That NIE: Does it Signal a U.S.-Iranian Thaw?

Like sly foxes watching the trapper step into his own trap, European diplomats are saying that the release of the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran won't change anything. They will, they said, continue to work for stronger sanctions against Iran both at the United Nations and unilaterally, to pressure Iran to halt its nuclear research. "The NIE has created a lot of noise in Washington. It's created less noise in our capitals," said Neil Crompton, a top British diplomat in Washington, speaking at a forum organized by the pro-Israeli thinktank, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. But in fact, the NIE changes everything, and Israeli officials told the Jerusalem Post as much. It takes the war option off the table, and in so doing it leaves European-style diplomacy as the only remaining option.

Diplomacy, yes. But don't hold your breath for any sort of strong sanctions. It already appears as if the United States has agreed to postpone the UN Security Council debate on Iran into sometime in early 2008, if it occurs at all. One U.S. official, quoted in the Jerusalem Post, implied that the Europeans were simply confused by the release of the NIE. He said that the European reaction to the NIE is "dumfoundedness," adding: "They don't understand how the American government could be as incompetent as it seems." But it's not a question of incompetence at all. Instead, it's a public sign of the private divisions within the Bush administration. My own suspicion is that Europeans know exactly what is going on: that the more dovish elements in the American national security community brilliantly outflanked the hawks, and it's game over. If there is any incompetence at all, it is entirely within the White House, which found itself incapable of either halting, watering down, or covering up the NIE's conclusions.

So far, criticism of the NIE in the United States has been confined to near-apoplectic responses from the usual suspects: neoconservatives, right-wingers in Israeli intelligence circles, the Wall Street Journal and the Weekly Standard, and others of that ilk, along with Henry Kissinger's chin-stroking op-ed in the Washington Post. A few Republican members of Congress (read: Senator John Ensign, the Nevada gambling king) are calling for a Team B-style commission of inquiry to challenge the NIE, but that's not likely - in part because they'd collide with the White House itself, which had no choice but to endorse the NIE and then try to spin it, once it was out.

An unintentionally humorous response came from Pete Hoekstra, the ranking Republican on the House intelligence committee, who disparaged the very community he helps oversee. "It has been met with great skepticism by people with better intelligence than we have . . . who have proven sources," he said. Perhaps Hoekstra ought to chair the Knesset's oversight committee, if he feels that strongly about it. In fact, the NIE, which ran more than a hundred pages and had more than a hundred separate footnotes involving classified sources, seems to have had "proven sources" galore. But Hoekstra doesn't think so.

The Republicans running for president, who've largely shut up about Iraq (because the war is so unpopular), may now have to shut up about Iran, too. Rudy Giuliani, perhaps the most war-mongering of the GOP field (thanks in part to Norman Podhoretz, his Iran adviser), is still warning that all-options-are-on-the-table, but he stuttered when trying to go further. "If it's true, if it's correct, if it's accurate, and they warn us it may not be--but if it is, then it shows Iran is susceptible to heavy pressure, because in 2003 there was heavy pressure on Iran," said Giuliani. What he didn't say, of course, is that between 2001 and 2003 Iran had cooperated with the United States in Afghanistan, helped the CIA battle Al Qaeda, and offered a peace treaty of sorts with Washington - only to be rebuffed by the Bush administration, which was busily eyeing Iran as its next conquest after Iraq. In any case, we're treated to the delicious spectacle of hard-right Republicans disparaging the work of the CIA and the other agencies at make up the U.S. intelligence community.

The only remaining justification for war with Iran, now, are the charges that Iran is behind the killing of American soldiers in Iraq. But that rationale, too, is petering out. First of all, American deaths in Iraq have plummeted to record-low levels. Second, U.S. military officials in Iraq - perhaps, like their NIE-writing counterparts, not wanting a war with Iran - have backed off charges that Iran is ferrying weapons across the border. Now, they say, Iran is behaving itself. And this week, Ambassador Ryan Crocker's embassy team will open direct talks with Iran's embassy in Baghdad. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is building bridges to Iran, too - first inviting Iranian President Ahmadinejad to attend a meeting of the Gulf Cooperation Council and then extending an unprecedented invitation to Ahmadinejad to make the pilgrimage to Mecca this month. For the first time since 2003, it seems that a thaw in U.S.-Iranian relations is possible.

Comments

[poopdeck]

1. No.
2. The report is probably close to the truth.
3. It is the military brass who have prevented Bush/Cheney from attacking Iran.
4. Ergo, the NIE is a convenient smokescreen for Bush/Cheney to admit that an attack is not necessary now.

[wsblake]

Given the track record of these criminals, I seriously doubt there will be any change for the better in relations. Couple Bush's stupidity and arrogance with Cheney's commitment to the Neocon cause I believe- especially after reading Scott Ritter's and Seymour Hersh's latest findings-the bombing will commence in April,08.

[outnow]

The CIA has torture insurance for paying legal bills for torturers. What kind of adjuster do they have? Santa Claus probably. Here, have a billion dollars on the old insurance company.

Bush shouldn't have developed bunker busters - it may his own bunker that gets busted.

Has there been a counter-coup by the not-so-rogue elements of the intelligence community? I saw the writing on the wall when the AFT didn't want George W. Bush's name on the emblem of the entrance to their new building. Budget cuts or just good taste and judgment?

A changing of the guard. Bush can pardon himself. Did you know that? Except in impeachable circumstances. Nancy? Nancy? Where are you?

[Grunty1]

The adminstration tried to surpress the NIE. The only signal is that the Neocons are on their own.

[Dohiyi]

What on earth makes anyone think that the Bush administration cannot and will not attack Iran just because of the latest NIE? Bush and Cheny are still spoiling for the fight. Bush said a couple of years ago that he would have to act against Iran before he left office because he could not be sure that his successor in office would do anything. That rationale is more cogent than ever because of the NIE. Israel and the American neocons still believe that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. Bush and Cheney have never let intelligence stand in their way when they want to attack.

[imusintheevening]

but, but they are evil-doers, they do evil. Ok, we've been pissing in their pea-patch since 1953, overthrouwn their democrat government, installed a dictator, called 'em evil-doers. Still, what right does Iran have to stop looking bad in our efforts at propaganda. They are not country full ok kids that just want i-pods, they are evil-doers, doing evil.

[Grunty1]

"They don't understand how the American government could be as incompetent as it seems."

8 years of rule by an idiot will do that...

[bethinCary]

"For the first time since 2003-it seems a thaw in US-Iranian relations is posssible"­....
and it irks the hell out of the neocons.

[LizM]

If you want to know what this latest NIE really signals, you have to understand how badly the US intelligence community does not want to be the only one left standing when the music stops - AGAIN - if and when the hapless Bush-Cheney administration takes another incompetent and woefully misguided stab at regime change.

This was more important than any message that would, inadvertently or otherwise, be sent to Iran or to the rest of the international community.

[Merlin7]

The following ad soon will appear in the International Herald Tribune:

"Wanted -- Evil Empires. A certain superpower is seeking a few ambitious regimes to serve as worthy enemies. Our current foes -- think Iran and North Korea -- have slacked off recently and no longer play the part convincingly. Are you a wacky dictator with some decades-old weapons that could be described as carrying WMD? Do you have social safety-net programs that could be exaggerated as militant Marxism on the rise? Have you ever been visited by Sean Penn? If so, contact D. Cheney, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., D.C., or anyone at the American Enterprise Institute . . ."