More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bruce Helander

GET UPDATES FROM Bruce Helander
 

Top Ten Undervalued Works At Auction

Posted: 05/07/11 04:23 AM ET

It's not much of a challenge to figure out which of the hundreds of lots are considered the most valuable--just look at the estimates, starting at $40 million, and work your way down the list. The following top ten artworks are not necessarily the obvious trophies that are available for sale next week, but rather works that are of a high level of engaging integrity, as well as outstanding examples of the artists' work that should not be overlooked. Often, these are underpriced, considering their quality.


TOP TEN KEEPERS & SLEEPERS



Courtesy of Phillips de Pury & Company, Contemporary Art Part II Auction, May 13, 2011. Lot 163, Richard Phillips, Double, 1996 - 1997, Pre-sale estimate: $100,000 - $150,000.

1. RICHARD PHILLIPS, Double, 1996-1997, oil on linen, 84 x 62 in. (Phillips #163) Est: $100,000-$150,000. It's safe to say that one of the most impressive portraits available from any of the May auctions is by this artist. In Double, Phillips has created a hauntingly beautiful image of a mysterious woman on a grand scale that is a complex hybrid of modern surrealist inspired invention and bold juxtaposition. In this graceful and mesmerizing portrait, he has taken a cue from Rosenquist's Pop style and twisted it into a masterpiece.


Courtesy of Phillips de Pury & Company, Contemporary Art Part I Auction, May 12, 2011, Lot 28, George Condo, The Nudist Couple, 2008, Pre-sale estimate: $500,000 - $700,000.

2. GEORGE CONDO, The Nudist Couple, 2008, oil on canvas, 80 in. x 80 in. (Phillips #28) Est: $500,000-$700,000. In this hysterically funny interpretation of a sunbathing nude couple caught in an impromptu two-person exhibition by a passerby, the raw genius of Mr. Condo and his endless bag of eccentric tricks become playfully obvious. This completely absurd and comical malformed composition of a luncheon on the grass pushes the boundaries of figure painting to the extreme. In this voyeuristic view, weird body proportions and skinny dipping naughtiness can't help but grab your attention. Throw in a three-legged human chimera that defiantly shows her fangs as a subtle warning, while her partner ignores a no smoking ban and you've joined a 'condo association' where anything goes.


Courtesy of Phillips de Pury & Company, Contemporary Art Part I Auction, May 12, 2011. Lot 5, Albert Oehlen, Pan de Burro, 2001, Pre-sale estimate: $250,000 - $350,000

3. ALBERT OEHLEN, Panza de Burro, oil and acrylic on canvas, 86 in. x 146 in. (Phillips #5) Est: $250,000-$350,000. The title of Oehlen's provocative, horizontal canvas translates to "the donkey's paunch," which, according to the auction catalog, refers to a layering of clouds above the Canary Islands. Well, that may be a stretch, but the painting itself sings like an exotic feathered friend on its way to a migratory convention of odd ducks. Bad directions, confusing routes and unexpected passages are all part of the artist's deliberate repertoire. The purposeful anti-aesthetic and anti-social clash of multiple, disparate visual thoughts and left-footed gestures is what makes big Albert such a rare bird. This picture, as with everything he creates, eventually will fly sky high.


Sotheby's New York, The Collection of Allan Stone: Volume I, 9 May 2011. Lot 9 John Chamberlain Nutcracker 1958 Est. $1.2/1.8 million

4. JOHN CHAMBERLAIN, Nutcracker, 1958, painted and chromium-plated steel (Sotheby's #9) Est: $1.2-$1.8 million. The nomination for the most perfect performance in a dramatic series is arguably this sculpture. It represents an exquisite balance of texture, color, form and composition made from a challenging material that raises the bar to an unbeatable height. This work was owned by the late, great, legendary dealer, Allan Stone, who had an eye for the best of the best. Don't overlook this museum quality masterpiece just because of its small scale. Size doesn't matter when the magical, visual rhythm created over fifty years ago is as fresh now as the day it was welded together. There's nothing else to be said, as it's the finest sculptural work by a living artist offered at auction in years.


Coutesy of Christies's Images LTD. 2011. Lot 64, Yayoi Kusama (b. 1929) Untitled (Infinity Nets) signed and dated 'YAYOI KUSAMA 1972' (on the stretcher) oil on canvas, 42 x 36 1/8 in. (106.7 x 91.8 cm.) Painted in 1972. Estimate: $350,000-450,000

5. YAYOI KUSAMA, Untitled (Infinity Nets), oil on canvas, 42 in. x 36 in. (Christie's #63) Est: $350,000-$450,000. Kusama arrived in New York City from Japan the same year that John Chamberlain created Nutcracker. She quickly became known as an artist who created unusually large works with circular, repetitive patterns called "net paintings." Kusama employs a strange combination of invention and convention mixed with eccentricity and stark beauty. This quiet painting has a richness and integrity that brings together elements of color field and abstraction, with receding passages that are slightly reminiscent of a geological aerial view of a rose garden. Had she not returned prematurely to her native country years ago, Kusama would be on a level with the late Louise Bourgeois. However, her star is rising faster lately, making her undervalued paintings a good catch.


Courtesy of Christie's Images LTD. 2011. Lot 60, Willem de Kooning (1904-1997) Woman and Child, signed 'de Kooning' (lower left); inscribed 'to Emilie with Love' (on the reverse) oil on paper laid down on canvas 55 x 36 in. (139.7 x 91.4 cm.) Painted circa 1967-1968. Estimate: $3.5-5.5 Million.

6. WILLEM DE KOONING, Woman and Child, 1967-1968, oil on paper laid down on canvas (Christie's #60) Est: $3.5-$5.5 million. The two great and uniquely American contributions to cultural history are Jazz and Abstract Expressionism, of which Mr. de Kooning is a founder; he was the hands-down greatest American painter in modern art history. This riveting work is an outstanding example of the sensational talent behind the carefully crafted, meandering brushstrokes and iconic lines. Examine this painting closely, and you'll discover a small child in a pink dress (upper left-hand corner) complementing the peach-colored central shape. The term "laid down on canvas" is an art dealer's invention coined to increase sales and make the painting more appealing, and is not necessary. Compare this masterpiece with the other artworks at a much higher price, and the winner of the race should be painfully clear.


Courtesy of Phillips de Pury & Company, Contemporary Art Part I Auction, May 12, 2011. Lot 30, Richard Prince, Untitled Joke Painting, 2009, Pre-sale estimate: $350,000 - $450,000.

7. RICHARD PRINCE, Untitled, Joke Painting, 2009, collage and acrylic on canvas (Phillips #30) Est: $350,000-$450,000. Calling an artist's work a joke is rude and offensive to everyone except Mr. Prince, who's been cleverly elevating one liners on canvas for over two decades. With this picture, viewers receive a double dose of block letters on top of his now iconic collaged vintage nurse/romance imagery appropriated from paperback books. This distinguished composition offers a new style of black-outlined letters that are incorporated into a semi-camouflaged, homogenized surface that is handsome, lush and distinguished. The text reads, "I never had a penny to my name, so I changed my name..." My dime is on this undervalued and enjoyable work.


Sotheby's New York, Contemporary Art Evening Sale, 10 May 2011. Lot 8, Mark Tansey, Shades, Oil on canvas, Est. $3/4 million.

8. MARK TANSEY, Shades, 2001, oil on canvas, 84 in. x 108 in. (Sotheby's #8) Est: $3-$4 million. Metaphysical juxtapositions and ingenious illusions of impossible events that often expose a snippet of history is Mr. Tansey's duotone trademark. From an unlikely interview with a microphone to the mouth of the Sphinx in Egypt to a lift-off at Cape Canaveral, where artists demonstrate the ambitious task of illustrating (and finishing) the entire process, Tansey twists a picture's impossible circumstances into a high art of suspense and irony. This work, a modern-day take on a cave-dwelling camp, where a palm frond held to the firelight casts an ominous shadow in the shape of an angel's wing on the wall, is yet another brilliant visual equation.


Sotheby's New York, Contemporary Art Day Sale, 11 May 2011. Lot 421, Jack Pierson, Teen Star, Found plastic and metal letterforms, Executed in 1994, Est. $150/200,000.

9. JACK PIERSON, Teen Star, 1994, 24 in. x 120 in. (Sotheby's #421) Est. $150,000-$200,000. Pierson could present a TV talk show titled, "Late Night With the Letterman," as his most famous works are an assemblage of found letters from old advertising signs. Mr. Pierson has developed a unique art form by adaptively reusing and rearranging words that create a visual image, and are beautiful as a collage, as well. These word sculptures are elegant and informal, simple and direct, and have become instantly recognizable. The artist spells success with this two-word equation.


Sotheby's New York, Contemporary Art Day Sale, 11 May 2011. Lot 564, Andreas Gursky, Fortuna Düsseldorf, 2000, c-print, Est. $350/450,000.

10. ANDREAS GURSKY, Fortuna Düsseldorf, 2000, C-print, 69 in. x 120 in. (Sotheby's # 564) Est: $350,000-$400,000. It's been said that a photographer needs a better-trained and more inquisitive eye than a painter. After all, the image process takes a split second, and it has to be the decisive moment--the right light, action and compositional elements. Mr. Gursky is really a contemporary painter in disguise, who substitutes photo paper for canvas. In this beautiful, diptych-like image, the photographer finds a natural dividing line by using soccer field boundaries and the minimalism of circles and players, who become dots and spots. The deep green background of manicured turf takes a cue from the late Kenneth Noland's striped paintings.

For a complete overview of these individual images with detailed information and all others in this auction consortium, please go to: www.sothebys.com, www.christies.com, www.phillipsdepury.com.
For further information on artists to watch go to The Art Economist.

 
It's not much of a challenge to figure out which of the hundreds of lots are considered the most valuable--just look at the estimates, starting at $40 million, and work your way down the list. The fol...
It's not much of a challenge to figure out which of the hundreds of lots are considered the most valuable--just look at the estimates, starting at $40 million, and work your way down the list. The fol...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 147
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
11:10 PM on 05/12/2011
Okay, I just have to say that as a recent graduate with an art degree I think I am VERY appreciative to all art, even the art I don't "like". I think anything has the potential to be art, and even good art. I think any art has the potential to be worth a lot of money. But saying these pieces are undervalued is hilarious. 1.2 million is undervalued? Since when? I just need to make a name for myself so I can sell mediocre, at best, photographs for millions and someone will call them undervalued....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Waterphoneman
artist, musician, inventor & mouth from the south
05:10 PM on 05/11/2011
The high, high fine art world is a mystery to me and I am an artist. Here in Mississippi the frames usually are worth more than the paintings and culture is something you see on TV.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
09:55 PM on 05/12/2011
I'm in Washington state and just saw the documentary about Jean-Michel Basquiat called Radiant Child.  In New York, which is the Capital of a certain kind of art world, an artist must be work of art himself.  It's not just about a hand-made object by itself.  Art must have the juicy context of a warm body.   It's a little creepy.  A sort of Sherlock Holmes shiver went up my spine as i realized how, hmmm, convenient and profitable it was for all sorts of people that Jean-Michel died young.  You are lucky to be where you are.  I hope you can live a decent life with the support of your community.   There are so many talented people here trying to make a living.   Chew on the idea of an artists' co-operative as a way to be strong.
03:00 PM on 05/11/2011
Well, Tansy certainly seems to have a bit of the Fernand Cormon in him, I'll give him that. The rest are pretty much the detritus of the 20thC; interesting as an anthropological reflection on the most dehumanized century ever, but as timeles art? it's more in line with the French Academics, with de Kooning playing Cabanel. The biggest difference of course was that the Academics could draw, handle paint, understand composition, and other supposedly trivial art details...But like the Academics, they served as a means for the wealthy to display their wealth through hanging unchallenging but acceptable work. If you want to understand the absurd prices, read Veblen's Theory of the Leisure Class - published 112 years ago, but still pretty valid. And think about the effect of excessive - especially inherited - wealth (a la Peggy Guggenheim) on what artists and audiences have to endure today.
07:17 PM on 05/10/2011
say what you want about Helanders predictions but the Chamberlain he predicted that was underpriced received $4+m the starting set was $2.m... not a bad day's work...
11:48 PM on 05/10/2011
Besides the de Kooning, the Chamberlain is probably the most blue-chip work here (and having just joined Gagosian's stable, I'm thinking this was basically a no-brainer). Hard to really draw any conclusions there.
10:50 AM on 05/10/2011
I enjoyed the article and would love to be able to own a work by Condo, DeKooning or Phillips. You keep writing Mr. Helander and I'll keep reading.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
normalintexas
TaDa!
07:17 PM on 05/09/2011
Egad!
05:32 PM on 05/09/2011
Dialogue is dialogue...agree or disagree with Mr. Helander or other postings...it's all good. Actually, I always enjoy his blog. And most of these works are worth every penny and as he says...more. Let's face it, most people know nothing about art and their inability to appreciate these great works just proves it.
08:06 PM on 05/09/2011
I'm sure you find you an art student who can and would make perfect replicas any of these pieces for a tenth of the price...maybe less. Half Gallery showed a whole exhibition of fake Condos more recently....
12:05 PM on 05/10/2011
That is SO not relevant. Copying? Seriously? The artist thought of the work, created the work, they copied nothing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:49 PM on 05/09/2011
The art market is one of the most skewed ever created. It picks its winners and everyone else, no matter how good, are left behind. Having so few people who can judge art anymore, buyers are left to the promoters of art, e.g. the galleries, whose only interestt is selling the works of their stable artists. Anyone can buy good art for cheap but hardly anyone can or will buy a piece of art for $100,000 or more and $100,000 is way high as it is. Buy living artists and enjoy your purchase!
12:23 PM on 05/09/2011
One woman? Just sayin.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
07:20 PM on 05/08/2011
undervalued? at $100,000 plus. you're kidding right? no?

hmmmmmm
05:20 PM on 05/08/2011
Negative remarks about any of these MASTERPIECES only confirm how truly unappreciated and greatly undervalued they are.
01:22 PM on 05/08/2011
sorry- it just aint clicking- these are overvalued not undervalued
08:49 AM on 05/08/2011
I absolutely love the Tansey painting. I find Condo's painting insulting. De Kooning's painting disturbs me - like an ink blot that goes straight to that which is buried deep in your psyche and for good reason.. I just don't get the Chamberlain thing at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bob72
02:08 PM on 05/08/2011
They're probably all out of your price range so your opinion doesn't really matter.
04:25 PM on 05/08/2011
Just because you can't afford something doesn't mean you have to stop liking it. When you go shopping, do you only like the things you can afford?
04:44 PM on 05/08/2011
They're probably out of most peoples' price range, and yet here we all are! Irrelevant anyway since I certainly wouldn't buy them i I did have the money.

Psst, Bob, you don't have to own art to appreciate it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:08 AM on 05/08/2011
The claim that De Kooning invented abstract expressionism is just nonsense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_expressionism
06:07 AM on 05/08/2011
De Kooning worked at another level than Kandinsky and the other european -and even New York artists: only Pollock rivals him. And even though he openly disliked the term abex -since he along with Pollock were the two most important practitioners of this complex and widely varied genre, its fair to say he invented it -by definition.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:51 AM on 05/08/2011
My point is that abstract expressionism was an evolution not an invention. By way of contrast, non-objective painting was, literally, invented by Kandinsky.
And they certainly worked on different levels. I think reading any art history book make that pretty clear.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 AM on 05/08/2011
This has almost nothing to do with art. It is about marketing, investment and maintaining the hegemony of the critic/gallery/museum cabal that has dominated the art world since the late 1940's. And it is perfectly legitimate for anyone to question the claims of "masterpiece" or "raw genius" that Mr Helander attributes to some of these works. After all we know what a masterpiece is at least some of the time. When we see a Rembrandt, Monet or even some Picasso's for instance. So why shouldn't we wonder how Richard Phillips or George Condo get into that rarefied company.
Mr Helander may be correct in that these are undervalued work but that's just a market analysis, like something you might get from your stock broker. Again, nothing to do with art.
By the way. The term "laid down on canvas" is not an art dealers invention. It's a perfectly accurate description of a way of presenting work on paper that a lot of artist use. Instead of matted and framed under glass it's glued to canvas. And why shouldn't it be it's an oil painting after all.