More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bryan Monroe

Bryan Monroe

Posted: December 7, 2009 01:03 PM

Robert Gibbs vs. April Ryan: The Groan Heard 'Round the Briefing Room

What's Your Reaction:

You've probably seen it by now.

Wednesday afternoon at the White House Daily Press Briefing, veteran radio correspondent April Ryan was hitting press secretary Robert Gibbs hard with a line of questioning about the uninvited gate-crashers at last month's state dinner.

Ryan, who reports for American Urban Radio Networks, was trying to get at whether the high-profile White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers was working the event that night or there as an invited guest at the dinner, or both -- and trying to get a better sense of how much responsibility the social office had in the fiasco -- when her questions struck a nerve with Gibbs.

RYAN: No, no, no, did she invite herself, or did the President ask her -- her name was on that list, and social secretaries are the ones who put the names on the list. Did she invite herself or did the President --

GIBBS: Was she at the dinner? April, April, calm down. Just take a deep breath for one second. See? This happens with my son, he does the same thing.

(REACTION FROM PRESS CORPS) Oooh --

RYAN: Don't play with me, I'm being serious. Do not blow it off.

GIBBS: And I'm giving you a serious answer. Was she at the dinner? Yes.

RYAN: Was she an invited guest?

GIBBS: She's the social secretary. She had the primary --

RYAN: Social secretaries are not guests of the dinner.

GIBBS: She is the primary -- for running the dinner. I'm going to get back to weightier topics like 98,000 men and women in Afghanistan. Jonathan, take us away...

You could hear an audible groan -- and see other reporters wince -- when Gibbs, 38, compared Ryan, 42, to a petulant child throwing a fit.

No he didn't!

Ryan, a 23-year veteran reporter who has spent the past 13 of those years covering the White House, is not new to the briefing room or contentious exchanges with press secretaries. She has mixed it up with three presidents and at least seven of their media spokesmen (and one spokeswoman).

And Gibbs has had his share of dust-ups with other reporters in less than a year in the hot seat -- just ask Jake Tapper of ABC News. He, like all press secretaries, is only human, and it is easy to become frustrated day after day when reporters pummel him with questions he thinks he's answered, and answered and answered again.

But standing there, with the seal of the White House behind him, Gibbs' reaction was, frankly, smart-alecky, condescending and inappropriate, no matter how frustrated he felt with Ryan's line of questioning.

To be sure, April Ryan is nothing if not aggressive -- sometimes "in-your-face" -- when she pursues a story. She has been for most of her career. Would I have gone at him like she did? Not my style. But I admire her for it, anyway.

Still, it was certainly appropriate for Ryan, or any other reporter, to ask about the overall involvement of the White House social secretary and what, if any, impact that office's activities may have had on the breakdown in security that evening. And it was appropriate for her to keep asking even when she was being blown off.

That's what reporters do.

I know and respect social secretary Rogers, and have a pretty good idea she was likely working hard that night on every detail to make sure the first state dinner of the Obama administration went flawlessly. But she knows she is now in the big leagues, and tough questions come with the job.

Gibbs is also a seasoned pro in dealing with the press. He normally works hard not to let reporters get under his skin. He prides himself on his sense of humor, calm and a respectful, good-natured rapport with a normally, well, ornery press corps.

But this time, in defending Rogers, he lost it. To patronize Ryan like he did, talking down to her from the podium, was beneath him and his office.

One only hopes that on Monday morning, Ryan is greeted with a fresh cup of coffee and a warm, sincere apology. Then we can move on.

-- Bryan Monroe is a visiting professor at Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. He was the former president of The National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), editorial director of Ebony and Jet magazines and assistant vice president/news at Knight Ridder. He has also been a regular contributor to CNN and helped lead the team in Biloxi, Miss. that won the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for coverage of Hurricane Katrina. He can be reached at www.bryanmonroe.com.

 

Follow Bryan Monroe on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bkmonroe

 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Feanor
I want my jewels back.
05:02 PM on 12/12/2009
Ryan did act like a petulant child with her breathless recitation of rumors.

She sounded extremely jealous of Desiree Rogers.

And yes there were groans - and not a few laughs.
10:30 AM on 12/10/2009
I saw the whole exchange and April Ryan was being defensive and ridiculously argumentative. She simply lost her cool as did Gibbs.

Could Gibbs have handled it better? Of course. But April Ryan needs to dial it down a bit and to quit tossing out "gotcha" questions over inconsequential issues, such as whether or not Desiree Rogers was an invited guest or not. Very bush league.
03:16 PM on 12/09/2009
ryan was the aggressor and asked a dumb a@@ question. could gibbs have handled it better? yes... but as the author noted, ryan is an experienced journalist. and instead of her carrying herself like one, she forgot where she was and that was a no-no. bravo to gibbs for keeping it real. if that had happened to me, i would have moved on and never answer her questions again.
06:07 PM on 12/08/2009
April's cruisin for a bruisin.
06:03 PM on 12/08/2009
Rober Gibbs is a smart ass and that's what I like about him. The white house press corp take themselves too seriously especially about matters that are unimportant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tmboy
Reading comments messes with my ZEN, but I'm addic
04:41 PM on 12/08/2009
These were not valid questions and she deserved to be treated in the manner in which she was acting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drkazmd65
Mom Taught me - Question Everything - Thanks Mom!
03:03 PM on 12/08/2009
I beg to differ,... this line of questioning is not what "reporters are supposed to do" IMHO.

Mr. Gibbs was absolutely correct. Why waste valuable time on something as relatively trivial as this with new troops going to Afghanistan, economic recovery shakily underway and economic recovery plans (or lack of them) as forefront issues. With 'Health Care' being done, with a World Environmental Conference merely days away,...

It was a line of questioning ONLY designed to pander to the idiot fringe who think TMZ is a legitamate news source.
12:52 PM on 12/08/2009
Why not think the person in charge of coordinating the event should be there...the exchange was stupid. She shouls have used common sense and not even asked the question, just trying to be on a certain band wagon that had already left. Its the Secret Service supid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A biocitizen is 3/5 of a corporate citizen
09:42 PM on 12/07/2009
Where was the White House press corps when Alberto Gonzales and Scooter Libby were repeating "I don't recall" and "I don't remember" before congressional investigations?

Where were they when Bush/Cheney were testifying--not under oath--before the 9/11 commission? When Bush/Cheney were drumming up the Iraq war on fabricated WMD intel?

Where were they when US attorneys general were kicked out of office for not being good Bushies? When Don Siegelman was repeatedly being treated to miscarriages of justice by Rove cronies?

When Ken Blackwell was sending Ohio voting results through Tennessee election night 2004?

They're all big bad reporters now when Secret Service people let gate crashers in and it's the social secretary's supposed fault? Desiree Rogers is a smart woman. You can be sure she'll have a rep with a big attitude checking the guest list next time.

The press corps should be glad the Obamas are going to have state dinners with interesting and important newsmakers as guests. Bush only had five state dinners and most of the guests were Republican donors.

The press corps were gutless wonders during the Bush years. They should be ashamed.
08:47 PM on 12/07/2009
I beg to differ with Mr. Monroe. Both Ryan's line of questioning and her demeanor were unprofessional. Gibbs' disdain was well placed and reasonably attenuated, in my view.
07:19 PM on 12/07/2009
I watched that exchange as it happened on C-SPAN... Two observations:

First, Gibbs should have directed Ryan to the East Wing and the Office of the First Lady, where there is a press secretary/spokesperson and a chief of staff. Ryan was clearly uninformed as to the standard pattern of events. The Social Secretary often is both a guest and a working staffer at events. The Social Secretary has a very capable staff -- some of who were even shown on the very pages of this website, working the event with their walkie-talkies and mic packs hooked on the backs of their designer dresses. The staff of the Social Secretary (as well as the Secretary herself) was available. Somebody dropped the ball. It appears that was the Secret Service.

Not only was Rogers at work for the entire day of the event, we do not know if the First Lady requested Rogers be in attendance (like a lady-in-waiting) inside the pavillion. Unless there is secret cloning going on at the White House, it would be hard to be in two places at once.
Ryan was getting "overworked" over what is in fact a minor issue. But Desiree Rogers reports to a different chain of command, not directly to the President.

Second, Gibbs could have chastised her petulance and borderline rudeness in a different manner.
But this question had been beaten senseless and no additional information was forthcoming.

Stalemate.
06:51 PM on 12/07/2009
Just the facts are that she was asking stupid questions. We have many problems to deal with at this time. This is the least of them. It had absolutely nothing to to with right or left and that is Just
the facts.
03:25 PM on 12/07/2009
She deserved it. She was behaving like a cantankerous 12 year old. She was clearly in an emotional state and had left her professional demeanor (if she has one) at the door. Gibbs had every right to call her on it. Being a member of the press corp is a privilege, and if you can't act with a degree of repose than you have no business being there. Ryan is not the one who deserves an apology…she lost her objectivity and let her emotions take over. Her question was asked and answered, Gibbs just couldn't believe how stupid it was, of course the "social secretary" was on the clock at a social event, it's like asking if your wedding planner got an invitation to the wedding. Frankly Bryan, I don't think your being very objective either, and I think many might question your motives, I know I do.
02:31 PM on 12/07/2009
April Ryan was asking stupid questions about whether she was invited to the dinner or did she invite herself...then she started up about some magazine Desiree was in earlier this year, then she asked was she to high profile......I don't blame Gibbs for getting snarky with her.

At one point April was counting how many black people had been hired by Obama and now she's trying to figure out if these same black people are to high profile.
04:05 PM on 12/07/2009
If April Ryan asked more intelligent, relevant questions, then I'd be upset at Gibbs. But she doesn't.

She deserved what was given to her!
04:22 PM on 12/07/2009
Yup. Gibbs did lose it a bit and get overly snarky. But the whole line of questioning was bizzare and came off as some sort of random jealous snit aimed at painting another woman as too haughty and flashy. It was just very, very weird.
photo
Laws456
Don't believe the Hype
02:16 PM on 12/07/2009
I didn't think the comment was wrong. I thought it was funny. In all seriousness, who cares if the Rogers was there as a guest, or employee. Does it matter?
06:12 PM on 12/07/2009
Yes the President's life is at stake and the leader of India's life also. She should have been where she was supposed to and not worried about hobnobbing with the guests.
07:24 PM on 12/07/2009
She was where she was supposed to be... inside the pavillion.

Desiree Rogers is NOT a member of the Secret Service. It is not her job to provide protection. It's her job to orchestrate the event.

The blame goes to the Salahis for overblown egos thinking they were high-profile enough to attend a state dinner. And the Secret Service for failing to use their Dick Tracy two-way wristradios to ask the staffers from the Office of the Social Secretary "just who the h*** do these Salahi people think they are?"