iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brian Secemsky, M.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Brian Secemsky, M.D.
 

Is Fish Oil The New Snake Oil?

Posted: 06/18/2012 9:30 pm

Last week, the New England Journal of Medicine published a study that caused my heart to skip a beat: daily supplementation of fish oil did not reduce the rate of lethal cardiovascular events (heart attack, strokes, irregular heart beat) in patients at high risk for such events.

As an avid fish oil enthusiast and chronic hypochondriac, it's an understatement when I say that this unsettles me. Even though I am more at risk for a panic attack than a heart attack, I still assumed that taking a daily dose of fish oil would protect me from the day that I keel over from eating too much take-out Chinese food.

Now that this may not be the case, I thought it wise to investigate further on the topic of fish oil and its potential to enhance health before officially retiring my take-out menu drawer.

Is it worth the cost and fishy breath that comes with taking fish oil supplements, or is this just another pharmacological pipedream?

What is fish oil?

Although fish oil preparations have been around for ages (the precocious British first extracted cod liver oil around 1775), only recently has fish oil supplements been regarded as being the closest thing to the fountain of youth. In fact, just by typing the term fish oil in any online search engine (I prefer to ask Jeeves) you may find all sorts of health benefits just by taking a few pills of fish fat a day. Fish fat, you say? Essentially, yes.

Fish oil can be cultured from most marine life, ranging from mackerel to the great white shark. As these fish pray on smaller fish, plankton, and microalgae, they accumulate chemical buildings blocks of fat in their tissues that the fish oil supplements we buy are based on. Specifically, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), both part of the omega-3 fatty acid group, are largely studied as potentially health-enhancing substances when taken regularly. In basic lab settings, these molecules have been shown to reduce inflammation on a cellular level.

Because it is this inflammatory physiological state that is thought to damage vital organs and contribute to a wide array of human disease, researchers began to clinically test the anti-inflammatory molecules in humans in search of any benefits.

And benefits they certainly found.

The Victories:

Similar to the online search of fish oil we've all just completed, finding core clinical scientific journal articles studying the effects of fish oil on human health was, yes, like shooting fish in a barrel. (No applause necessary.)

Even limiting my search to the past few years revealed substantial evidence for the protective benefits of fish oil on human disease.

Are you worried about your eyes? Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration, the leading cause of adult blindness in industrialized nations, in the studied female population (sorry, guys).

Are you feeling down? Taking daily doses of fish oil significantly reduced depressive symptoms in a patient population experiencing major depressive episodes without co-existing anxiety symptoms. Taking omega-3's has also been shown to protect the heart.

Studies have associated fish oil consumption with reduced triglycerides, a type of fat compound linked to hardening of the arteries and strokes, and found to increase in heart function in patients with congestive heart failure.

The Disappointments:

For as many journal articles I found suggesting fish oil to be the next slam dunk in medical pharmacology, I discovered just as many clinical trials showing it to be a complete air-ball.

In one study population, omega-3 supplementation in combination with diet and exercise did not improve weight loss. There goes tonight's beef fried rice and egg rolls.

In another study, high dietary intake of fish oil was found to increase the risk of contracting type-2 diabetes. Admittingly, frightening.

Take Home Point:

Fish oil is certainly not the coming messiah. Taking it regularly will not make us immortal any more than jogging an extra mile a day or keeping that beef jerky bag in the grocery aisle.

Because remember, fish oil supplementation is essentially that--a supplement to our otherwise supposed healthy living.

So in the end, will I continue to brave the fishy breath and ever-widening hole in my pocket? Yes.

But I will also run that extra mile and, perhaps one day, resist the jerky.

 

Follow Brian Secemsky, M.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BrianSecemskyMD

FOLLOW HEALTH NEWS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:57 PM on 06/23/2012
You want 3-4 grams per day of quality EPA based fish oil. The more EPA the better. AMR101's trials and outcomes studies are the best examples. The more EPA the less fishy aftertaste. EPA controls inflammation better than DHA.
07:54 PM on 06/23/2012
I have spent hours researching fish oil. all does and brands are not created equally. You want 3-4 grams a day of mostly of a quality EPA based fish oil. AMR101's outcomes study will prove this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lily P
Sofa King Awesome!
02:41 PM on 06/20/2012
I drink it straight 'out the bottle. It's lemon flavored. Yum. I don't get fish breath either.
12:02 PM on 06/20/2012
I did my masters degree paper on the cardiometabolic benefits associated with omega-3 consumption and in the end the research all underscores the importance of an overall healthy diet. Just consuming fish oil without watching the rest of one's diet is a recipe for disaster.
03:28 PM on 06/19/2012
The macular degeneration/fish oil study sounds suspect. Whenever a study claims to have obtained the desired results in one gender but not the other, I take it to mean that it had no meaningful results and the people doing the study are trying to deliberately skew the data in their favor. It would be different if they were dealing with hormonal or gender specific issues, but if fish oil prevents macular degeneration in women, it should have the same effect on men. Even if the numbers were only slightly improved for the men taking fishoil and substantially improved for women, it may have something to it. But if the only way to produce the desired outcome is by ignoring the results of the men tested, then it isn't a scientifically valid study.

The same could possibly said for the second study, unless they only recruited subjects without anxiety disorders in the first place.
10:45 AM on 06/20/2012
I believe the study he was referring to only included women

http://archopht.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1106372
12:12 PM on 06/20/2012
Wiping the egg off my face now. Not really sure why they would do a study for age related macular degeneration that only involved women, but I'm sure they had their reasons. That'll teach me not to spout off before I know all the facts. Thanks for setting me straight!
03:26 PM on 06/19/2012
Hi, The study was primarily powered to evaluate the effects of Largine insulin which failed every bit as much as fish oil which was a side arm trial. Why the "fish oil fails" headline of the study. And why the ridiculous dose of only 900mg a day which would barely alter the Omega 6/3 ratios of these high risk patients. If you answer these questions you will understand the mentality behind major allopathic journals publishing these types of studies.
04:58 AM on 06/19/2012
I read some reviews of the fish oil omega 3 supplement I bought. According to two reviews, one based on a doctor's analysis, the gel capsule didn't break down and the fish oil was never digested/absorbed.
So who knows.
photo
Hoonieman
Enjoy yourself; it's later than you think ..
01:16 AM on 06/19/2012
Sounds like a "fish story" to me ..

:)