"American exceptionalism" -- the narcissistic soundtrack of several presidential aspirants for 2012 -- is Un-American. The boast betrays ignorance of the Founding Fathers and the tarnished history of the United States. In any event, to overlook faults because other nations are more flawed is juvenile, and leads nowhere.
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney scribbles in, "No Apology: The Case for American Greatness," that, "This reorientation away from a celebration of American exceptionalism is misguided and bankrupt." Congressman Mike Pence (R. Ind.) similarly addressed the Detroit Economic Club on "Restoring American Exceptionalism: A Vision for Economic Growth and Prosperity." And the brilliant but sub-literate Sarah Palin, features a chapter in her book, America by Heart, entitled "America the Exceptional."
Although none of the three specifically define the term, "American exceptionalism" conveys three wrong or empty ideas: that Americans are blessed with morally superior DNA which immunizes them from the vices or ill-humors of human nature; that the history of the United States is morally irreproachable; or, that the United States, despite its warts, is less immoral than other wretched countries.
The Founding Fathers understood that human nature does not vary based on geography, race, religion, culture, or otherwise. They sculpted a Constitution that relied on a separation of powers, checks and balances, and a diffusion of authority to secure individual liberty and the rule of law. James Madison, father of the Constitution, lectured in Federalist 51:
Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.
Alexander Hamilton explained the Senate's involvement in treaty ratification by doubting presidential virtue in Federalist 75:
The history of human conduct does not warrant that exalted opinion of human virtue which would make it wise in a nation to commit interests of so delicate and momentous a kind, as those which concern its intercourse with the rest of the world, to the sole disposal of a magistrate created and circumstanced as would be a President of the United States.
In Federalist 10, Madison acknowledged that without constitutional constraints mal-government would prevail among Americans:
Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority. However anxiously we may wish that these complaints had no foundation, the evidence, of known facts will not permit us to deny that they are in some degree true.
The Bill of Rights was a vote of no confidence in "American exceptionalism" to thwart the dangers of government overreaching.
In sum, the United States was conceived in recognition that original sin had not carved out an exception for the American people.
To deny that American history has been regularly punctuated by immorality is to blink at truth. The Constitution protected slavery, which caused Thomas Jefferson to lament, "I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever." Jim Crow, featuring black lynchings, flourished for a century after the Civil War Amendments. Blacks were conscripted to fight in World Wars I and II in segregated units.
Women were subjugated until the 1960s.
The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 violated freedom of speech and due process.
Indian treaties were flouted with impunity.
Mormons were persecuted for half a century. Catholics were de facto unelectable to the presidency until John F. Kennedy.
Civil War hero and President Ulysses S. Grant descried the Mexican-American War as "one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation. It was an instance of a republic following the bad example of European monarchies, in not considering justice in their desire to acquire additional territory." World War I was followed by the A. Mitchell Palmer raids. World War II witnessed concentration camps for 120,000 Japanese Americans. The Vietnam War emblem was the My Lai massacre. Ongoing aimless wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan have killed or maimed tens of thousands. And post-9/11 waterboarding, detentions without accusation or trial, the suspension of habeas corpus, spying on Americans without judicial warrants, and threatening lawyers for defending accused terrorists or terrorist organizations are earmarks of tyranny, not liberty.
Despite its numerous moral blotches, the United States may still rank above other nations by an evenhandedly applied moral yardstick. Many died in the Civil War to end slavery. Freedom of speech, press, and association in the United States is greater than in any other nation. Discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation has plunged since the American Revolution. But the observation that the United States is less imperfect than other nations is jejune as a guide for the future. Complacency with injustice or bigotry because other nations or peoples are even worse is pointless and puerile. It guarantees stagnation, not improvement towards a higher life form.
Moreover, to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, a nation that loves itself will have no rivals.
Janet Tavakoli: In Third World America, You Can't Buy a Ream of Paper on Minimum Wage
Kent Hayden, M.Div.: The Bad Faith of American Exceptionalism
Why?
To take a unflinching look at oneself and freely admit one's flaws is, itself, exceptional.
America, like the rest of the world, is made up of exceptional people, working to make things better for everyone.
Exceptional and unexceptional alike.
he doesn't either. Or did I miss something?
What he does instead is launch into a litany of our historical shortcoming, and make quotes from founding fathers that are not on point. He confuses "American Exceptionalism" with Manifest Destiny; a common pseudo-intellectual mistake.
This article adds nothing to the understanding of "American Exceptionalism";
either pro or con, it's pure confusion.
A better understanding is this:
"America's exceptionalism stems from its emergence from a revolution, becoming "the first new nation", and developing a uniquely American ideology, based on liberty, egalitarianism, individualism, populism and laissez-faire. This observation can be traced to Alexis de Tocqueville, the first writer to describe the United States as "exceptional." The term "American exceptionalism" itself was first used by members of the American Communist Party in the 1920s, in reference to their belief that "thanks to its natural resources, industrial capacity, and absence of rigid class distinctions, America might for a long while avoid the crisis that must eventually befall every capitalist society."
Although the term does not imply superiority, some writers have used it in that sense."
This is not an "exceptional background."
Really? So you are saying the USA is still "exceptional" Bruce? In spite of everything you have just said!
Have you ever been outsiide of the USA Bruce? Do you read the foreign press or watch foreign media? If you did you would not continue with the illusion that the USA while not exceptional is exceptional.
love it or leave it pal
So you would refute what Bruce Fein is saying because you talked to some people or read items in foreign press? That is entirely anecdotal and provides your impression of the opinion and press throughout the entire world and "proves" your point.
Sounds like a sampling error. There are scientific methods of measuring attitudes, values and beliefs, even worldwide, although "world opinion" has never been scientifically measured
Think of it this way"
America's exceptionalism is what we earn when we're on the side of liberty.
Manifest Destiny is the belief we can expand our territory because "God is on our side".
Many of these wealthy right wing Republicans don't even like the idea of having to pay taxes to support the poor. elderly and disabled in the U.S., even though nearly all the wealth in America, which is enjoyed disproportionately by European Americans, has been generated from 400 years of FREE slave labor.....and now all we're required to do, to make-up for this wrong, is PAY TAXES to support African Americans in their economic and social recovery.
I think African Americans will need many more years of our financial and spiritual support to overcome nearly half a millenium of economic and social disenfrachisement and abuse.
Although we now see a few thousand millionaire black athletes and performers on television, our metro areas are surrounded by MILLIONS of African Americans living in crime ridden ghettos, struggling just to pay rent and buy food.
At this point, the only active "exceptionalism" is corporatism, greed & the GOP's continued reliance on Soviet-style Command Economy (aka supply-side trickle-down anti-economics) to starve the mythical Government "Beast." And they do this even as they become part of the "Beast" in January.
In certain circles, it seems that a second American Exceptionalism is at work: self-deception (aka the "Liberty Valance rule for the press - print the "legend" even if it's non-existent.
America's decline began when it began to look beyond itself, and to project its own manner of thought and its own history and institutions on a world for the most part not suited for them; as it expanded outward in an imperialistic fashion, what was uniquely American began to be vitiated and distorted; it was only a matter of time before the American giant would straddle the old and the new world like a collosus, but it lead to disaster.
1917 is the year that America took the decisive step towards its eventual destruction- it was a catastrophe unprecedented in the history of the West- Wilson's blundering decision to involve the US in a European war led to a Carthaginian peace, revanchism, the subjugation of Asia to Bolshevism, another more terrible war, and a still unresolved redrawing of the map in the Middle East, with consequences that are still to be suffered by the entire world.
not so sure that signing treaties with Native Americans that the US routinely violated, not to mention the out right squatting and theft of land made the US populated by people of "good will".
Enslavement of forcibly imported and detained Africans for the specific purpose of providing free labor advanced the wealth of slave owners. America's birth defect (h/t Condoleeza Rice) along with taking advantage of the indigenous Americans who were subjected to legal genocide.
Much greed and violence provided the 'exceptionalism' that the GOTP wants to return to? Corporatism will divide and destroy this democratic republic.
When we stop listening to FoxNews and stop supporting the 2% of the obscenely wealthy, perhaps we the people can stave off the misguided and miserably frightened 'patriots' who are not willing to acknowledge our flawed history.
We must be willing to move forward by resisting those (GOTP and greedy others) who want to 'take our country back' to a false sense of elevated 'exceptionalism.'