More

Bob Franken

Bob Franken

Posted: October 27, 2008 09:24 AM

Bankrupt Wealth Politics


Please help me understand: Why is John McCain harping on his accusation that Barack Obama wants to "spread the wealth around?

Actually, the real question should be why is that an accusation, instead of praise?

Shouldn't we all be interested in making sure each and every one of us gets our fair share...what we've actually earned? Haven't we had enough of a few hoarding the riches they accumulated through the unregulated subterfuge that has brought our world economy to collapse?

It's usually at this point we start hearing the mindless buzzwords from the demagogues: "Socialism!", they sputter, or even "Communism!".

Some ditzy anchor on local Orlando TV quoted Karl Marx in her one-shot-at-glory interview with the Democrats' VP candidate. Joe (may I call you Joe?) Biden was dumbfounded. "You gotta be kidding", he replied. Apparently she was not, although Biden suggested it was someone else who had written her questions.

She's probably not kidding any more than that Republican member of Congress, Michele Bachmann from Minnesota, who accused Obama and the Democrats of holding "anti-American" views.

This time, Bachmann's comments created an uproar and a huge backlash. But isn't it reasonable to ask whether they're all that different from Sarah Palin's "Real America" descriptions, or the relentless "spread the wealth" knee jerking from McCain?

The suggestion seems to be that it's "anti-American"to believe we should all get a fair shake and that we should weed out the corruption that allowed a few to swindle everyone else. Is it "anti-American" to require those whose lucky breaks brought them the good life to share their great fortune with the others in their community?

Is it so hard to understand that members of a team need to believe their contributions and hard work will be rewarded, that they won't be cheated out of what they've earned by an unfair society? Otherwise, why would they continue to be a part of the team?

Yes, we need to share the wealth and not in a Robin Hood kind of way. This is not about stealing from the rich. It's simply making sure they don't continue to take what belongs to the non-rich.

The reflexive efforts to stigmatize progressive thinking is reminiscent of the Red-Baiting from a different era. Hopefully, this time around we can all see it for what it is: A pathetically desperate attempt to hold on by those who have benefited from an egregiously unfair system.

If they succeed we will all end up buried in their last ditch efforts to prevent the kind of change we not only can "believe in" but absolutely require if we're going to dig out.

Follow Bob Franken on Twitter: www.twitter.com/frankenb

Please help me understand: Why is John McCain harping on his accusation that Barack Obama wants to "spread the wealth around? Actually, the real question should be why is that an accusation, instead...
Please help me understand: Why is John McCain harping on his accusation that Barack Obama wants to "spread the wealth around? Actually, the real question should be why is that an accusation, instead...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:15 PM on 10/30/2008
Ok, here's one of the MANY things that I question. When they speak of "Spreading the Wealth Around", do they not believe Palin's brag about giving Alaskans their "fair-share" of "oil" money is basically the same thing? The double standards in the Rovian/McCain Campaign at first made me a little angry, then a little sick to my stomach and now just make me laugh. The McCain/Palin campaign has come off in the past couple of weeks as a complete joke as does their cable news/mouth Fox Lies. Have any of them heard of stones and the glass house? -E.T.
02:40 AM on 10/28/2008
Mr Franken,

You wrote "Yes, we need to share the wealth and not in a Robin Hood kind of way. This is not about stealing from the rich. It's simply making sure they don't continue to take what belongs to the non-rich"
Since when do honest, hard-working people who educate themselves, become doctors, lawyers, and yes, even news correspondents, take what belongs to the "non-rich"? If people apply themselves, succeed, and amass wealth, they should not have to lose it to the Government to support those who have less.

Taking income from people who have struggled to earn it, to support people who are in economic crisis is called Welfare, and this is not a new concept. Taxpayers have been footing the bill for Welfare for decades. You may not like the world "Socialism", but that is exactly what it amounts to.

This Country was founded on Capitalism, and the chance for all newcomers to work hard, and succeed. My grandparents did it, my parents did it, and no one gave them checks from the Government.

You certainly did not have this mindset when I knew you back in your college and struggling radio career days. No one gave you a check. You had the determination to get where you are today, and yet you would advocate that those who can't, or who won't, should be taken care of by you and by me. Not "Socialism", my friend? What do you call it???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
odyssey58
09:55 AM on 10/27/2008
Many CONservatives choose to ignore that there has been a redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the top that started with reagan. But that's okay since they were the beneficiaries. What mean, selfish, greedy people they are!
I believe that socialistic values are actually the norm for humans. We lived for tens or hundreds of thousands of years in tribal groups that provided cradle to grave security for all members of the tribe.
Read "The Last Days of the Ancient Sunlight" by Thom Hartmann.