If you believe Barack Obama distinguished himself favorably in the first debate, you won't like the following rampage one bit. Those who judge debates on quality of information and truthfulness might have kept different score. But in the realm of making an impression, and in winning the lightning-quick emotional judgments that people make of each other, Obama suffered from ineloquence, hesitation, rambling, old material (the grandmother again, really?), and inadvertent signals of weakness.
Obama's painful defeat was foreshadowed by the president's first response, when he utterly ignored moderator Jim Lehrer's question and delivered a prepared opening statement. All political debaters bring prepared material to the podium. But without the slightest reference to the question in framing his answer, or allusion to Lehrer's topic within the answer, Obama's opening segment bristled with nonchalant disrespect for the audience. And Romney trounced him by buckling right down to his first volley of highly energized and precisely relevant bullet points.
The bizarre opening play could be forgotten if the president had snapped out of his rote recitation quickly thereafter, but Obama's entire performance conveyed the impression of a candidate whose staff had failed to inform him that the event was a debate. He appeared flummoxed by questions, baffled and wounded by his opponent's attacks, peevish, and overwhelmed by Romney's passion.
The body language was as unpresidential as it gets. Obama looked exhausted, and perhaps he was -- the man is running the country and managing responses to world affairs, while also struggling to keep his job. Governor Romney's only job is to prepare for campaign events. So it was understandable when Obama appeared to be performing a chore -- scowling, withdrawing, stuttering, going through motions.
Still, his job for 90 minutes was to perform in a nationally broadcast TV show that serves an important function in the democracy. If this had been an audition for a dramatic role as president, President Obama wouldn't get a call-back. He was sluggish; his responses amorphous and dissolute. Romney was quick and precise.
Memo to Obama campaign staff: Get a grip on your man and eliminate the following habits:
Obama's listless closing statement might be explained as a natural consequence of the thrashing he had just endured. Here, and at other times, the president seemed to credit Americans with the progress made during the first term. That is flattering, and of course everyone wants a president who doesn't get too carried away with himself. But constant deflection of credit invites people to muse over this question: "Well, then, what do we need you for?"
Here's hoping the president gets more sleep before the next debate.
Follow Brad Hill on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BradHill
Brian Jencunas: Obama's Failure Gives Romney Debate Victory and Possible Path to the White House
He will provide vouchers to seniors for Medicare and they will be on their own to purchase their own insurance. Yes, he did say that and we should trust that the insurance companies will not make victims out of seniors.
I'm not whining. I'm crying. Some people believe he can lead and will vote for him. How sad is that. I don't want to ride on the roof of his car, while the have's and have more's get to ride on the inside. No, I'm not whining, I'm crying.
1 % Growth will not solve the above.
DEMS have no idea how to grow beyond 1 % !
DEMS hate Business and Investment...............Tax Em' to Extinction.
Romney can and will spur investment and job creation.
Obama can't do it !
who here would switch positions with Obama electorally right now??
nobody - that's who...including whichever Romney shows up.
this was only a debate.
Nate Silver gives Romney less than a 20% chance of winning.
go ahead...take those odds over Obama - I dare ya.
forest through the trees people, forest through the trees.
The President would have had to be in the room to be "blindsided" as was also claimed but frankly all I could think of was Clint Eastwood's empty chair.
I acknowledge the President has done some good things that may have prevented a depression but they are in the end completely overshadowed by his divisiveness opposite the unity on all levels that he promised, the behind closed doors secrecy opposed to more transparency than any administration ever he said, and flat out lying to the people about something as literally deadly serious as Libya just to try and skate to the elections; it all tells me it's time to let someone else fill what through default has become an empty chair.