iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brienne Walsh

GET UPDATES FROM Brienne Walsh
 

An Open Letter to the Women Who Are Telling Me It's My Fault I'm Not Married

Posted: 03/03/11 08:58 AM ET

Every year, right around Valentine's Day, a flurry of women write articles directly addressing the large population of single women in New York.

This year, the two that I read were "Why You're Not Married" by Tracy McMillan, a "Mad Men" staff writer, in The Huffington Post, and "Dear Single Women of NYC: It's Not Them, It's You" by Jen Doll in the Village Voice.

Both articles share a message: "Women: it's your fault that you're not married, and you should stop bitching about how you can't find a good man."

These sorts of articles used to scare the ever-loving daylights out of me; now they're just infuriating.

I know it's my fault I'm not married. I know that in the future, if I don't get married, it will be my fault as well. And thanks to the advancements made by the women in the generation above me, it's my decision to make.

Because staying in a bad relationship just because it is heading towards marriage is like putting a plastic bag over your head, and just letting in enough air that you can stay alive.

So, I'd like to take a minute to directly address the women, or at least the type of woman, who are directly addressing these articles to me.

Obviously, marriage is not a fairy tale; stop telling us that.

McMillan wraps up her article with this "insight:"

Because ultimately, marriage is not about getting something -- it's about giving it. Strangely, men understand this more than we do. Probably because for them marriage involves sacrificing their most treasured possession -- a free-agent penis -- and for us, it's the culmination of a princess fantasy so universal, it built Disneyland.

But I grew up in a generation of women that literally never stopped hearing that marriage isn't a fairy tale. We were fed statistics about divorce in the same way that the Baby Boomer generation was bombarded with ICBM figures. Daily, we were told that men were not Prince Charming, that they would not vanquish a dragon to save us, rescue us from a tower or even just fight their way through a double transfer on the subway to come kiss
us goodnight.

And so we learned how to expect literally nothing from a man. And do you know what happened because of that? We learned to let men treat us like crap. We came to believe that men were doing us a favor by settling down -- because otherwise they would be out spraying the world of willing women with their abundant seed. We were taught to be grateful if a man showed interest in us, and we became fearful at all times that he would leave us once he did. Women of my generation are still the second-class citizens of
fairy tales: only now, we don't even have the chivalry or the ever-blooming roses to comfort us in our eternal boredom.

"All men want is for us to be nice to them." Do you know what men don't want? A lot of things that I really value about myself.

A few weeks ago, I was interviewing a woman who is at the top of her chosen profession. She's a single mother to her teenage daughter. She is enormously successful, well-educated, beautiful -- and never married.

Our conversation eventually -- and inevitably -- led us to the topic of why she never married, and to illustrate the point, she told me a story. "When I was younger," she said, "I was dating a man who told me: 'You're extraordinarily smart, and you're extraordinarily beautiful. You need a man who is either so strong that he can stand up to you, or so weak that you can walk all over him. I'm just a normal man. I'm not the man for you.'"

[20 years later, they met again, and she asked him why he had married his wife. "She made good sandwiches," he said.]

As I was leaving, she said to me, with a great deal of kindness: "You're pretty, and you're smart. It's a curse. You'll have a lot of difficulty finding a man."

It could have been crushing, if I wasn't aware of it already. For the first time in my life, someone openly acknowledged the dirty dark secret of my generation of women. And that is that all of the qualities we cultivate in ourselves from our first overachieving moments in elementary school to our graduation from the best universities in the nation -- confidence in our physical appearance, the ability to support ourselves, our cultured and well-read minds, the sterling pedigree of our schooling, our taste for healthy debate with our peers (both men and women) -- actually won't help us to find an equal partner. What it will do is make an "equal" man feel insecure, and what he will do with that insecurity is label us as "crazy." And crazy people aren't to be taken seriously -- they're to be medicated, dosed, tamed like "Kate," the eponymous shrew -- and made into the perfect wife. In essence, in order to participate in the ritual custom of marriage, we have to become shadows of our best selves.

So when you say to me, Tracy McMillan, that I have to work around a "man's fear and insecurity in order to get married," I say to you, why aren't you telling me that I should be going out to look for the men who wants a woman like me? (They do exist; some of them are my friends.) Instead of being told I need to medicate my "craziness" to pander to a man's itty-bitty oh-so-witty ego, I want a man who is every bit my match, and is not scared off by that. I want a man who appreciates that I enjoy sex. I want a man who loves that I can fire back a sassy comment like Katharine Hepburn on one of her lazy days.

I have a pedigree like an Arabian thoroughbred -- double Ivy League degrees in art history, the ability to speak in five languages, a resume full of prestigious jobs in the art world, a history of international travel that even Bruce Chatwin would gape at -- and it's come to the point that if a man doesn't immediately identify me as crazy, I question if he's even listening to me when I open my mouth.

When are women going to start telling women not to be afraid of raising children by themselves?

I'm a woman who both knows that she wants to have children, and who also knows that she'd like to have a few more opportunities to really, really fall in love. Because even though I know that the clock is ticking on my middle-aged ovaries, and even though I know that marriage isn't a fairy tale, I'd still like to actually be madly in love with the person I'm going to do all of this sacrificing and fighting and laughing and struggling with. I've been in love before, with men who were arguably (and endearingly) more troll than Prince Charming, and I know it can happen again.

In her article Doll quotes a friend as saying: "'If you could have babies easily into your 50s, I think you'd go on being single forever.'" She then follows the quote with the maxim: "But we can't. This is just a biological fact."

But it's clearly not a biological fact that a woman needs to be in a relationship to have a child. A decade from now, I know that I'll be making a more-than-decent living, and so, assuming I don't ask a friend to knock me up (hey, best friends make the best lovers, right?), I'll have plenty of money to pay for in vitro fertilization. I have many, many good friends, five siblings, relatively young parents, and over 20 aunts and uncles who would help me to raise that baby. I enjoy the perks of a thriving, enormous Irish Catholic family, but even if I didn't have over 50 immediate biological relatives, I still have the family that I've created from friends, mentors, lovers and co-workers in New York. And so do most women that I know. It might not be easy for us to be single mothers, but it would surely be workable, just another way of doing things that would have the same balance of happiness, sadness, and hardship as any other life I may choose to live.

All that I'm trying to say, ladies, is stop trying to frighten me; make me feel empowered. Speak to me like I can make my own decisions, and don't demean the difficulties I may be having finding a guy who I think is worth my time and energy. Marriage is a rapidly-changing institution. Let's discuss how it can be molded to fit our rising status, rather than trying to
jam ourselves into some outdated ideal.

Meanwhile, leave me a little room for my fantasies and my fairy tales. If I don't dream of the occasional miracle, the found glass slipper, the kiss that awakens me from my slumber, how do you expect me to make it through the drudgery of life?

 

Follow Brienne Walsh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/briennewalsh

Every year, right around Valentine's Day, a flurry of women write articles directly addressing the large population of single women in New York. This year, the two that I read were "Why You're Not Ma...
Every year, right around Valentine's Day, a flurry of women write articles directly addressing the large population of single women in New York. This year, the two that I read were "Why You're Not Ma...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,310
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
photo
Jokergirl
No joke actually, humor helps heal
01:47 AM on 04/26/2011
There's always been a stigma through out history with women who are not married, from oh, there a witch, to they are mentally inept, to they can't afford to be married, to they're a feminist, they're a lesbian, they are loose, they are controlling etc.etc.etc. With all those "positive" statistics about marriage, co-habitation, relationships, it's a wonder that anyone stays married at all anymore. Some couples they fall in love, best of friends, then when they get married it goes straight into the toilet. People marry for the wrong reasons a lot, they want to change the other person to fit their liking. Why should you have to change someone just to be with them? Why should they have to change you? Marriage is fine, but it's quickly becoming an outdated concept I think. Most married couples I know LIKED each other better when they were NOT married. I doesn't give a single person much hope to want to get married either. Is it my fault I'm not married? Yes, but so what, I'm not one of those women who is out there chasing down a future husband. Then again I'm wired differently.
12:19 AM on 04/26/2011
Reading articles like this, I'm beginning to think marriage means as much to women as sex means to men.
12:16 AM on 04/26/2011
"We came to believe that men were doing us a favor by settling down -- because otherwise they would be out spraying the world of willing women with their abundant seed." Ms. Ivy League

A man might be doing himself a disfavor by settling down -- with the wrong woman.

I think women try to marry within their socio-economic class or above. I don't see many women marrying down. Oprah won't be dating a cab driver. She might date a guy who was the CEO of a multibillion dollar nationwide cab company. Ms. Ivy League is probably self-limiting in this regard. Would she date a dude who graduated from Long Island University and ran a small five man, er, five person construction business? I doubt it.

As far as spraying abundant seed with willing women, I wish it was as easy and the women as willing as she implies. I'm not a cabbie, so that can't be my problem. Maybe I'm living in the wrong city.
05:43 PM on 03/16/2011
"But I grew up in a generation of women that literally never stopped hearing that marriage isn't a fairy tale. We were fed statistics about divorce in the same way that the Baby Boomer generation was bombarded with ICBM figures. Daily, we were told that men were not Prince Charming, that they would not vanquish a dragon to save us, rescue us from a tower or even just fight their way through a double transfer on the subway to come kiss us goodnight."

Ah, but that's not true. Your generation may have been told that men were garbage, but only MOST men. You were also led to believe that you would someday find your Prince Charming, through any number of books, TV shows, and movies. The plot has been re-done so many times it's amazing people still patronize these things: woman gets treated badly by husband/boyfriend/whatever and finds new guy who is just perfect, and they live happily ever after. This results in generations of overly picky women who think that being with someone who isn't perfect is equivalent to "settling."
11:12 PM on 03/14/2011
Thank you so much for taking the time to write this article. It's refreshing to know that I am not alone in my choice of being choosy and not settling for fear of being alone. I'd opt to be alone than with the wrong man anyday, and am fully aware that as a result, I may be alone for the rest of my life. I am open to finding the perfect guy for me, but am also open to the fact that he may not be found in this lifetime. May the possibility of finding Mr.Right keep us hopeful, but our common sense keep us grounded! :)
12:26 AM on 04/26/2011
"I'd opt to be alone than with the wrong man anyday" Rachel

Smart woman. If you need confirmation of your wisdom, Rachel, take a stroll over to the board on Divorce and read the horror stories there. A matrimonial motivation killer.
06:31 PM on 03/09/2011
"Watching From Afar" and "JF12" I hear you guys loud and clear! Let's be real, there are times in life when men and women BOTH treat each other like crap. If I allow either gender to continue to treat me like crap then the only person I can blame is - me! Not my parents, or my period, or the full moon, or the wind speed, or the woman's movement. People have been treating each other like crap since the beginning of time. Me? I've been married twice. Been proposed to a third time. Still good friends will all the men in my life. Personally, I treat my husband with kindness and will only accept being treated the likewise. I don't think it's rocket science to find a good relationship! If do think, if you can't find one, you have to look in a mirror.
photo
jf12
When I saw her I marveled greatly.
12:51 PM on 03/10/2011
Sorry, don't buy it. As a long-lived male, I have noticed that the only men who can stay friends with many of the women they broke up with are, wait for it, the kind of guys who break up with many women. Out of 100 men and women, there are approximately 2 of these guys.
01:54 PM on 03/10/2011
What exactly is your point? Men and women can't remain friendly after they break up? If you can't - maybe you do fall into the treating like "crap" category. Which would explain it -
12:35 AM on 04/26/2011
"If I allow either gender to continue to treat me like crap then the only person I can blame is - me!"

What if someone was vandalizing your house every month or so? Would you blame yourself or the vandal?

I'm just throwing out a hypothetical for laughs, so you don't have to answer. On the other hand, you shouldn't have to move or build a moat to protect your crib.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thetruthhoits
05:56 PM on 03/09/2011
I was gonna say columnists should try working on men. So rarely do I see a man who cares for his appearance and has a job, much less a job. It's not that many women are not finding men who want them. It's that everyone is telling them to lower their standards, and not superficial ones either. An educated man who wears clean trousers should not be a high standard.
I liked this article. Telling a woman to find the one is akin to telling an old lady to walk across the street faster.
11:12 AM on 04/18/2011
I agree. Feminists promised men that better conditions for women would give us better quality women, but it was just a big hoax. Even though they're already trying to sell women 24/7/365, men aren't buying, so they need to do more of the same.
12:41 AM on 04/26/2011
"An educated man who wears clean trousers should not be a high standard."

I got the educated part down cold, but here in sunny Southern California I usually wear shorts instead of trousers.

Do I still meet the standard?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Comeplayinmyreality
enter at your own risk
04:15 PM on 03/09/2011
Ok this is slightly off topic but still having to do with marriage, children and relationships. What I find hard as a divorced mother of 2 boys is finding a decent man who is willing to have a ready made family. I have noticed with divorced or single friends of mine, both men and women, is that a man whether he be a divorced father or single father has an easier time finding a woman who wants to be "mom" than us ladies do finding a man who wants to be "dad".
09:49 PM on 03/09/2011
Your experience is an accurate and helpful warning to all women who are thinking of exiting a marriage or other relationship with their children's father. It is not, repeat NOT, the case that you're going to easily replace that man in terms of his innate concern for your children with him. In fact, you should be highly vigilant about the motives of any man who does show a great interest in your children. It is a sad fact about behavioral biology, but step parents -- fathers and mothers -- are extremely unlikely to ever feel the degree of true concern that a biological parent does.
photo
jf12
When I saw her I marveled greatly.
01:06 PM on 03/10/2011
Yes, but. The reasons that decent men are relectant are the same reasons that there is the "wicked stepmother" stereotype so much more than the "wicked stepfather". 1) There are more stepmother raising little ones 2) They tend to treat them a lot worse than you would think.

Not to be too unkind, but by decent man you mean one who will happily invest his time and money raising another man's children? In other contexts this is known as cuckoldry etc.
02:58 PM on 03/09/2011
Old Irish saying ..........go forth, find a kind soul and have some little ones. I would like to see you put kindness first when you think about men.
If you are in the presence of a really kind person, it can melt those hard edges in a minute and make you a better person.
01:08 PM on 03/09/2011
Hi. I support you. You do, indeed, sound like an amazing woman. I certainly don't think this is true of all men but I know it's true that a lot of men are intimidated with a woman who either earns more, or has more or is very very smart. It's not fair but it is the way it is.

I think you should grab whatever happiness you can. You sound like you have an excellent support system. I think you should go ahead and have a child. Go for it. And don't forget that you can be a single mom and and find love afterwards. Yes, it might be harder but it does happen.
photo
jf12
When I saw her I marveled greatly.
03:24 PM on 03/09/2011
You're missing the point. We all get that she thinks she's a 10, fine. What she is complaining about is that men don't think that a 10 is so much better than, say, an 8.
04:29 PM on 03/09/2011
I think you're both missing the point, as is the author (who, but for her ego and unfortunate point of view, seems like a great catch). As someone who "really, really" wants to fall in love, this article demonstrates that she is going about the process all wrong and placing an emphasis on criteria that shouldn't matter at the end of the day (i.e., the whole pedigree thing) and seemingly will accept nothing less than absolute perfection while letting otherwise amazing guys pass her by - the difficulties she speaks of in finding a great guy is simply her and her way of thinking; its not men, especially when it comes to meeting a woman with such stellar credentials. Us single guys who are "every bit [the author's] match" in this city are used to smart, successful great looking women with ridiculous peddigrees; they're all over the place here. The difference between (a) the author and (b) a smart, successful great looking woman with whom men actual want to fall in love and settle down with is that the latter (who likely also wants to "really, really fall in love") demonstrates an emphasis on those intangibles like a sweet disposition, honesty, compassion, humor, a willingness to compromise/sacrifice and respect over pedigree (and likewise doesn't wave around their pedigree like a flag) rather than approaching love like a business transaction, touting her resume and dismissing those whose salary, education or number of passport stamps isn't worth her time or energy.
12:56 AM on 04/26/2011
"We all get that she thinks she's a 10" jf12

You're right, jf, that came through pretty loud and clear.

I'm fairly sure she has a pretty high opinion of herself. And maybe, just maybe, a pretty low opinion of most men she meets?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blisslet
bringing a little glamour to the stones and bones.
10:58 AM on 03/09/2011
thank you so much for this article. i am a single mother by choice, who is really quite shocked at how often i am put in the position of defending myself for that very choice. my son and i and my lovely career are doing quite well and i would not change a thing.

thank you thank you thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
usorthem3
07:56 AM on 03/09/2011
Just blame the gay people for not being married, everyone else seems to use it as the reason hetrosexual couples are divorced, can't have children, can't be faithful to their marriages....... abortion they are still trying to figure how that can be blamed on gay people too.
03:47 PM on 03/09/2011
they blame that on the black people.
05:04 PM on 03/08/2011
As a single woman, I really don't think it is the rise in feminism and greater influx of educated women in the dating marketplace that dampens the sound of wedding bells. I think it is a losing battle against the changing landscape of society. I grew up in a traditional household, complete with a breadwinning father that brought home the paycheck while my mother stayed at home to make sure that we all remained healthy. They were both operating on two halves of a whole, like an assembly line that made raising a family more efficient.

We are now facing many changes that challenge the idea of gender roles. Women are pursuing demanding careers. Men have grown comfortable with the idea of bachelorhood. The act of raising a family, though never an easy task, does not operate as a well-oiled machine anymore.

I consider myself a closet housewife. I bake brownies from scratch, can sort laundry with my eyes closed, and have an obsession with eco-friendly cleaning. Some days, I even fantasize about having a family of my own one day. But then I take a look at my aging parents with no retirement savings and my physically-disabled baby brother, and realize that without a stable career they won't be taken care of. And if my wanting a career and my reasons for having one intimidates a potential mate, then he obviously will not be right for me.
10:08 PM on 03/08/2011
It is interesting to consider your plight as it relates to the financial needs of your parents and brother, as I regard this as a microcosm of the real reason why women now constitute over one half of the U.S. workforce. The real reason is a decline in the prosperity of Americans.

What two large countries in the world in the last 50 years had long periods of virtually compulsory work requirements for women? Communist Russia and communist China.

Was this happening because these countries wished to help their citizens "self-actualize", or was this happening because these countries needed every able-bodied and able-minded person working to be working in order for their economies and citizens to survive?

One imagines the latter.
03:32 AM on 03/09/2011
I agree with you, but I don't know one democratic, capitalist world power where a dual income is not almost a prerequisite for a family to live a comfortable middle-class lifestyle without going into debt. So we can't really bemoan the past. It's unfortunate that women have to be as "careerist" as men these days because the one-income system doesn't work for all but the wealthiest.

I know I'm not only speaking for myself when I say that I have a job, not a career. I like doing well at my job because I enjoy what I do, but I also do not have the option of not working. Most of what does not go to rent or bills I save, and I try to minimize stray expenses as much as possible because I want as much of my earnings to go toward my future family as possible (partly so I can afford to stay at home and be a mother).

I don't know much about the Scandinavian welfare-state democracies - maybe stay-at-home women are given major government subsidies there so they can spend more time at home with their kids. Would like to know the stats on these.
08:27 AM on 03/16/2011
"It is interestin­g to consider your plight as it relates to the financial needs of your parents and brother, as I regard this as a microcosm of the real reason why women now constitute over one half of the U.S. workforce. The real reason is a decline in the prosperity of Americans."

-THANK YOU for this
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
ShipCritic
NYC Dog Lover
10:40 AM on 03/08/2011
I don't know what the issue is here .... you're insulted by people telling you why you're not married? You want to have it all? Sorry, perhaps I'm dense.

I''m late 40's, happily divorced, no children, and love my life. My experience is this: "the best men" get snapped up in their 20's, physically the best time for women to have children. Get into your 30's, and the odds of even finding a terrific guy get smaller each year as the chance of having children decreases.

Odds are if you can't find a good man to marry, you waited too long.

And yes you can have a child without having a relationship. If you're emotionally,physically and financially equipped to do that it's probably the best option. If the terrific guy also shows up it's icing on the cake.
01:02 PM on 03/08/2011
I'm a guy who just turned thirty who feels the exact same way. Divorced, no kids, and love my life. The most amazing observation I have made to date is, I have few peers. People go one way or another, kids and wife, or bachelor lifestyle. To split the two and find myself in the middle has been awkward. Just my 2 cents. Thanks for your time.
12:06 AM on 03/09/2011
Odds are if you can't find a good guy to marry (if you so desire it), you've spent too many of your prime guy-attracting years blowing off otherwise good guys who were "too this" or "not enough that", and before you know it your Google stock has turned into WaMu.

Does anybody ever really feel sorry for anyone who's lifetime of questionable or bad decisions leads them to a place they don't like? Not really.
12:25 AM on 03/09/2011
That's a bit too simplistic of an analysis. A lot of my friends who are still single and approaching (or past) 30 are that way for a bundle of reasons. Maybe a LTR didn't work out. Maybe they moved abroad and are living in a hardship post and focusing on their career for a few years. Maybe a parent passed away or they were dealing with more pressing personal concerns than finding someone to fill the role of spouse.

I agree that people who blow off otherwise great people for being "too this" or "not enough that" will find themselves single, perhaps unhappily so. But men are just as guilty of this as women. Men have a bit longer of a shelf life, but not so much so.
10:03 AM on 03/08/2011
Personally, I like good-looking, smart women so much I married one.
Buy her roses? Occasionally. Load the dishwasher? On my way in a few minutes. Hoover the floor? Yes I can do that.

But, you know, if someone thinks that's all there is then...I dunno...might they have missed something?

Yes, my wife makes good sandwiches - but so do I. You know, I looked after myself for years before we got together and I could still manage it now. That isn't why we got together, why we stayed together and why we are still together now. Or maybe the fact that I wasn't looking for a domestic servant IS part of the reason we're still together now. How long? 27 years married, fyi. 30 years altogether. NB - if I said we never argued, that would be an indication that we don't talk at all. We do, both.

Some of the points made in the article and some of the comments make my jaw drop, tbh.