Obama's Oprah Problem

Posted December 4, 2007 | 04:45 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Obama's Oprah Problem   digg: Obama's Oprah Problem   reddit: Obama's Oprah Problem   del.icio.us: Obama's Oprah Problem

When they put that little "Oprah's choice" sticker on the cover of a book, it instantly becomes a bestseller. It's not yet clear what happens when they put the sticker on a presidential candidate.

The impact of celebrity endorsements, of course, is usually overstated. Such endorsements are more likely to turn a citizen away from a celebrity than toward a candidate. But Oprah Winfrey isn't just a celebrity--- she's a lifestyle, a school of thought, an era. To speak of Oprah is to speak in superlatives: she's the richest this, the most influential that. What Caesar was to geography, it would seem, Winfrey is to turn-of-the-century middlebrow American culture. From her base camp on daytime television, she launches her sorties into every nook and cranny of public communications.

This could eventually be trouble for Senator Obama. In spite of the fact that he is seeking the highest office in the nation, he runs the serious risk of being upstaged by her. It's already hard to find a story about the Senator that doesn't include at least a mention of Winfrey, a situation that will continue as they go on tour together. He'll surely face observations that he is being groomed to be the latest in a line of brand extensions that also includes Dr. Phil; or more hostile accusations that he might become Winfrey's puppet, the deputized commander-in-chief of an Empress to big to be bothered to run for public office herself.

There is no question that Oprah Winfrey is a sincere person who has done a lot of good things and made a lot of people happy. Her life-story and her philosophy of self-invention reflect themes that are deep in the American heart. There is also no question that Barack Obama stands to gain a lot from Winfrey's endorsement. The Senator needs to take care, however, that his candidacy, and the office he seeks, isn't made to seem subordinate to the superstar endorser.

The "Oprah Effect" that everyone is talking about is a mighty and powerful vortex, best approached with extreme caution. According to a recent report, the Senator described the audience's response to Winfrey when he was appearing on her show during his 2004 run for the Senate. "We were waiting off stage to get brought in," the report quotes Obama as saying, "and we watched her walk out and there was a level of excitement among these middle-aged women that I've never seen. Their eyes glaze over...they were transported." I'm not exactly sure what it is, but there's something about that quote, and what it describes, that makes me really uncomfortable. This may be one of those stories that gets the most insightful treatment by late-night television comedies.

Which brings us to the writers' strike. Late night comedy, especially of the variety we've been seeing on programs like The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, has become an increasingly important part of civic discourse in the new century. The greatest loss to American citizens brought on by the writers' strike has been the silencing of these satiric voices just at the time we could really use them.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
14
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- eaglecapri See Profile I'm a Fan of eaglecapri permalink

Why is everyone so obssessed with Oprah and Obama?!?!?! This is - like - the millionth article written about the two. We get it, Oprah can sell books but may not be able to sell Obama! Just let the woman campaign for her candidate just like any other celebrity....like Barbara Streisand for Hillary Clinton! Where's your article about her concert seats going for thousands of dollars and how that could translate into Clinton campaign cash if she held a fundraiser? After all, Streisand has legions of fans! But, can her fans elect Clinton? Where's your article about that? Where's your article, where's your article? (Sorry, a little Godfather humor!)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 12/05/2007
- truth101 See Profile I'm a Fan of truth101 permalink

Talk about exaggeration -- Oprah is not half as important as the Professor thinks -- and certainly America does not require Colbert or the Daily for its satire, which is monopolized by just a handful of writers -- a virtual monopoly called a union, one based on NEPOTISM. There is a ton of satire ONLINE, AND AMERICA IS ONLINE. OLD MEDIA ARE HISTORY, OPRAH IS HISTORY, and
that is a fact. BELIEVE IT OR NOT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 12/05/2007
- sparkandy See Profile I'm a Fan of sparkandy permalink

This is probably the first time an individual has bought and paid for a presidential candidate. Usually the only entities with that much money are large corporations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 AM on 12/05/2007
- Qbear See Profile I'm a Fan of Qbear permalink

I found this over on Obama for President site, in the LGBT sub section under people section.
It concerns World's AIDS Day.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post_group/LGBTBlog/CRJZ#comments
I wrote:

"Is there a single gay/lesbian staffer still around here?
You might want to clue in the rest of the campaign that AIDS should be discussed on the African American section and the Latino section, and the women section, and the student section.
Only discussing it in the LGBT section is OFFENSIVE, especially to me who is a PWA since 85, and lost most of those I loved in the 80's and 90's.


btw. mine was the ONLY post, the previous LGBT thread 2 weeks ago had 3 posts, but the two threads before and after the McClurkin FIASCO had 168 posts and 158 posts.
yeah, keep telling themselves they didn't flush away their LGBT votes!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 12/05/2007
- Tellmethetruth See Profile I'm a Fan of Tellmethetruth permalink

Obama didn't vote for Kyl-Lieberman Resolution declaring Iran's Revolutionary Guards, the core of Iran's national army, a terrorist organization. Joe Biden did vote against this and has the guts to talk to Bush personally and let him know if Bush takes action against Iran - Biden will move to get him impeached and Cheney along with him. That's not just change, but action. Obama had a chance to act and did nothing. http://www.joebiden.com/getinformed/speeches?id=0091

As to Iraq - Obama has no plan but Joe Biden does and proposed legislation on Iraq. The political solution Joe Biden has proposed, which is within the framework of the Iraqi constitution, is the only logical way out without leaving chaos behind, by giving more power to local regions with a loose central government. Dodd and Clinton voted for it, Obama was not there for the vote but has said it "might be the way to go."

Obama - no I don't so. Joe Biden is the one with the action and history of bringing about change - it's not just a slogan for him, his words are put into action, and his reputation can be trusted.

www.planforiraq.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 AM on 12/05/2007
- zannamar See Profile I'm a Fan of zannamar permalink

Actually, there was an article on Huffpost a few months ago when O first endorsed Obama. In a poll, O made no difference. 6% said they would because of O, 6% said they would NOT because of O, and the rest said O made no difference. So who cares what O thinks in politics, but I tend to NOT like her books picks, they are always depressing topics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 12/04/2007
- altohone See Profile I'm a Fan of altohone permalink


"the deputized commander-in-chief of an Empress to big to be bothered to run"?

Silly indeed. Too silly.

Now Obama will do her bidding?

If that's anybody's actual fear, our country is in for ride...

... mandatory book club readings by executive order?
... favorite things shopping lists issued by the White House?
... doctors in scrubs preaching about vitamins to warm up crowds before Presidential appearances?

God forbid!
I'd much rather have daily life dictated by those helping elect Hillary... y'know, Big Pharma, Big Oil, Insurance companies, the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 12/04/2007
- SeanGardner See Profile I'm a Fan of SeanGardner permalink

Huh?

What were you saying?

That Oprah will be Obama's problem because of the quote that made you uncomfortable: "We were waiting off stage to get brought in and we watched her walk out and there was a level of excitement among these middle-aged women that I've never seen. Their eyes glaze over...they were transported."

I don't see the controversy, or potential problem.

Oprah endorsed Obama. Oprah has clout with the very constituency that Obama will need to win the general election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 12/04/2007
- Mrrar See Profile I'm a Fan of Mrrar permalink

You are silly.

You could say the same thing about Bill. ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 12/04/2007
- ystasino See Profile I'm a Fan of ystasino permalink

Your title is misrepresenting your message. It will become a problem only if Obama allows it to.

He just wants to be heard by a politics-naive audience and push a few undecided woman to Obama. This will be Obama's show with Oprah.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 12/04/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Bob Thompson›
 

 Site  Web ask.com