More

Mr. President: Stop Playing Games With The Lives Of Our Troops


This morning, President Bush will make an announcement about the situation in Iraq. For every American who supports the troops, I hope that you will listen carefully when he announces that troop deployments are being reduced from the current back-breaking 15 months to 12 months at the end of the summer.

In short, this is a hollow political announcement.

This announcement will do nothing to help the troops currently deployed for 15 months right now, some of whom will not return to the United States until summer 2009. Almost half of the active-duty Army's frontline units are currently deployed for 15 months -- HALF -- and of those units, three are on their fourth tour and almost all have been deployed at least twice. We need to reduce everyone's current tours to 12 months, every unit, right now.

From now to the end of this president's term in office, the overwhelming majority of frontline troops scheduled to deploy are Army National Guard, and their scheduled tours are already 12 months, so again, the president's announcement does nothing to help them even though many of these troops are scheduled for their second deployment, leaving jobs and families behind again, for a full year.

15-month tours are just too long. DoD itself has found that 15-month deployments are dispiriting. Every day at Veterans for America, we hear from Soldiers and their families reeling from the effects of 15-month deployments. And we listen as no less an expert than the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen says "the well is deep, but it is not infinite." Our reports show that the consequences of churning our troops will be significant and even greater in the future.

Our troops need their commander in chief to fight for them. They need real help, and they need it now.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:03 AM on 04/11/2008
The only thing Bush is fighting for is saving his legacy. Which he will fail at, just like he has failed at everything else in his miserable, pathetic life.
photo
TexasDem0
USMC Vietnam combat vet
05:48 PM on 04/10/2008
Your plea will fall on deaf ears. Dubya will simply continue to follow the lead of his neo-con puppet masters. Those who bear no burden of war will push to perpetuate it.
02:10 PM on 04/10/2008
But, but, but... didn't you see Dubya bawling the other day. He REALLY cares.......
12:46 PM on 04/10/2008
Skepticism about the war in Iraq is all well and good, but have you noticed that even the war's most severe critics rarely mention the war in Afghanistan, which is just as much a quagmire? The situation in Afghanistan is worse than it was five year ago -- and there is no reason to believe that adding thousands of troops to the NATO force, the current plan, will significantly improve the situation.
The sad fact is that no one in the U.S. government has the slightest idea of what to do to reduce Islamic extremism except to resort to military means. Many war critics favor shifting the war machine to Afghanistan, but ask them tough questions about the plan there and they begin to sound suspiciously like George W. Bush talking about Iraq. So don't be surprised if U.S. troops are still bogged down in Central Asia five years from now, with some new prez urging Americans to "stay the course"! It's all good for business, though, and permanent warfare no doubt will be the accepted business model for all major nations in the decades ahead.
01:49 PM on 04/10/2008
I was in favor of going into Afghanistan--and firmly against going into Iraq. Every resource we're wasting in Iraq would have been incredibly valuable in Afghanistan. No end in sight in either place, and no apparent exit plan. What a disgrace.