iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bob Dinneen

Bob Dinneen

Posted: February 4, 2010 06:42 PM

New Biofuels Strategy and EPA Policy: Promote Clean Energy & Green Jobs

What's Your Reaction:

With two important policy announcements, the Obama Administration is putting the nation on track to increase its production and use of clean-burning, American-made biofuels.

That's good news for all Americans who care about protecting the environment, combating climate change, generating good-paying jobs, reviving rural communities, and reducing our dependence on imported petroleum.

With its new biofuels strategy announced February 3, the Administration is right on target in four important ways.

First, the strategy recognizes the importance of setting a bold national goal, similar to President Kennedy's call to put a man on the moon. Thus, the Administration is recommitting the nation to the goal mandated by Congress in the 2007 energy bill - producing and using 36 billion gallons of biofuels by 2022.

Second, the Administration understands that the nation needs every proven or promising biofuels technology, from existing corn ethanol to the newer cellulosic (non-grain-based) technologies and the most visionary "next generation" technologies. New or old, we need them all. Yes, it is essential that all the newer technologies - from those closest to fruition to those that are still years from commercialization - have every opportunity to succeed.

But the strategy also recognizes that it would be premature to abandon near-commercial technologies, such as cellulosic ethanol, in favor of "drop in" fuels that are still years away. One renewable fuel need not be cannibalized for other technologies to succeed.

Third, the Administration is addressing the concerns about federal loan guarantee programs that are being raised by cellulosic and next generation ethanol technology programs. The national recession and the financial crisis have made it more difficult for every industry, including biofuels, to obtain the capital and credit that are the lifeblood of the economy. The loan guarantee programs must be made to work for cellulosic ethanol producers if this plan is to succeed and its goals to be achieved.

Fourth, this plan rightly recognizes that producing and using American-made biofuels such as ethanol is essential to generating good-paying jobs and taking charge of America's energy future.

The U.S. ethanol industry supports almost 400,000 jobs, providing a strong economic base for many rural communities. According to the 2010 U.S. Ethanol Industry Salary study, nearly 75% of ethanol industry employees earn more than $50,000 a year, and 99% receive healthcare benefits from their employers.

As President Obama understands, supporting the U.S. biofuels industry isn't only good energy policy and good environmental policy. It's also good economic policy, good job-creating policy, good healthcare policy, and good rural development policy.

To add to the good news, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued its final rule for implementing the Renewable Fuels Standard that under-girds the national goal of producing and using 36 billion gallons of biofuels.

Among other provisions, the Renewable Fuels Standard will set mandatory blend levels for renewable fuels in all motor fuels. Also, it will create a framework for calculating the carbon reductions achieved by biofuels.

EPA is right when it declares that ethanol from all sources - grain-based, cellulosic, and the newest technologies - provides significant greenhouse gas reductions, compared to gasoline. According to EPA's modeling, corn-based ethanol achieves a 21% greenhouse gas reduction, while cellulosic ethanol achieves a reduction of 73-130%, depending upon feedstock and conversion processes. All these greenhouse gas reductions exceed those mandated by the existing Renewable Fuels Standard.

However, there's still one pitfall in the EPA's modeling. The 21% greenhouse gas reduction results when the unproven idea of "international indirect land use change" is included in the calculation. Without this dubious concept - which holds that the production of corn-based ethanol in the U.S. results in the destruction of rainforests elsewhere in the world - this biofuel would be credited with a 52% greenhouse gas reduction.

Nonetheless, the EPA has developed a workable program that will achieve the fossil fuel replacement goals outlined in the national energy legislation and embraced by the Obama Administration. With public policies moving forward on the right track, America can continue the journey from dirty fossil fuels to cleaner alternative fuels from all sources.

 

Follow Bob Dinneen on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ethanolbob

With two important policy announcements, the Obama Administration is putting the nation on track to increase its production and use of clean-burning, American-made biofuels. That's good news for all ...
With two important policy announcements, the Obama Administration is putting the nation on track to increase its production and use of clean-burning, American-made biofuels. That's good news for all ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:57 PM on 02/11/2010
I think that the US accounting for land-use changes is so important to set the bar higher for the environmental performance of biofuels. This is a move forward for a greener, responsible, economy. I found some great information at www.greencollareconomy.com and they also have a great directory for businesses at www.greencollareconomy.com/Green_Directory/green-building
08:25 PM on 02/11/2010
The EPA's new regulations are a step in the right direction, but the problem is that there are thousands of miles to go. Corn ethanol is not a solution and anyone should be able to see that from looking at the EPA's own calculations about Ethanol's green house gas reductions. After all, it takes 33 years just to break even on emissions when you take the entire life cycle into account. Here is a good article that talks about it from The Greener Truth
http://thegreenertruth.com/2010/02/the-ethanol-life-cycle/
08:05 PM on 02/08/2010
Great news from the EPA. Expanding RFS to 36 billion gallons by 2022 will take America’s fuel production and consumption green. Let’s hope the Obama administration supports the EPA with more funding and the biofuels industry with more tax credits, stimulus money, and job creation.

Researching how to make your company, product, or next project more Green? Go to http://www.greencollareconomy.com for sustainability white papers and the largest b2b green directory on the web.
12:18 AM on 02/08/2010
Ethanol has been a joke. It's wasted huge amounts of money the federal government doesn't have too promote a fuel that is barely on the plus side as a source of energy and that has a carbon footprint at least as bad as gasoline. The stuff only gets 70 percent of the fuel economy of gas and now we have a mandate to use more ethanol than that US fuel system can absorb with Government Motors and the other car companies voiding their warranties. Going green fine, but ethanol is as bogus as it comes in that regard.
11:30 PM on 02/07/2010
hemp can be the cure to many problems we face,but continued propaganda from big oil ,forestry & big agg. throws a wet blanket on progress. not to mention it is still illegal to grow in the U.S., thanks to William Randolph Hearst. that law has to be overturned now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
01:59 PM on 02/06/2010
We need HEMP LEGALIZED we need our big rigs running 20% hemp diesel in 2 years.
Just replace half the corn&soy grown with hemp and you will have a huge amount of hemp diesel.

Soy oil 74 gallons per acre.
Canola 133 gallons per acre
Hemp 1,000 gallons per acre.

And you still have the seeds for animal feed and lots of fiber leftover too.
photo
TakeSake
The United States for All Americans
01:36 AM on 02/07/2010
Ethanol is a solution to the problem of too much corn production. It isn't a practical solution to replace oil. Other technologies can fulfill that role, some available now, some available later. Clearly, hemp is the most glaring solution for this. Besides, the other products from hemp are completely usable. Additionally, the fertilizer and pesticide load is so much lower.

A biofuel program without hemp ignores the best tool for the job.
05:46 PM on 02/05/2010
If we switch to 100% corn ethanol auto fuel how much corn would be left for livestock and people? Where would that corn come from? There is nothing dubious about assessing the true environmental cost of a decision. Your effort to greenwash the product your do PR for only makes me less supportive of the idea, though I realize that in our political system it doesn't matter what I think.
09:51 PM on 02/04/2010
I'm not a huge fan of using ethanol in an internal combustion engine. There are serious issues with cancer-causing emissions.

http://gas2.org/2009/12/14/study-finds-ethanol-use-increases-ozone-and-carcinogen-pollution/

However, if you put that ethanol into a fuel cell electric car - well, then you're talking clean, renewable transportation!

http://running_on_alcohol.tripod.com/id30.html