EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Carol Felsenthal

Carol Felsenthal

Posted: March 24, 2008 03:14 PM

Who's Paying Maggie Williams?


?>

For weeks now, it has been routinely reported that Maggie Williams, who replaced the ousted Patti Solis Doyle as Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, is working without pay. I've wondered about it from the first time I read it.

This is the same Maggie Williams who worked as the First Lady's chief of staff, with an office in the West Wing and the additional title of Assistant to the President; the same Maggie Williams who came under fire during the Clintons' first term for allegedly removing papers from Vince Foster's office after he committed suicide, and who, although never charged with any wrong doing, accumulated $350,000 in legal bills as a result of being hauled in front of the Senate Banking Committee and questioned about matters relating to Whitewater. She also became embroiled in President Clinton's fundraising scandals. After Bill Clinton unhappily left the White House, Williams worked briefly as his chief of staff; successfully bringing order and goals to the initially distracted and disordered former president.

In Saturday's Wall Street Journal, Mary Jacoby, T.W. Farnam and Amy Chozick report on the financial situations as of late February of the two campaigns. Obama has little debt and $32 million in the bank to devote to besting Hillary. Hillary has $11 million and has $3.7 million in debt. For the month of February, Hillary's campaign managers paid $3.1 million to pollster/strategist Mark Penn's firm and $608,000 to advertising adviser Mandy Grunwald's firm, while Maggie Williams, who seems central to whatever ups the Hillary campaign has enjoyed lately, received nothing.

Questions were raised when news broke last month that Hillary had loaned her campaign $5 million and that some of her senior staffers would be working, temporarily, without pay. But then came assurances that fundraising had picked up and everyone was being paid; everyone, apparently, except Maggie Williams.

As far as I can tell nobody is raising the question about Williams' payless paydays. Does it strike anyone else as odd? If Hillary wins the nomination will Williams work for free during the general election campaign? If Hillary makes it to the White House, has Williams been promised the chief of staff's job?

 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:49 PM on 03/31/2008
Carol,

Why didn't you ask Maggie to comment?

If it's true, it shows Hillary isn't wise. You don't forget to pay your top gun and expect to get her best effort. You pay the person you need the most first. Not last, and not late.

The continuati­on of the campaign is a waste of everyone's time and money. Nobody seems to point this out. Why?

Clinton is draining the Democratic Party supporters­' bank accounts. First by giving to her when it won't help her; and second, because it forces other Democrat Party supporters to give to Obama to defeat Clinton. Then he spends millions more on ads which he wouldn't spend if she went home.

Squandered resources across the board.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
07:26 AM on 03/25/2008
The honor of being Hillary's campaign manager is payment enough, am I right Maggie?
10:53 PM on 03/24/2008
It does make me think someone is paying her....it could be an illegal donation from someone over the limit donating to the campaign. It could be Hillary is paying her hence the sense behind the no tax returns and all the other muck up about finances. I truly cannot believe Maggie will work for free and I would challenge a real journalist­/reporter or whomever to find the source of her payday. Someone must know.
09:44 PM on 03/24/2008
Think of it as a (large) campaign donation.
08:50 PM on 03/24/2008
Maggie Williams apparently does a much better job than Waste Management could ever do. She knows her value and the Clintons know it too. Poor little former Chief of Staf to both Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton is being abused.
08:28 PM on 03/24/2008
This is very interestin­g. Why would Maggie work for free? Why would HRC allow her to work for free? Didn't she just make a speech about women finally getting equal pay for equal work? Maybe she should lead by example and make sure it happens in her own campaign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbrillante
It's a well known fact, reality has a liberal bias
06:42 PM on 03/24/2008
All I know is that report on finances demonstrat­es to me that Senator Obama has greater potential to be a great leader when it comes to the economy as he carries minimal debt compared to income. When it comes to how he has run his campaign I think it is a good reflection of how he would run the country. Senator Clinton could have had this nomination if she had been ethical, smart, and honest throughout her campaign. She had every advantage. But to me the striking difference between the candidates is their character and some dismiss this as 'personali­ty' as if it should be somehow irrelevant but I see clearly how the president'­s personalit­y is interjecte­d deeply into how they run the country. I am not interested in rewarding a highly unethical campaign by voting for Hillary if she became the nominee. I would be out of integrity with myself if I did.
06:24 PM on 03/24/2008
If Maggie Williams is indeed working for free, it would appear to be exploitati­ve (look at the fees/compe­nsation for Mark Penn, Howard Wolfson, etc) paid by the Clinton campaign..­a black woman working for free while the white men get paid. Is this something that the feminists should be concerned about? Why should HRC allow Maggie Williams to serve without compensati­on while she pays top dollar to her male contractor­s? I too think this story stinks whether true or false.
06:22 PM on 03/24/2008
If Maggie Williams is indeed working for free, it would appear to be exploitati­ve (look at the fees/compe­nsation for Mark Penn, Howard Wolfson, etc) paid by the Clinton campaign..­a black woman working for free while the white men get paid. Is this something that the feminists should be concerned about? Why should HRC allow Maggie Williams to serve without compensati­on while she pays top dollar to her contractor­s? I too think this story stinks whether true or false.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laylahb
04:10 PM on 03/24/2008
Would you work for nothing? I don't think so. The scent of four day old salmon fills the air..
06:14 PM on 03/24/2008
Couldn't have written it better myself. Something definitely is wrong with this.
02:17 AM on 03/25/2008
Maybe they're paying her mortgage, auto loan, grocery bill, utilities, etc. in lieu of an actual salary. Surely they wouldn't allow her to go homeless or hungry.