Critical US Supreme Court Ruling Against Rovian GOP Vote Meddling May Prove Temporary

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS
What's Your Reaction?

A critical US Supreme Court decision against GOP voter meddling in Ohio may prove temporary.

In its on-going campaign to inject chaos and confusion into the voting process, the GOP has sued Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, demanding that she release to county boards of elections lists of registered voters whose information does not precisely match government data bases. The right to vote of such registrants -- by most estimates as many as 200,000 in Ohio alone -- could then be challenged on a case-by-case basis. George W. Bush was awarded Ohio's 20 electoral votes in 2004 with an official margin of less than 119,000 votes, though more than 100,000 votes cast in that election remain uncounted.

The 200,000 voters targeted by the Republican Party were all registered since January 1, 2008. News source estimates suggest 75-80% of these newly-registered voters are Obama supporters.

Brunner, a Democrat, has argued that the process of sorting through the minutiae of the registration discrepancies and forcing the use of provisional ballots would cause mass confusion, and would do nothing to legitimize the vote count. By all accounts, the discrepancies are usually caused by typographical errors in numbers entered for the Social Security administration and the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Rarely do such discrepancies indicate fraudulent behavior or illegitimate registrations.

Last week, after a twisted back-and-forth trail of contradictory lower court decisions, the Supremes ruled that the Republicans "are not sufficiently likely to prevail" in their argument that such discrepancies pose a significant threat to the legitimacy of the electoral process. The Court also ruled that the GOP had not standing as a private organization to file such a suit.

The decision pertains to Ohio, but could have major national impact. Throughout the US, the GOP has been working to strip voters from registration rolls and challenge voting rights predominantly in districts leaning toward the Democrats. Our next article will include an estimate of how many voters that campaign could actually disenfranchise in Ohio.

But the GOP continues to seek ways to disrupt the registration and voting process. In a separate case, the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled 4-3 that the Secretary of State must allow partisan observers into voting stations where early voting is proceeding. Outside the early voting sites, Republican operatives have photographed early voters and recorded their license plates in an attempt to intimidate and challenge new voters.

The idea of massive fraud by voters continues to be proven as a hyped-up myth. The Cincinnati Enquirer has provided a detailed analysis of Ohio's more than 8 million registered voters and found that problems involving illegitimate voting are minimal. The Enquirer found only 6567 voters who had duplicate registrations. All are individuals who registered twice at their own address, a common routinely resolved by election officials and poll workers. An investigation by Dr. Richard Hayes Phillips of the 2004 election found that of the nearly 800 duplicate registrations he analyzed, none voted more than once. The Enquirer also flagged 589 registered voters who won't be 18 on Election Day.

So contrary to Republican hype, overall the total number of problematic voters appears to be miniscule. The Enquirer concluded that "Data-entry errors make matching voters to other databases an inexact science. Variations on first names, maiden names, and misspellings could red-flag an otherwise eligible voter."

On the other hand, several female Ohio voters have contacted the Free Press asking why the Republican Party would send them absentee ballot forms under maiden names they hadn't used in years. Two of the women feared that they were being targeted for challenges at the polls, since they had a history of voting Democratic.

Since 1953, only six Ohioans have been sent to prison for voter fraud, according to the Columbus Dispatch. But Republican sheriffs and prosecutors are in the midst of a partisan witch hunt the likes of which hasn't been seen since the 1960s in the Deep South. to harass, arrest and prosecute voting rights groups registering new voters.

In Franklin County, Republican prosecutor Ron O'Brien has issued subpoenas to 13 voters linked to a 527 group -- Vote from Home. Joe Deters, a disgraced Republican former state treasurer now Hamilton County prosecutor, has opened a similar investigation.

Greene County Sheriff Gene Fischer opened an investigation of 304 new voters, mostly college students, prompting Columbus's African-American mayor Michael B. Coleman to write, "Whether a buffoonish mistake or partisan scheme gone wrong, there's no excuse for such blatant voter intimidation, in which young college students are told they may have to go through a sheriff's investigation just because they registered and voted in Ohio."

The FBI has also opened an investigation of ACORN, the national grassroots organization established in 1970. ACORN has registered some 1.3 million new voters this year, and has become a whipping boy for the GOP nation-wide anti-voter campaign.

This bizarre hysteria against "voter fraud" can be traced directly to the White House and to the McCain campaign. In order to divert attention from voter suppression tactics that helped win Bush the White House in 2000 and 2004, the Bush administration created the myth of "voter fraud." Karl Rove and his political operatives like Mark F. "Thor" Hearne used fake "voting rights" organizations and other obscure groups to finance civil suits and put pressure on the U.S. Department of Justice to bring criminal charges against voter registration organizations. Twelve federal prosecutors were fired by the Bush Administration for refusing to go along with this witch hunt.

Hearne testified before Rep. Bob Ney's committee at the Ohio House in 2005. Speaking on the last panel, Hearne followed Ohio's Republican Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, who engaged in a bitter verbal dispute with Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Cleveland), since deceased. Among other things, Jones accused Blackwell of using his official web site to spread outdated information that may have led prospective voters to wrong voting locations.

Hearne claimed to represent the "non-partisan watchdog" group, the American Center for Voting Rights (ACVR). He did not tell the Congressional committee that the ACVR was newly formed and that he was national election counsel to Bush-Cheney '04. Hearne's nonprofit center's publicist, Jim Dyke, is a former communications director for the Republican National Committee.

Based on scant evidence and a single incident of a volunteer allegedly linked to crack use, Hearne pushed a version of voter fraud in Ohio that directly attacked not only ACORN, but the NAACP, the AFL-CIO and ACT-Ohio. By attacking this combination of groups, Rove and Hearne were targeting the leading forces for registering blacks, poor, union workers and young people in Ohio -- those most likely to vote Democratic.

Aided by The Free Enterprise Coalition, a front group connected to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, local Republican operative Mark Rubrick filed an Ohio corrupt practices lawsuit (RICO) against all the voter registration organizations listed above in Wood County.

The civil RICO case, backed by financing from the Free Enterprise Coalition, alleged that the voter registration groups provided ". . . payments made in connections with the violations (in the form of, among other things, 'bounties,' payments or other rewards for collecting and/or processing the registrations including but not limited to illegal drugs, paid to individuals actually engaged in the violations), . . ." At the bottom of the document filed by attorneys Jeffrey Creemer and Douglas Haynam of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, a law firm based in Toledo, the following words appear: "jsc\Free Enterprise Coalition\Amended Complaint.doc" calling into question who was behind the lawsuit.

The suit was later quietly withdrawn after election rights attorney Cliff Arnebeck discovered that the Free Enterprise Coalition had indemnified Rubrick and had promised to pay any and all expenses related to his RICO suit. "I told Rubrick in no uncertain terms that his accusations that the NAACP was a criminal organization were false and that the indemnification from the Free Enterprise Coalition wasn't worth the paper it was written on," Arnebeck said.

Elsewhere throughout the US, the Republicans have used caging and a wide range of other tactics to strip as many likely Democratic voters as possible from the voter rolls. More than 308,000 were disenfranchised in Ohio prior to the 2004 election. At least another 170,000 have been eliminated since, an overall total of roughly ten percent of the Ohio electorate. Nearly all those disenfranchised come from heavily Democratic urban areas. Similar disenfranchisements are being reported throughout the US.

In 2007 Brunner succeeded Blackwell as Ohio's Secretary of State. Blackwell also served as co-chair of the Bush-Cheney campaign, and helped choreograph the theft of the Buckeye State electoral votes that tipped the election. Brunner has generally attempted to open the voting process in Ohio 2008, but has met with fierce resistance from the GOP, which still controls the Ohio legislature. Among other things, Brunner's attempt to provide paper ballots for all Ohio voters who want them has been reduced by GOP resistance to just 25% availability. The GOP also resisted early and open voting procedures that have allowed Ohioans to cast their ballots for several weeks now.

This new US Supreme Court decision removes a significant morass of confusion and chaos from the voting process. Many of the myriad discrepancies among official data sources "bear no relationship whatsoever to a voter's eligibility to vote a regular, as opposed to a provisional ballot," Brunner explained. The mismatches "may well be used at the county level unnecessarily to challenge fully qualified voters and severely disrupt the voting process."

Trailing badly for the presidency and nearly all other federal offices, the GOP is desperately seeking other routes to inject chaos into the electoral process. It has filed new motions in front of the Ohio Supreme Court, which has seven Republicans and no Democrats, and was re-shaped by more than $7 million in illegal and anonymous campaign donations linked to the US Chamber of Commerce. With this latest filing, the GOP is clearly hoping to revive this challenge to at least 200,000 Ohio voters, and to make this restrictive and confused process into a standard nationwide. The Republicans continue to deploy challengers to the polls wherever possible, and to foster legal attacks against ACORN in particular and the voter registration process in general.

In Ohio and elsewhere the GOP is desperately seeking a way around this new US Supreme Court decision. In 2000 the high court overruled the Florida Supreme Court in a "one time only" decision that stopped a recount and put George W. Bush in the White House.

But if this surprising new pro-democracy decision holds, it could set important precedent for protection of voter rights and help guarantee a fuller and fairer electoral process this year. If not, the electoral system could be crippled yet again, for years to come.


Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman have co-authored four books on election protection, including As Goes Ohio and How the GOP Stole America's 2004 Election & is Rigging 2008, and What Happened in Ohio, all available a http://freepress.org, where this article first appeared.

A critical US Supreme Court decision against GOP voter meddling in Ohio may prove temporary. In its on-going campaign to inject chaos and confusion into the voting process, the GOP has sued Ohio Sec...
A critical US Supreme Court decision against GOP voter meddling in Ohio may prove temporary. In its on-going campaign to inject chaos and confusion into the voting process, the GOP has sued Ohio Sec...
 
Comments
8
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- JWakkaJane I'm a Fan of JWakkaJane 3 fans permalink

re: "Our next article will include an estimate of how many voters that campaign could actually disenfranchise in Ohio. "

I have wanted to do this on a broader level, the overall effect of all this, but somebody should do it. In part, giving a little PERSPECTIVE on how many actual cases or convictions of 'vote-fraud' compared to an estimate of how many votes may have been deterred and blocked in the entire country. This would include the effects of the Bush Administration's corruption of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, and the EFFECTS of the Justice Department 'Prosecutor Purge' -

Murray Waas has written some excellent stuff about the Civil Rights Division aspect of this particularly.

All the other tactics and 'campaigns' that have been employed by whoever toward this effort to suppress the dem vote, such as disinformation ("dems vote Nov 5th" flyers in Virginia), robocalls, etcetera should be included in a comprehensive study of the effects of all this.

Check out "The Damage Done" here:
http://crowings.wordpress.com/2007/03/28/the-crime-vs-the-damage-done/

Wish I had the energy/time/means to follow up on that thought thoroughly and exhaustively, the way somebody should. Should have a long time ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 10/29/2008
- zanzig I'm a Fan of zanzig 39 fans permalink

The sad part is that you cannot even rely on the Courts to declare these to be frivolous and vexatious and dismiss them out of hand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 10/29/2008
- proreality I'm a Fan of proreality 4 fans permalink

This is just disgusting and despicable! Enough! My God these people need to go to jail already! Targeting of voters for political affiliation by spying and employing law enforcement? these people have turned the United States into a Banana Republic and I swear if they get away with this crap again I for one will up hold the oath I took to support the Constitution and defend it against ALL enemy's foreign AND DOMESTIC! Touch screens flipping votes already in W VA, broken down machine's in FL. For Christ's sake just print ballot's and count them by hand. If you live in the United States you have a right to vote how do these malevolent reprobates continue to get away with their filth? Is their logic really civil war beats losing? And where the hell are the talking heads and so called "liberal Media" on what all this really represents? I pray to God Obama takes the office to which he is elected despite these despotic tyrants and once and for all puts them in their place, behind bars!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 AM on 10/21/2008
- linzy I'm a Fan of linzy 8 fans permalink
photo

Scary stuff. It sounds on the surface that this should be made a permanent part of any existing voter rights act. Until then, we need to educate the voter, inform him/her of their rights, and have the maximum allowable poll watchers in place. This is a dismal state for out country to be in. Don't we send people to other countries to monitor their "free" elections? How credible is that?! Maybe one way to be sure the count is going correctly is to count the vote right at the precinct and post it on a tally board, visible to all. No names, just a tally of the votes. Lots of work, yes, cumbersome, yes, but we have got to get our sh-- together or this country is going to be worse off than ever! To all voters, "Be vigilant and keep your own record if you are not given a backup of any kind." What is sad, is that it is my neighbors who work at the polls, and in the Registrar of Voters' Office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 AM on 10/21/2008
- zanzig I'm a Fan of zanzig 39 fans permalink

Perhaps it is time the UN decided to send observers to US elections to protect voters' rights? American observers at other countries' elections will have lost ALL credibility by now, and if not, will certainly do so by the time these elections are over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 10/29/2008
photo

This latest suit by the GOP should be considered a nuisance suit. But since the Ohio Supreme Court is loaded with Republicans, Brunner may be forced to take this to the SCOTUS. Any chance they'll slap the Repubs with a nuisance suit?? How many ways can the Repubs think to disrupt the general election?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 10/21/2008
- Beowolf741 I'm a Fan of Beowolf741 8 fans permalink
photo

Yes this has to stop. If this becomes an issue after the election I hope Obama fights this tooth and nail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 10/20/2008
- 4real I'm a Fan of 4real 29 fans permalink
photo

This is disgusting. The GOP know there is no possible way they can win without OHIO.

I hope when Obama becomes president he will put in place a way to stop all the madness that happens every election season. Enough!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 10/20/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect