More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Carol Felsenthal

Carol Felsenthal

Posted: June 22, 2010 05:13 PM

Does Norah O'Donnell Work for MSNBC or the White House?

What's Your Reaction:

Norah O'Donnell, MSNBC's chief Washington correspondent, was on the panel last Sunday of NBC's Chris Matthews Show. The subject was BP and the $20 billion fund that President Obama had, the panelists (in addition to O'Donnell, Newsweek's Howard Fineman, the Washington Post's David Ignatius, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Cynthia Tucker) agreed, skillfully forced BP to cough up -- "at least $20 billion," Fineman said. He later added that "Obama plays a deep game." Chris Matthews went further, calling Obama's negotiation "a bit of world-class jawboning" and "miraculous, almost."

When it was her turn, Norah O'Donnell paid tribute to Obama's "one-on-one meeting where he really pressed the chairman of BP [Carl-Henric Svanberg] and got that $20 million." (A Wall Street Journal article published the next morning offered a more nuanced description that showed how lawyers hired by BP, including the well-connected Jamie Gorelick -- number two in Bill Clinton's Justice Department -- had pushed back and resisted two major demands from Obama.)

Obama's widely ridiculed Oval Office speech the Tuesday before was also up for discussion. That's when O'Donnell made a remark that made her sound more like a White House flack in a private strategy session than a newswoman. Matthews mentioned that during the Oval Office speech Obama had referred to BP being able to capture 90 percent of the oil "within the next several days." O'Donnell's response: "...and that was one promise that made me very nervous, because if the president cannot hold that -- to that number there's going to be hell to pay, quite frankly."

Why would an objective reporter be "nervous" about Obama's ability to keep his promise?

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:31 PM on 06/22/2010
As Uncle Walter said, "our job is only to hold up the mirror, to tell and show the public what has happened". He also pointed out: "there's a little bit more ego involved in these jobs than people might think"
jerryatthebeach
Till Death Do You Barrier Island...
06:12 PM on 06/22/2010
I've wondered the same thing. It seems like these commentators have a slanted edge and give biased news coverage which is why most of the public has stopped watching. What's in your "goody" basket???
05:54 PM on 06/22/2010
Well, whether O'Donnell supports Obama or not, the fact remains that she was right. If Obama made a fatuous claim he is going to be left with egg on his face.

I would also offer that nobody within Fox News has any qualms about openly rooting for Republicans.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Carol Felsenthal
06:23 PM on 06/22/2010
Absolutely true; FOX and MSNBC both commit the same journalistic sin. It's no more acceptable on the right than on the left.
07:35 PM on 06/22/2010
Not true at all. Comparing any aspect of MSNBC and Faux News as the same is extremely lame. Give me the particulars. They are both on TV...that's about it.

Reporters on this particular show are being asked for their educated opinion. The format is not for straight reporting of facts.... although to be fair, MSNBC spends much more time telling the truth and Faux News spends much more time lying.

To jump on what she said as egregious is to ignore the many far more despicable things that some "straight news" reporters say when allegedly reporting straight news.

John