"...we have an outstanding opportunity to change the political landscape by taking on South Florida's entrenched Republican trio...all three Republican incumbents will be challenged by strong Democratic challengers..."
It's a missed opportunity for the two Democratic incumbents who are not actively supporting the strong Democratic challengers. Why should voters support these candidates when their own elected officials aren't supporting them, when the CHAIR of the Red To Blue program is not actively supporting them even when that is the very purpose of the program she is chairing?
Voters are grown-ups. They know that their elected officials help each other out at election time. I seriously doubt any of the Republican voters will hold it against them if they campaign for their own. If it bothers them, they probably didn't vote for the Democrats anyway, so it's no big loss. Really, there is no justification whatsoever for incumbent Democrats refusing to campaign for Democratic challengers. It's disloyal and makes it harder to change Red seats to Blue. And this is especially true for the program chair. These rogue Democrats need to get on track with what's in the best interest of the party. If Debbie Wasserman-Schulz cannot perform the most important of her duties, then she should be replaced. And every incumbent Democrat should be penalized in some way if they do not actively campaign for challengers in their region. Less dollars for campaigning sounds like a good start.





Loading comments…



Posted March 20, 2008 | 07:57 PM (EST)