iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bruce Wilson

Bruce Wilson

Posted: May 20, 2010 08:27 PM

Rand Paul Keynoted 2009 Rally for Far-Right Constitution Party

What's Your Reaction:

All you really need to know about Christian Reconstructionism is in the title of a January 2008 Talk To Action story of mine, More From The Biblical Stoning & Legalized Slavery Movement.

Enter Rand Paul.

Amidst the hullaballoo over Republican Rand Paul's upset victory in the Kentucky GOP primary for US Senate, one of the few journalists to raise the issue of Paul's somewhat uncomfortable proximity to Christian Reconstructionism has been Alternet's Adele Stan, who observes that Rand Paul's father Ron Paul is personal friends with one of the bigger names in the Christian Reconstructionist movement, Howard Phillips, founder of the US Taxpayers Party -- now re-branded as The Constitution Party. But there's much more direct evidence tying Ran Paul to the Constitution Party, whose national platform declares,


"The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations...

The U.S. Constitution established a Republic rooted in Biblical law"

As Adele Stan notes, Phillips gave a keynote address at the Ron Paul For President Convention in Minneapolis a year and a half ago. And, Ron Paul endorsed the 2008 Constitution Party's presidential candidate in the 2008 election, Chuck Baldwin.

As it's said, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. In a May 21, 2009 appearance on the Alex Jones Show, Rand Paul affirmed that his political beliefs were extremely close to those of his father Ron:


Alex Jones: "You're basically what I would call a chip off the old block. Your policies are basically identical to your father, correct?"

Rand Paul: "I'd say we'd be very very similar. We might present the message sometimes differently.. I think in some ways the message has to be broadened and made more appealing to the entire Republican electorate because you have to win a primary." [Rand Paul on Alex Jones, 5/21/09]

So it isn't altogether surprising that Rand Paul could be found, in April 2009, at a rally held by a political party that's been heavily influenced by a movement whose founder, Rousas Rushdoony, advocated executing homosexuals by stoning, wanted to reimpose the institution of slavery, and maintained that the Sun rotated around the Earth.

[below - video from Minneapolis "End the Fed" rally establishes that Rand Paul was in the vicinity prior to the Minnesota Constitution Party rally later that day. Note: the rally itself was not held by the MN Constitution Party.]

On April 25, 2009, Rand Paul was the featured guest speaker at The Constitution Party of Minnesota's "event of the year." I've found video of Rand Paul at an afternoon Minneapolis rally, so he was without a doubt in the vicinity.

Just to make sure I talked to Tammy Houle, whose phone number is the Minnesota Constitution Party listed contact number, and she confirmed to me that Rand Paul had indeed spoken at the April 25th evening event.

The odd thing about Rand and Ron Paul's political tendency is that it offers liberals and progressives a number of points of agreement, probably more than with more 'mainstream' conservative GOP politicians. For example, Ron Paul has been a principled opponent of the invasion of Iraq and US military adventurism in the Mideast generally, and Rand Paul espouses the same position.

But it's hard to get much more extreme than Christian Reconstructionism, whose founder Rushdoony was a Holocaust denier, a racist, a creationist, and an advocate for slavery who claimed that African-American slaves were lucky.

Weigh it for yourself -- Howard Phillips, who founded the Constitution Party, has, according to journalist Frederick Clarkson, described Rousas J. Rushdoony as "my wise counseler."

As Rushdoony wrote in Politics of Guilt and Pity:

The white man is being systematically indoctrinated into believing that he is guilty of enslaving and abusing the Negro. Granted that some Negroes were mistreated as slaves, the fact still remains that nowhere in all history or in the world today has the Negro been better off. The life expectancy of the Negro increased when he was transported to America. He was not taken from freedom into slavery, but from a vicious slavery to degenerate chiefs to a generally benevolent slavery in the United States. There is not the slightest evidence that any American Negro had ever lived in a "free society" in Africa; even the idea did not exist in Africa. The move from Africa to America was a vast increase of freedom for the Negro...

None of this, of course, is Rand Paul's direct responsibility. But it certainly is suggestive.

And so, without further ado, here's the April 9, 2009 post advertising Rand Paul's April 25th appearance at the Minnesota Constitution Party "Liberty Banquet 2009" that's posted on Ronpaulforums.com :

The Constitution Party of Minnesota announces with anticipation, the event of the year -- Liberty Banquet 2009

Patriots and statesmen will come together on April 25th to hear featured guest,

Dr. RAND PAUL

Don't miss this opportunity to unite with other like-minded folks for an evening of inspiration and motivation. The evening begins at 5:00 pm with a social hour, dinner at 6:00, followed by introductions and guest speakers. Preceding Dr. Paul, we will hear a few words from the two tenacious gentlemen that recently accepted the co-chairmanship of the CPMN Veteran's Coalition, Leon Moe and John Salsbury.

The Chaska VFW will be the location of the event, which is located one block west of the intersection of Old Hwy. 212 and Hwy. 41 near downtown Chaska. The cost of tickets is $30 per person or 4 for $100. Get yours soon by sending payment to CPMN Treasurer, Patricia Becker, 23078 - 21st Avenue, St. Augusta, MN 56301.




A version of this post was originally published on Talk To Action.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 444
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
charon
The question is more important than the answer
10:54 PM on 05/23/2010
These people are just whack. The Constitutionalist Party wants to "restore American jurisprudence to its bibilical roots"? Absolutely crazy. The rules of the Bible, found in Levictitus and Exodus, are not written into American law at all. That is just a delusion.
01:03 AM on 06/04/2010
You are greatly exagerrating. I am a Consitution Party member. I never heard anyone suggest in the Consitution Party we should follow Levtical laws.
10:08 PM on 05/23/2010
You can think that Rand Paul libertarianism is naive and not realist. You can say it's not practical or realizable. But you cannot say that Rand Paul is racist. His stance was on liberty and the overreach of government on private sector not on racism. It's like resuming the whole debate of free speech by asking only one question: Would you defend and protect the right of a white supremacist to say hateful thing to a minority? If he responds yes, and people hear only the response to this question without considering the whole context, they will deduce that he's a redneck racist. This is distorting his view and just unfair to him.
09:37 PM on 05/23/2010
As Bill Maher said recently about Rand Paul in relation to his father: "The s#*t doesn't fall far from the bat."
09:30 PM on 05/23/2010
Stop painting Ron and Rand Paul with those who are Christian fundamentalists. They may be believers, but they don't want the US to be ruled by Biblical law and the 10 commandments like Palin. I follow Ron Paul and am a big fan and I'm an atheist. Most Paul supporters are pretty much liberals who understand economics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
charon
The question is more important than the answer
10:56 PM on 05/23/2010
Do you understand economics? What are your credentials?
12:29 AM on 05/24/2010
I do have a degree, but the vast majority of my knowledge comes from daily articles and books on econ including economic treatises. They really aren't as boring as they seem. And no, I'm not listening to the same economists who were blindsided by the greatest recession since the Great Depression, though incredibly most still are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
levibatgirl
does this meet your guidelines?
08:30 PM on 05/23/2010
These groups are as much the enemy of the US as any Islamic extremists.

They're more of a danger because they lurk within "mainstream" politics thanks to the welcome mat the desperate GOP has put out for them. Palin fits in with these extremists as well.
09:34 PM on 05/23/2010
So well said.
08:21 PM on 05/23/2010
THE RADICALISM OF TODAYS CONSERVATIVES

In the name of constitutional purity, they propose a great undoing. Not just the undoing of Obamaism. Undo Medicare and Social Security. Undo the expansive American global commitments that proceeded from World War II and the Cold War. Undo progressive-era economic regulations. Undo the executive power grab that preserved the union. Undo it all — until America is left with a government appropriate to an isolated, 18th-century farming republic.
The teabaggers and Rand Paul”s proposals is for time travel, not a policy agenda. The federal government could not shed these accumulated responsibilities without massive suffering and global instability — a decidedly radical, unconservative approach to governing.
Exactly. They are radicals. But this is exactly where the right is today — and not just the teabaggers.
Look at Paul Ryan’s plan to scrap Social Security and Medicare. Jim DeMint at CPAC, suggested that the federal income tax is unconstitutional. Listen to Mike Huckabee, calling for the United States to withdraw from the UN. Look at Steve King’s efforts to repeal labor laws like Davis-Bacon. Consider the right’s decidedly unconstitutional zeal for torture. And remember, the John Birch Society was one of the sponsors of CPAC this year.
These aren’t fringe players in the Republican Party — they’re its leaders. And it’s a scandal that the national media still treat these people like they’re perfectly reasonable, responsible members of the opposition.
07:47 PM on 05/23/2010
If he is a doctor, why doesn't he practice medicine?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
06:36 PM on 05/23/2010
And that, my friends, is precisely why the religious fundamentalism I fear is not the extremist Muslims (who do undeniably exist), but the "Christian" counterparts. I was raised in Christian fundamentalism. Much of what they told me was a lie. They said the Pope's mitre had "IHS" superimposed on the front, and that it stood for "In His Stead." The pope, it was said, had put himself as the substitution for Christ. Obviously they never read Christian history. The IHS, of course, was reportedly initiated by Constantine. He had a "vision" at the Mulvane bridge, where he saw the "Pax Labrium" (First two Greek letters of the name of CHrist), and simultaneously heard a voice, "In Hoc Signo Vinces" (In this sign conquer). That is the sum total of IHS. It was not the only lie I heard growing up, but it was one of the most ignorant lies I encountered.
05:01 PM on 05/23/2010
The problem with "Christian Reconstructionism" is that it is anything but Christian. Their members and other religious rightists are becoming more and more like the Taliban. My niece who lives in the UK told me of a recent report about some churches in Uganda that are in the midst of a huge campaign against homosexuals, including sending gays to prison. Rachel Maddow has investigated the ties of some Republican sentaors to this movement in Uganda. I guess these religious hypocrites have never read the bible verse that says, "Judge not lest you, yourself, be judged."
04:51 PM on 05/23/2010
Now the libertarian is some sort of theocrat...really guys, find a new approach you lefties are so predictable..lololol...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dagmaclugh39
Nomen est omen.
04:00 PM on 05/23/2010
One of the tenets of Christian Reconstructionism is that it is acceptable, even laudable, to lie in order to further the CR agenda. These subversives--and that is exactly what they are--despise our democratic republic, and seek to overthrow it in favor of a Christian Theocracy based on the Mosaic Code. Non-Christians would be stripped of their citizenship; and "undesirables", e.g., atheists, agnostics, homosexuals and rebellious children, would be subject to execution, preferably by stoning, as rocks are cheaper than bullets.
03:44 PM on 05/23/2010
I'd vote for this guy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momcat54
03:07 PM on 05/23/2010
Well, the 7 million Jews vanished and we did Blacks a favor be forcing them into slavery. Interesting . Dr. Paul is a fine succesor to his father and a true representative of his Party . I think I just threw up a little in my mouth
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
02:59 PM on 05/23/2010
Kland paul is a fool. He's a male sara plainun.Both are toxic for America.
02:58 PM on 05/23/2010
The details in this story are important to consider -- Rand Paul ignores his "libertarian values" when he finds it convenient or in opposition to his own personal lifestyle.

Hence, this so-called libertarian has no problem with banning a woman's right to choice. He has no problem telling same-sex couples they cannot marry.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
termgirl
terminate nuclear power
08:52 PM on 05/23/2010
He also has no problem accepting Medicare payments.