iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Cari Shane

Cari Shane

Posted: December 13, 2010 08:31 PM

The Manufacturing of No Labels

What's Your Reaction:

The launch of No Labels brought the big wigs out from behind their desks, Monday, for an all-day lesson in compromise at Columbia University in New York City.

2010-12-13-imgres1.jpeg

It also brought more than one thousand citizens from all 50 states who logged many miles (or many more who logged in on-line from town meetings throughout the country) to find a way to make their voices -- the voices in the middle -- heard. Their voices come from both sides of the proverbial aisle because they believe that change will only take place if there is conversation across the political barriers of "Democrat" and "Republican."

They hope that No Labels will be the forum for their voices.

"There is a quiet revolution happening in this country," says the founder, or really, the manufacturer of No Labels, Nancy Jacobson, who years ago conceived of and then built this movement that will give a voice to all the people in the middle who are, in fact, the majority of people living in the United States.

According to the No Labels website, the group is "united in the belief that we do not have to give up our labels, merely put them aside to do what's best for America."

Those who know Jacobson, named one of the "50 Most Powerful People in D.C.," by GQ Magzine, never doubted that her concept would come to fruition. Others, she says, told her, "'you can never do this because people don't have passion, you can't do this because you don't have one main personality running this, a candidate.' The truth is," says Jacobson, "the idea is so much more important than any one person. No Labels doesn't mean 'don't have a label', it just means put the label aside so we can focus and work together and do what government needs to do. That's it," says Jacobson.

And so, the force known as Nancy Jacobson made it happen.
2010-12-13-imgres2.jpeg

Jacobson's work history is a who's who of politics: chief fundraiser for former president Bill Clinton, Finance Chair of the Democratic National Committee and Democratic Leadership Council and founder and creator of the Women's Leadership Forum, the first female-only finance council whose mission was to raise money and party awareness among women. She worked, too, for former Indiana Senator Evan Bayh and as a Senior Advisor for Senator Hillary Clinton's Presidential Campaign, which doesn't even begin to cover the ground that Jacobson has covered in her nearly 3-decade career.

Jacobson is well known for her uncanny ability to "connect" people, certainly an under-appreciated gift during her formative years. It was exactly Jacobson's ability to bring people together, to corral people, to talk to people, that got her kicked out of a private Miami, Florida high school when she was 14-years-old.

"I wasn't your stellar kid. I had a lot of energy. I was more the class clown. I was always connecting with people so I was always talking in class. That's really what it was. Always being the ringleader, always talking in class and being disruptive. That's a little known fact."

But it wasn't until Jacobson left Miami after her freshman year at the University of Florida and transferred to the much larger and more diverse Syracuse University, that she finally realized that her forte which had left her admonished throughout her childhood was exactly what was going to pave the way to her eventual success.

"I harnessed my urge to connect people and I put it to use," says Jacobson who is much happier behind the scenes than in the limelight and usually declines press interviews. What annoyed her teachers and got her kicked out of school, "is exactly what they value in politics," says Jacobson. "That's what was valued. If you could bring people, if you could corral people, if you could bring them together, whether it was to organize or to raise funds. That was valued. It was never valued before and now it was valued so I was encouraged. The lights went on and I started getting involved in politics right then a there."

Her involvement started in 1982. "I heard Gary Hart at a very small, 20-person meeting. He was running for president. I put my name down on a sheet and somebody called me. I ended up organizing the Syracuse campus. I did the first fundraiser. The headquarters was impressed and I got a lot of attention for that. And then Gary Hart won New Hampshire in 1984 and I ended up coordinating the district."

And that locked her in. By the age of 19, Jacobson had become one of the youngest alternate delegates in history.

By the time she had graduated from college, Jacobson had become a professional connector. A professional ringleader, if you will.

"I always did love people, loved connecting with people. I was led to do something that I was good at. But, if you ask me what I do, I'm not a fundraiser. Fundraising is the way I was able to make an impact. I realized very quickly that was the only way for women to be at the table in politics. But it's bringing people together to make impact, that's what I do. And fundraising is what got me at the table. I want to put people together. That's truly what I have always done. Everyone who knew me back in the day is surprised at what I have done."

While a senior advisor for Senator Bayh (who earlier this year announced he would not seek another term in the Senate), Jacobson realized that there was "one thing missing out there. It wasn't that we needed another candidate but that the majority of the people needed a voice." She wanted to figure out a way to round those people up and put them together -- and No Labels was born. "But I never wanted anyone to impugn me for this or think that there was anything in this other than my deep passionate desire to do this so I am a fulltime volunteer. I have never been more passionate, exhilarated or taken with a project in my life."

At the launch, Monday, in fact, Jacobson hung back from the limelight, speaking only for a short two minutes while a list of nationally recognized journalists and politicians took center stage, including John Avalon (senior political columnist for The Daily Beast and the author of Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe is Hijacking America and Independent Nation: How Centrists Can Change American Politics), NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, David Brooks of the New York Times, Newark, New Jersey Mayor Cory Booker and Morning Joe's, Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough not to mention Kiki McLean, D.C. communications strategist and Bob Franken,

"I have created a career working under the radar promoting the agendas of the politicians. All I have ever wanted to do is to build, create, be able to make impact. This whole idea came to me when I realized that Evan Bayh was going to step down because the politics had gotten to him. I got to the age when I said, I want to be able to have an impact; I want to be able to make some change."

While Jacobson admits she built the "pool" (into which the middle is now jumping), she'll only take credit for being the architect. "This couldn't have been done without others, without their inspiration, with their words and their writings. I'm not even the lifeguard of this pool, just the architect."

And now that the pool has been built, Jacobson says it's in the hands of the people. "This is the public pool that everyone gets to swim in and everyone has a right to swim in and everyone has the right to own this platform and make this work," she says. "Anyone can dive as deep as they want if that's what they want. It's a public pool for a new kind of politics. That's what this is. It's not the 'deficit group,' it's not the 'health care group'. This is a group about attitude. It's not an ideology, this is just pushing our leaders to develop the right attitude and if we have the right attitude we will find the right solutions. This is why people are involved. The people are ready to go in this direction."

In fact, states are already organizing on their own, hiring their own people. "All we had to do is create the pool and now they are diving in. The point is nobody ever created the pool for the majority of people in the country to have their voice, they want to build this new house, this new pool."

[Today] is the first day of the journey: it ratchets it up," says Jacobson, "There are too many people who want to start being empowered. It's only the first day of the movement."

 

Follow Cari Shane on Twitter: www.twitter.com/insidebeltway

 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:16 PM on 12/24/2010
This whole No Labels thing is a hilarious misconception by powerful insiders that the big problem with Washington is the partisanship. They think that if Washington went back to being that comradely village it used to be when Democrats and Republicans all lunched, dinnered, danced and cocktailed together the countries problems would get solved.

Sorry, insiders. But the biggest problem is the all-encompassing need for money and the corporate influence it brings.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bishop999999999
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Kurnarsky
11:37 AM on 12/14/2010
Hey, if you judge the tree by its fruit, it's pretty much one party anyway. The true division, which is being obscured, including in this discussion, is the on-going class war of the rich against the rest of us. Nothing good will come out of this no-labels if it means ignoring the donkeyfant staring us right in the face. For, one thing is absolutely clear, the Big Business Oligarchs, who own the mortgage on our congress, are not about to withdraw their troops when they are meeting so little resistance.
stumanchu35
Tolerance is a one way street.
09:04 AM on 12/14/2010
This movement will fall flat on it's face. It is nothing but liberals ashamed to say they are liberals.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
08:47 AM on 12/14/2010
It should be called "No Fighting Back By Democrats" movement.
 
Why it there is talk of filibuster reform when Dems are in the minority?
Why is there talk of civility in public discourse after established republicans spent two years flirting with and encouraging the racist fringe to help propel them into office.
 
Aren't there still 40-45 Republican congressmen who have publicly stated they have doubts the president is a US citizen?
Doesn't XX% of Republicans still think the president is a Muslim?
Didn't  Rush Limbaugh and Mitch McConnell both publicly state they want the president to fail?
 
When the Dems stop thinking it is compromise when the alternative is your opponent's Plan B, when the Dems begin dealing from an offensive rather than a defensive position, then we'll talk about civility and labels and adult conversations.
 
Until then this No Labels scheme is just more of "Thank you, sir, may I have another?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
diversityreport
Editor American Diversity Report
08:40 AM on 12/14/2010
I see 'No Labels' more as a process rather than a political stance. It's good to see diplomats, negotiators and moderation gurus band together. It's a refreshing change to the 'No compromise, in-your-face, take no prisoners' crowd. It remains to be seen if the organization skills, star power and money behind this group can make a dent in the current slash & burn political style. I give it only a 50-50 chance of success.
07:32 AM on 12/14/2010
I think "No Labels" is a little off. It should be "Check Your Guns at the Door".
"Listen critically to your friends, listen carefully to your opponents."
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
07:17 AM on 12/14/2010
Good luck with that. I love the idea, but how are you going to get people to agree on an issue like the Dream Act? Some think it's rewarding kids for hard work, some think it is rewarding and encouraging law breakers. Same with abortion, gay marriage.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
07:05 AM on 12/14/2010
Another "it can't happen here" movement? Oy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:11 AM on 12/14/2010
It is just a half baked idea that you can have no labels, something to aspire to maybe, but in the end, you will have to come down on one side of an issue at some point, and that will label you.

A central voice for the middle? Sounds like a great thing and a possible start of a viable third party. Is this the way to do it? Of that I am not sure.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeKTtkH_8Tc
05:31 AM on 12/14/2010
Interesting comments. I'm an outsider and I have just one suggestion: try and find reasons to make this work, not for it to fail. You have enough problems already, don't bury the fragile beginnings of something the US really seems to need under cynicism. Instead, take each criticism you have and see what it looks like when you turn it upside down - how would it help this idea to be better, to improve it?

Good ideas need help. Being negative is easy - and lazy.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
04:32 AM on 12/14/2010
I read elsewhere the No Labels organization didn't pay the artist who designed their logo.
09:22 AM on 12/14/2010
Could be. But., were they supposed to?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
12:29 PM on 12/14/2010
Here's the story I read on ResdState.com, which admittedly probably is biased against the group.
"
But now it turns out that there’s actually a real reason to mention “No Labels:” Ben Smith reports that they stole their design frm a graphic artist named Thomas PorostockyA very unhappy graphic artist - and for good reason: Mayor Bloomberg has more money than Croesus, which means that he could have easily just paid for the designs that his group stole.  But it apparently didn’t even occur to No Labels to recompense artists for their work; which makes sense, as it’s clearly not as important as electing Democrats by splitting the independent vote away from the Republicans."
  http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/12/13/bloomberg-rips-off-graphic-artist-for-no-labels-logo/
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
12:30 PM on 12/14/2010
RedState...typo
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
R.W. Sanders
Numerous questions, too little expertise
02:58 AM on 12/14/2010
Political parties are developed in an attempt to define general policy ideals among a group of people with differing ideas, but who are pointed in the same general direction. If a person says, "I'm a democrat" then you can make some general assumptions about their policy. That allows us a deeper discussion much quicker than otherwise.

How often has it taken you five or ten minutes to determine if a stranger leans left or right? Sometimes one can tell right away,other times it takes longer. If you can ask, are you a democrat or republican, you can skip much of that defining time and refine your approach.

People are all wired differently, but there do seem to be two clear categories, progressive and conservative. There are varying facets of each, but most can fit those general parameters. It is about the way our brains work which is somewhat out of our control.

Any two parties can compromise if they so desire, but they must desire. A person's label is not the cause of his rigidity, it is his attitude about existing with others. Once one realizes that compromise makes life easier, compromise usually happens. Dropping labels only confuses and disguises, it does not clarify. Instead of trying to drop labels, let's try to drop stubbornness. We should try sitting at the big kids' table, you know, like adults.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HoratioGalt
Do not think, or speak, or write with moderation.
08:04 AM on 12/14/2010
The problem is that there is no longer a consensus in this country, no longer a common understanding of what we want to stand for going forward. We have two opposing ones. The first, espoused by the contemporary GOP and libertarian types, is one in which government is neutered, where the wealthy and powerful run roughshod over their workers and the environment, and states regain the power to discriminate against their minorities. The other vision is more of a social democracy model, held by a handful of Democrats and the unorganized rabble that is the American left, wherein protections for workers are strengthened, social welfare is advanced, the environment is protected, and the upward redistribution of wealth is reversed. These goals for America are in conflict on almost every level. It's not a matter of "sitting down and reaching a compromise." One side is going to win out, the other is going to lose. Hope and pray that the second vision wins out, otherwise a vast majority of Americans are screwed.
09:26 AM on 12/14/2010
The Republicans want to create the Confederate States of America, no less.

We are in the middle of a re-fight of the Civil War.

Ultimately, it is class warfare.
01:25 AM on 12/14/2010
What's interesting, or should telling, is the timing of this group. The right has been the impetus of most, if not all, of the vitriole in Washington, DC. Since Lee Atwater and the southern strategy, the right has bullied the media and the left into submission. No one dares to challenge the fallacy of supply-side economics for fear of being called a liberal. When the media points out the lies and corruption of the right, they are labeled the dreaded liberal word.

Now that the left is finally getting in the game and pushing back against 30 years of Reaganism and conservative economic policy destroying the middle class and foundational basis of this country, NOW the middle wants to stand up against excessive partisanship. Where were these cowards the past 30 years when the right systematically emasculated the media and the left to get their way.

My theory is this, the middle is made up of unrealistic people with no identifiable principles that define them who think we can magically solve the nation's problems with declining tax revenues because their defining issue is they want to keep their taxes low. No Labels may as well be called Non Realistic. There are no leprechauns out here with pots of gold to sove our problems. And most honest people can clearly trace the economic problems to the failed conservative policies of the last 30 years. Memo to No Labels, the left is not the problem, the flaky middle is.
photo
southingtonian
"I'm a Capricorn and you can't make me do sh*t.."
03:15 AM on 12/14/2010
I'm middle (in some eyes), but not flaky. I am willing to support anyone who can accomplish the greatest good for the greatest number of citizens. The blatantly self-serving on any side, with any label, will not find support from me.
12:57 AM on 12/14/2010
Sounds like the Tea Party for the left.
photo
Rich Baska
BlueTrooth
01:54 AM on 12/14/2010
Sounds like the opposite of the Tea Party. The Tea Party is just the disgruntled Republicans that splintered off after McCain took the "all-or-nothing" primaries on the right (the same system will cripple the GOP in 2012 as well). It started with Ron Paul supporters and then it got co-opted by the Express crowd (the ultra-conservatives that rejected McCain). The Tea Party is "hyper-partisan". This attempt at getting people involved in our democracy has no stated ideology or position on issues. Which means there's a huge vacuum that will be filled with something. Or it might evolve into a think-tank of sorts, with grassroots input. It doesn't really look like a "movement", it actually looks more like a vehicle to organize "independents".
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
07:06 AM on 12/14/2010
Swing and a miss.
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
07:18 AM on 12/14/2010
Wasn't that the Coffee Party? Does that still exist?