EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Dead Troops Remembered By President Who Had Them Killed


?>

Read more about Memorial Day from Huffington Post bloggers.

Yes, that's a harsh headline for this piece.

But I'll ask you to forgive me because, as a Veteran, there isn't a day on the calendar that causes my hatred -- and I do indeed mean hatred -- of George W. Bush to bubble over the top more than Memorial Day.

"On Memorial Day, we honor the heroes who have laid down their lives in the cause of freedom, resolve that they will forever be remembered by a grateful Nation, and pray that our country may always prove worthy of the sacrifices they have made," reads Bush's official Memorial Day proclamation, issued by the White House on Thursday.

The Chickenhawk-in Chief says a lot of things that make this Vet's blood boil but stuff like saying that he prays "...that our country may always prove worthy of the sacrifices they have made" is almost vomit inducing.

This statement comes from the same man who himself began dishonoring the sacrifices of all Veterans in such huge ways in March of 2003, when he invaded Iraq behind a veil of lies and deceit and started spilling barrels of military and civilian blood to start a war with a country that posed no threat whatsoever to our national security. These stirring words of remembrance come from an administration that began with a stolen election in 2000, which goes entirely against what I was taught way back when I was in the U.S. Navy, which was that part of the "way of life" we were protecting was symbolized by the ability of all of our citizens to have their votes counted.

"These courageous and selfless warriors have stepped forward to protect the Nation they love, fight for America's highest ideals, and show millions that a future of liberty is possible," continues Bush's proclamation. "Americans are grateful to all those who have put on our Nation's uniform and to their families, and we will always remember their service and sacrifice for our freedoms."

The words Bush puts forth are true -- it's him being the one to say them that I find so sickening and personally offensive.

It is positively nauseating to have George W. Bush ever talk to us about "America's highest ideals" when his administration has started a bloody war for no reason, imprisoned those suspected of being "terrorists" without trial or benefit of legal counsel, tortured prisoners in America's name and done everything but grab the original U.S. Constitution from the National Archives and run it through a paper shredder.

I also don't believe for one minute that the majority of the planet now holds our country in such extreme contempt because we're right and they don't understand our "highest ideals." This Veteran will go to his grave believing that the years 2000 through 2008 were a dark time in our history when much of what I believed when I served in uniform was made invalid and debased.

According to the Defense Department, we have now lost 4,082 men and women in Bush's war of choice in Iraq and we should not allow the man who sent them needlessly to their deaths to lead our nation today in mourning their loss. Make no mistake about it, George W. Bush is as responsible for the deaths of those men and women as if he himself had fired the bullet or set the IEDs that ended their lives.

And before the right-wing hate mail starts flowing in my direct I'll admit that, yes, you are probably right that if Bush said nothing today I might notice that as well. But here's the thing with so many of us Vets: Memorial Day is not an abstraction to us. Too many of us knew personally and can remember the faces of a few whose untimely deaths we mark today. Some of us actually even saw them killed in battle.

So, we do indeed take Memorial Day very personally and I for one would rather that Bush say nothing at all than to issue hypocritical pronouncements and give an insincere, flowery speech in honor of our war dead when he is personally responsible for the most recent we mourn today.

Even a garden-variety murderer would be unlikely to make an appearance when the victim's family is observing the anniversary of a loved one's death.

The least Bush can do is stay in the White House today, keep his lying mouth shut and understand deep in his craven soul that the next day the Congress should declare a national holiday is January 20, 2009, the day he leaves office and his days of dishonoring our war dead are forever done.

Read more about Memorial Day from Huffington Post bloggers.

 
  • Comments
  • 83
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
12:02 PM on 05/28/2008
This is a beautiful example of why Democrats cannot win in the long term. The party has too many in it, judging from all the comments as well as the author of the piece, that are fueled by hate and anti-Ameri­canism.

Most of us don't do hate, and do not respond positively to it.
08:41 PM on 05/27/2008
Bush is just the mouthpiece­. It's not just his fault. His VP, our Congress and the MSM are equally to blame. So are the vast majority of Americans who care more about who's up on American Idol, NASCAR, the NFL, their Nintendo or Dancing with the Stars than what's going on in Washington and the rest of the world.

This could end by Sept. if enough of us (200,000+) would show up the next timeCongre­ss in session like some unknown patriot did at the last McCain speech and chant "Endless War."

The vast majority of Americans just don't care because they have no stake in this war. No draft, no rationing, few immediate relatives killed or wounded, and two many TV channels so they don't get a daily dose of the carnage.
10:59 PM on 05/27/2008
God Bless you! I have been saying this for months.
However, most of these patriots have no time for writing a congressma­n or protesting­, just bashing Bush.
03:06 PM on 05/27/2008
Oh. my. god. Bravo, bravo, bravo. If I were in the same city as you, I would pick you up and carry you on my shoulders through the streets of downtown.

Everyone reading your post should print it, cut it out and paste it in every room of your house. Not until we get mad enough will we take care of this sick little prick we call a president.

Thank you so much for this post.
02:23 PM on 06/02/2008
You spoke what was in my mind, maizie.
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
02:17 PM on 05/27/2008
This is precisely the kind of rage that is building in mainstream America. It's been suppressed way too long. It's time to hold Bush and his cronies accountabl­e for the war, the economy and the flagrant disregard for rule of law.
02:10 PM on 05/27/2008
Great headline;
12:20 PM on 05/27/2008
Geo. Bush has a reptutatio­n for accidental­ly saying appropriat­e things, but definitely not on purpose. His recent speech was a good example. According to the account in the Washington Post, he made a tribute to those who had been killed and then said that political leaders should follow their example. I can think of a couple political leaders that would do the world a big favor by following their example, but they are notable for avoiding circumstan­ces where that might be possible. Five deferments including getting his wife pregnant to obtain a deferment characteri­zes one politician and pulling strings to get into the party wing of the Texas Air National Guard and then going AWOL characteri­zes another.
11:57 AM on 05/27/2008
Thanks to headlines and articles like this, Americans get a good look at the ugliness of the hard left.

This kind of hatred must be viewed to be understood­.

So I say BRAVO!

Keep reminding us that you exist and want the White House!
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
02:12 PM on 05/27/2008
We exist,and we will get the White House. Those who have betrayed the public trust should be very afraid. You won't be able to burn and shred fast enough!
07:57 AM on 05/27/2008
Again, I ask you anti-war Bush haters the following.­..

Do we also hold accountabl­e for "killing" soldiers the Democrats on the intelligen­ce committee, those who saw the raw intelligen­ce data before the President was briefed? Those who had a responsibi­lity to raise their voices of the intelligen­ce was cherry-pic­ked or misreprese­nted? Or is killing soldiers okay, as long as it's done by people who verbally attack our soldiers as well?

Do we also hold accountabl­e for "killing" soldiers the Clinton administra­tion and its cabinet, who had a hard-line policy against Iraq and regularly claimed Saddam was supporting terrorism and stock-pili­ng nuclear weapons? And the Democrats who supproted such claims at the time? Or is killing soldiers okay, as long as it's done by people who also kill unborn babies?

Do we also hold accountabl­e for "killing" soldiers the intelligen­ce agencies of many European nations, several of whom just happened to oppose the war in Iraq? Or is killing soldiers okay, as long as it's done by people who verbally attack the United states?

Geiger, you're a jack@$$. Adjustable morals is every bit as bad as having no morals at all. And if you're going to whine about the 2000 election, why not take Al Gore to task for his valiant efforts to exclude the military vote? Let me guess, excluding the military vote is okay, as long as the military vote continues to be strongly Republican­.
photo
elbzee
push, pull, our get outta the way
09:11 AM on 05/27/2008
The Bush administra­tion has dealt effectivel­y with dissenters­. They lose their jobs or are set upon by Rovian trolls. Why in God's name do you think anyone should hold accountabl­e as you say, "intellige­nce agencies of many European nations, several of whom just happened to oppose the war in Iraq"? Pretty twisted logic there buddy. Sorry, but this one's Bush's & Cheney's. He should have hung his head and begged for forgivenes­s from the world for the crimes he's committed.
09:19 AM on 05/27/2008
I could not have said it better myself. As someone who has family members who serve, I could not disagree more with Geiger's poisonous remarks.
07:46 AM on 05/27/2008
Well said sir. As a vet myself I am continuall­y sickened by this morally bankrupt sot playing Army.
07:41 AM on 05/27/2008
Great headline. Thank you for saying it so eloquently­. Jan 20 as a national holiday. I LIKE it. Blessings for you.
07:07 AM on 05/27/2008
Great idea, blame the police chief or mayor and not the murderers who actually did the killing. After all their freedom fighters not suicidal death cult terrorists seek martyrdom.
btw, loved the part about W being a chickenhaw­k as reported from a Navy guy. Unless Mr Geiger saw more combat than Mr Bush...it rings not of sarcasm, but of hypocrisy. Oh, and thank you for your service Mr Geiger.
I do believe this article was one of the best pieces of leftist propaganda I've seen in a while though, and so my hat tips to you. After all, you hit every single Bush-is-Sa­tan conspiracy theory except 3:
-Bush caused Global Warming
-Bush deliberate­ly sent Hurricanes Katrina and Rita to New Orleans to kill Black people
-and Bush fired people for political reasons (as if it's unique to his administra­tion)
note: I deliberate­ly leave out the Karl Rove outed Valerie Plame conspiracy theory only because I'm tired of hearing that Rove's been indicted as opposed to DepSec Armitage.
Wake up and smell your propaganda Mr Geiger. You're a tool for a Party that does nothing but lie to get more political power, and they even admit it
http://www­.floppinga­ces.net/20­08/05/26/v­ideo-dems-­admit-they­-lied-abou­t-iraq-to-­seize-cong­ress/
photo
elbzee
push, pull, our get outta the way
10:01 AM on 05/27/2008
Hell, brfc, MY DOG’S SEEN MORE COMBAT THAN MR. BUSH...And he’s never been in the military! The man was AWOL and derelict. He's a coward & psychopath­. NO, I don't blame him for global warning (although his refusal to open his eyes lost an opportunit­y). Nor do I blame him for Katrina. I blame the Army Corps of Engineers and corrupt New Orleans government­. Of course, Bush’s lack of leadership did result in needless deaths there. (Are you sensing a trend here?). . And good ol Rove doesn't need me pointing out his domestic partisan espionage, he's pretty well exposed at this point.

Sounds like you need a dose of your own medicine, BRFC, wake up and smell your own propaganda­.
12:00 PM on 05/27/2008
As a matter of fact we would blame the police chief if, for no other reason than he likes to show off his authority, he sends a bunch of innocent bystanders into what was a calm situation with the sole intention of causing trouble. It would show a lack of competence far surpassing that necessary for his removal.

I have a cat who has seen more combat than Bush. Playing one game of football is more combat than bush has seen in his whole life.

For some right wingnut to parrot all the talking points emanating out of Karl Rove's wastepaper can is a bit much, don't you think?
06:51 AM on 05/27/2008
As an officer in the US Army and a veteran of the current war, I do NOT agree with this piece, and your headline is absolutely disgusting­. It might as well have been written by Al-Qaeda itself.
Nowhere in your bio does it state when you served or whether it was during wartime, but have you stopped to consider this: that, following your logic, your headline could have applied to Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, or for that matter, any wartime president in US history?
Here's the real problem with it: Terrorists­, Al-Qaeda, Mahdi Militia, criminals, Taliban, and many others, are the ones who actually killed our troops - troops who all volunteere­d to serve. The fact that you don't even write two words mentioning any of these shows me that you are a unreasonin­g hyper-left­ist who hates his own country far more than he hates those who have attacked it.
Sorry, Mr. Geiger - you do NOT speak for all of us. Not by a long shot. I also take Memorial Day personally­, and think it's time to put partisan screeds aside. Your bio says you work for the Democratic Party (big surprise). You might have added that as a disclaimer­.
Have a nice day.
photo
elbzee
push, pull, our get outta the way
09:48 AM on 05/27/2008
I find a few things lacking, John. The position you've expressed does not touch the REASON you and so many other volunteer soldiers had to be sent there. Or, is it that you believe that we're at war with Iraq because of what they did to us on 9/11? If that's the case, I accept your post as you've obviously been mislead. If it's not, then I'm more concerned about the psychologi­cal well being of our military. Secondly, what are screeds?
10:38 AM on 05/27/2008
John, you seem to have missed the point: No American soldiers or civilians, or nearly 500,000 Iraqis, give or take a few hundred thousand, would have died if Bush hadn't illegally invaded Iraq and supported his war crimes with lies. Lies to the American people, lies to Congress, lies to the American military, and lies to the rest of the world.
As for the troops volunteeri­ng to serve, that's a sleazy excuse. The troops volunteere­d to protect the U.S., to fight the good fight, to get back at the people who caused 9/11 (Actually the Saudis, the ISI, and some others a little too close to home). Did any of them volunteer for an illegal invasion of country that wasn't a threat in order to take its oil? It's hard to believe an officer in the U.S. military would believe the troops sold their lives for the profits of oil companies and war profiteers­, including Bush and Cheney themselves­.
01:58 PM on 05/27/2008
No one ever said we were going into Iraq because of 9/11, so that's a straw man argument.

If Bush went into Iraq for personal profit or to steal the oil, then I might understand this article a little better. But that never happened, despite plenty of conspiracy theories to the contrary.

Additional­ly, no one here is saying anything about Afghanista­n. We we lied there too? Do you all think that the CIA caused 9/11?
photo
feo
huh?
10:22 AM on 05/27/2008
I see your sorry and raise you another sorry: You can't get killed in Iraq unless you're in Iraq. All blame for this disgusting mess goes directly to Geo Bush.
01:52 PM on 05/27/2008
Once again, you can insert any country into that statement. Unless you condemn all former presidents in the same manner, you are being a tad hypocritic­al.
03:18 PM on 05/27/2008
feo, good job attacking a vet and calling him a coward. " You can't get killed in Iraq unless you're in Iraq. "

you don't have to agree with someone but you don't have to attack that person, who is particular­ly moved by Memorial Day for a REASON.
06:07 AM on 05/27/2008
The bastard belongs in jail.
07:43 AM on 05/27/2008
Indeed he does. So if you need a little poetic justice until the real justice arrives, stop on over and see us sometime. ;-)
11:03 PM on 05/26/2008
Have we earned the sacrifices of our veterans? Are we being the nation that our veterans (and those currently serving) are buying with their blood, sweat and tears?

I am very uncomforta­ble with the apparent answers to these questions, particular­ly since March 20 2003.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
deadcustodian
Saul Alinsky knew the way.
10:34 PM on 05/26/2008
Bob, Thank you.