We progressives have a dream: to elect leaders who inspire and mobilize men and women, throughout America and around the world, to realize the great aspirations of the two historical waves of our time, the Female Century and the Populist Century.
My suggestion is this: re-elect Barack Obama in 2012 and draft Hillary Clinton for 2016 to achieve an era of reform and realignment that will powerfully change history.
If, perchance, any of the three relevant Clintons read this note, I would bring to their attention (and yours) the monumental new album by Bruce Springsteen, Wrecking Ball, a powerful, passionate, populist, patriotic protest against inequity and a tribute to America.
My vision of a Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 would be a continuation of the passion and conviction of Robert Kennedy in 1968 when he rallied working-class whites, blacks and Hispanics to the cause of his campaign based on the interests they shared.
American politics must never be limited to a choice between Karl Rove and Mark Penn, the mirror images of a politics gone bad, in which smart people no longer come to Washington to make a difference, as they did under FDR and JFK, but to make a buck, as far too many do today.
If Hillary runs in 2016 and "does a Robert Kennedy" and "does a Bruce Springsteen" and wins: The Obama-Hillary years could look like the FDR-Truman years, and the JFK-LBJ years, which were eras of great social and economic progress.
There is political risk for Hillary or anyone else to defy the conventional politics of the moment, the crony capitalism of the revolving door that corrupts both parties, in favor of the transforming politics of a movement, but it is the imperative of a movement that meets the historical moment we live in:
The Female Century is real. The Populist Century is equally real. They are bound together, inseparable, transcendent and global.
There is a profound commonality between women who seek the equal pay that is a trademark of the Female Century, and working-class men and women of all races who seek the jobs, equity and dignity for all that is the hallmark of the Populist Century.
There is a profound commonality between the Occupy Wall Street movement and heartland Americans who are disgusted when Washington is bought and sold by those with money.
There is a profound commonality between them and the idealistic young of the Arab Spring, the hundreds of thousands of Israelis who march for economic betterment, the multitudes who marched for Walesa and Havel and Kennedy and King and Mandela, the young and noble heroes (crony capitalism notwithstanding) who carried Lady Liberty across Tiananmen Square, the courageous young woman Neda who ascended to heaven from Tehran, the workers who fight for collective bargaining in Ohio and Wisconsin and the heroic freedom fighters who might perish today, though their cause will ultimately prevail, on the bloodstained streets of Damascus.
Hillary Clinton stands at the intersection of the Female Century and the Populist Century. She speaks for the yearnings of women everywhere but also for the great truth, as RFK understood in 1968, after years of existential experiences and growth similar to that of Hillary Clinton today, that the real magic of politics that matter is the unity of vastly different people with profoundly common interests behind what is, in truth, a movement.
On Wrecking Ball, Springsteen sings with a passionate dose of outrage about what is wrong and offers a tribute to an America he loves and calls the "Land of Hope and Dreams," a flag that promises we take care of our own, and the country he brilliantly calls an "American Land," in which immigrants come from everywhere to build and share the dream that must be the right of all -- which is why I propose the movement of our moment should be:
Re-elect Obama in 2012. Draft Hillary for 2016.
This column was originally published at The Hill.
William Bradley: Hillary for President? On the Other Side of the Gauntlet
Brent Budowsky: Hillary for Vice President
 |
 |
|
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Electoral Votes (270 to win) |
332 | 206 |
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 65,899,660 | 60,932,152 |
| Percent | 51.1% | 47.2% |
| Democrats* | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Current Senate | 53 | 47 |
| Seats gained or lost | +2 | -2 |
| New Total | 55 | 45 |
| Democrats | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Seats won | 201 | 234 |
And he squandered it.
If given four more years he'll only succeede in souring the waters for the next Democratic candidate.
If it's gonna be Hillary, it needs to be Hillary 2012.
She was my choice for 2008.
Yet the naval gazing media writ large, couldn't see past her pant suits.
And....
Women of America........
Ya blew it.
It's gonna be 20 years before you see another woman with the same solid credentials as Hillary run as a presidential candidate.
LBJ's claim to fame -- The Great Society --
4 TRILLION spent in 40 years to change the poverty rate by 4 points.
IF we count each point as 2.5 million people (based on a 40 year average of our population) that equates to 10 million people.
4 TRILLION divided by 10 Million people (4 pts times 2.5 million) we come up with 400,000 dollars per person EXCLUDING interest on what we borrowed.
Quite a legacy indeed. Esspecially if we overlook the fact that poverty has still increased -- The Great Society programs have (as government tends to do) become entrenched, they have a grown a class of people who service those in need (more spending of course) and by any reasonable estimation the programs are an utter failure.
Solutions are not usually found in government. This concept is aptly demonstrated when examining the legacy.
Now why don't you do the math for us on that. You might start with ninety three percent of all of the benefits of said sum going to less than one percent of the population. I'll take the Great Society programs over the High Society ones we have been treated to lately any day of the week.
It will change the future .. Into one that includes a poor America that has cannibalized its wealth and finds itself chumming for change from countries that applied the economic principles shown by history to work. The very ones that built the America of history.