Brent Lang

Brent Lang

Posted: November 1, 2008 01:56 PM

Battered, but Not Beaten, Gay Republicans Remain in the Fold

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

They rank among the most embattled political factions. And it's not just because as a local chapter of a conservative grassroots organization, they represent a bubble of red in the tsunami of blue that is Manhattan. It's that after years of being on the firing line of America's culture wars, gay Republicans are becoming more than just a political anomaly.

They may also be an endangered species.

Branded traitors by many who share their sexual preference, and attacked as immoral by many of their own political persuasion, these gay men and women seek strength in dwindling numbers as members of the Log Cabin Republicans. At least one evening a month, they meet at local bars throughout the city to bond with others over their unique balancing act -- being openly homosexual and unabashedly conservative.

"It was easier to come out as gay to Republican friends than it is to come out as a Republican to other gays," said Brian Graybow, a member of the New York group's governing caucus.

"I'm afraid of where the Republican Party has been heading in recent years, particularly with respect to Christian fundamentalism," said James Saunders, a tax attorney and longtime Log Cabin member. "It makes it uncomfortable to be a Republican."

But leaders of the Log Cabin Republicans believe that the current presidential election represents a chance to turn the page on the divisive Bush years. After declining to endorse President George W. Bush in 2004, the organization has thrown their support behind Senator John McCain's candidacy.

"The McCain-Palin ticket represents perhaps the most gay-friendly Republican ticket in history," said Brian Graybow, a member of the group's governing caucus, in explaining the Log Cabin's endorsement.

At the local level, the New York City chapter of the Log Cabins is using excitement surrounding the 2008 presidential election to reinvigorate an organization that had become moribund during the past five years. In May, Log Cabin launched a redesign of its website and began hosting monthly receptions to bolster membership. Their efforts are paying off. Ranks swelled to over 1,000, and the organization's political action arm has raised $75,000 on behalf of four state assembly candidates who are supportive of gay rights.

While Log Cabin's leadership is feeling sanguine about the direction of the Republican Party, many members at the ground level are more cautiously optimistic.

"I do not agree with the Republican party on gay issues," said Kent Michaels, a research analyst at Goldman Sachs. "In fact, their attitude is truly reprehensible. But the Democratic Party hasn't stepped up on that issue either."

Michaels, however, went on to say that he could never vote for Obama because of his views: "He wants to redistribute the wealth. The ability to get really, really wealthy is part of the American Dream."

Michaels exemplifies the kind of hybrid Republican that Log Cabin gatherings typically attract. The crowd of sixty partygoers watching the debate tended to be affluent, white, and overwhelmingly male. Economic issues and tax policy were of paramount importance, leading them to typically vote Republican (although a smattering sat out the last election). Most, however, were less orthodox in their conservatism than other party faithful, even as everyone in the barroom voiced support for McCain.

"I believe that McCain can better handle entitlement issues," said Carlo Aprea, a hedge fund manager.

"McCain is an example of somebody who put country before everything else," said Dr. Abraham Uncyk, who has been a fan of McCain since he ran in the 2000 presidential primary. "I've been waiting eight years to vote for him."

For Aprea, Uncyk and their fellow Log Cabin members, McCain's views on the economy and international relations make up for his opposition to gay rights. While most expressed dismay that McCain was not more supportive, a few bridled when asked if gay issues factored into their decision.

"I cannot stand narcissistic gay people who think that the world revolves around gay issues," said Reynolds Butler, a Brooklyn-based librarian. "I mean right now we are fighting against Islamo-terrorists who plan to take over the world."

The fiery Butler, who came to event decked out in a McCain-Palin t-shirt, exhibited passion throughout the course of the debate. He heckled Senator Joesph Biden for being "weak on terror" and cheered lustily when Gov. Palin repeated the mantra, "drill, baby drill.

Only one other person matched his intensity. Gioia Ambrette.

As one of only seven women at the bar, Ambrette, with her booming voice and cackle, made certain that what the female Log Cabins lacked in numbers, they more than made up for in volume. Her sarcastic quips ricocheted off the walls of the tiny room, overwhelming the comments of the other, equally spirited members.

"When was the last time he was in Scranton?" hooted Ambrette, her arm draped over her partner of thirty years, as Biden recounted his childhood spent in Pennsylvania steel country.

Four decades ago, Ambrette would have been shocked to have found herself at a gathering like this. As a college student, she was a self-described "crazy hippie leftist," caught up in the anti-Vietnam War movement. As her voicemail business grew, she became irate over the amount she was spending on taxes and found her allegiances shifting to the party of Reagan.

It hasn't been easy. Until she started coming to Log Cabin meetings last summer, Ambrette confesses she never felt safe to express her political views freely.

"Gay liberals are the most intolerant people in the world," Ambrette said. "Once they find out you are conservative, they drop you like a hot potato."

Graybow echoes Ambrette's sentiments, noting "It was easier to come out as gay to Republican friends than it is to come out as a Republican to other gays."

Part of what Ambrette and Graybow's gay friends may be responding to is the sheer novelty of finding a gay Republican.

Recent studies have shown that over the past eight years, the gay vote, which represents about 5 percent of the vote nationally, has become almost exclusively Democratic. In just three weeks, as many as 90 percent of gay voters are likely to pull the lever for Senator Barack Obama, according to polling by Kenneth Sherrill, Professor of Political Science at Hunter College.

It wasn't always this way. In the past, gay voters were not a monolithic constituency. Studies conducted in the 1990s by the late Robert Bailey, a Rutgers University public policy professor, demonstrated that one-third of gay voters supported Republicans in 1998. But that began to change with George W. Bush's election in 2000 and, in particular, with his reelection campaign in 2004.

As part of its strategy, the Bush re-election campaign stoked anti-gay prejudices by maneuvering to have marriage amendments placed on the ballot in swing states such as Ohio, in an effort to bring out evangelical voters. This year, despite the fact that marriage bans will be on the ballot in such electoral-rich states as California and Florida, the war in Iraq and the economy have dwarfed social issues.

Log Cabin members were hopeful that McCain's reluctance to resort to these types of polarizing tactics derived from a greater willingness on his part to support gay rights. As evidence, they cite McCain's opposition to the federal marriage amendment and his recent interview with the Washington Blade, a gay magazine - the first time in the publication's history that a Republican presidential nominee has ever agreed to answer their candidate questionnaire.

Scott Tucker, Communications Director for the national Log Cabin Republicans believes that this election represents a chance to push the Republican Party to be more sympathetic to gay rights issues.

"We believe it's conservative to support relationship recognition," said Tucker. "We are calling for the Republicans to return to the basics: free trade and open markets. We are urging the GOP to return to those issues that unite us rather than those that divide us. And Senator McCain has been willing to hear us out on these things."

In arguing that little has changed, other left-leaning gay groups such as the Stonewall Democrats and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force point to McCain's opposition to hate crime legislation and civil unions and his endorsement of the army's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

They have a point. Though the McCain camp has been more solicitous of the Log Cabins than past Republican candidacies, sending top strategist Steve Schmidt to accept their endorsement in person and calling the group from time to time for advice, it is notable that there is no section on the McCain's website devoted to gay issues. In contrast, Sen. Obama's campaign has devoted enormous resources to courting gay voters by forming an Obama Pride group numbering in the tens of thousands and appearing with other Democratic primary candidates at a gay rights voter forum last fall.

Though part of a shrinking subset of the American electorate, as the debate commenced, the Log Cabin Republicans at the Sheraton came together to show their solidarity. They pumped their fists in the air, stomped their feet and hollered words of encouragement while washing down wings and burgers with martinis and beer.

The loudest cheers, however, were reserved for Gov. Palin's answer to a question regarding benefits for same-sex couples. While Gov. Palin reaffirmed her opposition to gay marriage, she did state: "No one would ever propose, not in a McCain-Palin administration, to do anything to prohibit, say, visitations in a hospital or contracts being signed, negotiated between parties."

Good enough for the crowd at the Sheraton. Their catcalls of approval were so uproarious that they drowned out Sen. Biden's follow up. After the debate ended and members made their goodbyes, many were still talking excitedly about Gov. Palin's response.

But a few remained wary. James Saunders admitted that he still harbors doubts regarding his allegiance to the GOP. Yet he hopes that one day soon, perhaps under a McCain administration, the party will return to the big tent philosophy it once espoused.

"I'm an Episcopalian and I'm a Republican," said Saunders. "But that can be difficult today, which is a shame. The Bible tells us that God created everyone in his own image.

"Shouldn't that include homosexuals?"

They rank among the most embattled political factions. And it's not just because as a local chapter of a conservative grassroots organization, they represent a bubble of red in the tsunami of blue tha...
They rank among the most embattled political factions. And it's not just because as a local chapter of a conservative grassroots organization, they represent a bubble of red in the tsunami of blue tha...
 
Comments
67
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- musselmanm I'm a Fan of musselmanm 18 fans permalink
photo

Log Cabin gays can rest secure that the Democrats will try to end the hatred the Republicans have for the gay and lesbian community.
I guess your civil right do not matter when you make gobs of money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 11/02/2008
- Badbone I'm a Fan of Badbone 11 fans permalink

Like a battered wife, the log cabin repubs keep going back to those that hurt them. And like that battered wife, people around them keep asking, why do you stay with that guy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 11/02/2008
- Egalitare I'm a Fan of Egalitare 6 fans permalink
photo

It's all about the money for many (though probably not most) of this segment of voters:
"I do not agree with the Republican party on gay issues," said Kent Michaels, a research analyst at Goldman Sachs. "In fact, their attitude is truly reprehensible. But the Democratic Party hasn't stepped up on that issue either."

Michaels, however, went on to say that he could never vote for Obama because of his views: "He wants to redistribute the wealth. The ability to get really, really wealthy is part of the American Dream."

Funny. Clinton's tax increases didn't prevent Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and a host of other tech-boomers from getting "really, really wealthy." And they were facing almost double the corporate tax rates that Big Oil and the Big Three were subject to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 11/02/2008
- McFlipFlop I'm a Fan of McFlipFlop 14 fans permalink
photo

Exactly. Like paying 3% more in taxes keeps someone from being wealthy.

Sounds like a bunch of very confused people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 11/02/2008
- jugganaut I'm a Fan of jugganaut 12 fans permalink

Log Cabin Republicans are nothing more than Uncle Toms, so they certainly chose a fitting name for their group.

How any GLBT people would support a party which perennially drags them out as its whipping boy and beats on them just to drum up votes from the ignorant is beyond me.

I'm sorry, but when you elevate the value of a few pennies here and there over your very identity-which is what the LCR's do-you deserve all the scorn and derision you get from other gays.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 11/02/2008

"The McCain-Palin ticket represents perhaps the most gay-friendly Republican ticket in history," said Brian Graybow
Seriously? If you ever get to meet Gov Palin, watch your back. You'll find yourself with a sack thrown over your head and shoved into the back of a waiting van ready to take you to her witch doctor pastor so they can heal you. Exocise the demons that possess you so that you will be normal - just like them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 11/02/2008

It's always a delight to have my work cited. I want to note two things. First, the study was conducted in 2007 in collaboration with Pat Egan and Murray Edelman. Second, the 90% figure was in a hypothetical presidential horserace between an unnamed Democratic candidate and an unnamed Republican candidate. Votes in a real election are affected by candiate qualities and issues as well as by partisan allegiances. Nevertheless, we find that the level of identification with the Democratic Party among gay voters is extraordinary. Close to 70% of LGBs who are children of Republicans identify as Democrats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 11/02/2008

In that VP debate Palin brought up being gay as being a "choice." Was that lost on anyone? Does anyone actually use that ridiculous argument anymore???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 11/02/2008

Gay and Black Republicans? That just doesn't make sense. DO people really hate themselves so much that they would support a party that hates them? What is this, some kind of Stockholm Syndrome? I don't get it.

If people only tolerate you for your vote then you really should be looking somewhere else for acceptance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 11/02/2008
- DanmaxKL I'm a Fan of DanmaxKL 6 fans permalink
photo

Log cabin Repuglican... oxymoronic to say the least . You have to give it to the Repugs mind you , they sure know how to pitch their product .. albeit a lot of it is mis-selling. They are good at getting marginalised social groups to vote against their self interest,be it on economic or social issues....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 11/02/2008
- sweetwilly I'm a Fan of sweetwilly 4 fans permalink

very few headlines have dropped my jaw like this one. i thought to my myself, well, i'm not gay so maybe i don't see how some things affect the gay community.
but i see this ticket, and the entire republican party of the past two decades, as highly intolerant of anything except money, control, power, and a fundamentalist (and highly hypocritical) sense of morality. this ticket would like nothing better than to have you disappear. but since they can't really do that, they double speak their position on you, to you.
so i don't think it's about being gay or not, i think it's about being in complete denial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 AM on 11/02/2008
- XME I'm a Fan of XME 26 fans permalink
photo

I'm guessing these folks haven't had the "pleasure" of getting to meet Sarah Palin and get to know her views!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 AM on 11/02/2008
- ndolomar I'm a Fan of ndolomar 11 fans permalink

I copy edit an LGBT magazine in SoCal, and sometimes both the editor and I find it disturbing that gay Republicans find it necessary to support the McCain/Palin ticket. If their biggest concern is "Islamo-Fascism," you'd think these people --- who mostly claim to be Republican because of economic issues -- would support Bob Barr, who at least recognizes the fundamental rights of everyone, regardless of sexual orientation or gender. After the California chapter of Log Cabin endorsed McCain/Palin, both the editor and I realized that some people, no matter how intelligent or how discriminated against, will continue to vote against their best interest. How sad indeed. Perhaps they need another four to eight years of similar mistreatment before they get the net. Maybe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 AM on 11/02/2008
- sypage I'm a Fan of sypage 2 fans permalink

"Scott Tucker...believes that this election represents a chance to push the Republican Party to be more sympathetic to gay rights issues."

Uh-huh.

Interesting that you should use the word "battered" in the headline. Having listened for years to the Log Cabin Republicans try to justify their support of that party, I have come to the conclusion that they suffer from something akin to battered-spouse syndrome: vehemently defending their abuser, declaring their faith that the spouse will change, "she didn't really mean it," "he really does love me," etc. When will they learn? When it's finally too late?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 AM on 11/02/2008
photo

If leading gay conservative Andrew Sullivan is endorsing Obama, and he absolutely hates Palin that tells you much about these LCR people. They obviously dislike themselves. Furthermore, what is it about being a conservative and having to be a Republican? I think fiscally conservative but socially liberal people need to show how proud they are to be a Democrat

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 AM on 11/02/2008
- HC4BO I'm a Fan of HC4BO 34 fans permalink
photo

Gay Republican ?

Now that is a contradiction by itself ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 AM on 11/02/2008
- kaukerc I'm a Fan of kaukerc 9 fans permalink

"I cannot stand narcissistic gay people who think that the world revolves around gay issues..."

Really? I mean REALLY???!!! You should try living as a gay man down here in the south for a day....I think you would be whistling a different tune very fast. And exactly when did wanting equality in our lives turn into narcissism? Some things in life are more important than the almighty dollar.... or even 30 pieces of silver.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 11/02/2008

What's the psychological term for accusing others of your own weakness - projection, or is there one that's more specific?
To espouse becoming "super wealthy" as the one issue to trump all others, and then accuse others of narcissism, well ... LCRs couldn't be more clearly pre-therapy, they need serious, deep, and long-term self-examination; facing the truth of their self-hatred is only the beginning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 11/02/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect