of the political/economic divides. The cheap fossil fuel energy lifeblood of our complex, wealthy civilization is going into decline and all this talk by anyone of a return to growth is nothing but wishful thinking.

Our economy and every economy on the globe is headed for contraction as far as the eye can see into the future and it's not even a blip in the national conversation yet. It's just too frightening for hardly anyone to contemplate. If it hasn't already started, it will in the next few years. Then we will see what we are made of when oil is either too expensive for the bulk of us and/or is rationed like we have never seen rationing before.

We'll have reductions in oil output of 3-5% each year. It doesn't sound like much, but think Arab Oil Embargo that never ends and only gets worse. This is one crackpot who fervently hopes that we have enough sense to help each other cushion the fall. The only way to do that is through government policy and intervention.

The only good thing about it is that it will have the greatest effect on those institutions that depend the most on cheap energy. Can you say, "The Military and Multi-National Corporations?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
05:51 PM on 06/11/2011
The key to this is the "American Dream." If the things that were being done to the middle and lower class were being done anywhere else (see Egypt), it would erupt in revolution,but here we are sold a bill of goods that one day we will be the powerful, rich, industrialist. Because of organizations like Faux News, a whole portion of our country will vote against the people's interest, and for big business, because they feel that any day, they will hit their own personal lottery, and one day be on top. Unfortunately, this is not what is happening, but instead, we have working class people, turning on other working class people, and siding with the corporations over their fellow man, and actively fighting to allow the companies to continue depressing the population in the pursuit of profit.

(I just had a talk with one of my co-workers about how Mitt Romney used to dismantle companies and lay off workers for a profit. His response was straight out of the Limbaugh play book. Unions are ruining this country. Poor people caused the financial crisis. Outsourcing is good. Anyone who doesn't like their job can get a new one! The free market will correct everything. The government is bad. 99ers are lazy, they don't want to get jobs. Everything should be privitized. Its disturbing how many people have their blinders on)