iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bob Cesca

Bob Cesca

Posted: November 3, 2010 06:58 PM

There are a variety of explanations for the frustratingly backwards outcome of yesterday's election.

Clearly Americans were dissatisfied with the objective reality that the Obama administration and the congressional Democrats actually made things better by cutting the deficit by an historic $122 billion; creating upwards of three million new jobs; ending the war in Iraq; passing the largest middle class tax cut in history; and rescuing the economy from the brink of collapse. Not good enough, obviously.

Or did voters simply not know about these accomplishments? That's entirely possible given the Democratic Party's uncanny penchant for running away from its successes, while also fumbling very basic add-water-and-serve marketing chores. (And, by the way, adding to the party's failures to ballyhoo its accomplishments, the progressive movement was systematically out-hustled, out-gunned and outmaneuvered for much of the last two years.)

Of course there's also the Flailing Rage Factor, which I tend to favor as a reason for yesterday's outcome more than ignorance or lack of Democratic marketing chops. For two years now, Americans have been incited by fakery and horror stories to the point of being pumped up into a 'roid raging mob chanting shallow platitudes and bumper sticker zingers -- incoherently attacking Speaker Pelosi's face, and bent out of shape by the fact that there's not a doddering old white guy stumbling through the West Wing spinning grandfatherly yarns about American mornings and saintly cowboys.

Ultimately, what Americans voted for yesterday was divided government, which admittedly isn't new in American politics. We typically like the idea of two sides, Congress and the White House, locking horns and ultimately compromising on the important matters of the day.

Unfortunately, this is a "pre-01/20/09" mindset. It's a mass delusion based on antiquated political attitudes.

The era when Republicans would, at least reluctantly, compromise with a Democratic president is long gone.

What voters unknowingly asked for yesterday was gridlock: immovable, unprecedented, insufferable gridlock of the worst kind, and at the worst time imaginable.

The Republicans have no intention of handing the president any successes. They'll never in a million years compromise with this White House, or the Senate Democrats for that matter, because any move in that direction will bring down the loud, screechy tweet wrath of Sarah Palin and the Tea Party who will neither accept nor support anyone who appears to be leaning in the direction of the Obama agenda.

How do I know this? There's two years of precedent, naturally -- and the Republicans weren't even the majority party in the House during that time. They voted against anything and everything that came down the line, regardless of how politically awful it looked (health care for 9/11 workers, bonuses for the troops, etc.). Now imagine what they're going to accomplishment in the name of "Hell No You Can't!" now that they enjoy a decent majority in the House and a narrow minority in the Senate.

Now that they're in control of appropriations and all House legislation, they'll only take up business the president would never in a million years sign into law, because as soon as he signs a bill, any bill, it becomes a win for the White House. A victory, however minor, that the president would be able to campaign on in 2012. Consequently, the Republican Party and its Tea Party base will only deliver far-right crap on a stick, with deceptive names and semi-hidden, unacceptable amendments that will make the legislation instant veto fodder.

So it's difficult to imagine a scenario whereby anything gets done from January 2011 through, at least, January 2013.

Strike that.

Yesterday's election launched America headlong across the zero barrier of the Darrell Issa Decade. Welcome, my friends, to the suck that never ends. Let the cartoons begin!

Brace yourself for a wide variety of investigations designed to slowly fester into an all out impeachment necrosis. The Republicans will absolutely investigate ACORN, those two Black Panther guys in Philadelphia, birth certificates, Joe Sestak's (unpaid) job offer, the oil spill response, the tax records of anyone even remotely associated with the White House and, for good measure, I'll go out on a McCarthy limb and predict another congressional witch hunt for commies, with maybe even a bonus witch hunt for Muslim evildoers, in the Obama government.

The cable news media will enjoy this thoroughly. And by "enjoy" I mean "inject it into its bloodstream like black tar heroin laced with permanent orgasms." And we can all rest assured knowing that, with a few obvious exceptions (Maddow, Olbermann), the coverage will be framed with advantage Issa.

Oh, and did I mention the inevitable government shutdown? Just wait until the House attempts to de-fund health-care reform in the next budget and, predictably, the president refuses to sign it. The government will shut down and all of those anti-government-health-care, anti-socialism retirees stop receiving their Social Security checks and Medicare reimbursement checks. And why? Who knows. They'll tell you something about "freedom" and "slavery" and trail off when they begin to slowly realize that they can't pay the bills that month because they elected a Congress that would rather torment the president than actually accomplish the business of governing.

See, unlike the Democratic Party -- and the pre-Bush-era Republican Party for that matter -- the modern Republican Party, driven by the contradictory memes of the Tea Party movement, doesn't require or seek legislative success to thrive as long as there's fear, inchoate rage and a mega-funded media apparatus (Fox News and talk radio) to spread the nonsense far and wide. So why bother digging into the ugly business of compromise with the other side? There's no need. The total lack of legislative accomplishment can simply be masked over with loud noises and sloganeering aimed at blaming, you know, the black guy.

Again, how do I know? The strategy paid off bigtime yesterday.

One final thought: I wonder if this will help to ameliorate a slow growth economy. Don't bet on it.

Listen to the Bob & Elvis Show, with Bob Cesca and Elvis Dingeldein, on iTunes.
Bob Cesca's Awesome Blog! Go!

 
 
 

Follow Bob Cesca on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bobcesca_go

There are a variety of explanations for the frustratingly backwards outcome of yesterday's election. Clearly Americans were dissatisfied with the objective reality that the Obama administration and ...
There are a variety of explanations for the frustratingly backwards outcome of yesterday's election. Clearly Americans were dissatisfied with the objective reality that the Obama administration and ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,033
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
01:55 PM on 11/16/2010
"Clearly Americans were dissatisfied with the objective reality that the Obama administration and the congressional Democrats actually made things better by cutting the deficit by an historic $122 billion; creating upwards of three million new jobs; ending the war in Iraq; passing the largest middle class tax cut in history; and rescuing the economy from the brink of collapse. Not good enough, obviously"

Tell me why with all this having happened, we couldn't get DEMOCRATS out to vote. That's what killed us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mitsie
07:51 PM on 11/14/2010
I have tried to figure out why the voters voted the way they did. Actually I was wrong and want to set the record straight. First of all, I didn't believe the polls, I felt that the media were depending on them to much, to the extent I have to wonder if people voted the way the polls were going? I can't make any sense why any voter would vote in the far right Republicans, when they're already going to try to keep the Republican caucas and it's members towing the line. Now that should be interesting.

On one issue I think I'm right, that all we'll see is a replay of the nineties, when they tried to impeach President Clinton. I remember that gov. shutdown, I was laid off as a nurse with the VA, now that makes alot of sense right? At that time, I supported the President, and now I have a letter from President Clinton on my wall, he wrote me and thanked me for supporting him.

If people think D.C. is broken, just wait until they start hearing, of hearing after hearing........Nothing with get done with tanning boy, trying ever way he can to block President Obama from being reelected. I hope the far left, and even some moderate Demcrats and Independants, wake up and realize if we get some far right President in charge, and in the Congress, our medicare, social security, VA etc are in jeopardy. We better find the highest mountain
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edlindaspy
God Bless America
01:05 PM on 11/14/2010
Democrats need to call their bluff...as far as getting anything done in the next two years,,the tea party supposedly is watching so they say,,they are a do nothing government,,,they will be voted out,,and the first one they will go after is McConnell,,,If they don't, they have no gonads,,,

They start investigations in to these frivolous issues,,then the democrats better go after those who outed a CIA agent,,get Bush for torture,,and for going into war illegally,,this book of his might of been his own demise.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
01:56 PM on 11/16/2010
Too bad. Old news.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:52 PM on 11/10/2010
Great article, thank you.
05:03 PM on 11/09/2010
Good Point!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cowboylove
03:38 PM on 11/08/2010
The people have spoken and given us an evenly divided government. In swing districts, winners only won by between about 1100 and 5000 votes. This is not a huge change election. It is a "by the skin of their teeth" election. In dividing so close to down the middle the American people are saying work together for compromise, not do it all the Republican way. The thing they want? Lower unemployment. Period. That was the message. If the republicans work on other stuff, and sacrifice jobs, they will be out in two years in huge numbers.
12:12 PM on 11/08/2010
Sheep. Lemmings. Attention span of a spoon. So disappointing.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Helloise
Healthy skeptic admires reason, trusts intuition
11:14 AM on 11/08/2010
That's what the politicians want. As far as I can see the voters just chose "the other guy", whomever he or she might have been. I think we should officially change the name tr olls to moles, buried or unearthed, they still can't see.
06:07 AM on 11/08/2010
Only the Demos can cause the problems. The Republicans won.
If there is a gridlock the Demos will have caused it.
The people have spoken the office holders are servants of the People.
Opposition to the People is a job loss in 2012 to the office holder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cowboylove
03:36 PM on 11/08/2010
The people have spoken and given us an evenly divided government. In swing districts, winners only won by between about 1100 and 5000 votes. This is not a huge change election. It is a "by the skin of their teeth" election. In dividing so close to down the middle the American people are saying work together for compromise, not do it all the Republican way. The thing they want? Lower unemployment. Period. That was the message.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:31 PM on 11/07/2010
No need to worry, we still have the same bankers and military running things from behind the curtain. More of the same.
09:59 PM on 11/07/2010
I hope this article is right about gridlock -- it's the best we can hope for. But watching so much pre-negotiation capitulation by the Democrats while they were (allegedly) in power doesn't fill me with confidence that they will grow spines now. Already Obama and Reid have been telegraphing their weakness.
09:14 PM on 11/07/2010
Sounds good to me, at least until we can get rid of the rest of the liberal brainmulch in 2012..
07:24 PM on 11/07/2010
And there you have it, right at the end....race bait.

Bob, you are getter extremely predictable.
09:17 PM on 11/07/2010
They're like lemmings, "Huffpo Lemmings"-------- The only thing missing is "Four legs good----Two Legs Bad"
02:07 PM on 11/17/2010
Not race baiting, just the facts JJ889. Most of us are wise, educated and living the realities Bob outlined. And thank goodness some whites aren't hesitant about facing and writing about this truth. Racism has held back our countries progress on so many levels it's nice to not be denied or looked at as being "too sensitive". Need some real facts, check out our education system since 1955 Brown vs the Board of Education or the pay scale for women when they were the largest body of teachers. All of our children live in a country that has provided the template to China, India and Japan and yet we are falling behind in technology, math, science and language training in our elementary and secondary institutions. The reason? Racism + Sexism= White male supremacy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
06:13 PM on 11/07/2010
Two things: 1. We didn't "unknowingly" vote for anything. We knew exactly what we were doing and we like gridlock, investigations and shutdown. 2. If Obama chooses to veto the appropriations bills because we didn't let him spend enough money, he and he alone is responsible for any shutdown that results. This is not a negotiation; it is an ultimatum.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:37 PM on 11/07/2010
Spoken like a true republian....go figure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:38 PM on 11/07/2010
"republican"....
04:02 PM on 11/07/2010
Gridlock will hurt short term but maybe the old white haired people need to know that the fisical conservatives that have been railing against adding to the debt, need to explain how the tax cuts won't add to the debt. Hold them to the fire. Make them explaine HOW THEY WILL PAY FOR IT........... They won't have an answer. Then keep asking them over and over and over, on every talk, news show out there. Finally the hard-headed people will get it. They don't want to give tax cuts to the rich and will demand a vote against it. If they don't fund healthcare, then shut down must take place as well. It is deficit neutral therefore it must pass. Grow and back bone and stand tall and fight for once.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
07:04 PM on 11/07/2010
Give that 'fiscal conservative' line a rest.
The more 'fiscally conservative' our legislators, the deeper the nation spirals into debt. Back in 2000 America was the strongest, most respected country on earth with full employment and a budget surplus. The the 'fiscal conservatives' got into the WH via judicial coup. Eight straight years of running the show exactly how they wanted, with the added disaster of NAFTA, and look at the result.
10:46 PM on 11/07/2010
Bush was far from a 'fiscal conservative'...