- BIG NEWS:
- Afghanistan
- |
- Israel
- |
- Philippines
- |
- European Union
- |
I never thought I'd be rooting for Iran .
I am in awe of the courage of the people of Iran.
They are giving the world hope. They are teaching a shocking lesson about truth. They embody freedom. And, perhaps hardest to grasp, for those of us who live in the Middle East, they are putting their very lives on the line not for the sake of some ferociously sectarian End of Days, but for the most profoundly radical notion of all -- a better life.
Every person who has taken to the streets to demand what their government promised them, free and fair elections, did so knowing that police or secret police could arrest them, act to cripple their careers, or outright gun them down.
When the national soccer team, the sporting love of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's life, took the field in Seoul, and when Iranian state television showed the team captain and most of the squad wearing wrist and arm bands in the green of the reformists, the players knew that there was much more at stake -- at risk -- for them personally, than whether they would defeat South Korea and advance to a place in the World Cup. The game ended in a 1-1 tie. Iran's fervent hopes of appearing in the quadrennial tournament were all but dashed. But the team had already clinched a victory of momentous proportion. They are quiet lions. They are, in every sense of the word, champions.
I never thought I'd be rooting for Iran. But I'm pulling for them now, hard as I can.
Don't get me wrong. I never swallowed the neo-con view of Tehran as the Great Satan. I didn't take Ahmadinejad's cataclysm threats at face value. I never even quite trusted the sincerity of his anti-Semitism. It seemed, in his hands, like just one more rabble-pandering tool in the kit.
This is, after all, the Middle East, where straight truth is routinely bent around corners to fit, mask, or skirt inconvenient realities.
Still, I have to get used to this. For years I watched the Islamic Republic in the stern public face that the ayatollahs themselves carefully nurtured. It was said that the founding Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeni, never allowed himself to be photographed while smiling. More recently, vexed by the ease and the smugness of Ahmadinejad's Jew-hate, I came to view them as a brilliantly well-adapted enemy. While it seemed to me that the odds were against a down spiral and an Israeli-Iranian exchange of ballistic missiles, the word "erase," when used publicly against another country, becomes hard for the mind located in that country to, well, erase.
In trying to view the Israel-Iran stand-off with equanimity, an official policy of Holocaust denial was little help. Every time I opened the door of the bomb shelter in our basement, I could see Ahmadinejad's grin in the darkness.
Now, though, the people in Tehran's streets have made it possible to begin to see past Ahmadinejad. I have to get used to Iran not as a cartoon bully, but as my neighbor. Not because they will go nuclear -- though nuclear they may well go. But because it is a nation of people, as we are, not pawns in an increasingly obsolete revolution.
It often seems that fundamentalism is the curse of the Middle East. In Israel, in Palestine, in Lebanon, in Iraq and Iran -- it appears at first glance that it is fundamentalism that keeps peace at bay; that it has cursed Israel with settlements and faith-based racism; that it has cursed the Palestinians with anti-Jewish incitement and dated ideology which has kept statehood a practical impossibility; that it makes Hezbollah worship weaponry over all else; and has spurred brother Muslims, Shi'ites and Sunnis in Iraq, to suicide bomb each other's mosques, and each other.
But this view is too simple. It fails to take into account the fact that it is not religion per se, but its unholy marriage with politics, that yields the excesses that rob people of their freedom, dignity, and a future of peace. When fundamentalism becomes revolution, the truth that is in religion, becomes the first casualty.
And make no mistake. We are all revolutionaries here. And when everyone is a member of one revolution or another, the struggles are bound to collide. In Israel alone, the founding rival revolutions (socialist Zionism versus right-wing Revisionism) which have succumbed to age and irrelevance, have been replaced by the deadlock between the settler/no compromise revolution on the one hand, and the software/global-outlook two-state revolutionaries of the new center. The Palestinians have a similar dichotomy, with the aging onetime-Marxists of Fatah battling the middle-aging Armani Islamists of Hamas.
In the wider Middle Eastern theater, the fundamentalist revolution of neo-conservatism clashed with -- and thus fueled -- the various rival revolutions of Islamism.
The saving grace, for this reason, may be the circumstance that for all their talk of permanency and messianic solutions, revolutions, like the people who run them, age. At some point, when they no longer serve their stated goals, or their people, they begin to die.
Enter, at this point, the world revolutionary named Barack Obama. The revolution he has declared is one that has resonated here with telling effect. Perhaps because it explicitly values quality of life over confrontation; peoplehood over dogma.
When Obama ran a campaign on a platform of change, few expected that, after carrying 28 states and the District of Columbia, he would carry Lebanon as well. Iran may be next. Where do we fit in? Israel and Palestine may take time. They are tough territory for moderates. And revolutionaries do not relinquish their struggles easily. But if recent events are any measure, Obama is not just any moderate.
In the meanwhile, let us return the favor of the people of Iran, and offer our hopes.
It is time for us to wear the green.
The full post appears on Haaretz.com
Follow Bradley Burston on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradleyburston
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Could you please explain the conflict between "peoplehood" and dogma?
Congratulations on recognizing fellow humans; it's a revelation, isn't it? Now, stop opening the door to the bomb shelter in the basement so often; you'll find that the hallucinations of malevolent entities in the darkness will begin to diminish, the fog will begin to lift, and your whole being may begin to clear and heal.
Why is this a revelation - have you been asleep all your life?
"Iran" is not a nation of ayatollahs and fanatics - no more than Russia was a nation of " Godless Commies ".
They are people, like you and me, trying to cope in this crazy place we are born to, manipulated by our "leaders" for the good of those same leaders.
The Middle East is not the only place on the planet where truth is " bent around corners to fit, mask, or skirt inconvenient realities". I offer you the past 8 years here in the USA, at a minimum...
--
bravo rfdude . . . totally agree with you . . .and Bradley got a question for ya' . . . how about getting your governmnet to tear down its Jerusalem Wall, dismantle the illegal settlements, etc and start treating the Palestinians as human beings . . . your article sticks in my throat
LOOK , at my picture . I got caught up too.
.......... .......... ..........
They are my brothers and sisters...
Too bad Israel wasn't impressed with Obama's "peoplehood above dogama" before they voted in an appalling fundamentalist government.
What does that tell you about where Israel's at?
Lebanon, Iran?
Print out pictures of those street marches, hang them where the Iran haters you know can see them. Keep pushing the truth.
I keep remembering the Iranian boys in college with me in the 70's. They were getting ready to go back to Iran to overthrow the Shah. They were kind, sweet boys--just regular kids. I think of them often, wondering how, if they are alive today, they feel about what has happened to Iran since the revolution. I'm pretty sure this was not what they were fighting for.
As time goes on, and the more the events of the world unfold, the more convinced I become that the simple desire for courageous peace is all that matters.
Well said.
See, I have never had anything against the Iranian people. Having traveled in Muslim countries, I see evidence of misunderstanding and lack of information on both sides. It is usually the government that is to blame.
I feel a great deal of solidarity for the Iranian protesters today because I know how it feels to have your vote discounted. I felt that way in 2000 and it's really frustrating. Mousavi may not be the ideal candidate, but if the people voted for him and the elections were rigged, I can understand their frustration and I am on their side.
Look at TV and movie 'villans' of the last two decades. Most often offensive bigoted stereotypes of unshaven greasy-looking Arabs (American culture doesn't distinguish Arab from Persian) in turbans, undifferentialted from eachother, and most often too stupid to shoot straight. I especially loathed the depictions in that truely awful film "True Lies".
Compare those media images with the footage of the protests. THESE people on the street could be my neightbors, or coworkers or friends, even my relatives. These people on the street are the 'enemy' we've been repeated warned about, the SAME people Cheney had threatened to explode a nuclear weapon over.
Mike Du, your comment on movies is right on. People are manipulated in a variety of ways and since we can no longer fight the evil Soviet Union we needed a generic Arab to give us our air battles and blowups.
The neocons hate this, letting us see Iranians as people just like us is the last thing they want. We all need to keep looking at the videos.
Just say Hell No to; bomb, bomb bomb, bomb Iran.
Maybe Israelis will change as well.
These are the people your government wanted to nuke, Burston.
bravo RobertHenryEller . . . well said . . . we can only hope . . in the meantime . . . how about an editorial in your newspaper Bradley about tearing down the illegal setlements and complying with international law . . or is there one rule for israel and another for everyone else . . . just asking because it sure does seem that way
"Your people wanted to nuke". When has Israel ever provoked Iran?
We in the west have been frustrating Iranians since 1953, when we toppled their duly elected government and installed the Shah.
t.")
We did it again in the 1980s when we backed Saddam Hussein as our proxy against Iran (Oh yes, folks, many of you may be shocked to know, the US supported, and funded Saddam. Why did we think Saddam had WMDs? Because we sold them to him! Sorry, it's all well documented. It's not even old news. It's not even a secret. But you won't hear this on Fox News, of course. It's not "convenien
It's amazing that Iranians still want Democracy, after over 50 years of the US giving Democracy a bad name in the middle east.
Just like we kept Vietnamese from determining their own future, when their choice was pretty much to live as they do now.
Will we ever learn? Will we ever stop listening to incompetent, ignorant, neo-con war-mongers?
I was having trouble articulating what I was feeling about the situation in Iran. You did it for me. Thanks.
It's funny how people find it so unfamiliar when people do something to fight for freedom and democracy instead of just talking about it.
Pretty good commentary.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with